Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I'm sorry all your spawn were aborted, but it was the humane thing to do.

My spawn are alive and well.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Heh, funny how those who disagree with you, become lefties. 🤡

Right wingers are intelligent and don't disagree with me :) 

Left wingers tend to have emotional problems and aren't big on logic. Thats' why you see them do things like delete all their posts in a thread after they lose an argument so that people don't see how dumb they were :) 

Or stalk people after they lose an argument because they're butt hurt :) ( exflyer, blackdog, moonbat .... STAAAAAAAAARRE) 

9 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

My spawn are alive and well.

Don't mind her. She thinks just because she eats her babies everyone does. 

Edited by CdnFox
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Right wingers don't disagree with me

Removed the BS from your post 🤡

Posted
1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

He said an individual has a right to decide on their own healthcare according to the state's interpretation of 'liberty'.

Do you not believe individuals should have the right to decide their own healthcare? Are you against liberty?

Why do you lefties keep trying to impose the state's interest on individuals? We don't need any more of your big brother government! 

The idea it is a human being after six weeks is insane.

I'm against baby murder

Posted
15 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/georgia-judge-overturns-states-six-week-heartbeat-abortion-law-calls-unconstitutional

Vile scumbag. These Marxists need to be eradicated from the bench quickly before they do more damage to the US. 

That judge is an abortion activist and needs to be removed from the bench. 

14 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

What are the legal flaws in the judge’s ruling?

 

The judge was appointed by a Republican governor.  

His perception is skewed by his abortion activism. It's time for the piece of shit to find a new career. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, I am Groot said:

Me too. But a 6-week-old fetus is not a baby any more than an acorn is a tree.

That may well be true, but that would be for a legislature to decide legally.  And if they can't, a judge sure can't. 

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Me too. But a 6-week-old fetus is not a baby any more than an acorn is a tree.

How can you be so insensitive to acorns? I hope none of the trees heard that shit pouring out of your hypocrite face. 

 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
On 10/1/2024 at 12:55 PM, robosmith said:

^False equivalency FTL!

1. Jews all over Europe were affected, as well as their friends, and potentially all over the world.

2. Slaves were affected as well as their FAMILIES. Not to mention everyone who had to compete with free labor.

OTOH, natural miscarriages happen ALL THE TIME, and only the woman and perhaps her friends and family are the least bit affected.

You see, your analogies are INVALID for another reason: there is no conflict of rights in the examples you cited.

OTOH, a US citizen woman's right to make a free choice about whether a parasite should inhabit her body is a right in conflict with the fetus in her womb.

I don't expect you to acknowledge your CLEAR ERRORS of LOGIC.

 

Imagine creating a human life out of your own willful actions and then calling it a "parasite".

You know how people were able to enslave blacks and kill Jews and still sleep at night?  They dehumanized them just like you're doing here.

Get your head checked.  The woman isn't the innocent victim here, the unborn baby is.  Unless you're talking rape or the mother's life/health is in danger.  Maybe people should take some responsibility for their actions?  What a novel idea!

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Imagine creating a human life out of your own willful actions and then calling it a "parasite".

You know how people were able to enslave blacks and kill Jews and still sleep at night?  They dehumanized them just like you're doing here.

Get your head checked.  The woman isn't the innocent victim here, the unborn baby is.  Unless you're talking rape or the mother's life/health is in danger.  Maybe people should take some responsibility for their actions?  What a novel idea!

IF the pregnancy is unwanted, it is a parasite. Esp at the zygote stage or anything before a fetus.

People make mistakes and accidents happen. You're naive if you believe that unwanted pregnancies are all just irresponsible behavior. In ANY case, it's really NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS cause you have NO SKIN in the scenario. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Imagine creating a human life out of your own willful actions and then calling it a "parasite".

You know how people were able to enslave blacks and kill Jews and still sleep at night?  They dehumanized them just like you're doing here.

Get your head checked.  The woman isn't the innocent victim here, the unborn baby is.  Unless you're talking rape or the mother's life/health is in danger.  Maybe people should take some responsibility for their actions?  What a novel idea!

Nobody is dehumanizing the fetus. The point is that this is a decision about what a woman does with HER body. It is not your decision to make.  
 

You know perfectly well that these abortion restrictions MURDER WOMEN.  They DIE because the laws prevent them from getting LIFE-SAVING HEALTHCARE when medical emergencies occur.  

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Get your head checked.  The woman isn't the innocent victim here, the unborn baby is.  Unless you're talking rape or the mother's life/health is in danger.  Maybe people should take some responsibility for their actions?  What a novel idea!

That's what abortions are.

Edited by Black Dog

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
21 hours ago, robosmith said:

IF the pregnancy is unwanted, it is a parasite. Esp at the zygote stage or anything before a fetus.

People make mistakes and accidents happen. You're naive if you believe that unwanted pregnancies are all just irresponsible behavior. In ANY case, it's really NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS cause you have NO SKIN in the scenario. 

"Oops I accidentally ejaculated inside your vagina".

That's like saying plantation slave-owners and Nazi holocaust camps aren't any of your business either, you have NO SKIN in the scenario.  Or Bob killed his wife Sally.  It's NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. 

12 hours ago, Black Dog said:

That's what abortions are.

No abortions are for erasing a f*ck-up.

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted
12 hours ago, Rebound said:

Nobody is dehumanizing the fetus. The point is that this is a decision about what a woman does with HER body. It is not your decision to make.  
 

You know perfectly well that these abortion restrictions MURDER WOMEN.  They DIE because the laws prevent them from getting LIFE-SAVING HEALTHCARE when medical emergencies occur.  

There's 2 bodies involved.

If a pregnancy is threatening a woman's life then yes its ok to terminate the pregnancy.  If a woman goes to some underground and unsafe abortion clinic and dies then that's on her or the clinic, she made that decision just like she and her man made the decision to engage in sexual activity with well-known risks.  That's what being an adult is about.

At the end of the day you believe that men should have the right to consensually ejaculate inside a woman's vagina and that this right supercedes a baby's right to live once it has been created through willful, consensual sexual activity.  I've never heard of anything so self-serving and narcissistic in my life.  I hope your pee-pee feels good.

If you don't want a child then either don't ejaculate inside a vagina or use multiple methods of birth control properly.  Only using a condom or only using the pill isn't good enough.  If you're not willing to do that then tough.  My sperm is ultra-potent and i've had sex with thousands of beautiful women and it hasn't failed me yet.

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted
13 hours ago, Rebound said:

Nobody is dehumanizing the fetus. The point is that this is a decision about what a woman does with HER body. It is not your decision to make.  
 

You know perfectly well that these abortion restrictions MURDER WOMEN.  They DIE because the laws prevent them from getting LIFE-SAVING HEALTHCARE when medical emergencies occur.  

Its not her body once it's a person. 

You can make an argument as to when you think a fetus becomes a person but continuing to claim that this is about the 'womans choice" is an absolute lie and one that's really getting old.  This is about the question of when does the egg become a human being - because at that point it's the CHILDS body and we don't kill children.  

So it's got zero to do with a woman's right to choose.  Nobody would say she's not got the right to get her tubes tied for example. But a baby's life is not hers to decide to kill.  So - the real question is when is it a baby, and you have to make your case for that. 

 

Posted
On 10/8/2024 at 9:59 PM, Moonlight Graham said:

No, abortions are for erasing a f*ck-up.

ftfy

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
On 9/30/2024 at 9:32 PM, TreeBeard said:

What are the legal flaws in the judge’s ruling?

The law was explicitly created by elected officials. That's how democracy is designed to work.

There is nothing unconstitutional about it.

You could probably make some good arguments why 6 weeks is too short, it's possible that there are severe problems that can't all be detected by 6 weeks, but 22 weeks is also too long. Babies are making decisions about how much amniotic fluid to drink, based on how it tastes, at 16 weeks.

It's hard to deny that a fetus is just a small human once it starts making decisions.  

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,847
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Justathought
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • farzaneh6157 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • farzaneh6157 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Reg Volk earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...