BeaverFever Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 Trump is earning his FIFA peace prize again. Everyone remembers all these attacks being part of Trump’s election campaign right? Whats hilarious is he bombed Iran the first time he claimed the had obliterated their nuclear program and MAGAs all screamed media conspiracy when the media reported it hadn’t done much damage at all. But now apparently the justification for more attacks is that nuclear program is still intact after all. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 28 Author Report Posted February 28 1 hour ago, BeaverFever said: Trump is earning his FIFA peace prize again. Everyone remembers all these attacks being part of Trump’s election campaign right? Whats hilarious is he bombed Iran the first time he claimed the had obliterated their nuclear program and MAGAs all screamed media conspiracy when the media reported it hadn’t done much damage at all. But now apparently the justification for more attacks is that nuclear program is still intact after all. That is not what was said. What was said is that they were attempting to restart the program. This is a regime that killed 10,000+ people for protesting and you are playing stupid word games to satisfy your TDS. Wtf is wrong with you? Grow Up. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
John Johnston Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 Guess Iran did not give Trump a peace prize. Shrug. Quote
paxamericana Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 Not sure how these limited strikes are going to work against the religious thugs. Well short of a sustained air campaign that glass the entire country. Quote
Politics1990 Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 so stupid a pointless war and i believe they hit a school full of girls by accident now Quote
Nationalist Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 As said, I do not agree with the US taking part in this. But at least I dont lie and make stupid comments. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Michael Hardner Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 Not much support for Trump on this thread? 🤔 Mostly, a few are pointing out some hypocrisy around fast reactions to Biden. But nobody is saying hooray for this. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Legato Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Not much support for Trump on this thread? 🤔 Mostly, a few are pointing out some hypocrisy around fast reactions to Biden. But nobody is saying hooray for this. No rush. Quote
Nationalist Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Not much support for Trump on this thread? 🤔 Mostly, a few are pointing out some hypocrisy around fast reactions to Biden. But nobody is saying hooray for this. My instincts are screaming at me that this is a bad idea. Those bloody Zionists are gonna get us all killed. And asses like Jack Keen. Edited February 28 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Nationalist Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 I wonder if the Iatola is dead? I wonder how Russia and China will react? I wonder what this is gonna do to the price of energy? This could all turn out big-bad for everyone. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 2 hours ago, paxamericana said: Not sure how these limited strikes are going to work against the religious thugs. Well short of a sustained air campaign that glass the entire country. So are you advocating MASS MURDER? AKA ethnic cleansing. No blame for Trump destroying the JCPOA. 🤮 Quote
robosmith Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 13 minutes ago, Nationalist said: My instincts are screaming at me that this is a bad idea. Those bloody Zionists are gonna get us all killed. But you can't bring yourself to actual criticism of Trump backing "bloody Zionists," right. This would not have happened without Netanyahu and Trump's unconditional SUPPORT. Quote
Nationalist Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 1 minute ago, robosmith said: But you can't bring yourself to actual criticism of Trump backing "bloody Zionists," right. This would not have happened without Netanyahu and Trump's unconditional SUPPORT. I thought that was implicit. I apologize though. I forgot how dull some people are. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
West Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 6 minutes ago, Nationalist said: I wonder if the Iatola is dead? I wonder how Russia and China will react? I wonder what this is gonna do to the price of energy? This could all turn out big-bad for everyone. Too bad liberals have imported so many Muslims here. Sleeper cells are a real thing 1 Quote
robosmith Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: I thought that was implicit. I apologize though. You didn't even mention Trump's role. Duh 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: I forgot how dull some people are. But you remember how to AVOID criticizing your hero and instead blame Jews. 1 1 Quote
ironstone Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 Some sources are saying the Ayatollah is dead but the regime says no of course. It's a very risky operation but it can't be denied that the Iranian regime has been the biggest cause of destabilization in the entire region for many years. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
paxamericana Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 36 minutes ago, robosmith said: So are you advocating MASS MURDER? AKA ethnic cleansing. That’s too expensive. The preferred method is regime change. Targeted decapitation and in conjunction with the Israeli, assassination. Quote
CDN1 Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 (edited) On 2/25/2026 at 4:22 PM, herbie said: Not dealing with Venezuela. Iran is capable of striking back even pulling off operations on US soil as a response if it wants to. No better way to shut down Muslim immigration into the West for good. Edited February 28 by CDN1 Quote
paxamericana Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 (edited) 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: But nobody is saying hooray for this. It’s like the dirty job you need to do to get to the real job. Which is China. Removing a Bejing friendly government in the Middle East sets the stage for weakening a potential Taiwan incursion. China cannot source oil outside an American approved petro dollar source. Edited February 28 by paxamericana Quote
Michael Hardner Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 2 minutes ago, paxamericana said: It’s like the dirty job you need to do to get to the real job. Which is China. Removing a Bejing friendly government in the Middle East sets the stage for weakening a potential Taiwan incursion I don't believe for a second that the US is going to take action against China. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
paxamericana Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 Just now, Michael Hardner said: I don't believe for a second that the US is going to take action against China. That’s where you’re wrong. Taiwan is part of the first island chain and serves to box in their aspiration into deep water. It’s necessary for US National Security interest in the pacific. Quote
Nationalist Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 52 minutes ago, ironstone said: Some sources are saying the Ayatollah is dead but the regime says no of course. It's a very risky operation but it can't be denied that the Iranian regime has been the biggest cause of destabilization in the entire region for many years. Its been one of them. 4 minutes ago, paxamericana said: It’s like the dirty job you need to do to get to the real job. Which is China. Removing a Bejing friendly government in the Middle East sets the stage for weakening a potential Taiwan incursion. Huh...not a good strategy right now. Or ever... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Legato Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I don't believe for a second that the US is going to take action against China. Probably not direct action, rather more a constant nibbleing at China's economic sources/resources. Quote
paxamericana Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 8 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Huh...not a good strategy right now. Or ever... I don’t it’s avoidable. Controlling oil flow to China is important to maintaining American pressure on Beijing. Quote
West Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 19 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I don't believe for a second that the US is going to take action against China. They just did. China wishes to build its pipelines through Pakistan into Iran where they can control the oil supply as part of the belt and road initiative Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.