Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/19/2023 in Posts

  1. Canada has a tapeworm, a disgusting parasite - Justin Trudeau. Election in the near future? Politically lazy Canadians have a chance to take the medicine (vote), and sh!t this parasite out. We Canadians look down our noses at everything around us . . . well, the world's laughing at us because we aren't aware of our bloated belly full of Justin the Tapeworm . . . Embarrassed to be a Canadian at this time.
    3 points
  2. In an unprecedented move today, Trudeau came out in the House and openly accused India of murdering a Sikh extremist here in Canada. He said Canada had 'credible intelligence' India was behind it. Okayyy. But how does that explain his actions today? He's had credible intelligence for a long time about China interfering in Canada, spying on us, blackmailing and threatening Chinese-Canadian expats here, funneling money into the pockets of politicians and interfering in our elections and he's taken no real action nor accused China. Also, Trudeau has never shown any interest in national security matters. Trudeau's only interest is votes for Trudeau. Further, the normal way to handle such things, particularly when there's no proof, is to rally support from allies and then do some stern, behind the scenes things with India. Why not try that here? After all, if it really did happen, maybe it's a rogue operation and Modi doesn't even know. Ah, but that wouldn't give Trudeau any votes. Suddenly, we have Captain Trudeau, standing nobly before us and the great evil Indian Other! Hands on hips, shoulders back, chin elevated nobly and bravely, a stern look on his face (which he's probably practiced in mirrors). "Rally around me!" he cries. Poilievre has little choice but to express support. Singh hates India so naturally he's on-side. Trudeau will institute some sort of minor sanctions he will play up which will have no affect on India. India will retaliate, which WILL have an impact on us as India has way more power and influence in the world than we do. But Trudeau will get to act tough against an 'enemy' and thus narrow the big gap between him and Poilievre. I think it will work, too. Watch his approval ratings and poll numbers shoot up. There goes any hope of any sort of trade deal with the world's largest country, but hey, if it gets Trudeau more votes that's well worth it! It's not like the economy matters to him anyway. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-canadian-authorities-have-intelligence-that-india-was-behind-slaying/
    2 points
  3. They can't even decide which bathroom to use.
    2 points
  4. The issue with the way the State runs things is that they decided, without planning a little bit, to have 1 million more people a year in Canada with little to no additional infrastructure. Now we have to accelerate State spending on Immigration, we can't cut the number of public employees because there is too much demand that is artificially created. The Liberals didn't increase immigration for no reason; many in the GTA and big cities vote Liberals as they see the value of their properties skyrocket because of said increase in demand through immigration. It is simple, the Liberals bet on the middle class-wealthy people in rich urban neighborhoods to win, as those who live there control many corporations, the media and many ways to shadow-finance political campaigns. The issue is that it will bite these landlords/homeowners in the ass so hard. Taxes will increase, GDP per capita is stagnating and even going down and the quality of services offered by the State goes drastically down. If you're not a homeowner/landlord, you're a loser in today's canadian economy, except if you were able to get a huge raise the past few years or have your own little business.
    2 points
  5. Well they certainly don't seem to care if their policies lead to death or suffering. Although 'death cult' would explain their recommending MAID to PTSD suffering vets.
    2 points
  6. Ah, the articulate, intelligent rebuttal I've come to expect from the conservatives on this board. Sigh.
    2 points
  7. I guess you didn’t get the memo that the PM was recently in India had a frosty reception from Modi. It’s now been revealed that this is when Trudeau first confronted Modi about the assassination. It’s no coincidence that he raised this issue in parliament pretty much immediately upon his return. You also stated that he has not publicly accused China of foreign interference which is false He did keep it under his hat for a while because Canada like almost all west countries is so economically dependent upon and vulnerable to China. Greedy capitalists in the private sector and politicians from BOTH PARTIES especially the right fed the Chinese juggernaut with money and technology for decades, thinking it would be perfectly harmless and would earn them a few extra bucks. “China is embracing capitalism” they wrongly claimed. In fact China’s communist regime had simply learned how to weaponize capitalism and use it as a tool to destroy the west and strengthen the Communist Party. Many wealthy and powerful businessmen in the west want these insane relationships w Russia and China to continue because they no longer remember how to be profitable without them. .
    2 points
  8. And? Seriously who cares? I think Bever is just mad that these people are sleeping with two different people and he can't get laid at all
    2 points
  9. Is it to weaken Russia? I just don't see the point of dragging this conflict out for however long it takes. Russia isn't going to collapse or fall on their knees for Ukraine. Russia is like one hundred times bigger and has a much bigger population. Putin is just another a*shole dictator and not a serious threat to Americans safety. It's an unwinnable war. Their is no benefit or advantage to supporting Ukraine. It's just another fringe conflict like Vietnam or Korea. I don't believe the US is the global policeman.
    1 point
  10. "I like that he said that," he told Welker. "Because that means what I’m saying is right. I would get him into a room. I’d get Zelenskyy into a room. Then I’d bring them together. And I’d have a deal worked out." NBC Because when Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao, Chaushesku, Castro please insert any dictator thug here, praises your idea it means that it's going to work, right? For who, though? Get into a room a brutal, murderous rapist. Then, get there his innocent victim. Get Hitler into a room with the Jews he murdered. And what? What f-ing bloody miracle would transpire? How old, morally and mentally has one to be to not see it for plain, sheer and total nonsense it is? But he's saying it publicly and aloud. I'm sure especially in the early days of WWII there were those who gave their ear and even in some aspects at least, admired Nazi's leaders and thinkers. But it was back then and we're supposed to have memory and reason, or common sense at least. We were supposed to have learned, and remember. The guy is a jerk. He admired Putin and Un, probably still does. Here's what he's doing: not only destroying the foundations of democracy; now he is teasing you to do away with your very reason and common sense. If it doesn't make sense to your notions of reason and reality, just forget them and leave at the door. And believe whatever new daily nonsense pours out of the deep throat, you won't even notice anymore: because you aren't thinking. For yourself. Unfortunately, we humans have been known all too well to do just that. The coming one would be more than a regular election, rather the final sanity test. Nothing isn't known today about who he is and what he does. There can only be two reasons one would even in wildest dream imagine voting for the jerk, if he gets nominated: they are not thinking; or they voluntary and deliberately decided to not think, for themselves. And for that condition, alas democracy has no solutions. All the hard labors of the founding fathers would be in vain. Rome knows.
    1 point
  11. I'm thinking trudeau thought he could somehow hold it all together long enough to get to the next election and then make a bunch of claims about how he'll fix it. But - he's making those claims now and the actions he's taking will have no effect, and things will get worse. to even begin to make a dint hes' got to substantially cut back on immigration and temp students (like - in the neighborhood of a 30-50 percent reduction from current) AND hes' got to cut total gov't spending by about 3.5 percent - and instead he's increasing it. But reducing immigration and cutting spending is like giving superman a kryptonite smoothie - he's not going to be able to stomach it.
    1 point
  12. It's such a tragedy that Indian sectarianism has become a serious issue here. This will inevitably divide politicians as "pro-Hindu" or "pro-Sikh/Muslim". I don't want that. I want to vote for someone who's pro-Canadian!
    1 point
  13. We have never protected our sovereignty. And I'm not all that interested in starting with this guy. He should have been deported decades ago.
    1 point
  14. Good question. Apparently he fled to Canada after being accused of involvement in a bombing. He came in under a fake passport and then applied for asylum. It was rejected. Eleven days later he suddenly married a Sikh woman and she applied to sponsor him. That was rejected as a fake marriage. There is no word on why he was kept around but I'm guessing the courts forbid us deporting him since he faced likely human rights abuse in India. According to our immigration minister he became "Canadian" in 2015, but he wasn't a Canadian, really. He had no interest in this country. He was devoted to trying to set up a separate Sikh homeland in India, and if he had ever succeeded he'd have left Canada. He was a technical Canadian, but not one I recognize as such.
    1 point
  15. I'm guessing you don't know why telling a conservative to 'go cry in his grits' because the libs are ruling is so funny, but just in case i'll tip my hat to the reference and line That was pretty clever if intentional It's true. Just last year he said that someday you'd say something intelligent. Man - credibility shattered right there
    1 point
  16. Trump and Putin. Hitler is so much more on your side. He hated Jews, and so does the Left. He was just a racist in general, and so are you guys; the only difference is that he was upfront about his racism - you degenerates try to project it on the Right. lol
    1 point
  17. For sure - and here's the thing: trudeau has had his people studying this all year, and all his people agree that the grocery stores are telling the absolute truth - their markup is between 3 and 4 percent on groceries. That's it. Some of them are doing much better on their clothing and makeup, like the 'joe fresh' line of clothes that superstore sells which has a huge mark up thanks to slave labour which we're not talking about ( ) but actual groceries are a thin margin. Sure. It's a cumulative or stacking tax - which means it gets built into people's mark up. So the farmer pays it THEN charges mark up on it to the next guy who pays it And the mark up AND then marks all that up for the next guy and so on. It's a significant cost factor (but not the only one of course) Well they can't. There is not much mark up on food at the grocery store level. Most of it happens before then and much of it is just the costs involved.
    1 point
  18. I don’t know if this guy was really a terrorist as we would define it. Advocating for a Sikh country is not terrorism here, just as supporting an independent Scotland or Quebec isn’t either. As I posted earlier, India makes ‘absurd’ (to use its own adjective) criminal accusations of terrorism against people it doesn’t like that take years to come to court. Conveniently, the evidence is kept secret because of national security concerns and, in the interim, the accused languishes in jail. I’m not saying he wasn’t a terrorist either but I wouldn’t believe one thing the Indian government alleges without corroboration.
    1 point
  19. It’s worse than that. Upper caste supporters of the BJP want to dominate everybody else: Muslims, Christians, lower caste Hindus and those of no caste (Dalits and Tribals). India is a Dickensian nightmare for them with no access to the legal rights the country claims to offer all citizens.
    1 point
  20. Faux Biden is a cheat and a liar. He really belongs behind bars.
    1 point
  21. Lol… nice how you insult someone without bothering to explain what your disagreement is. I guess that’s because you incorrectly assume everyone knows what you’re thinking. You’re so certain you’re right that you think everybody knows what is “right” and they only disagree with you because they have evil intent. This is not so.
    1 point
  22. You certainly have a vivid imagination which is completely divorced from the reality of Russia INVADING UKRAINE. IF that is successful, we can expect much more of KLEPTOCRAT PUTIN stealing more country's' resources. ?
    1 point
  23. If we're keeping score, this is the second time that Trudeau is siding with a terrorist against another country. Last time it was the USA, now it's India. Could he have at least picked some smaller countries to ruin our relationships with? 1) If the gov't of India conducted an extrajudicial killing of a terrorist I don't give a rip what country it happened in. If it was here, then we should be asking ourselves why we didn't grab that guy and extradite him... This was a really inopportune time for Trudeau to suddenly grow a testicle, and in defence of a terrorist no less. WTF. And he won't even talk to peaceful protesters in our country. What a God-damned piece of sh1t he is. 2) If the Khalistani separatists were white, like the IRA or something, Trudeau would see them for what they are, but their skin is darker than a brown paper bag so he has to be down wid it. 3) I have no problem whatsoever with Sikhs (non Khalistani separatists), but anyone with any historical knowledge at all knows what happened the last time India was partitioned. Over ten million lives were lost, and millions of others were displaced. There's no way to do separation "right". In Israel they never even killed 1,000 people (even if you count the wars where Israel was attacked they killed less than 100,000 people) and 85% the planet thinks that Israel is more evil than Pakistan. The likelihood of a genocide of the Israeli will remain high for the next 100 years. If they let their guard down, they will be slaughtered like dogs, and over 1 billion people will celebrate it. Partition is a nasty, nasty business. I'd never advocate for it.
    1 point
  24. well admittedly it was pretty anti climactic. It would be like finding out at the end that bruce willis was alive the whole time and the kid coudlnt' see dead people and was just overly eccentric.
    1 point
  25. For some there is no way Trudeau could have handled this better no matter how he reacted, but that isn't a surprise.
    1 point
  26. Modi or his cronies ordered a hit in Canada. That should be the headline here. They’re the bad guys, not us. And I trust CSIS who may not be able to release all the evidence. Assassinations of this type are often never fully investigated to a point where perps land in behind bars. We’ve seen the Israelis, Brits etc. carry out similar ops that remain deniable to some extent. Which doesn’t stop, say, the Israelis bragging about them at the same time.
    1 point
  27. BLM absolutely had the blessing of leftards. Kamala Harris asked people to donate to a bail fund to get them out of jail, and only the worst of the worst went to jail. During the height of the rioting Mich Obama was telling HS kids to "stay angry, and focus your anger" Justin Trudeau: Ummm, ok, that's fair, but that comment was actually directed towards the Freedom Convoy lol. This is what he said about BLM: Ummmm, do your goals include burning down buildings, torturing mentally handicapped people and killing cops Mr. Prime Minister? I don't blame for being sucked in initially because your "news" sources bludgeoned you with disinformation about it 24/7, and most people lack the mental fortitude to resist that level of propaganda, but after 6 months you should have started to feel it all unravelling. Especially after Van Jones admitted that it was all a charade for the CNNtards. The fact that you still bewieve is cute. (Just kidding, it's alarming you stupid child. Do you still bewieve in Santy Claus too?) FYI "justice" was never the goal, and there was never any evidence that an investigation needed to be conducted in the first place. The dossier was all a pile of Hillary disinformation (that didn't stop the FBI from lying about it for 2 years, to a judge no less), and in the end no one was ever successfully charged with anything related to "collusion". The FBI just charged people with other things and tried to coerce false testimony from them.
    1 point
  28. Air India was a mess, CSIS was a new agency engaged in a turf war with the RCMP so they weren't talking to each other, evidence was deleted or destroyed. It was an un professional gong show.
    1 point
  29. Thanks for illustrating your ignorance once again, your reply to this thread is completely worthless. This isn't about "a bit of FN study within a Social Studies course", it's an entire FN course of its own: I dunno how I ever got by in this world without speaking any Secwepemctsin. That class is such a valuable part of the new curriculum.
    1 point
  30. I'm sure the economy matters, but as usual in Canadian politics it's party first. In fact, it would be a great rallying cry for Poilievre to campaign on.... country before party. He would win hands down.
    1 point
  31. Liberals preach tolerance until they remember the existence of rural areas. Then, they think of a backwards underclass of untermenschen because they fail to rationalize how someone could possibly not think like them. I don't think all urbanites are evil or dumb, I just think they're more misled by popular media which is very prominent in those places, and generally people who depend more on services will be more leftist and pro-big government. There are plenty of leftists in rural areas, too. Look at the state of Vermont and Northern Ontario. While cities like Calgary, Virginia Beach and Colorado Springs also have reputations for being right-leaning.
    1 point
  32. I'm so sick of liars and cheats. It's why I can't stand the democrat party.
    1 point
  33. I don't believe the so-called asylum seekers are legit asylum seekers. I believe at least 90% of non-Americans at our borders are illegal aliens, and they don't give a sh*t about US law. This is why we need ENFORCEMENT at our borders not more woke bullshit.
    1 point
  34. I agree with ExFlyer that this is off-topic. You may have to request a moderator to move this thread to the appropriate subforum. Anyway, I hope Americans are happy with a leader just as incompetent as ours.
    1 point
  35. I have no idea how to move posts - where is that function?
    1 point
  36. Our influence is everywhere. That's what it means to be a superpower. I have no interest in becoming a hermit nation like NK. Far better to take part in positively shaping the community in which one lives than to simply hope things work out in your favor. If we're not positively influencing things, someone else will fill that role, and we might not like what comes of it.
    1 point
  37. I'd argue that a lot of social clubs and religions did it to themselves, becoming less inclusive as society became more inclusive. Plus COVID of course being the death of even more such organizations. But the effects of this are not good for our society, I do agree. Many young men are the most isolated. The problem is all those social clubs and community events cost money. The lower class just can't afford it when housing and food are barely affordable. So the government would have to heavily subsidize recreational facilities and community centers. Which might seem expensive, but compared to incarceration or the cost of paying mental health professionals, may not be that bad on the net.
    1 point
  38. Beats voting for crooked hillary you know - the girl who covered up for her husband RAPING another girl? My what standards you must have.
    1 point
  39. There are plenty of geopolitical reasons to support Ukraine, but the core interest is that it's a free people fighting for survival against an aggressive dictator to remain free people. There aren't many more noble causes. As Republicans used to believe, freedom isn't free. Self determination is something to be cherished, rather than taken for granted. It must be protected from enemies foreign and domestic (ahem!). And that's a burden that all like-minded people can share Every Western democracy in the world exists because another another nation supported their fight to be free. Ukraine deserves the same, not out of cynical self interest, but simply because it's the right thing to do.
    1 point
  40. Conservatives lead by 15 as federal government disapproval jumps 4 points September 14, 2023 https://abacusdata.ca/conservatives-lead-by-15-as-government-disapproval-jumps-4-points/
    1 point
  41. Poilievre's under Trudeau's skin! ?
    1 point
  42. Yep. In fact there's a good chance they'll ditch it Yeah - you're getting to that point where you don't make sense any more. Try to calm down and start again. You're not related to myata by any chance,, Welp - looks like we broke you for the day. Go to sleep and see if you can be coherent in the morning.
    1 point
  43. The CBC article says that this came from Stalinist Stephen Lecce's office... Here's some advice... wait a bit before reacting to these things...
    1 point
  44. Should men and women have equal rights? Yes. Should men and woman have equal pay for the same jobs? Yes. Do men gravitate to jobs and careers differently than do women? Yes. Should a nursing home attendant be paid the same as a construction worker? Sure...that sounds reasonable. Its one thing to advocate for equal rights. It quite another to advocate for equal outcomes. A man...ok most men...make better construction workers because men are simply bigger and stronger. By the same token...women...ok most women...make better nursing home attendants because they have more empathy for human suffering...generally. To belittle women for their differences from men is a dullards argument. Women are the givers of life itself. They are invaluable. Nothing men do can compare to that. By the same token, to force or impose women, or men, onto positions they are simply not suited for is also a dullard's argument and act of stupidity on several levels. Be proud of what you are. Make the most of your talents. Men and women together form the strongest and most important unions of all. And our Libbie society is trying its danmdest to undo this basic truth and necessity. THAT is the true tragedy of the sexes.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...