Jump to content

TUCKER CARLSON OUT AT FOX NEWS


Recommended Posts

Quote

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court issued a rare order Tuesday to the FBI and Department of Justice, demanding they spell out a series of planned reforms following a damning report from the DOJ's inspector general that scrutinized surveillance of a former aide to President Donald Trump's campaign.

The FBI is being told to reform because of their corruption by the FISA court. 

Quote

"The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable."

 

A FISA court judge said that there was so much corruption that they no longer consider the FBI a reliable source of information

 

A random internet poster, who is placed on ignore by most of the users on this forum because of his constant barrage of lies, said there was "no corruption". Hmmmm, whom to believe...

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

well what constitutes a trend to you then? You've already blown the answer once so your credibility is running thin ;)

If we go from none to half,,, woudn't you say it's trending up?

Your hypotheticals are irrelevant. The number is still miniscule and NOT increasing as a percentage of the whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

If you can read all of that and say that none of it was "corruption", your opinion is more worthless than I thought.

Back to the ignore list, troll. 

I didn't say there was no corruption, I said the guy hired by Trump to find it, completely FAILED in his mission; Troll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The FBI is being told to reform because of their corruption by the FISA court. 

A FISA court judge said that there was so much corruption that they no longer consider the FBI a reliable source of information

 

A random internet poster, who is placed on ignore by most of the users on this forum because of his constant barrage of lies, said there was "no corruption". Hmmmm, whom to believe...

Your are the one who is LYING here. I didn't say there was "no corruption." Duh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2023 at 10:00 AM, BeaverFever said:

Sometimes there’s little difference. He made his millions off his lies, I’m sure he left with a golden parachute too.  Now he joins other disgraced Fox castoffs like sexual predators O’Reilly and Ailes.
 

Better question is:  who is the new cult leader? Given that each of them sees it as their mission to be more extreme than the last guy what’s next? Open calls for terrorist attacks?  Calls for US rogue “patriot” military members to defect to Russia?  Bomb the White House?

...deface city buildings and set automobiles on fire? Oh, wait, that's Antifa.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Nothing ^here explaining how Andy Ngo determined it was "antifa" which set fire to the courthouse.

 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Andy Ngo really gets around, but still NOTHING ^here about how the perps were identified as "antifa."

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Still NOTHING about "antifa" being involved except "suspicion."

Quote

More than two dozen suspected Antifa rioters have been charged in Portland in the past two weeks, signaling an escalation by both local and federal prosecutors following a full year of riots in the besieged Oregon city.

Next time you post NAKED LINKS, I won't be reading them. Quote YOUR EVIDENCE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well FOX news ratings have dropped since firing Carlsen. My one takeaway is that it is interesting how most know that the commentators like him do not fully believe what they say during their shows. Alex Jones as another example. If I knew that someone did not actually believe what they were saying.. I would be done watching/listening to them immediately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Well FOX news ratings have dropped since firing Carlsen. My one takeaway is that it is interesting how most know that the commentators like him do not fully believe what they say during their shows. Alex Jones as another example. If I knew that someone did not actually believe what they were saying.. I would be done watching/listening to them immediately. 

Van Jones said "Russian collusion is a big nothingburger" over a year before CNN stooped pretending that it was a rock-solid case and that Trump was an illegitimate president. Almost everyone there knew that they were lying for most of that 3-year period. They did it with very real emotion though. The hatred was real, even though they were the actual liars. 

The fact that Tucker voiced his disapproval of a narrative that he was supposed to push, and didn't push very hard or for very long, is actually a sign that he was worth listening to. 

Tucker and Bongino are the only two from Fox who didn't push for war against Russia as hard as everyone else in the media is pushing, and war against Russia is stupid. The actual case against Putin is non-existent. If the US wasn't pushing for NATO in Ukraine there's no evidence that there would be a war at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Van Jones said "Russian collusion is a big nothingburger" over a year before CNN stooped pretending that it was a rock-solid case and that Trump was an illegitimate president. Almost everyone there knew that they were lying for most of that 3-year period. They did it with very real emotion though. The hatred was real, even though they were the actual liars. 

The fact that Tucker voiced his disapproval of a narrative that he was supposed to push, and didn't push very hard or for very long, is actually a sign that he was worth listening to. 

Tucker and Bongino are the only two from Fox who didn't push for war against Russia as hard as everyone else in the media is pushing, and war against Russia is stupid. The actual case against Putin is non-existent. If the US wasn't pushing for NATO in Ukraine there's no evidence that there would be a war at all. 

^^^ Hence why if I care about an issue... I do my own research and make up my own mind. Needing to listen to Carlsen to form the opinion or more likely get affirmation.... is not my style. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nothing ^here explaining how Andy Ngo determined it was "antifa" which set fire to the courthouse.

Sure there is. Read it again.

34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

 

Andy Ngo really gets around, but still NOTHING ^here about how the perps were identified as "antifa."

But they were identified.  Thats PROOF - do you have PROOF otherwise? No? THEN your OPINION doesn't MATTER :)

34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Still NOTHING about "antifa" being involved except "suspicion."

Nope - they all identify antifa. Thats PROOF - do you have PROOF otherwise? No? THEN your OPINION doesn't MATTER :)

34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Next time you post NAKED LINKS, I won't be reading them.

You didn't read them this time apperently AND your OPINION doesn't MATTER, I gave PROOF. SO you LOSE sparky :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

^^^ Hence why if I care about an issue... I do my own research and make up my own mind. Needing to listen to Carlsen to form the opinion or more likely get affirmation.... is not my style. 

So why is there war in Ukraine?

Did the Russians really commit genocide against the Ukrainians? Why do the death tolls show the opposite of the narrative that all the leftards here are pimping?

Are the Azovs really just a bunch of swell guys who unknowingly tattooed a bunch of Nazi symbols on their own bodies and just joked about being Nazis? Are all their war crimes from the last decade false?

If Ukraine is always "winning, winning, winning", why are the battles taking place so far into Ukraine? Shouldn't the battles all be right along the border? 

Do you really think that Russia spent all that time and money building that pipeline, and expanding their economic influence, and their control over western Europe, just to blow it up themselves? Or did Biden get rid of it, like he said he would? If so, what does that make Biden? 

 

You're claiming to be this guy who's too smart to listen to Tucker or any other news source, so inform us, omniscient one... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Sure there is. Read it again.

But they were identified.  Thats PROOF - do you have PROOF otherwise? No? THEN your OPINION doesn't MATTER :)

Nope - they all identify antifa. Thats PROOF - do you have PROOF otherwise? No? THEN your OPINION doesn't MATTER :)

You didn't read them this time apperently AND your OPINION doesn't MATTER, I gave PROOF. SO you LOSE sparky :)

Nope, you've posted NO EVIDENCE that people were actually members of antifa.

Just one reporter who claimed they were with NO explanation HOW he determined that.

That's clearly the REASON you posted NO QUOTES from your LINKS. LMAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope, you've posted NO EVIDENCE that people were actually members of antifa.

Just one reporter who claimed they were with NO explanation HOW he determined that.

That's clearly the REASON you posted NO QUOTES from your LINKS. LMAO

Your OPINION doesn't MATTER without EVIDENCE! I posted EVIDENCE so IF you CAN"T Then YOUR opinion Doesn't MATTER . PROVIDE EVIDENCE!

 

What-can-be-asserted-without-evidence-ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/24/2023 at 1:22 PM, sharkman said:

Apparently AOC called for Tucker to be fired just yesterday.  How many are gullible enough to believe this is just a coincidence?

 

 

 

 

Do Democrats now openly embrace authoritarians?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2023 at 8:52 AM, Zeitgeist said:

You’re putting words in his mouth.

 

’Clearly you haven’t listened to him.  He’s very critical of the Republican Party.  It doesn’t matter, you won’t listen.  You just believe everything you watch on MSM.  No critical thinking.

I did not “put words in Tucker Carlson’s mouth.” I quoted him.  
 

His texts made at least two things clear: Carlson did not believe the 2020 election was stolen, while believing that Fox should fire reporters who state the election was not stolen. 

Edited by Rebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

I did not “put words in Tucker Carlson’s mouth.” I quoted him.  
 

His texts made at least two things clear: Carlson did not believe the 2020 election was stolen, while believing that Fox should fire reporters who state the election was not stolen. 

Nope.  Go back to commie re-education camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

So why is there war in Ukraine?

Did the Russians really commit genocide against the Ukrainians? Why do the death tolls show the opposite of the narrative that all the leftards here are pimping?

Are the Azovs really just a bunch of swell guys who unknowingly tattooed a bunch of Nazi symbols on their own bodies and just joked about being Nazis? Are all their war crimes from the last decade false?

If Ukraine is always "winning, winning, winning", why are the battles taking place so far into Ukraine? Shouldn't the battles all be right along the border? 

Do you really think that Russia spent all that time and money building that pipeline, and expanding their economic influence, and their control over western Europe, just to blow it up themselves? Or did Biden get rid of it, like he said he would? If so, what does that make Biden? 

 

You're claiming to be this guy who's too smart to listen to Tucker or any other news source, so inform us, omniscient one... 

It is clear that you want affirmation not information. Anyone with an IQ above 20 knows that anything that I say you will disregard and default to the usual, "liberal democrat, stupid, id__t". So lets end this here and move on. There has to be someone who can fill this void with you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

It is clear that you want affirmation not information. Anyone with an IQ above 20 knows that anything that I say you will disregard and default to the usual, "liberal democrat, stupid, id__t". So lets end this here and move on. There has to be someone who can fill this void with you. 

You're the one who said that you "do your own research" and that you don't rely on the news for your opinions.

I'm just interested in hearing your take, that's all. 

Sure, my guess is that it will sound exactly the same as what a CNN drone would say, but you could at least pretend that it's your own informed opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're the one who said that you "do your own research" and that you don't rely on the news for your opinions.

I'm just interested in hearing your take, that's all. 

Sure, my guess is that it will sound exactly the same as what a CNN drone would say, but you could at least pretend that it's your own informed opinion. 

I would start that one of my faults is that my "BS detection meter" never really turns off. When I see a story on MSNBC or FOXNEWS.. Immediately, I think, "This is mostly subjective opinions and filling in the blanks". 

My understanding of the war in Ukraine comes from someone in an another office that is from Belarus. In short, there was a region in the east of Ukraine called Donbas. Apparently, the population is more Russian than Ukrainian. There was civil unrest starting in 2014 as they were pro-Russian and such. The current Ukrainian leader took action against this. From there, Russia took action against them in an effort to help fellow Russians who live in this area (Donbas). Its my understanding that the war in Ukraine is mostly rooted in this conflict. 

Now, I showed you the courtesy of responding. Do me the same by not responding with a bunch of links. I will not read them. Unlike you, I do not spend hours upon hours watching cable news and searching the internet for news stories. I find that I can get all of the information that I need quickly and without the aid of commentators and their biased view. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Now, I showed you the courtesy of responding. Do me the same by not responding with a bunch of links. I will not read them. Unlike you, I do not spend hours upon hours watching cable news and searching the internet for news stories. I find that I can get all of the information that I need quickly and without the aid of commentators and their biased view. 

You're asking the wrong guy there my man, but kudos to you for even trying.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,741
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    timwilson
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • User earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • User earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Videospirit went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...