Leaderboard

Yup. You want unvaxxed people to lose their jobs, be stripped of freedoms, be denied healthcare, be sent to camps and to die. Don't give a rat's patootie about you. And you dare call anyone else a "scourge on society".

And doctors here are having their licenses revoked for prescribing it:

Just out of curiosity, what is your plan for ensuring there are still viable oil reserves for future generations? Less oil =much higher prices for the thousands of products and chemicals derived from petroleum.

The point that I've been saying all along is that the 2 main reasons why people under 50 are getting vaxxed is 1) Big Pharma bucks, and 2) because the vaxxes' stats would look horrible if only the vulnerable were getting vaxxed (partly because they don't work as well as advertised). Look at Canada as an example: there were almost 18,000 deaths in people 80+ (~4% of the population), and only 630 deaths in people under 50 (~75% of the population). If only people 50+ and people with co-morbidities were vaxxed, that would be ~25% of the population, and all of the deaths would occur in that group. The stats would say "only vaxxed people die. I promise you that people from 12-50 are being vaxxed to pad Big Pharma's stats.

Yeah I’m not sure how they come up with this statistic, considering retail and service industries have been decimated, and are still operating under capacity restrictions. Then add this to it. Trudeau hates the middle class.

Those are both Big Pharma. The advantage of Ivermectin is the patent has run out on it. I hear it's about a buck a dose in North America but you can get it for pennies a dose elsewhere.

They have been through trials...just not in Canada. https://c19ivermectin.com/ Keep in mind, the emergency use authorization for the vaccines was not possible if there was ANY other treatment available. If they showed people were allowed to show that ivermectin worked then by law, the FDA would have to pull the emergency authorization for the vaccines. Hence the war on ivermectin and previous HCQ.

Just 10 years ago the world was going through a massive scare that oil was running out and in 10 years there would not be enough for future generations, and yet here we are 10 years later, still pumping out oil like it was going out of style... And your right can't lubricate generators with toonies, but there are plant based oils that could be substituted, and i'm hoping by the time we do actual know how much oil and gas are in the ground, the smart people would have discovered replacements for fossil fuels and al the oils and lubricants we have now... As for people being stupid how do you explain the infinite number of genders using science, and medical facts.. or the gun control issue or abortion issue or you name it, climate change, How does one topic not pass the science or facts test and still become law in this nation...there are a lot of stupid people out there, maybe not stupid but what do you call a person that is to lazy or just does not want to change their minds. I person call them idiots but i was being nice stupid sounded much better. This has nothing to with walking in heels , you go sister be what ever you want to be, i have no issue with anyone wanting to be another sex, be it through surgery or just wanting to live as the opposite sex, but when it comes down to science if you have junk down stairs your a man, you can be a gay man but your still a man, and vice versa with women. but don't try to sell me that there are an infinite amount of genders which anyone one person could be or decide to change on a whim depending on how they feel... You can be what ever you want to pretend to be. just don't get me involved in any way..

Hah! A single climate scientist? quote On the eve of the UN COP26 climate conference in Glasgow, CLINTEL, an organization of over 925 scientists and scholars has called out the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for false claims of a climate crisis in the policymakers summary (SPM). Friends of Science says this critique and the Allan Inquiry reports show the Tar Sands Campaign environmental groups are misleading the public on climate change and the Alberta oil sands. Unquote COP26 Eve - CLINTEL Calls out IPCC on False Claims of Climate Crisis says Friends of Science | Benzinga It is easy to find scientists who disagree with the man-made climate change alarmists. If you are counting the number of scientists who agree and the number who disagree, then you are not going by the scientific method or reason. It then becomes pure politics.

Science is the Scientific Method...not expert opinions. You rely on expert opinions where as NOBODY has figured out Earth's climate cycles over time. NOBODY.

That's bullshit, plain and simple. It's not like the kids haven't seen anyone, and most kids hang out with their parents 99% of the time till at least the age of two, anyway. Even if these kids never saw anyone but their parents for a few weeks or months, that's plenty enough "socialization" for a baby. Only if a child was kept completely isolated - as in kept in a closet, or kept in a crib in the bedroom for years would their IQ be affected. The doctor, if they are a doctor, is a quack, and you're a fool for believing them.

No, not every scientist believes in the GW alarmism claims. The fact is very few scientists are even in the field of climate science. quote Scientists who disagree with the claimed consensus In 2016 alone, over 500 papers were published in peer-reviewed science journals that seriously questioned the supposed ‘consensus’ on climate change.33 Some high-profile scientists who dispute the alarmism include:34 Lennart O. Bengtsson, who was Director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany. John R. Christy, Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science and Director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama in Huntsville, and NASA. He and Dr John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites.35 Judith A. Curry, who due to the “craziness” of the politicization of climate science, in 2017 took early retirement from her position as Professor in the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech, USA, a position she had held for 15 years. Richard S. Lindzen, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT, contributed to the IPCC’s 1995 and 2001 reports, but became skeptical of the alarmist climate model projections. Nir J. Shaviv, Professor and Chair of the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. There are many others. In September 2019, a global network of 500 prominent climate scientists and professionals stated that there is no ‘climate emergency’. They invited the UN to organize with them a constructive high-level meeting between world-class scientists on both sides of the climate debate early in 2020.36 When we consider the persecution that dissenters have experienced (e.g. Dr Judith Curry mentioned above), we see another parallel to the creation/evolution debate. In both cases, dissenters from both the Darwinian and climate-alarmism paradigms have been demoted and even fired.37,38 Unquote Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) at creation.com website, This article is a scientific and biblical approach to climate change by Don Batten

So you are unable to provide any proof that man-made climate change is real. No surprise. What I expected. CO2 is a tiny part of the atmosphere, but that doesn't prove man-made CO2 causes climate change because climate has always changed. In fact the climate was just as warm or warmer 2000 years ago in the Roman Warming Period and then in the Middle Ages in that warming period that lasted for several hundred years. The fact is water vapour (H2O) is a significant part of the atmosphere and also causes global warming but that is not mentioned because it doesn't fit the narrative of those who want to blame mankind for GW. Graphs demonstrate the rising temperature has not occurred evenly with the increase of CO2. The correlation is not really clear plus just because something happens at the same time as temperature increases does not prove that is what caused it. The stock market went up also at times but it doesn't prove the stock market caused GW. quote The now-infamous ‘hockey stick’ graph (Figure 5) produced by Michael Mann (Penn State University) and co-authors was the lynchpin of the AGW movement. The IPCC used the graph in the Summary for Policy Makers in their Third Assessment Report (2001). It was very influential. The graph was exposed as fraudulent; it ‘erased’ the Medieval Warm Period from the temperature record, and worse.52 Mann even sued a critic, lost, and then refused to pay the court-ordered costs. Underlining how corrupt climate science has become, instead of being disgraced, Mann was awarded the 2019 Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement! Unquote "Figure 5. The fraudulent ‘hockey stick’ graph where the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age have been erased, giving the false impression of a thousand years of stability prior to radical recent warming.53" A biblical and scientific approach to climate change - creation.com Trying to equate smoking causes cancer with man-made climate change is a huge stretch because cancer from smoking was easily proven by statistics and damage to the lungs where lung cancer occurs. There is no similarity with man-made climate change. There have been many fraudulent claims on the subject of climate change which have later turned out to be false. Examples would be disappearance of the artic ice caps, disappearance of polar bears, the UN warning in 1989 that life on earth would be catastrophic by the year 2000 with major flooding and loss of islands. Never happened. Yet the UN IPCC is believed as the last word on climate change. Politicians like Trudeau and many others got on the bandwagon, without having a clue of science to do with it, because it is a political cash cow for them. Much of the world has been deceived into believing all the lies and deception around the subject. Trudeau left this morning on his jet to fly around Europe for six days, wining and dining, and hob knobbing with the liberal elites of Europe as they discuss how they are going to save us all and save the planet from the boggy man of man-made climate change. I assume his right hand environmental climate change radical will be going to the climate conference too on the taxpayer dime. Note the Roman Warming Period, 2000 years ago, and the MIddle Ages Warming Period were strangely left out of the famous hockey stick graph. I wonder why.

If leftists started off their fight against covid as hard as they fought against HCQ trials then covid wouldn't have stood a chance. Old saying: "Fight like you're the 3rd monkey on the gangway to Noah's Ark." New saying: "Fight like a leftist killing the truth." I can't believe you managed to get leftists to admit that they were wrong. They usually just skip to another lie, or call us racists when they hear some truth. One of the best memes I saw in a long time was: CNN Headline: "Joe Rogan drinks fluid commonly used as engine coolant!" [it was water] Nope, they'll just start off another sensational lie and call everyone who doesn't believe them racists.

Awww muffin. I think you overestimate the vaxxed restrictions on anyone who's not a front-line worker that deals with public health. Where are the camps?

So that's a no.

Go find it yourself. There's lots of information out there on the PCR tests. I'm done taking homework assignments for you, providing cites that you simply ignore and then continue to regurgitate the same old arguments.

Thank you for your back-handed approval of the comment. I must be on the right track. "lies and anti-science"??? Science requires proof. Do you have anything that proves man-made climate change is true; i.e. something that is proven by the scientific method? No, because it is just political bafflegab and has not been proven. There never has been any proof because the size of the earth and the complexity of the environment prevents such a thing from being replicated or proven.

Maybe coal will stretch to 1000 years but accessible oil will likely be exhausted in just 200-250 years. We need to do all we can to stretch it out as long as possible. You can’t lubricate a generator with toonies. people are not stupid (well excepting me and a few others). But I am smart enough to listen to people who know what they are talking about. People are not stupid. They lack information. As for gender reassignment or cross dressing, don’t judge someone until you have walked 1.6 km in their heels.

Westcanman , thanks for starting this thread, I’ve been on lots of forums and most people just don’t know the truth. I’ve been mentioning ivermectin to people but they still think it’s for horses, because of the strong campaign against anything but the vaccines. I had to show that its use on humans won a Nobel in 2015, and then the response was near shock. The MSM and our governments are going to pay for what they’ve done when the truth finally comes out.

Its not mandatory in parts of Canada, that it true. leg·is·la·tion /ˌlejəˈslāSH(ə)n/ noun laws, considered collectively. "tax legislation"

We will have to create an atmosphere on Mars when we can't even save the one we already have here.

The gov't acknowledges that the vaxxed deaths occurred almost exclusively among elderly people with co-morbidities, but they don't acknowledge that it was like that before the vax even existed. Literally everything that ever came out of the mouth of a Liberal or Democrat since January of 2020 is railroading people towards the vaccine. At first they gave out shitty advice, like "ride the subway like normal, don't wear masks, hug people in Chinatown, and don't block travel because that's racist". Then when covid was entrenched here they sent it into cares homes, fudged 'data', ramped up fear mongering to panic level, attacked alternatives to vaccines and vilified anyone who dared to mention them, and they've constantly overstated effectiveness and safety of vaccines. When they couldn't stop the evidence from coming out about the therapeutics that they were using in Florida, the federal government jacked the supply. Now they've got the population divided and they're brainwashing vax-Nazis in the general public to ostracize the rest of us dirty, dirty unvaxxed terrorists.

And still, the vaccines have outright killed people and caused serious harm to others. How can you insinuate that ivermectin poses a greater health risk than the vaccines when ivermectin doesn't do those things when taken as it's administered by a physician.