The Climate Crisis is a global scam

[robosmith]

21 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It's been talked about countless times with countless scientific papers published.... It's unequivocal.  

You're part of that far right knuckle dragging crowd that is obliged to deny climate change anyway so it's a pointless and would be a wasted exercise trying to explain otherwise to you.

Even if you proved it, CdnLIAR would just LIE about it.

[LinkSoul60]

11 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Ya?

Usually it's anger that makes people kneejerk react and not get the actual points being made.

Best to take some time off the board, either way.

 

 

There has been nothing 'knee jerk' about my comments or points.  You and your rightwing crowd are very predictable so the conversations and comments from them are generally the same wash, rinse and repeat.

Funny you say that.... Last October-ish I got bored with the same old day in day out comments of 'look what the liberals did' or 'it's Trudeaus fault' so I didn't visit again until two or three weeks ago. Your crowd does make me laugh sometimes though but at some point, I'll get bored again and take another long break from the forum. It's a needed brain-cleanse from the never ending nonsense.  I highly recommend it....

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

Tell that to Obama, I'm sure he will sell his oceanfront property.

 

What makes you so sure he can't afford to lose it?

I was looking at investing ocean front property, but I KNOW that is the kind of investment you make IF you can afford to LOSE IT ALL. 

Never thought about that, did ya, CLOWN.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Even if you proved it, CdnLIAR would just LIE about it.

Awww, still too scared to talk to me directly are you?  Poor kid. Tell your therapist i said hi   

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

There has been nothing 'knee jerk' about my comments or points. recommend it....

Obviously they are entirely knee jerk. You can't even provide scientific documentation to back up your facts and you're getting angry and upset when you're asked about it

Would you prefer the term hissy fit?

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

and take another long break from the forum.   I highly recommend it....

I do also from time to time.

I took a very long break a couple (?) years ago when my ex-hubby died of a sudden heart attack.  He was 43.

There were a lot of kind souls on here who worried about me and I appreciated it.

[robosmith]

10 hours ago, Nationalist said:

How do you figure this?

So we're both seniors. I want my kids and their kids to be able to afford good food. Enjoy life instead of struggle to keep their heads above water. 

We are not destroying the world. We ain't all gonna die. Relax yourself. Every method we use for energy is much more efficient and much less "dirty" than it was originally. Even coal burning generators are way cleaner than originally. Today we hardly use coal anyway. We use natural gas, propane, nuclear, hydro. None of which are "dirty" at all. Hell we're now on the doorstep of harnessing fusion power. 

You completely ignore these developments. Your premise strongly suggests that Man will not continue to develop and that's just silly.

Again...how do you figure? Do you not understand the principle of cause and effect? Do you not understand what's driving most of our inflation? Do you not want your family to enjoy a comparable life style that we had years ago? We have regulated ourselves into a nightmare. We cant even build a Gawd Damn house in a reasonable period of time. Its insanity.

The bottom line is, your fear is unwarranted. All you've accomplished is to make your own family struggle to make ends meat.

Bravo.

So you believe it's a good GAMBLE to force on YOUR CHILDREN because YOU ARE CHEAP.

[LinkSoul60]

14 minutes ago, Legato said:

So in other words, reversing the crazy rules forced into an unwelcoming public domain by the Biden administration.

About time. Common sense at last.

Another one who has transvestites consuming their thoughts.... Wow

[LinkSoul60]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nobody said we were. So now you're just lying again to try and change the subject. Typical

What I said was that when she does she provides evidence. When other people make scientific claims they provide scientific evidence.

But you can't provide a single drop of scientific evidence

And when that's pointed out you just start lying your ass off as you just did moments ago claiming that people talked about something they didn't talk about

If you continually lie as you are doing people will look at you as nothing but a liar. There are a few on the left here who have that problem. You should avoid being one of them and start being honest

Because there isn't any.

I found plenty that suggests it's not a crisis, but I haven't actually been able to find anything that suggests it was.  I even posted scientific peer reviewed documents to that extent. But nothing so far that suggests its' a crisis from a science research study or the like.  Just 'webpages'. 

The real question is why can't you find it. You obviously can't so what does that tell us?

Listen jackass....  We can play semantics all day long if your little mind likes but I have far better things to think about that humouring you.  Crisis, concern, alarming.... you choose a word that makes your little mind happy and run with it.  The fact remains that the climate change is real and impacting our lives. That's fact and not debatable.  

[Michael Hardner]

25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

There is 100% proof in the lab that CO2 causes warming, so the only question is how much of the warming we're seeing is CO2 and how much is other sources LIKE METHANE.

These are reasonable conclusions but for air-tight "proof" you would need more.

I would say we have a practical certainty that CO2 is causing it.  But not semantic "proof" as with proving Pythagoras etc.

[LinkSoul60]

21 minutes ago, User said:

I’ve never had anyone in my life or my close friends or family murdered….

Oh well, I guess murders don’t happen and are no big deal. 

Even for you that is a monumentally stupid comment....

After the shooting we had in BC a talk radio show I was listening to was talking about this and people of your simple mind skills going on about trans being more prone to mass murder than others.  I could be and probably am off slightly in the %'s but the facts are that trans account for ~1% of the population while trans connected murders is ~0.5%.

Using your mindless comments, I'd be far more worried about a white guy killing someone than I would a trans.

 

[WestCanMan]

40 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Here.  No go find another sandbox to play in....

 

Yes, since 2022, and with a significant acceleration in 2025, there has been a coordinated, multi-pronged effort in the United States to restrict and rescind rights for transgender people at both state and federal levels.

 

According to 2025-2026 reporting, these actions have targeted gender-affirming care, identity documentation, public accommodations, and legal recognition. 

Wikipedia +2

Key Actions and Restrictions (2025-2026):

• Federal Policy Reversal: Following his inauguration in January 2025, President Donald Trump signed executive orders targeting transgender individuals, including a directive defining sex as binary and fixed at birth, reversing federal recognition of transgender identities.
• Healthcare Bans: As of late 2025, over half of U.S. states have passed laws banning or restricting gender-affirming care, particularly for minors. On June 18, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Skrmetti that bans on gender-affirming care for minors are constitutional.
• Military Service: In 2025, the Trump administration barred transgender individuals from military service and initiated the discharge of currently serving transgender personnel.
• Identification Documents: Federal policy now restricts the ability of transgender people to obtain passports with accurate gender markers, removing the "X" marker option and requiring passports to match sex assigned at birth. Several states, including Florida and Texas, have also restricted or banned changing gender markers on driver's licenses.
• Education and Sports: Federal and state actions have moved to restrict transgender students from participating in sports teams matching their gender identity and have implemented policies restricting the use of chosen names or pronouns in schools.
• Public Accommodations: Several states have passed laws restricting access to restrooms and locker rooms in public facilities based on sex assigned at birth. 
  HRC | Human Rights Campaign +6

While many of these policies are being challenged in court and some have faced temporary blocks, the overall trend has been a significant rollback of protections, with 2025 marking a record year for anti-trans legislation considered and passed. 

Anti-Trans Bill Tracker +2

If you think that "people born as males" have a "right" to compete in women's sports, you are sadly mistaken. That is not a "right". It is a "privilege" for any person to compete in any athletic league, but taking away other people's basic rights is never really a right.

Likewise, men going into "public accommodations", ie "opposite-sex bathrooms" is not a "right" either. In fact, allowing them that right would mean that "no women anywhere in the US have a right to use a public bathroom without biological males present in it." That is actually "stripping a right away from 50% of the population" in favour of .01% of the population.

Do you understand that? 

Allowing people who are PHYSICALLY "MALES" into girls' bathrooms mean that "every woman in the US is stripped of the right to a women-only bathroom". Simple. 

FYI wiki isn't a legal document. Anyone can write in to wiki to contribute to their pages, and in this case, really stupid people wrote in and got wiki to record some misleading info.  

Edited March 12 by WestCanMan

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Listen jackass....  

LOL awwww muffin, do you need a cookie and a nap?

Quote

We can play semantics all day long

This isn't semantics. This is facts and science versus echo chamber opinion and propaganda. I'm the one with the facts and the science

  T

Quote

he fact remains that the climate change is real and impacting our lives. That's fact and not debatable.  

Nobody has suggested climate change isn't real. That's your go-to when you know you've lost the argument and you're crying again

What is being questioned is whether or not it's a crisis and whether or not we actually can do anything about it. And based on what you've said and your lack of evidence the answer is no it isn't and no we can't

 

[LinkSoul60]

20 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I do also from time to time.

I took a very long break a couple (?) years ago when my ex-hubby died of a sudden heart attack.  He was 43.

There were a lot of kind souls on here who worried about me and I appreciated it.

It is what it is.... a chat forum with many and varied opinions from many and varied persons.  Like most things in life something grabs your attention for a little while then you move on to something else that grabs your attention.

Condolences for your loss. Life isn't fair sometimes and 43 is far too young...

[LinkSoul60]

13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If you think that "people born as males" have a "right" to compete in women's sports, you are sadly mistaken. That is not a "right". It is a "privilege" for any person to compete in any athletic league, but taking away other people's basic rights is never really a right.

Likewise, men going into "public accommodations", ie "opposite-sex bathrooms" is not a "right" either. In fact, allowing them that right would mean that "no women anywhere in the US have a right to use a public bathroom without biological males present in it." That is actually "stripping a right away from 50% of the population" in favour of .01% of the population.

Do you understand that? 

Allowing people who are PHYSICALLY "MALES" into girls' bathrooms mean that "every woman in the US is stripped of the right to a women-only bathroom". Simple. 

FYI wiki isn't a legal document. Anyone can write in to wiki to contribute to their pages, and in this case, really stupid people wrote in and got wiki to record some misleading info.  

I agree.  Men should not be playing women sports.

I also agree that men or women for that matter shouldn't be allowed in restrooms that are not designated for them.  I've mistakenly walked into women's restrooms a couple times and have also been in all gender restrooms.  Got a couple sideways looks in the women's room but women and men alike in the all gender with nobody looking over their shoulder seemed normal to me.

Okay....that's all I got so we're done, right!

[Goddess]

13 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Life isn't fair sometimes and 43 is far too young...

No, it's not and yes it is.

If you are wondering at my interest in the covid vax, it's because my sister was injured by them.  Neurological damage.  she still cannot work.  No previous health issues.

My ex-hubby, visited me 5 months before he died and told me he hadn't felt well since he got the jabs mandated for work.  He said he had been hearing lots were dying from sudden heart attacks and said, "I feel like that is going to happen to me."  5 months later he had a heart attack and work and was on life support for 3 weeks before decisions were made.  He had no previous heart issues and doctors said his arteries were clear.

I'm not a kook.

 

[LinkSoul60]

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL awwww muffin, do you need a cookie and a nap?

This isn't semantics. This is facts and science versus echo chamber opinion and propaganda. I'm the one with the facts and the science

  T

Nobody has suggested climate change isn't real. That's your go-to when you know you've lost the argument and you're crying again

What is being questioned is whether or not it's a crisis and whether or not we actually can do anything about it. And based on what you've said and your lack of evidence the answer is no it isn't and no we can't

 

Try to keep up jackass.... nowhere have I or anyone else here that I'm aware of said it's a crisis.  It's a concern for the longevity of our planet that we need to address and deal with, which the world is doing.

[CdnFox]

14 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Try to keep up jackass....

I am keeping up. You're having a complete hissy fit in mental breakdown because everybody is pointing out correctly that you're wrong and it makes you big mad

Quote

nowhere have I or anyone else here that I'm aware of said it's a crisis.  

People here have constantly insisted that it's a crisis. And if it isn't a crisis why are we talking about it

 

Quote

It's a concern for the longevity of our planet that we need to address and deal with, which the world is doing.

Do we though? It sounds like there's going to be change but we have before and will in the future adapt to change. There is a fair bit of scientific work that shows that carbon emissions can only retain so much heat. There's a point after which more carbon does not mean more global warming, if in fact that is the source or the primary source rather than just a secondary or minor source.

But we were told that we had to institute in carbon tax immediately because this is a crisis and we must act right now or by 20:35 we would be past the point of no return

Study Says 2035 Is Climate Change Point of No Return | HowStuffWorks

But despite the headline, do you see what's not there? Any link to any scientific data.

This kind of rhetoric about how we're all going to die and we will be destroyed unless we take action right now has been used since the 90s as I previously posted proof of.

 

So you're being extremely dishonest. In fact it has been cast as a crisis, it has been cast that if we don't take action now we will face a dire consequence and it's not about the future.

But the science does not support that position

As near as I can tell the science supports the idea that global warming due to greenhouse gases may continue a little bit it will eventually reach a saturation point after which it's not contributing anymore, and by that time there will be a lot of significance weather events and we will have to adapt to a slightly different planet. But I see nothing at all to say that that adaptation will be terribly difficult or in any way shape or form more expensive than the proposed climate change resolutions which may not work.

[LinkSoul60]

8 minutes ago, Goddess said:

No, it's not and yes it is.

If you are wondering at my interest in the covid vax, it's because my sister was injured by them.  Neurological damage.  she still cannot work.  No previous health issues.

My ex-hubby, visited me 5 months before he died and told me he hadn't felt well since he got the jabs mandated for work.  He said he had been hearing lots were dying from sudden heart attacks and said, "I feel like that is going to happen to me."  5 months later he had a heart attack and work and was on life support for 3 weeks before decisions were made.  He had no previous heart issues and doctors said his arteries were clear.

I'm not a kook.

 

I don't recall you talking about vaccines but yes, I assumed you were anti-vax because of other positions.  

I'm pro-vax because of undeniable good vaccines do in saving lives.  That said I'm also pro-choice so if you choose not to get vaccinated don't.  I am though of the opinion that if you choose not to get vaccinated and you work in close proximity to vulnerable persons (hospitals, long term care, etc), then you've forgone your right to work in that position.  That's just my opinion which I'm fully aware that some don't agree with....  I also understand that although it's a very small percentage of people who get vaccinated adverse reactions happen. To the degree of your ex....that is very rare, and heartbreaking.

Lol... I know you're not a 'kook'....  A bit of a 'wackjob' with strong opinions of anything 'left',  but harmless enough 😄

[User]

46 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Even for you that is a monumentally stupid comment....

After the shooting we had in BC a talk radio show I was listening to was talking about this and people of your simple mind skills going on about trans being more prone to mass murder than others.  I could be and probably am off slightly in the %'s but the facts are that trans account for ~1% of the population while trans connected murders is ~0.5%.

Using your mindless comments, I'd be far more worried about a white guy killing someone than I would a trans.

 

I was pointing out the stupidity of your repeating the same thing but replace murder with dudes who think they are women impacting women in their spaces… 

50 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Try to keep up jackass.... nowhere have I or anyone else here that I'm aware of said it's a crisis.  It's a concern for the longevity of our planet that we need to address and deal with, which the world is doing.

No, but you and others here have acted like you have no idea where we are getting it from that people on the climate change is bad side do in fact make those crisis claims.

 

[eyeball]

On 3/9/2026 at 2:36 PM, User said:

The point of saying the climate changes is just that. It is an observation to counter the "climate change" narrative that climate change is bad. The point is that regardless of anything humans do or have done, the climate changes. 

Rarely as fast though and when it was mass extinction events usually followed close behind. It might have taken decades or even a couple of centuries so pffft...what me worry right?

At my age it won't be in my lifetime and I might actually get in a lot more golfing with warmer weather or climate or whatever. That difference seems blurrier too. Climate is probably just another cockamamie political term some interfering anti-capitalist do-gooding commie dreamed up.

[eyeball]

On 3/9/2026 at 4:11 PM, Michael Hardner said:

Anu scientist who found an alternative would be a world famous hero.

I bet even Steven Tyler would throw his panties into the mix.

[User]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I agree.  Men should not be playing women sports.

I also agree that men or women for that matter shouldn't be allowed in restrooms that are not designated for them.  I've mistakenly walked into women's restrooms a couple times and have also been in all gender restrooms.  Got a couple sideways looks in the women's room but women and men alike in the all gender with nobody looking over their shoulder seemed normal to me.

Okay....that's all I got so we're done, right!

Well… the issue here is that your side plays these games to obfuscate…

So, to be clear, you agree that trans men, dudes who think they are women, should not be able to play in womens sports? Or be in womens only spaces? 

[User]

10 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Rarely as fast though and when it was mass extinction events usually followed close behind. It might have taken decades or even a couple of centuries so pffft...what me worry right?

At my age it won't be in my lifetime and I might actually get in a lot more golfing with warmer weather or climate or whatever. That difference seems blurrier too. Climate is probably just another cockamamie political term some interfering anti-capitalist do-gooding commie dreamed up.

Here you go @Michael Hardnerand @LinkSoul60 someone inferring an “extinction level event” now…

But of course, where do we get these ideas from that folks on your side are saying thing like this? 

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you believe it's a good GAMBLE to force on YOUR CHILDREN because YOU ARE CHEAP.

I dont gamble.

You dont think.

[eyeball]

On 3/9/2026 at 2:50 PM, Goddess said:

I also know that most models are most often, "worst case scenarios".  And that those worst-case scenarios rarely occur.

Yeah, your COVID trickle thread certainly bears that out. More people have DIEEEED in greater numbers in that one thread than all the other threads in this forum put together.