CdnFox Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: In REALITY, ^this OPINION is not FACT without specifying the exact details of the sampling (to within half the significance of your stated (0.1%) tolerance). Show us your sampling method and the printout of your analysis equipment. Now you might pretend that "Nitrogen is between 75% and 80%" of the atmosphere is a FACT..... That will help you getting around the FACT that the concentration of Nitrogen in the atmosphere is NOT THE SAME everywhere. under all different atmospheric parameters. It is fact robo. That's his point. It's not an opinion. The FACT you can't SEE what YOU want FOR corroboration DOESN"T mean ITS not FACT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 6 hours ago, robosmith said: In REALITY, ^this OPINION is not FACT without specifying the exact details of the sampling (to within half the significance of your stated (0.1%) tolerance). Show us your sampling method and the printout of your analysis equipment. Now you might pretend that "Nitrogen is between 75% and 80%" of the atmosphere is a FACT..... That will help you getting around the FACT that the concentration of Nitrogen in the atmosphere is NOT THE SAME everywhere. under all different atmospheric parameters. Yeah...no one was talking about small areas. The atmosphere is the whole thing. Not some little subsect. But I see who you are now. You are someone that doesn't have a grip on reality and will do or say anything to hold onto this liberal fantasy world you "live" in. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 17 hours ago, robosmith said: You forgot to post ANY EVIDENCE for ^this OPINION. Posts share old Stormy Daniels statement as new info BUSTED! https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/stormy-daniels-denies-affair-donald-trump-never-happened-010513645.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGc29HPOCXQzGT8XTO9WKCHbEzNuW4IbzNeZ2f1x_Erh3a6UQFR7gtUT54BMU76cn5UjPrt4edAB4YmDlOR2RX65uF8V-WJAn6TDlOUYmKxDbOX4op5bLVj-dYBJsV4Fa1W3TocizC_a10ceyKNlJcqZUeHjIrQlmgJSWZh05sIf&_guc_consent_skip=1713461919 https://news.yahoo.com/stormy-daniels-denies-affair-trump-060743639.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGc29HPOCXQzGT8XTO9WKCHbEzNuW4IbzNeZ2f1x_Erh3a6UQFR7gtUT54BMU76cn5UjPrt4edAB4YmDlOR2RX65uF8V-WJAn6TDlOUYmKxDbOX4op5bLVj-dYBJsV4Fa1W3TocizC_a10ceyKNlJcqZUeHjIrQlmgJSWZh05sIf&_guc_consent_skip=1713462038 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 9 minutes ago, ironstone said: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/stormy-daniels-denies-affair-donald-trump-never-happened-010513645.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGc29HPOCXQzGT8XTO9WKCHbEzNuW4IbzNeZ2f1x_Erh3a6UQFR7gtUT54BMU76cn5UjPrt4edAB4YmDlOR2RX65uF8V-WJAn6TDlOUYmKxDbOX4op5bLVj-dYBJsV4Fa1W3TocizC_a10ceyKNlJcqZUeHjIrQlmgJSWZh05sIf&_guc_consent_skip=1713461919 https://news.yahoo.com/stormy-daniels-denies-affair-trump-060743639.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGc29HPOCXQzGT8XTO9WKCHbEzNuW4IbzNeZ2f1x_Erh3a6UQFR7gtUT54BMU76cn5UjPrt4edAB4YmDlOR2RX65uF8V-WJAn6TDlOUYmKxDbOX4op5bLVj-dYBJsV4Fa1W3TocizC_a10ceyKNlJcqZUeHjIrQlmgJSWZh05sIf&_guc_consent_skip=1713462038 AFTER ^these articles, came the explanation I posted. To review: she retracted her denial of the affair when she found out the NDA she thought she violated was UNENFORCEABLE. BUSTED on YOUR DOUBLING DOWN. LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, robosmith said: AFTER ^these articles, came the explanation I posted. To review: she retracted her denial of the affair when she found out the NDA she thought she violated was UNENFORCEABLE. BUSTED on YOUR DOUBLING DOWN. LMAO Dershowitz is right as usual. A lifelong Democrat too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbie Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 15 hours ago, CdnFox said: Only double? Did your credit card rate change or something? maybe the chip is wearing out, any decent credit card should triple the value of a home regularly so i'm told It might have. Only made a few hundred in credit card rebates. Like I said, ya shood lurn how stuff works, any stuff at all. 22 hours ago, CdnFox said: 23 hours ago, herbie said: Did Clinton write it off as a tax deduction or business expense? Yes. But that's not illegal. Start with GR 11 Law. Oh wait, the Rapist has the Divine Right of Kings, he's above the law unlike us peons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, ironstone said: Dershowitz is right as usual. A lifelong Democrat too. Douchowitz LIED TWICE in the first minute of your video. That's where I stopped watching. Douchowitz is a hired gun, will defend ANYONE with the bucks to pay, even OJ. And will lie his ass off when not in court. IOW, his unsworn "testimony" is worthless when it comes to the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, herbie said: It might have. Only made a few hundred in credit card rebates. Like I said, ya shood lurn how stuff works, any stuff at all. What, lying about it you mean? I'm ok with remaining unskilled in that respect my life is good enough that i don't have to make crap up like that Quote Start with GR 11 Law. I'm a little past grade 11 at this point If you ever make it there you're welcome to take it tho. Quote Oh wait, the Rapist has the Divine Right of Kings, he's above the law unlike us peons. You realize that Clinton is the rapist right? That's what he was covering up. In any case paying hush money isn't illegal as i said. IN fact it's an every day occurrence in the states, it's often part of court settlements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffypants Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Douchowitz LIED TWICE in the first minute of your video. That's where I stopped watching. Douchowitz is a hired gun, will defend ANYONE with the bucks to pay, even OJ. And will lie his ass off when not in court. IOW, his unsworn "testimony" is worthless when it comes to the truth. What were the lies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 On 4/17/2024 at 5:27 PM, CdnFox said: Does our commie loving resident hypocrite think he can convince anyone by deflecting ? dossier Someone should tell Herbie that his hero Carl Marx was pro-gun and a racist. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 18 hours ago, robosmith said: In REALITY, ^this OPINION is not FACT without specifying the exact details of the sampling (to within half the significance of your stated (0.1%) tolerance). Show us your sampling method and the printout of your analysis equipment. Now you might pretend that "Nitrogen is between 75% and 80%" of the atmosphere is a FACT..... That will help you getting around the FACT that the concentration of Nitrogen in the atmosphere is NOT THE SAME everywhere. under all different atmospheric parameters. Methinks you could use the help of a factotum. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 7 minutes ago, Legato said: Someone should tell Herbie that his hero Carl Marx was pro-gun and a racist. But his brother Karl was not. 5 minutes ago, Legato said: Methinks you could use the help of a factotum. I KNOW you're a TROLL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 18 Report Share Posted April 18 25 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: What were the lies? His first lie: "The ONLY purpose of this trial is to prevent Trump from campaigning." BTW, Wednesday there was no court and Trump didn't campaign at all. His second lie: "There's no crime." The FACT is, as Bragg has stated, false business records are illegal and prosecuted ROUTINELY. More lies to follow.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffypants Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 (edited) 1 hour ago, robosmith said: His first lie: "The ONLY purpose of this trial is to prevent Trump from campaigning." BTW, Wednesday there was no court and Trump didn't campaign at all. His second lie: "There's no crime." The FACT is, as Bragg has stated, false business records are illegal and prosecuted ROUTINELY. More lies to follow.... Are you kidding me I would say there is a 50/50 shot when all is said and done it will be a hung jury and if convicted a 100% chance it gets overturned. When Trump gets into office his DOJ will go after Fani, Merchan, Erdogan, Jack Smith and Bragg for malicious prosecution and election interference. Falsifying Buisness Documents is a misdemeanor that is past the statute of limitations, he shouldn't even be on trial. Bragg is trying to claim it is a felony due to aggravating circumstances of which no one was even indicted on let alone convicted of. If this was truly about justice Merchan would recuse himself and they would allow a change of venue from a politically hostile district. Edited April 19 by Fluffypants 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 2 hours ago, robosmith said: His second lie: "There's no crime." The FACT is, as Bragg has stated, false business records are illegal and prosecuted ROUTINELY. More lies to follow.... If this was indeed a campaign finance violation, why did the FEC not charge him? We all know that this is entirely politically motivated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 22 hours ago, CdnFox said: It is fact robo. That's his point. It's not an opinion. The FACT you can't SEE what YOU want FOR corroboration DOESN"T mean ITS not FACT. OMG! I think you just out-capped the queen of cap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 On 4/17/2024 at 12:20 PM, WestCanMan said: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/14/clinton-settles-sexual-harassment-suit-1998-983371 One guy had consensual sex with a porn star. The other was successfully sued for his inappropriate sexual conduct with an employee, and he has a court-documented history of being guilty of that. Which is worse? Trump isn't being charged with having sex with a porn star or paying her off. He is charged with falsifying business records. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 19 Author Report Share Posted April 19 Just now, Aristides said: Trump isn't being charged with having sex with a porn star or paying her off. He is charged with falsifying business records. Clinton was accused of an actual rape by Jaunita Broderick. It wasn't a silly story about a ho that went into a change-room with a guy to model lingerie for him, and then giggled whenever he touched her, and who was able to end the incident at the first sign of objection. It was an actual rape, where Clinton used violence on her to force her to have intercourse to it's gooey conclusion. It also wasn't a vague accusation about a random month/year that she couldn't even name. Her accusation named a specific room in a specific hotel on a specific day at a specific time, and Clinton was in that town on that day with a break in his itinerary. Broderick also had a witness to her physical injuries. Then Hillary called all of Bill's accusers names. Still, Bill wasn't rung up on any charges of rape, Hillary was never sued for her libel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 (edited) 4 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Are you kidding me I would say there is a 50/50 shot when all is said and done it will be a hung jury and if convicted a 100% chance it gets overturned. Based on what? Your amateur OPINION? LMAO 4 hours ago, Fluffypants said: When Trump gets into office his DOJ will go after Fani, Merchan, Erdogan, Jack Smith and Bragg for malicious prosecution and election interference. And IF that is ATTEMPTED it will GO NOWHERE, cause that's not how the US Justice system works. 4 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Falsifying Buisness Documents is a misdemeanor that is past the statute of limitations, he shouldn't even be on trial. Not when it was used to hide another crime, then IT IS a FELONY with a longer statute of limitations. You much believe FOS LIES when they're telling you the DA is CORRUPT. But they're LYING. 4 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Bragg is trying to claim it is a felony due to aggravating circumstances of which no one was even indicted on let alone convicted of. Says who? You? LMAO 4 hours ago, Fluffypants said: If this was truly about justice Merchan would recuse himself and they would allow a change of venue from a politically hostile district. According to who? Your amateur legal OPINION means NOTHING. And you've presented NO EXPERT. We KNOW that Douchowitz is LYING when he says there is "NO CRIME," cause we can read the NYS CODE. Duh. Edited April 19 by robosmith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 2 hours ago, ironstone said: If this was indeed a campaign finance violation, why did the FEC not charge him? We all know that this is entirely politically motivated. You're right. The FEC was corruptly destroyed by Trump right after he was elected. He refused to appoint enough members for the FEC to even have a QUORUM which was NECESSARY to INDICT. And that was politically motivated to save Trump's ass. 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: OMG! I think you just out-capped the queen of cap. I KNOW you have BUPKIS and are therefore BANKRUPT again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 44 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Clinton was accused of an actual rape by Jaunita Broderick. It wasn't a silly story about a ho that went into a change-room with a guy to model lingerie for him, and then giggled whenever he touched her, and who was able to end the incident at the first sign of objection. It was an actual rape, where Clinton used violence on her to force her to have intercourse to it's gooey conclusion. It also wasn't a vague accusation about a random month/year that she couldn't even name. Her accusation named a specific room in a specific hotel on a specific day at a specific time, and Clinton was in that town on that day with a break in his itinerary. Broderick also had a witness to her physical injuries. Then Hillary called all of Bill's accusers names. Still, Bill wasn't rung up on any charges of rape, Hillary was never sued for her libel. Except Broderick waited WAY TOO LONG to tell her story, which is why Bill was NEVER CHARGED let alone FACED TRIAL. Special law passed in NY, enabled the E Jean Carroll case. Too bad, so sad. LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 Marjorie Taylor Greene Attempts Trump Legal Defense, Fails Very Badly Quote There’s a solid argument that Alvin Bragg should not have charged Donald Trump for falsifying business records in connection with his hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels. There’s a shakier case that Trump is innocent of the crime. And then there’s the argument being made by hard-core Trump cultists like Marjorie Taylor Greene that Trump never had the affair at all: Yes, there is a signed statement by Stormy Daniels denying that she had an affair with Trump. Trump paid her to make the statement. The payments for that statement is what the case is about. Greene is citing evidence of the crime, which she imagines to be evidence the crime never occurred. It’s a bit like a defense lawyer asking a jury, “If my client is a murderer, how do you explain THIS?” - and then dramatically revealing the gun used in the murder. At the risk of trying to induce Greene to commit logic, one is tempted to ask: If she imagines the affair never happened, why did Trump pay Stormy Daniels? Does anyone believe that Trump foolishly WASTES his money? I can believe that his continual violation of gag orders and defamation losses proves he does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 On 4/17/2024 at 3:20 PM, WestCanMan said: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/14/clinton-settles-sexual-harassment-suit-1998-983371 One guy had consensual sex with a porn star. The other was successfully sued for his inappropriate sexual conduct with an employee, and he has a court-documented history of being guilty of that. Which is worse? Donald Trump committed fraud when he listed the payoff to Stormy Daniels as a tax-deductible legal expense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 17 minutes ago, Rebound said: Donald Trump committed fraud when he listed the payoff to Stormy Daniels as a tax-deductible legal expense. Also campaign finance violations since those payoffs were clearly campaign related and NOT REPORTED AS SUCH. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted April 19 Report Share Posted April 19 34 minutes ago, robosmith said: Also campaign finance violations since those payoffs were clearly campaign related and NOT REPORTED AS SUCH. But Obama wore a tan suit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.