Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/13/2024 in Posts

  1. Haven’t we seen enough of the racist hiring policies in Canada caused by the Liberal government of Canada? It’s time for class action lawsuits and challenges at the Supreme Court, as highly qualified white people, many of them at the top of their field, are excluded from applying to jobs on the basis of race, something they have no control over. Canada has become a disgusting, racist country under the Trudeau Liberals: “Jamie Sarkonak: No off-ramp to diversity quotas, federal research executive says There is no plan to end discriminatory hiring requirements for quota-bound research program — even as targets are met, Commons hears. (…) For example, the current opening for a Canada Research Chair in physics (specifically, quantum sensing) at the University of New Brunswick, which has been vacant for one whole year, will not accept applications from white men. Similarly, white people can’t apply toDalhousie’s opening for a chair in industrial engineering. Many more such cases exist. These clearly amount to discrimination, as people are being denied tremendous opportunities simply due to their immutable characteristics.“
    2 points
  2. 2 points
  3. Ever since 1967 Gaza has been under some form of Israeli Occupation, and hamas has never started a war with Israel, at most they've ended ceasefires in the ongoing war against Israeli occupation of Palestine. Anyone who tries to claim "Gaza" hasn't been under Israeli Occupation is willfully ignorant of the situation. There hasn't been a moment where Hamas was in control of Gaza where Israel wasn't committing acts of war against the territory. Hamas has been relatively peaceful in comparison, mostly because they struggle to mount any kind of resistance not any lack of desire, but still. Trying to claim that Israel laying siege to a territory and blockading its ports is peace is laughable and anyone doing so should never take part in a political discussion.
    2 points
  4. He said: Is there a company or business or hiring entity in Canada that..... Further, there are tonnes of companies that are not private. the CBC is not a private company, but it is a company for example. So once again you feel the need to shift the goalposts and hope nobody notices in order to be dishonest. You are quite aware that there are indeed many 'hiring orgs' that discriminate like that but you're trying to alter the parameters of the question so that you don't have to admit it because you can't just be honest and address the reality. Let me guess - your next attempt will be 'why are we talking about this, its' such a nothing issue'.
    2 points
  5. Are people pointing out that China bussed students to a Liberal nomination meeting to get their guy elected as an MP in parliament ? Hope so.
    2 points
  6. It's not a conspiracy, it's capitalism period. Of course they push things that work for them - that's how it's supposed to work. Anybody who writes a blog post that actually says "Business is no longer separate from politics." should be regarded as, basically, a new born baby to the world of political economy.
    2 points
  7. I'm filling out your nomination for the 'optimist of the year' award even as we speak....
    2 points
  8. Of COURSE they do! They put a LOT of work into creating economic hardship in a land of endless opportunity and a free market where anyone can succeed! Do you think inflation just pops up on it's own? Do you think disownership of our proud heratige and hatred of the country just 'HAPPENS'?!?! DO YOU THINK BUDGETS JUST UN-BALANCE THEMSELVES?!?! Fer Chissake show a little appreciation for the effort you stupid self-responsible anti-hippie!!!
    2 points
  9. We'll stop the presses. This changes EVERYTHING.
    2 points
  10. There are only 2 genders. That the corporate world is warping realty for profit tells me they've run out of realistic markets to exploit and are in the process of creating one and forcing it on the public. There is nothing "nice" about promoting transgenter. These people live with serious psychological conflict. But it happens and that's unfortunate...not beautiful. Our society is being driven off a cliff by zombies who will promote any new fad, no matter how warped it is.
    2 points
  11. Whatever, bigot. You cultists can't hide your racism ALL the time, as evidenced by that racist piece of shit, Kathy Hochul.
    2 points
  12. There has been a concerted effort in trying to destroy the white race for decades now. from programs and agendas like feminism, interracial marriage, abortions, the promotion of the gay/lesbian life, trying to encourage white folk from having more white babies, and to massive third world immigration. Just by looking at our immigration numbers every year for the past several decades now we can see that pretty much 80-85% of our legal and illegal immigration numbers favor non-white people to enter white into countries like Europe, the British Isles, Australia, and North America. All those countries mentioned above are being swamped with non-white immigration. Our white politicians have become traitors to their own white people. We the white folk do need a White History Month for ourselves. White people have a right to have their own white homeland. My opinion of course. 😇
    2 points
  13. Biden to Hike Tariffs on China EVs and Offer Solar Exclusions Chinese EVs to face 102.5% tariff with other rates set to jump US solar manufacturing equipment poised for an exclusion. But when Trump proposed the same thing it was "bonkers." Trump suggests tariffs could go higher than 10%. Why one economist is saying, ‘bonkers.’ Remember it is not a double standard, it is the standard. When Trump proposed it originally, he was xenophobic, racist, economically illiterate and so on. Now that Joe's handlers are doing it, it'll be a stroke of genius that saved the economy (that is doing great, btw).
    1 point
  14. Have you TALKED to him before? you're just concerned about his superficial and nonsensical attention span NOW?
    1 point
  15. Well there it is. Sorry @User but if you don't agree with the clear lie that white men benefit from being excluded from applying for jobs then it must be because you're a white bigot. Shocking.
    1 point
  16. Within Gaza, Palestinians had freedom of movement. You just admitted Israel did not have boots on the ground... so they can't enforce movement restrictions if no one is there to enforce them. What was restricted was travel to the West Bank, as that required passage through Israel. People in Gaza could fish, the limit was on how far out, because they would smuggle weapons otherwise. Israel was not going to just sit there and let Hamas import as much weaponry as they could so they could kill even more Israeli people. Duh. No, Gaza was not 100% free, but they could control much of their own destiny and chose to squander billions in aid given to them on building tunnels and military infrastructure to wage war against Israel. They could have lived in peace, but chose instead to constantly probe and attack Israel, to dig tunnels to try to kidnap Israeli people and to conduct terrorism on Israeli people.
    1 point
  17. I've posted this before but since you are new here, I'll put it up again. A short history of your beloved Hamas. "Hamas has been relatively peaceful in comparison..." Your statement ranks right up with that 'journalist' with burning buildings behind him while stating it's "mostly peaceful".
    1 point
  18. People expect the victims of a conflict to be bitter and vengeful. They're willing to overlook a lot of reprehensible things when those feelings are directed towards a villain. And in general, it's expected that two countries at war will hate each other because of it, and that hatred alone doesn't justify continuing a war, because that will never end. That's an outright lie. Even if I was willing to concede that they've spent every moment since than in a state where if they were forced to honestly answer whether they wished they could commit genocide against Israel or not they'd say yes, which I'm not, that still wouldn't mean they've actively tried to do so even once since Israeli defeated them in 1967. This kind of thinking is toxic and prevents people from forming any basis for real change in the situation.
    1 point
  19. What is Biden doing to defend and promote liberalism in his own country? We all know how government resources have been weaponized against his most serious political opponent with nonsensical charges.. Speaking of China and Russia, we also know that Joe and his family have very lucrative financial ties to both countries, especially China. Those countries are not the only one's. Biden is 99% opportunist and perhaps 1% liberal.
    1 point
  20. And continuing with the dishonesty. He also didn't say 'enforced on'. He said "allowed to" and doing so. And there is. Seriously - are you so afraid of the truth you have to be that dishonest?
    1 point
  21. He said company or business. I don't know what phantoms you're chasing by interrupting my conversations with other posters, but you should talk to somebody about it. And whatever you disagree with me about - provide a cite instead of raging on about me lying...
    1 point
  22. There are a number of articles which have been posted here, some by me, pointing to hiring practices excluding whites and males. I think it's a little late to the game to feign ignorance on that front. @User is quite correct.
    1 point
  23. Are you for real? You can't possibly post something this dishonest... no way. The link said: "Therefore, only applicants who self-identify as members of gender equity deserving groups (including cisgender women, transgender women, transgender men, two-spirit, and non-binary) and/or as racialized individuals will be considered for this opportunity. We encourage those with intersecting identities to apply (for example, women who identify as racialized individuals, Indigenous, and/or persons with disabilities)." They don't need to say White Men do not apply when they clearly outline who can apply that doesn't include white men. Perhaps he could have been a bit more explicit in saying straight white men need not apply.
    1 point
  24. 1 point
  25. Uh-huh. Notwithstanding Mexico's ongoing invasion of our southern borders. Really, robowrong; how do you degenerates have the nerve to even show your faces in public? You're a f*cking disgrace.
    1 point
  26. I have no doubt he's gonna get this done. He might not use drone strikes with big USA flags on the to do it, but it ill probably be a bad time to be a cartel boss if Trump wins the election. I personally don't care about international border lines which theoretically make terrorists and cartel leaders safe from other countries. I was pretty clear about how I felt about the Indian Go'vt taking out our trash.
    1 point
  27. Crap = i posted this as well but i didn't see this thread first - sorry. Bottom line is that they were right all along - there IS systemic discrimination in Canada.
    1 point
  28. Well of course. Especially trump who is well known for coming up with the most zany ideas and not holding himself back during the brainstorming stage, and then settling down and looking at what makes sense. But right now trump is slightly ahead in the polls and we are getting closer and closer to the election. So you're seeing more and more desperation in the accusations that the democrats have thrown out. Well it is more panicked fear-mongering than anything. At this point it would seem that trump has about a 60% chance to win the next election. The democrats have tried a number of things to try and sway people the other way, but they haven't been effective yet. They pinned a lot of their hopes on people hating trump for all of the trials he's being put through. But there are so many that people have kind of just written it all off. They can't really run on Biden's record, and there's a fair bit of concern that Biden won't make it till Christmas before passing away and leaving Kamala Harris as the acting president. So they are trying everything humanly possible to smear Donald or make him seem insane. Unfortunately they've done that so much and so loud for so long that now they just seem like "the boy who cried trump".
    1 point
  29. He's just mad because trump CAN float ideas, whereas all of Biden's have sunk.
    1 point
  30. NY governor slammed for saying black children don't know what computers are: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68971655 Maybe it was the alcohol talking. lol
    1 point
  31. First, you say she apologized for misspeaking... then you defend her comment. LOL The point is not that there might be a few black kids in the Bronx who have not been introduced to computers, its the presumption that they are BLACK kids: "They don't know these things." Not kids in general, but specifically BLACK kids, "THEY" don't know these things. Its a generalization focused on BLACK kids. And you are here defending it. For crying out loud...
    1 point
  32. She never misspoke. She accidentally said what she thought was true and then she gave an insincere apology. Yeah, there are schools in NY that don't have computers 🤣 "There are leftards posting on this forum who don't know what a fact is." Oh wait, that's true.
    1 point
  33. So quantum is a race-induced theory now, OK. Waiting for new amazing breakthroughs down this path of glory.. one can guess where it ends. By the way, in the sane world, there's a difference between: "Between equally qualified candidates, the preference will be given to..." and "Just cannot apply". Period. Why bother about such things as sanity though? The future is assured and guaranteed!
    1 point
  34. Ahhh the Democrats. They created the welfare state and now want to scold anyone who opposes this tragedy. It's truly evil, what's been done. But the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. The public who support this evil, say they are compassionate. Yet look at the results of this "compassion".
    1 point
  35. Maybe. Nobody is going to fact check that yarn-on-the-wall conspiracy. Let's stipulate that the facts are accurate, if not the implications. What the author misses is that gender inclusion policies at those institutions are not rare or special. They didn't indicate anything, because most of the big companies in the Western world have the same policies. Pick a few big companies--particularly public companies--and search "gender inclusion policy" and chances are you'll find something very similar. Black Rock (or whichever) isn't mastermind a conspiracy. Rather, like everyone else, they're just doing good business. Strong diversity positions attract better talent, retain better talent and have less friction in the workplace, because everybody knows you have to treat all people with decency and respect. They have a lot more to gain through inclusiveness than exclusiveness. Oh, and as far as makeup and fashion for men, there's huge and only partially activated market. We spent the last 100 years convincing women that natural wasn't good enough and that they needed to buy and use all kinds of crazy stuff. Now it's the men's turn.
    1 point
  36. We won’t hear many promises, if any at all, on most policy issues before the actual election kicks off and he’s on the campaign trail. It’s too early for that. Ideally a politician would want to get elected with as few specific promises to keep as possible. And you don’t want to make them so early that they have to revised/backtracked upon as circumstances change. We might not even hear much detail on the campaign trail, because he’s so far ahead in the polls he doesn’t need to come out with a lot of specific promises. Even if he does, no matter which party is in power and what is promised, when it comes to Defence in Canada history has shown that words are meaningless and only seeing is believing
    1 point
  37. But that isnt a double standard. That is the standard. Liberals can't be questioned and no question is ever in need of proof if it is asked of a conservative.
    1 point
  38. You're probably not wrong. At least as far as political parties or more accurately candidates go. There's been lots of political and racial unrest in the past of course, the 70's campus riots, the 'zoot suit' riots etc etc. But as far as actually focused on the president himself this is pretty bad. Having said that it's been inching in this direction for a long time. Remember when the dems demanded unironically that Romney said he would put the black people in chains again? As if he was advocating a return to slavery? Just like they're now trying to say trump says there'll be a bloodbath if he looses, when he really said the auto industry will have 'bloodbath' under biden. I think that one of the differences is that in the past people still kind of knew that level of hatred was not real and blew it off a little (at least the reasonable ones), whereas the left has really bought into the idea that every single crazy thing they say about trump is the absolute truth. they've just been improving their ability at self delusion over the years and now they've achieved olympic levels
    1 point
  39. They don't? https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/09/us/the-everymigrants-guide-to-crossing-the-border-illegally.html
    1 point
  40. Jews and arabs perhaps. I mean - if we're getting down to it there's been no real peace between anyone and anyone else during that time either Just brief lulls in the fighting. I remember one miliary writer saying "peace is a theoretical concept whose existence we mistakenly postulate because there are pauses between wars." But as much as peace ever exists, on October 6th there was peace. And Gaza and Israel had a choice to continue that peace or not. And Gaza chose not. Don't mistake me, there have been times in the past when Israel made the wrong decision as well. And maintaining peace always requires both sides to be willing partners in that concept. But there can be no doubt that in this case it was Gaza that chose violence, and organized itself in such a way that it's civilian population would pay an insanely heavy price for the war. Really as outsiders there's not much we can do other than to support our ally in pursuing the criminals who started this and hoping in the future people make better choices. It is sad that so many non-combatants will wind up paying the price but it is also unavoidable and is the choice of the gaza people , not israel. Israel would happily accept surrender tomorrow without killing a single additional person.
    1 point
  41. Did she have to? If she hadn't, would you not be making excuses for her? Of course you would. She could have dropped 20 N bombs and you would find an excuse.
    1 point
  42. 1 point
  43. He won't have to apologize.
    1 point
  44. Let me tell you how it is. For starters, anything they do is usually a make-work project. And anyone running many of them have no clue as to what they aere doing. 15 minute breaks always turn into well over 30 minutes. 30 minute lunch breaks always turn into well over an hour. The there are smoke breaks and do you thjink they take them in their two breaks? Nope. In fact if you added the time of all their smoke breaks, it is worth at least 3 weeks out of the year so non-smokers should get that in vacation time added to the already long vacations they get. Then you have the two additional days off, the volunteer day and what is the other one called, personal leave or some BS thing like that. Then they get Remembrance Day that nobody else gets. As I stated, working as a Public Servant who is always overpaid and underworked is like being on a PICNIC all year long. Hell, they don't work when they are at work, so how can you expect them to do more work at home. LOL
    1 point
  45. Feel free to explain what ignorance it is you are accusing me of, if you can. I doubt your ability though, since this is the best you could come up with over a week later...
    1 point
  46. "AHHH!!! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!!!" I would point out the censorship at the hands of Brandon's administration, or the lawfare brought to us by Brandon's administration...but you'd just deny deny deny. In the final analysis... You're nothing more than a little girl screaming 'cause she can't have 2 pieces of cake.
    1 point
  47. How long did it take for the US to find Bin Laden? The IDF gives advance warning before they attack, plenty of time for 'civilians' to get out. You greatly underestimate how much control Hamas has in Gaza and over the people that live there. Hamas controls what journalists are allowed and not allowed to see. It's also Hamas that controls how much aid gets to the people...after they take their usual cut of course.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...