Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/30/2023 in all areas
-
Elon Musk is an antisemite. What can anyone do about it I went to the LA Auto Show yesterday and had the opportunity to drive a Tesla. Not many waiting in line, unlike Ford, Jeep, and Nissan. After the drive, they asked about my desire to buy one. I told the guy I probably would not consider Tesla due to Musk's antisemitism and failure to provide Star Link service in Ukraine's Crimea attack. The guy claimed ignorance about both, not that I believed him.3 points
-
That is because you see the world in extremes. Most people are moderates. You are at the far right of the political spectrum. Most people are somewhere in the middle. However, in your mind, anyone who disagrees with you must be some sort of Antifa member....lol. The World does not work like that.3 points
-
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/court-victory-for-teacher-silenced-for-transgender-book-criticism An Ontario judge has declared that human rights legislation “does not prohibit public discussion of anything,” in a free-speech victory for a teacher who was shut down when she raised concerns at a school board meeting about transgender-themed books in elementary school libraries. “What happened here should not happen in a democratic society,” Ontario Superior Court Justice James Ramsay said in the case of now-retired teacher Carolyn Burjoski. “The Human Rights Code does not prohibit public discussion of issues related to transgenderism or minors and transgenderism. It does not prohibit public discussion of anything.” The judge was ruling on an attempt by the Waterloo Region District School Board to have Burjoski’s defamation lawsuit against the board and its former chair, Scott Piatkowski, thrown out. Burjoski’s ouster from a board meeting on Jan. 17, 2022 drew international attention. She was ejected after discussing publications she said are available in the libraries of kindergarten to Grade 6 schools. She had begun to argue the books made it seem too simple and “cool” to medically transition to another gender when Piatkowski cut short her presentation. She launched a defamation lawsuit, which the board sought to have thrown out. In a Nov. 23 ruling, Ramsay dismissed the bid and ordered the board to pay Burjoski $30,000 in costs. He said her claims have merit and should be allowed to proceed, adding the comments made against her were “defamatory.” This is a fantastic win. If you have seen what she said and the books she referred to and the passages in it she definitely had a point, and they threw her out and hounded her into the hospital for daring to stand up for children. This is a major victory against the woke hard left trans/gay community and their brown shirts who seek to silence anyone who DARES to even consider questioning their logic. 30 grand just for legal fees and the defamation suit is still to come.2 points
-
Just keep in mind that Elon's a modern day Henry Ford, who was also an a$$hole.2 points
-
You're a bit of a slow learner aren't you. You could easily have looked this up and found out he was completely correct. Here - dui specialists in ontario Other Legal Repercussions of Biking Under the Influence in Ontario Even though you may be shielded from a potential biking DUI in Canada, you can still be charged for other offences on your bike. In fact, if Ontario police spot you riding a bicycle erratically, in an unsafe manner, or in any other ways that suggests impairment, they will likely pull you over to test or otherwise evaluate your sobriety. If their evaluation proves impairment, you can be charged under the Ontario Liquor License Act with public intoxication. Depending on the circumstances, police can also charge you with careless driving under the province's Highway Traffic Act. While neither of these charges are criminal, they can lead nonetheless to a $50 fine for public intoxication, as well as fines between $400 and $2,000 for careless driving. https://torontodui.com/knowledge-centre/charged-dui-bike-heres-what-you-should-do/ There's a few dozen others. So first you try to change the channel by going from 'illega' to "dui", then you insist that a sask law firm is somehow wrong without providing a single link or bit of evidence. And you could easily have looked it up on your own but didn't. BTW - if you ARE found to be 'drunk in public' because you're on a bike impaired then they can throw you in jail for the night and lock up your bike as well. Fun fact It is not lawful to operate a bike while you're impaired in every province i'm aware of. Yeash,2 points
-
Vague and unhelpful. Teenagers who question their gender exist. Trans people exist. We should be explaining how our communities function with such minorities for the purpose of public health and civics. "Let kids be kids" is a mindless feel-good statement like the term "parents' rights" that doesn't clarify anything. If we're going to care about the kids, let's not be hypocrites and make a conversation that goes nowhere to actually help them.2 points
-
I now see the folly of my ways Literally a person who can't figure out the difference between a round hole and a round peg2 points
-
Nope - that would be a false equivalency. If you take any group of people and divide them you will have a slight variation in intelligence. If you then polled the groups and found that purple is preferred to blue in one group and blue to purple in the other, and then looked at the two groups and said "a is smarter than b on average" - using your logic we could there fore say smart people prefer purple. But in reality - there is NO evidence that's the case or that there's any connection - 10 other groups randomly separated could all have different results. And frankly - the fact you didn't realize that and needed it explained is definitely not moving the bell curve in favour of the dem's intelligence LOL ROFLMAO - ahh yes the left's favorite game - "Whataboutism" IF we're going that route - what do you think about the intelligence of dem supporters who thought clinton was honest - or that biden is? THere's more evidence of governmental wrongdoing by those two than trump so far2 points
-
Did you mean that everyone thinks you're a bit of an 1diot? Because that's what i'm seeing2 points
-
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/special-interlocutor-waiting-for-mp-bill-criminalizing-residential-school-denialism-1.6661615 Kimberly Murray called on lawmakers to consider "legal mechanisms" that could address the practice of denying or minimizing the abuses Indigenous children suffered at residential schools in her interim report released back in June. "Make it an offence to incite hate and promote hate against Indigenous people by … denying that residential (schools) happened or downplaying what happened in the institutions." In the meantime, Murray says she hopes to see NDP MP Leah Gazan bring forward her private member's bill seeking to criminalize such denialism, as the Parliamentarian has indicated that she will. Asked recently about its status, the Winnipeg representative said "there is something in the works." Not the libs this time, but once again the left looks to cancel those who disagree by locking them up. I don't think anyone out there ever has denied the school program happened. But - they throw in that whole' minimize the impact' thing. IN other words - if you dare to say "i don't think first nations children today are impacted by the residential school system which closed a generation ago", then you should go to jail? It's spreading hatred if you say "ok, but shouldn't we be over that by now?" or "when does that supposed 'generational' damage end? Are we saying first nations are now damaged forevermore by that? I've never particularly agreed with jailing holocaust deniers either - i think they're largely nuts but whatever. But at least there's some sort of validity. But suggesting as they do in this article that the residential school system is the same as the holocaust... ooops, i guess i better stop there, don't want to go to jail.1 point
-
The Economist: Trump Poses the Biggest Danger to the World in 2024 The Economist has long been among the most rational of publications. Unlike the MAGA CULT.1 point
-
Odd thing to say seeing as your complaint was that she wasn't doing what the people wanted. I guarantee btw the people want to use natual gas Oh? And how exactly would you suggest they should "Change slow and cheap" by the 2030's? How would that be possible? THe gov't law requires it but offers nothing to make it happen? They're already well into the process to buy nukes, but that'll be a couple decades before they can replace their NG generators. So - what else can they do exactly? Typical leftie - "we know what we demand is impossible but if you fail to do it its because you're a corporate capitalist!!" where have they performed poorly exactly ANother meaningless posts from a mindless leftie with no answers.1 point
-
Well - it's interesting actually. Here's what was said by the poster elon agreed with Jewish communties have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest shit now about western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face, there it is So - what the guy said was that the jewish communities in the west (us) have supported people saying the same thing about white people that is now being said about them - specifically that whites are privlidged and try to take over the world and control everything etc, basically the whole critical race theory argument. He seems to be suggesting many jewish communities are on the left and have supported left wing ideology. And now people are saying that about them and they don't like it - the jews are privlidged the jews repress people etc etc And he notes that many of the immigrants that the jews supported with this (muslim immigrants presumably) turn out not to like the jews and they've shot themselves in the foot. Elon agrees this is true. Is that anti semetic? I'm not sure it is. He's not saying all jews, and it is demonstrable that many jewish communities did support this kind of thing. It's a broad statement so maybe it is. And is it 'replacment theory'? I don't see that AT ALL - he's not talking about jews trying to REPLACE white people with foreigners, he's saying that their arguments for letting these foreigners in are now being used against them. That's not really got anything to do with replacement theory. Soooo - kinda feels like the left making shit up to suit them again.1 point
-
Seems you're completely IGNORANT of the DoJ case which indicted Hunter Biden. Boom! Your IGNORANCE has been exposed and your "argument" DESTROYED.1 point
-
1. I can't tell what was blurred out but it seems like it shouldn't be given to under-18 to me. 2. You're not addressing my point. If you think it's ok to effectively lie about people in the midst of talking about an issue that you're trying to resolve together ... it sure isn't "so fcking what" in my books. Why would you trust anybody who did that to come to a solution ? You'd just be eradicating their position entirely, which means you'd go nowhere. IOW - "they're going to lie and cheat so I will too" Doesn't lead to anywhere good from what I can see. 3. They don't though. They look at polling, they see what's happening in the world. Same-sex marriage came about because regular folks stopped opposing it. Or, more accurately, the ones against it started dying off. 4. You are lucky to have a wife to support your cake habit. Enjoy your afternoon nap i guess.. I'll go take mine now.1 point
-
1. The part about depictions of sex... the article said her concerns were elsewhere. 2. She is asserting that she was defamed but that doesn't speak to whether it was done vengefully or not. I didn't see anything in the description that indicated these were personal vendettas. 3. But "charge" her ? With what ? 5. Reputation ? Yes possibly. But they won't be personally impacted at least not as much as she waas. 6. Supposed to, why ? You think that you are allowed to say anything at all in a School Board meeting ? The fact that YOU think it's acceptable is utterly meaningless. They have business to conduct, and they don't have to listen to every Chud who wants to expound on his flat earth theories... 7. Yes we established that. "Tossed out" = "Suspended" , "Quit" = "Retired with full pension" ... clarity, my son... 8. We shall see... at least if she loses you won't be able to crow that the courts are compromised, there's not any justice etc... which is a good thing.1 point
-
OH i think you've shit yourself enough today Go change your diaper and see someone about addressing your fecalphillia there Best... line.... ever....1 point
-
You are a little mixed up. Did you mean DUH instead of DUI?1 point
-
So...your argument here is that you've decided a Saskatchewan law firm...does not know the laws in Saskatchewan? Because their web developers posted State instead of province on their site and thus are not "reputable" as far as you're concerned? Pfft...1 point
-
1. I accept your lecturing of me here. Call out my mindless feel-good statements and I will explain and/or recant. 2. Well... I can't tell exactly which books are for kids and which aren't, and the context for everything in that video. I think it's fine to oppose books being openly available to pre-teen children and to ask to have certain books for parents to be aware of. But that's dialogue. What is NOT dialogue is this zealot calling everything 'pornography'... and I have no doubt she is exaggerating. I would ban her from all meetings and libraries for accusing people of being pedophiles and using that lie as a device to cancel books that other parents want to make available to their kids. If you think she is acceptable to be included in the dialogue then you have to accept hard-left people who outright accuse others of things without basis also. That's called a principle.1 point
-
And this...ladies and gentlemen...is why the USA and much of the western world, is such a mess. These Libbie dweebs don't care about things like effectiveness for a nation. All they care about is doing the opposite of Orangemanbad. Like...opening the southern border. Its not about the nation...its about their precious feewings. To Hell with the nation...the people...the economy...just oppose anything Trump...at all costs.1 point
-
Err... https://www.criminallawyersinsaskatchewan.ca/can-you-get-a-dui-on-a-bicycle-in-canada/ I would expect a "DUI_Offender" would have known this. Meh...Libbies...1 point
-
"Fantastic win"? "Major victory"? ===== I simply don't see such an issue in such a way. I'll be honest: Kids changing gender/sex? I oppose. They're too young to know/decide. Older people? Live and let live.1 point
-
No, that would not be legal in canada. You can't even ride a bike drunk1 point
-
I can criticize the policies of successive Israeli governments, in particular this one, and still recognize that Hamas is an enemy of all that I hold dear. Secular social democracy is the way to go; I can’t give unqualified support to anybody who doesn’t agree with that.1 point
-
Depends who wears it - if nancy pelosi did it would be more like birth control.1 point
-
Sticky stuff is presently pouring forth from another country. In such matters going early is OK if you turn out to be correct. Looks like JT was vindicated on this particular file.1 point
-
Putin is the head of the Russian Mafia, and also the head of the current successor to the KGB the Federal Security Service (FSS) which uses the same tactics as its multiple processors to enforce compliance with what Putin wants, to include teaching people to be domestic terrorists. These people are trained by FSS to go into countries they want to disrupt the government in so Russia can get or enlarge its foothold in the country. To that end they set up discontent -makers in the population, and fake leaders ; often charismatic individuals who work for Russian/FSS goals and are financially supported by Russia to achieve those ends, often dictatorships. Now, to own ANY business in Russia, you must pay Putin's Price. He has a financial hand in every business and a percentage of its profits. Trump went to Russia, set up businesses, set up golf courses. ...champions Putin. Suspicious yet there may be more to this than you thought before? Ok, add this: in the 1960's, the U.S. Mafia decided to buy into.legitimate businesses to modernize itself but its tactics continued in the same way. You don't hear of them much in the media but they are still quite active . The Russian and American Mafia are good friends still. In the 1950's to late 1960's deals by the Mafia were often made at golf courses because sophisticated listening devices didn't exist that could over hear conversations on fairways. Put it all together. ..Now Mike Johnson meets Trump..where? Mar I Largo...A Trump owned golf course he refused to allow the U. S. Secret Service to install electronic bugs in to better protect him as POTUS. Trump travels the country on perpetual campaigns causing elevated discontent everywhere he goes..in fact doing exactly what Putin would want here to undermine our Constitution and throw Americans at each others throats, while collecting large amounts of money, and community tying multiple crimes along the way, and trash mouthing the Justice department Just Like Every Other Career Criminal does when they are caught.1 point
-
Hmm... What does calling half the population "A basket of deplorables" make a person then? Or saying half the nation are ",,, an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic."? Gee...that pretty darn nasty. Fascist even.1 point
-
It continues... posting links to editorial opinions as if they were facts that prove one's point. Non-stop whataboutism, straw men and red herrings. Ad hominem as well as outright lying claiming when you said the sky is blue you said it was red. What would a doctor know about medicine? A Judge know about justice? The attitude is prevalent, some people in my own town would say what do I know about electronics, I've only designed, built, programmed and serviced that shit for over 50 years. Still phone for free help finding the MENU button on their TV remote or Start button on Windows 11 though.,1 point
-
Well you've shown yourself as the Chump you are with your fawning adoration of Trudeau.1 point
-
Seen it for a long time. My first posts here were interactions with WCM in which he invoked a logical fallacy and provided evidence that proved HIS CLAIM wrong. Of course it was he who called me stupid. When proven wrong, he put me on ignore.1 point
-
Thanks for proving you KNOW NOTHING about the evidence of Trump's CRIMES. You should change your screen name to Mushroom. LMAO1 point
-
Norway isn't in the EU but is part of the EEA, EFTA and Schengen. It also contributes and average of 391 million Euros to the EU under the EEA agreement. It is very integrated with the EU. Only 20 of the 27 EU countries use the Euro, Denmark and Sweden also have their own currencies.1 point
-
So if I leave some turnips and take some money as a trade isn't that the method currently used?1 point
-
1 point
-
They do not "judge" people. They adjudicate the question before them. Politics is exactly why and how laws are made. The politicians hear what people (you) want and make laws to appease you. The courts and supreme court is there to ensure the "politically motivated" laws are within the present constitution and the present legal structure. Not sure where you get the idea that a judge just sits there and say "yeah, that's a good idea or not a good idea" LOL Experts are everywhere. Even you seem to think you are an expert if you insist "experts" are needed. You are in expert in what? What is an expert anyway? Someone that agrees with your take on things?? LOL1 point
-
No, and my dog doesn't bite either. But I'm actually looking forward to it because every so often Canadians need a good conservative whack upside their collective head to re-establish why we're a progressive country. It's just as certainly true that progressives need time-outs on occasion to re-establish their priorities - a natural quintessential period of constructive destruction. Poilievre should enjoy his moment in the sun, I guarantee you it won't last and it will go down in flames. They all do, always. So I wonder how long Poilievre and his supporters will try to ride the old we-inherited-a-mess shtick to explain their failures and faux pas?1 point
-
1 point
-
I gave up asking ppl like you "How dumb can you get?" as they all take it as a challenge....1 point
-
Why do you LIE about the point being made? A: you have to deflect because you cannot defend the TRUTH about what Musk POSTED. Duh1 point
-
Translation - "holy shit he might just win - and he'll do to us what we did to him!!!!!!1 PANIC!!!!!"1 point
-
Having a more compliant DoJ will go a long way towards Trump getting revenge on his enemies. Sessions got fired for not acting as Trump's "Roy Cohn" and Barr quit when Trump demanded he get Joe Biden arrested and had his goons sack the Capitol.1 point
-
I am still thinking that the fear of Trump is overblown and that a new MAGA government would be stymied in a lot of what they want to do. Firstly, they're incompetent. They couldn't change the ACA in four years, how are they going to dispose of democracy?1 point
-
I think you did not understand what I meant, but this is not surprising. I think he found you stupid and acted that way, because clearly, Musk isn't an anti Semite. He's just a megalomaniac billionaire with too much power. And the way you seem to control your anger, means you have trouble communicating which goes symbiotically with a lack of general intelligence.1 point
-
1 point
-
Voters must take Trump seriously and literally. The stakes are that high.1 point