Trudeau's immigration minister Marc Miller announces that he is quintupling the number of refugees Canada is taking from Gaza from 1,000 to 5,000.

[NAME REMOVED]

39 minutes ago, herbie said:

and you shall be the Judge, right?

So you only hate Palestinians and that doesn't make you racist. Only people that hate more than one group are racists.

Listen to them oink, squeal and deny.... in their starched white shirts

All your posts imply that you hate Eastern Europeans. 

Let's just be blunt. You are woke, and hate all White people, but that seems to be the flavour of the day.

Holy projectionist, Batman!

[NAME REMOVED]

3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

 

Have you ever met a single Palestinian person, boozehound?

I've probably met more that you have. Then again, if I was living in my parents Lethbridge basement at 42, I probably would not be in touch with reality. . 

Edited June 4, 2024 by DUI_Offender

[Black Dog]

50 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

I've probably met more that you have. Then again, if I was living in my parents Lethbridge basement at 42, I probably would not be in touch with reality. . 

Didn't you literally just have to move home because of your very public mental breakdown and/or alcoholism?

Edited June 4, 2024 by Black Dog

[NAME REMOVED]

9 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Didn't you literally just have to move home because of your very public mental breakdown and/or alcoholism?

 

Come to think of it, I'm not going to waste energy with you. Blackie, you are miserable with life, have severe anger management problems, and I hope you get the help you need.

I am placing you on my ignore list., until you can demonstrate that you can post constructively. 

 

Edited June 5, 2024 by DUI_Offender

[CITIZEN_2015]

On 6/2/2024 at 5:19 PM, taxme said:

I thought that there was an housing crisis in Canada? If so, why do the stupid leftist imbecile liberals keep bringing in millions of so many unwanted and unneeded non-white refugees who have nothing in common with the white culture of Canada? Is there a conspiracy to make white people become a minority in their own white homeland? I am beginning to believe this is so. Just saying. 

There is indeed a housing crisis in Canada but there was also a labor shortage during pandemic and a future pension crisis looming too as someone must support the aging population. Though I agree that immigration levels should be cut to a third due to housing crisis and my preference is European and South American immigrants due to adoptability issues , however, I don't think legally they can do this. This will be against international laws. I think they take immigrants as percent of the country to world population and we know India and China almost have a third of world population and middle east a quarter and Europe less than a quarter unfortunately. Like yourself I too worry about Canadian values be swallowed by large number of non-European immigrants without consideration for adoptability and potential for integration.

[Venandi]

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

And so we forced our choice on them, we even helped engineer the process of apartheid that was employed against them.

I don't know what you mean....

Are you now suggesting that Egypt's hesitation is a choice we (whoever that is) forced on them? That if they had the option they would want Hamas operating in the Sinai? 

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

We made the ME regions choice for it. They got the Jews we didn't want.

What do you think we'd call it or do if the UN had forced us to accept Europe's Jewish refugees?

Well, I see only two choices for ya here, hop in your time machine and fix it or deal with the realities of today as they exist in the present. 

Never mind history lessons, pretend you're  the king of Egypt.... are you at all concerned that a mass influx of Palestinians will lead to attacks originating from the Sinai?

I happen to think that Hamas would love to set up shop in the Sinai and drawing your kingdom into the fray would be a bonus to them.

What key factors am I missing here, those would be the ones that suggest my concerns are groundless and brand me a racist for even thinking it.

 

 

 

Edited June 5, 2024 by Venandi

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Venandi said:

Well, I see only two choices for ya here, hop in your time machine and fix it or deal with the realities of today as they exist in the present. 

He has been told this so many times. I've said almost those same words a dozen times. Oh there's a history? Cool story. So here's what we're dealing with today and here's the decisions and choices we get to make.

Either you make a decision that you're going to accept the world as it is and try and find a way to be prosperous and happy or you choose violence and misery in which case you're the problem.

[Black Dog]

16 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Come to think of it, I'm not going to waste energy with you. Blackie, you are miserable with life, have severe anger management problems, and I hope you get the help you need.

I am placing you on my ignore list., until you can demonstrate that you can post constructively. 

 

LOL don't start fights you can't win you psychotic pu$$y.

[taxme]

18 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

There is indeed a housing crisis in Canada but there was also a labor shortage during pandemic and a future pension crisis looming too as someone must support the aging population. Though I agree that immigration levels should be cut to a third due to housing crisis and my preference is European and South American immigrants due to adoptability issues , however, I don't think legally they can do this. This will be against international laws. I think they take immigrants as percent of the country to world population and we know India and China almost have a third of world population and middle east a quarter and Europe less than a quarter unfortunately. Like yourself I too worry about Canadian values be swallowed by large number of non-European immigrants without consideration for adoptability and potential for integration.

I do not know or understand as to why Canada has to sign on to UN agreements that involves refugees. Why is is that Canadians are not asked as to whether they want to be a part of any refugee UN agreements? We need and should only bring in new immigrants when needed. Bringing in close to half a million refugees and new immigrants every year is not required nor acceptable. The house is full. Close the door. No more trying to flood Canada with millions of unwanted people is bloody ridiculous. We the Canadian people need a moratorium on immigration for at least 7 years. My opinion. 

[eyeball]

16 hours ago, Venandi said:

I don't know what you mean....

I don't believe you. You're just not that stupid.

 

17 hours ago, Venandi said:

Never mind history lessons, pretend you're  the king of Egypt.... are you at all concerned that a mass influx of Palestinians will lead to attacks originating from the Sinai?

Like any other politician on the planet I'd be concerned about any massive influx of refugees whether they were forced or voluntary.  Wouldn't you?

Put yourself in the same shoes just like Canada did 75 years or so ago.  Was our concern justified?

[taxme]

3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

 

LOL don't start fights you can't win you psychotic pu$$y.

You have not won with me yet, princess. I keep getting a gotcha moment every time i have to debate with you. Talk about a psychotic ****? You sure do come to mind alright. LOL.

[Black Dog]

45 minutes ago, taxme said:

You have not won with me yet, princess. I keep getting a gotcha moment every time i have to debate with you. Talk about a psychotic ****? You sure do come to mind alright. LOL.

I wasn't even talking to you here you retarded mutt.

[NAME REMOVED]

On 6/4/2024 at 3:10 PM, DUI_Offender said:

I've probably met more that you have. Then again, if I was living in my parents Lethbridge basement at 42, I probably would not be in touch with reality. . 

Sorry 

 My bad. Black Dog is 54, not 42.

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Sorry 

 My bad. Black Dog is 54, not 42.

Black Dog is the song I'd want to play every time I walked into a room.

[NAME REMOVED]

36 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Black Dog is the song I'd want to play every time I walked into a room.

Led Zeppelin IV was a hell of an album...

[CITIZEN_2015]

2 hours ago, taxme said:

I do not know or understand as to why Canada has to sign on to UN agreements that involves refugees. Why is is that Canadians are not asked as to whether they want to be a part of any refugee UN agreements? We need and should only bring in new immigrants when needed. Bringing in close to half a million refugees and new immigrants every year is not required nor acceptable. The house is full. Close the door. No more trying to flood Canada with millions of unwanted people is bloody ridiculous. We the Canadian people need a moratorium on immigration for at least 7 years. My opinion. 

In a democracy an elected government decides on policies based on their platforms during the election. I think that Liberals did make it clear that they are pro-immigration especially those from middle east. They were elected with about one-third of the votes and they are carrying out their platform. I did vote for them even though I didn't agree with them on immigration and a few other policies but this is democracy.

Form a party and state your platform as ending immigration for 7 years and accepting white immigrants only and if you win then of course you can form the government and carry out those policies and you have the right to do so again because this is democracy based on majority will not an individual's wish.  Hell, I may even vote for you.

Edited June 5, 2024 by CITIZEN_2015

[Michael Hardner]

2 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

 

Form a party and state your platform as ending immigration for 7 years and accepting white immigrants only and if you win then of course you can form the government and carry out those policies and you have the right to do so. I may even vote for you.

There'd be a price to pay. You would have to go through a constitutional challenge for that proposal, and then when the supreme Court shot it down you'd have to use a notwithstanding clause. 

Then When you lose the next election, the incoming liberals or NDP would institute some kind of anti-constitutional idea like no whites allowed, no religion allowed, retroactive, 100 % taxation and they would use the notwithstanding cause.

[herbie]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

There'd be a price to pay. You would have to go through a constitutional challenge for that proposal, and then when the supreme Court shot it down you'd have to use a notwithstanding clause. 

That's what it was designed for. To let the feds do whatever is unconstitutional whenever they like.[/s] That's why the Tories are constantly threatening to use it, they hold the Constitution and Charter of Rights with the same contempt as Trump holds the US judicial system. While they make you look away shouting the leader of a minority govt is a dictator as loud as they can.

Edited June 6, 2024 by herbie
added [/s] cuz so many of you think that IS why it's there...

[CITIZEN_2015]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

There'd be a price to pay. You would have to go through a constitutional challenge for that proposal, and then when the supreme Court shot it down you'd have to use a notwithstanding clause. 

Then When you lose the next election, the incoming liberals or NDP would institute some kind of anti-constitutional idea like no whites allowed, no religion allowed, retroactive, 100 % taxation and they would use the notwithstanding cause.

I am not sure it would be so complicated. In UK there are white supremist political parties like the National Front or British National parties. They freely participated in elections. I think even in Canada in spite of the fact that Canadians are much more tolerant than Europeans, I think we had or still have a Heritage Front party which wants a white-only Canada (if I am not mistaken because I haven't wasted my time to read their platform).

[Michael Hardner]

39 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

I am not sure it would be so complicated. In UK there are white supremist political parties like the National Front or British National parties. They freely participated in elections. I think even in Canada in spite of the fact that Canadians are much more tolerant than Europeans, I think we had or still have a Heritage Front party which wants a white-only Canada (if I am not mistaken because I haven't wasted my time to read their platform).

You couldn't pass a racist law and survive a constitutional challenge, is the point.  

[I am Groot]

On 6/4/2024 at 8:04 PM, CITIZEN_2015 said:

There is indeed a housing crisis in Canada but there was also a labor shortage during pandemic and a future pension crisis looming too as someone must support the aging population.

Bear in mind our progressive taxation system allows over 45% of the population do not pay income tax. In order to 'support' anyone, you have to be sufficiently skilled that you earn a high enough salary to pay income tax. None of these people do or will. The earnings of refugees are usually well below that of immigrants. The earnings of family-class immigrants, who are the majority, are also below that of Canadians.

All these Tim Horton workers we're bringing in are going to be sapping resources from health care and other governmental systems but they will not be contributing to their own support, much less that of others.

 

On 6/4/2024 at 8:04 PM, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Though I agree that immigration levels should be cut to a third due to housing crisis and my preference is European and South American immigrants due to adoptability issues , however, I don't think legally they can do this. This will be against international laws

There are NO international laws governing immigration. If there were, countries like Japan wouldn't be able to get away with allowing in almost no immigrants or refugees. Likewise, rich gulf countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar take no immigrants and virtually no refugees. Pakistan is in the process of forcing out the two million Afghanis who took shelter there after the Taliban took over, forcing them back across the border into Afghanistan. And nobody cares.

 

[I am Groot]

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

did 75 years or so ago.  Was our concern justified?

This is a complete non sequitor and has zero to do with the present situation. This is not the country it was 75 years ago and the circumstances and fears are entirely different. And just because the Jews back then were harmless does not even begin to suggest the Muslims today are similarly harmless.

Especially if you're a woman or a Jew or gay.

[I am Groot]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

That's what it was designed for. To let the feds do whatever is unconstitutional whenever they like.

No, to allow democratically elected governments to pass laws even if an ideologically bound and unelected bureaucrat in a robe pretends it's unconstitutional.

1 hour ago, herbie said:

[/s] That's why the Tories are constantly threatening to use it, they hold the Constitution and Charter of Rights with the same contempt as Trump holds the US judicial system.

Constitutions don't protect rights when the judges are corrupt. And our judiciary has been corrupted. They no longer care about what is good for the citizenry or the country. They are in ideological bubbles and communicate only with their fellow travelers in the same elite bubbles. Ordinary people are to be ignored and looked down on, for they don't know what's good for them. Only the elites can make those decisions.

 

 

42 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

You couldn't pass a racist law and survive a constitutional challenge, is the point.  

You don't need any racist laws. You just need to slow immigration and put in place criteria that restrict it to those who are highly skilled and can get a job offer. Then you screen them the way we should have been screening people for decades to remove those whose ideological and social views and values would be damaging to Canadian society.

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

This is a complete non sequitor and has zero to do with the present situation. This is not the country it was 75 years ago and the circumstances and fears are entirely different. And just because the Jews back then were harmless does not even begin to suggest the Muslims today are similarly harmless.

Especially if you're a woman or a Jew or gay.

Jewish refugees weren't harmless back then. People died especially Palestinians.

Maybe our country's concerns and fears were justified after all.

[CITIZEN_2015]

26 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

 

 

There are NO international laws governing immigration. If there were, countries like Japan wouldn't be able to get away with allowing in almost no immigrants or refugees. Likewise, rich gulf countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar take no immigrants and virtually no refugees. Pakistan is in the process of forcing out the two million Afghanis who took shelter there after the Taliban took over, forcing them back across the border into Afghanistan. And nobody cares.

 

By international law prohibiting Canada I meant if Canada is going to adopt white only immigration not banning refugees. If Canada wants to stop immigration altogether that is not against international laws but if Canada adopts white only immigration it will be.

What Canada needs to do and is legal too is to be selective both financially and culturally as who gets in and deport the bad apples even after citizenship (no time limit on foreign born citizens).