Rebound Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 4 minutes ago, West said: Uh no.. if anything the recording is exculpatory evidence between a man and his lawyer. Facts of the matter is you all spread a bullshit conspiracy theory about Russia somehow fabricating his laptop. Your Intel lied. Very sick It could have been exculpatory, if Trump asked Cohen if the scheme was legal, and if Cohen told him it was. But Trump did not ask if it was legal, because he knew it wasn’t. 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Rebound said: It could have been exculpatory, if Trump asked Cohen if the scheme was legal, and if Cohen told him it was. But Trump did not ask if it was legal, because he knew it wasn’t. It's implied by the guys profession, jackass. The man had a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of his client and not bring harm on him. Edited June 11 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 33 minutes ago, Rebound said: HEY DUM DUM, TRUMP WAS NOT CONVICTED OF VIOLATING FEDERAL LAW. HE WAS CONVICTED OF VIOLATING NEW YORK STATE LAW, INCLUDING NEW YORK STATE ELECTION LAW. THIS WAS NOT A FEDERAL CASE. YOUR FAKE NEWS WEBSITES HAVE BEEN LYING TO YOU AGAIN. Why would Trump's team bother bringing in the FEC chair to talk about how the federal election laws are applied if it wasn't federal election laws that they were dealing with stupid? Why not just bring in a Chevy mechanic? Or a really good taco chef? Do you know what FEC stands for? Just guess really quickly, don't Google it. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverFever Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 36 minutes ago, West said: Uh no.. if anything the recording is exculpatory evidence between a man and his lawyer. Uh, no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 1 minute ago, BeaverFever said: Uh, no. Uh ya. It was a private consult between a man and his lawyer. If I'm going to go in for a consult with a lawyer I'm expecting they aren't going to get me charged with a crime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 On 6/10/2024 at 6:41 AM, Nationalist said: What comes around...goes around. ^Says the stupid PARROT. LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 On 6/10/2024 at 8:09 AM, WestCanMan said: It's kinda hard to read the constitution now because the Dems, their DOJ, the FBI, and other DNC puppets like judges Merchan, Engoron & Chutkin, DA Bragg, etc have all wiped their arses with it. ^This has got to be the stupidest post I've ever read here. LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 1 hour ago, BeaverFever said: You said he would get a slap on the wrist, West and ironstone said he would get off, I don’t think the others opined. I don't see where Ironside said he was going to get off, it looks to me like Ironside thought he would get some species of slap on the wrist as well. Westcan man seem to feel it was going to be a slap on the wrist or the like. Even west didn't actually say he was certain that he would get off, just thought he would probably get off because things are that effed up. Methinks thou doth protest too much. Actually if you go back some time ago my theory was that he would be convicted And that Biden would use this to say that it's an end to the accusations that he was involved with hunter's wrongdoings in some way or form. And I'm sure that will be the case. When it's pointed out that hunter was funneling money to his Dad they will say that the fact hunter Was convicted shows that biden is innocent because reasons. My expectation is he will get house arrest till about a day after the next election Basically stuff his home full of hookers, blow, and frozen pizza and tell him to sit in his room and think about what he's done until daddy is done work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 On 6/10/2024 at 8:19 AM, ironstone said: The DOJ is apparently using a laptop as part of their case against Hunter. I guess this would be the same laptop that they and the media had described as Russian disinformation. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/it-only-took-4-years-doj-finally-acknowledges-hunter-laptop-is-legitimate-for-first-time/ar-AA1ncGMI Has anyone from the left come clean and admitted that we were right about this story all along?😜 Hunter is the favorite son of Delaware's favorite son so what is this jury most likely to do? They said it "had all the markings of Russian disinformation." WTH is https://www.stateofunion.org/ and how do you find such OBSCURE websites? LMAO The dubious origin of Hunter's laptop has been discussed here MANY TIMES. LMAO Thanks for revealing YOUR IGNORANCE about it by repeating debunked LIES. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 15 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I don't see where Ironside said he was going to get off, it looks to me like Ironside thought he would get some species of slap on the wrist as well. Westcan man seem to feel it was going to be a slap on the wrist or the like. Even west didn't actually say he was certain that he would get off, just thought he would probably get off because things are that effed up. Methinks thou doth protest too much. Actually if you go back some time ago my theory was that he would be convicted And that Biden would use this to say that it's an end to the accusations that he was involved with hunter's wrongdoings in some way or form. And I'm sure that will be the case. When it's pointed out that hunter was funneling money to his Dad they will say that the fact hunter Was convicted shows that biden is innocent because reasons. My expectation is he will get house arrest till about a day after the next election Basically stuff his home full of hookers, blow, and frozen pizza and tell him to sit in his room and think about what he's done until daddy is done work. If the Democrats had any integrity they'd be locking up Brennan and the multiple Intel professionals who signed the nonsense about Russia for obstruction of justice 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 46 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Why would Trump's team bother bringing in the FEC chair to talk about how the federal election laws are applied if it wasn't federal election laws that they were dealing with stupid? Why not just bring in a Chevy mechanic? Or a really good taco chef? Do you know what FEC stands for? Just guess really quickly, don't Google it. Because they just wanted to CONFUSE the jury into having the same ridiculous understanding of the issue that you have. LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 2 minutes ago, West said: If the Democrats had any integrity they'd be locking up Brennan and the multiple Intel professionals who signed the nonsense about Russia for obstruction of justice Thanks for ^revealing your COMPLETE IGNORANCE about US laws. You don't even know what that statement said: Quote We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement -- just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case. If we are right, this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this elec8on, and we believe strongly that Americans need to be aware of this. There are a number of factors that make us suspicious of Russian involvement. Such an opera<on would be consistent with Russian objec<ves, as outlined publicly and recently by the Intelligence Community, to create poli<cal chaos in the United States and to deepen poli<cal divisions here but also to undermine the candidacy of former Vice President Biden and thereby help the candidacy of President Trump. For the Russians at this point, with Trump down in the polls, there is incen<ve for Moscow to pull out the stops to do anything possible to help Trump win and/or to weaken Biden should he win. A “laptop op” fits the bill, as the publica<on of the emails are clearly designed to discredit Biden. Such an opera<on would be consistent with some of the key methods Russia has used in its now mul<-year opera<on to interfere in our democracy – the hacking (via cyber opera<ons) and the dumping of accurate informa<on or the distribu<on of inaccurate or misinforma<on. Russia did both of these during the 2016 presiden<al elec<on – judgments shared by the US Intelligence Community, the inves<ga<on into Russian ac<vi<es by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and the en<rety (all Republicans and Democrats) on the current Senate Intelligence CommiSee. Such an opera<on is also consistent with several data points. The Russians, according to media reports and cybersecurity experts, targeted Burisma late last year for cyber collec<on and gained access to its emails. And Ukrainian poli<cian and businessman Adriy Derkach, iden<fied and sanc<oned by the US Treasury Department for being a 10-year Russian agent interfering in the 2020 elec<on, passed purported materials on Burisma and Hunter Biden to Giuliani. Our view that the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden email issue is consistent with two other significant data points as well. According to the Washington Post, ci<ng four sources, “U.S. intelligence agencies warned the White House last year that Giuliani was the target of an influence opera<on by Russian intelligence.” In addi<on, media reports say that the FBI has now opened an inves<ga<on into Russian involvement in this case. According to USA Today, “…federal authori<es are inves<ga<ng whether the material supplied to the New York Post by Rudy Giuliani…is part of a smoke bomb of disinforma<on pushed by Russia.” We do not know whether these press reports are accurate, but they do suggest concern within Execu8ve Branch departments and agencies that mirrors ours. It is high 8me that Russia stops interfering in our democracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Thanks for ^revealing your COMPLETE IGNORANCE about US laws. You don't even know what that statement said: There's a bit more to it than that. They killed the story on social media you seem to forget... banning the New York Post account for a factual story on Twitter and then proceed to portray America's Mayor in false light. All to kill a legitimate story and to engage in election interference. And now we find to obstruct a federal investigation into the crimes of Biden’s son. Spin how you want... it's disgraceful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 1 minute ago, West said: There's a bit more to it than that. They killed the story on social media you seem to forget... banning the New York Post account for a factual story on Twitter and then proceed to portray America's Mayor in false light. All to kill a legitimate story and to engage in election interference. And now we find to obstruct a federal investigation into the crimes of Biden’s son. Spin how you want... it's disgraceful Like I said, you don't even know what the statement said. Now you know, but LIED about it anyway. Quote We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: Thanks for ^revealing your COMPLETE IGNORANCE about US laws. You don't even know what that statement said: The statement said exactly what he said it did. It was a bunch of lies and innuendo from DNC operatives to influence an election. The former intelligence officials, aka "Fascism for America" operatives, accused Russia of putting this out as disinformation but they're the ones who issued 100% disinformation. Russia didn't do sh1t. Again. This is the second time that all those fascists in the FBI, DoJ and DNC ran an election interference campaign and blamed it on Russia. The FBI had that laptop for 11 months before those guys all pretended to be "in the know", and then lied to everyone. the FBI told news outlets and social media outlets in advance that they suspected "Russian disinformation " about a laptop was going to be coming out, then these "former 'intelligence' officials" said "This has all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign." then those clowns said "media reports say that the FBI has now opened an investigation into Russian involvement in this case" and the MSM ran with it. If these guys have inside information, why do they have to cite "media reports" to know what the FBI is doing? The MSM ran the Fascism for America's disinformation and BS at full volume and you and your fellow cultists gobbled it allll up. As usual. robo "But they said Russians! And Russian disinformation. C'mon, man, it's the cult's favourite buzzword! Of course we were going to believe it. You'd believe it too if your IQ was below 60." Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 14 minutes ago, robosmith said: Like I said, you don't even know what the statement said. Now you know, but LIED about it anyway. I never lied about shit. The fact is these people knew what they were doing a inserted falsehoods into a presidential election cycle and interfered in a criminal probe into Hunter Biden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: The statement said exactly what he said it did. You're LYING. You can't even quote the part of the statement that says what you claim in spite of being GIVEN THE LINK. LMAO 12 minutes ago, West said: I never lied about shit. The fact is these people knew what they were doing a inserted falsehoods into a presidential election cycle and interfered in a criminal probe into Hunter Biden You CLAIMED they should be prosecuted for obstruction, and quoted NOTHING from the statement to back that up. YOU LIED! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 (edited) 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: You're LYING. You can't even quote the part of the statement that says what you claim in spite of being GIVEN THE LINK. LMAO You CLAIMED they should be prosecuted for obstruction, and quoted NOTHING from the statement to back that up. YOU LIED! They should be prosecuted for obstruction because they knew the laptop was real and then defamed America's mayor, giving the illusion that he committed a crime by working with Russia, and interfered in a criminal investigation in the process. They acted as experts to muddy the waters. It's much different than you or I getting the facts wrong as I don't claim to be an expert. Why you support breaking the law here is beyond me. Edited June 11 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 23 minutes ago, West said: They should be prosecuted for obstruction because they knew the laptop was real and then defamed America's mayor, giving the illusion that he committed a crime by working with Russia, and interfered in a criminal investigation in the process. They acted as experts to muddy the waters. It's much different than you or I getting the facts wrong as I don't claim to be an expert. Why you support breaking the law here is beyond me. They said they DIDN'T know WHETHER the emails were legitimate OR NOT. Duh. I'm beginning to believe you only see what you want instead of actual words written. LMAO But keep digging your hole; it's quite amusing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 (edited) 1 minute ago, robosmith said: They said they DIDN'T know WHETHER the emails were legitimate OR NOT. Duh. I'm beginning to believe you only see what you want instead of actual words written. LMAO But keep digging your hole; it's quite amusing. 😆.. yes former Intel officers should just blindly throw out a conspiracy theory to kill a story that would've probably impacted the election while the guy was under criminal investigation Edited June 11 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 4 minutes ago, West said: 😆.. yes former Intel officers should just blindly throw out a conspiracy theory to kill a story that would've probably impacted the election while the guy was under criminal investigation They gave REASONS derived from EXPERIENCE. YOU have BUPKIS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: They gave REASONS derived from EXPERIENCE. YOU have BUPKIS. LOL, they were wrong. They based their claims on partisan speculation to aid Biden in the election. Even now, James Clapper refuses to apologize for being wrong. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: They gave REASONS derived from EXPERIENCE. YOU have BUPKIS. You know you folks could really lead the way in bringing the country together if you'd stop reading your nonsensical conspiracy theories into the public record. Get back to debating tax reform and stop the abuse of American institutions 2 minutes ago, User said: LOL, they were wrong. They based their claims on partisan speculation to aid Biden in the election. Even now, James Clapper refuses to apologize for being wrong. Aid Biden in an election and interfer in a criminal investigation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Share Posted June 11 8 minutes ago, User said: LOL, they were wrong. They based their claims on partisan speculation to aid Biden in the election. Even now, James Clapper refuses to apologize for being wrong. It's REALLY IMPOSSIBLE to be "wrong" when they say they don't have the FACTS, just REASONS and EXPERIENCE. The FACT is, whether Russians tampered with the laptop with enough skill to HIDE it, is STILL UNKNOWN, no matter how CERTAIN you believe YOU are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 11 Author Report Share Posted June 11 Just now, robosmith said: It's REALLY IMPOSSIBLE to be "wrong" when they say they don't have the FACTS, just REASONS and EXPERIENCE. The FACT is, whether Russians tampered with the laptop with enough skill to HIDE it, is STILL UNKNOWN, no matter how CERTAIN you believe YOU are. They should've kept their conspiracy mumbo jumbo to themselves instead of abusing their titles and positions of authority to create a false narrative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.