Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood


Recommended Posts

Let's talk Peter Daszak.

This is a story that should be keeping you up at night.  And definitely a name you should know and remember.

He is the founder of the increasingly ironically named - EcoHealth Alliance.

In 2014, US bans were put in place on so called “gain of function” research on viruses.  And not everyone was pleased with the new limits, especially not the NIH.  This GoF research seeks to deliberately modify viruses to make them more dangerous, either more deadly, more contagious, or both.  Contrary to what many believe, this is not the same as a weapons program. It is done for the purposes of immunology to try to “head off” future risks and find vaccines and treatments.  The NIH was working on dozens of GoF projects.

Anthony Fauci was a fierce supporter of GoF research.  He opposed the ban and immediately tried to circumvent it by moving NIH operations to Wuhan.   

Anthony Fauci Argued Gain-of-Function Research Outweighed Pandemic Risk in 2012 | National Review

Microsoft Word - 689_Lin (ispsw.com)

In January of 2018, the US embassy  in Beijing called home, warning of serious safety concerns at the Wuhan Institute.

Quote

“Additionally, the cable warned the researchers “showed that various SARS-like coronaviruses can interact with ACE2, the human receptor identified for SARS-coronavirus,” meaning bat coronaviruses can be transmitted to humans to cause SARS-like diseases.”

This was clearly disallowed, so how did the NIH manage to do this?

Enter........Peter Daszak.

daszak.JPG.7577d90da5c0144beac4bf79d2d5d574.JPG

His group, Eco Health Alliance, was used to funnel NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the now internationally infamous “bat woman", Shi Zhengli.  This is well known and well covered ground.

Fauci, Daszak, and a cast of dozens of others denied any possibility of lab leak, vilified those seeking investigation, planted fake stories in top journals, and generally acted very shady.

They then nominated themselves to “investigate the matter" and Peter was front and center.  That's right.  Fauci literally appointed the key perp (Daszak) to the panels investigating it.

Quote

“Also on the video was Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs.  Sachs is a former special advisor to the UN, the former head of the Millennium Villages Project, and was recently appointed Chair of the newly-formed EAT Lancet commission on the pandemic. In September, Sachs’ commission named Daszak to head up its coommiee on the pandemic's origins.  Daszak is also on the WHO's committee to investigate the pandemic's origin. He is also the only individual on both committees."

“See any crimes, Bonnie?”

“No, Clyde, not a one.”

Who is Peter Daszak, what is he interested in, what kind of science does he do, and what is this widely discredited, but incredibly connected gent up to now and who is helping him?

You can tell A LOT about a scientist by their grant applications. They tell you what they are up to, what they have been doing, what they would like to be doing, and generally paint a picture of state of mind, character, capability, and sometimes even..... ethics.

So let's look at this grant application to DARPA filed back in 2018 (right when the GoF ban was lifted). (I strongly recommend downloading this in case it’s taken down.)

PREEMPT Volume 1 no ESS HR00118S0017 EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE (documentcloud.org)

Peter is admitting to having been a naughty boy, to having flouted the GoF ban, and asking for $14 million dollars to do stuff that sounds like the origin story for a zombie pandemic movie.  And he names Duke University, UNC, and some other collaborators alongside the WIV.

Right from the start, we see that Peter is already in the Wuhan caves looking at high spillover SARS-Covs, wants to amplify them, insert them into bat viruses, but thinks this is “exempt from dual use and GoF concerns”.

Here’s where it REALLY gets scary. These guys want to create “novel chimeric polyvalent recombinant spike proteins” (like the one in covid 19) and actually go infect wild bats with them while also modulating their immune systems using a set of novel, aerosolized delivery mechanisms.

If this does not sound so wildly reckless and unpredictable that it resembles a horror movie, you may not have grasped what was going on here.

(See Section ll - Executive Summary of the above document.)

They want to take hotwired viruses with new, more dangerous spike proteins and infect caves full of wild bats with them or with vaccines based on them, to see what happens to shedding and see if they can render the bats a less potent reservoir of potential disease risk for human crossover before releasing them back  into the wild. If this sounds like that scene in Jurassic Park right before everything goes horrendously wrong, then I think you’re following along. These people are crazy. This is WAY past reckless.

What's really bizarre is the utter lack of safety concerns. They want to infect/inoculate wild bats and track them as they fly around foraging at night. This was not a proposed lab experiment. It was an experiment in the wild, using dangerous and novel viruses. It’s jaw dropping than anyone would put this down on paper. 

It’s also clear that this is NOT just a GoF program. It’s also a vaccine program. And that’s important. File that fact away for later.

d2.thumb.JPG.2939db1fe3cfcc52f7b03c39a7d2bd1d.JPG

And the work they are wanting to do looks EXACTLY like what came out of Wuhan.

d3.thumb.JPG.7e4094c371769f76983578176a3d650a.JPG

And this looks an AWFUL lot like the science that suddenly emerged from the NIH to provide the basis for the Moderna vaccine, just days after the SARS-cov2 viral genome was purportedly published, a feat that has always looked implausible without a huge head start. 

Bancel, the CEO and founder of Moderna, used to run Biomérieux, a company with strong ties to the the highest levels of the Chinese government AND to the very P4 lab where GoF research on coronaviruses was funded by the NIH, through Daszak.

d4.thumb.JPG.85cfc88cba08fd68d031a1c5450fe8ed.JPG

This is the same Prof. Baric about whom Fauci said: “Dr. Baric is not doing gain-of-function research, and if it is, it is according to the guidelines, and it is being conducted in North Carolina.”

Get that?  "We're not doing GoF research, but if we are, it's okay, so stop asking questions."

Also quite telling on p7 is the admission that “EHA (Ecohealth Alliance) has had unique access to these caves for ~10 years.” This is longstanding research clearly going on during the period when GoF was banned.

And were they playing in a dangerous sandbox. This is pretty much the blueprint of what emerged from Wuhan.

They are obviously fascinated with S proteins and inserting them into things (as well as what seems to be a deeply "iffy" loophole around doing so.)

d5.thumb.JPG.38a9bbea86b0dc186024323f2b0519e0.JPG

Ironically, it was the bats that were called "a clear and present danger."

d6.thumb.JPG.87428ee8633ee2ae6ab01df9566d79c9.JPG

There's lots more, and this grant application is like a battlefield of smoking guns. 

The key takeaway here is pretty straightforward:

Daszak was in Wuahn, working or planning to work with many of the folks that got embroiled in this controversy and clearly had been and was working on the exact viruses that become covid-19. His fascination was evident and his thought for safety and consequences near absent. Hotwiring a virus and spreading it (or some poorly tested inoculum based on it) to wild bats to “see what happens with viral shedding” is bat-poo insane. No wonder the DoD didn't want to fund this.

But Fauci did. 

And Peter......well, he’s getting new grants and new collaborations working with many of the same cast of characters from the last mess.

And here's another super-scary development:

d7.thumb.JPG.60b88b004cced2a7a2e809c404853ebc.JPG

Quote

“Columbia University will partner with EcoHealth Alliance in a new "Pandemic Response Institute."

So many folks at NIH look dirty here. They funded this work and then amazingly - had a vaccine candidate in what is alleged to be days. 

This warrants scrutiny. And guys like Daszak should be watched closely. They do not suddenly get sane. Or careful. 

Now, Daszak has vehemently denied that the Wuhan lab had a leak, but then, he certainly has a great deal of incentive to do so, as does Fauci.

Having funded the research that caused a global pandemic because it escaped...... is not a good look for anyone’s political or scientific career.

MAYBE they just happened to be doing this at covid-19 ground zero. Maybe it’s a coincidence. But maybe it’s not. It’s China, so actual hard evidence is likely to be elusive at best and nearly impossible to gather.

But I think it's a thread worth pulling.

d8.thumb.JPG.6d5d7a51248bb4a61b31546154a5699e.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2022 at 3:24 PM, Goddess said:

So, these new bivalent boosters.....

Moderna’s bivalent booster is said to “provide a strong immune response against the Omicron BA.1 variant as well as the original 2020 Wuhan strain,” which, for the record, is extinct and no longer in circulation anywhere in the world.  BA.1 is now rarely ever found, either. So, this booster contains two strains that aren’t even relevant anymore.  See graph below:

variants.thumb.JPG.bf2de484cbdb19cdb1325f978118aa96.JPG

Important to note:  These boosters will not undergo additional testing.  It is claimed that since the first jabs were sooooo "safe and effective" (?) these ones will be, too.

They’re being rolled out under a new fast-track standard where ingredients can be swapped out without additional testing.

This is the standard protocol for seasonal flu vaccines. However, we’re now using an entirely new type and essentially untested technology. There’s no telling whether variations in the spike mRNA being injected might produce vastly different side effects. They could potentially have differing toxicities, but that’s not being investigated.

Also, remember that the “efficacy” they’re referring to is only based on measurements of antibody titers, which tells us nothing, really, about its ability to prevent infection, severity of illness or death. Why?

Because antibodies form only a part of your immune response, and they’re not even the most important. It is far more likely that your innate immune system — your first line of defense — will destroy a virus before your adaptive immune system even has a chance to respond and create antibodies.

It is important to understand that no vaccine improves your innate immune response. All vaccines are ever able to do is address your own individual adaptive immune system and create antibodies. Your innate immune system has T cells that can directly kill viruses.

If you happen to have a vigorous T cell response, you’ll be protected even if your antibodies are low. So, antibodies are not a necessary measure of immunity.

Antibody titer levels are what’s called a “surrogate outcome.” It’s a substitute for actual clinical outcome. But it’s in no way equivalent, no matter how much the powers in control want it to be.

Antibody titers may be high, but in the real world, more people may end up in the hospital and die — either from the infection or from the shot. In short, high antibody titer is not a guarantee of effectiveness — and it tells us absolutely nothing about safety.

Coronaviruses mutate very rapidly in general, and the mRNA jabs are based on a surface protein (spike), which is the most rapidly mutating portion of the entire virus. What happens when you vaccinate against a rapidly mutating virus? You encourage it to mutate even faster, and to develop immune-evading properties.

This is what we’ve been witnessing since the beginning of the COVID-19 jab campaign, and at this point, there’s no hope of ever catching up with the virus. What’s worse, while variants have so far evolved into milder strains, they are in fact gaining the ability to evade antibodies, and could theoretically switch course to become even more parthenogenic.

This is particularly true when a vaccine is “leaky,” meaning it doesn’t fully prevent infection (which none of the COVID-19 shots do). Just like when you overuse an antibiotic that fails to eradicate the bacteria, which allows antibiotic-resistant bacteria to flourish, overuse of a leaky vaccine can pressure a virus to become more lethal.

BA.4 and BA.5 are the most resistant to date, with BA.5 able to get around even of those with natural immunity. Fortunately, it doesn’t appear to cause severe illness in most people.

The take-home here is that, had natural immunity been allowed to take place without these jabs, the pandemic would be over and reinfections near-nonexistent. Instead, we’re now in a pandemic of the vaccinated, with the vast majority of serious infections occurring among those who have been jabbed.

Choice of whether to boost or not, should be made with FULL INFORMED CONSENT.

I hope the information here helps in your decision.

 

Yep.

I too scratched my head when I heard about the new shot and the variants it covers. Even the coverage against omicrom had me wondering why that’s so important. In some places such as the UK they practically encouraged the public to get a case of it while it is so mild.

Bottom line whether you question their safety, they don’t seem to work that well. I never heard of a vaccine needing to be injected every 2-3 months. I read that’s what they’re doing in QC.

Lied about Astrazenica. Lied about the efficacy. Blood clots. Myocarditis, a symptom commonly associated with vaccine injuries in the past.

Plus they’ve bypassed the long established safety protocols. It’s unconscionable.

But most of the dunderheads dont know about shit like that.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

But most of the dunderheads dont know about shit like that.

I don't think the dunderheads are the ones who don't know shit like this.

The dunderheads are the ones who don't WANT to know shit like this.

The ones who come on this thread and nitpick a minor point, deliberately ignoring the actual points made.

The science behind OAS and immune imprinting is the most relevant thing to combatting covid right now, and not one of the "dunderheads" here has even one thing to say about it.

Rejecting a scientist and an expert because he also has a line of vitamins and herbal supplements with his name on it....is just lazy-ass and stupid.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2022 at 4:34 PM, TreeBeard said:

Then why did Trump order “Operation Warp Speed” to make a vaccine?

Is Trump in on the COVID hoax?

Because he had too. If Trump did nothing then lefty liberal/democrat losers like you would have said that Trump did nothing to try and fight covid. Trump was not in on the covid hoax but big pharma globalists certainly were. It was the liberal/democrats that gave us masks, lock downs, social distancing, quarantines and the experimental vaccines after they won the fraud election.

At first, the stupid liberal democrats said that they would not take Trump's vaccines at all. But after they won their fraudulent created election all of a sudden it was okay to take the vaccines now. And look at what all those forced mandated covid restrictions do to our society. Hypocrites and liars is what all you lefty liberals are all about. Every time you open your lying lefty liberal mouths you continue to spread mis and disinformation on purpose all of the time. Get lost, lefty. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, taxme said:

Because he had too.

I'm not a Trump Supporter, but he was lied to about covid and the jabs by everyone - Wallensky (CDC), Fauci, etc...even Brix has admitted she lied to him about everything and now is saying she "knew the vaccines wouldn't work."

People are gonna thrown under the bus on this and these are the people already in butt-covering mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2022 at 4:10 PM, Goddess said:

I'm not a Trump Supporter, but he was lied to about covid and the jabs by everyone - Wallensky (CDC), Fauci, etc...even Brix has admitted she lied to him about everything and now is saying she "knew the vaccines wouldn't work."

People are gonna thrown under the bus on this and these are the people already in butt-covering mode.

You think the vaccines don’t work at all, or don’t work 100%?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

You think the vaccines don’t work at all, or don’t work 100%?

Quebec is now issuing their 5th booster, and recommending people get a shot every 3 months.

Quebec will offer 5th dose of COVID-19 vaccine to ...

Ever heard of a vaccine like that, fella?

Is it any good? I think by now we can say... naah. The risk of dying from myocarditis approaches the risk of dying from covid, but is actually higher in the 20-30 age group.

Doesn't mean I'm saying don't take the shot, if you want to.

Fill one's boots, as it were...

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

You think the vaccines don’t work at all, or don’t work 100%?

I think they don't work any near 100%.

I agree with the established science behind OAS and immune imprinting and I believe that is what is happening now, based on sound data sets in every highly vaxxed country.

I believe immunologists who are saying repeated inoculations damages innate immunity.  I think 10 jabs in 2 years is a really bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now the British government is warning pregnant and breastfeeding women against taking the shot.  Two years too late:

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/08/30/british-government-rules-safe-use-of-pfizer-covid-vaccine-in-pregnant-women-cannot-be-provided/

The British government has recommended against pregnant and breastfeeding women receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, admitting that “sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine” for the demographic “cannot be provided at the present time.”

Edited by sharkman
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, sharkman said:

So now the British government is warning pregnant and breastfeeding women against taking the shot.  Two years too late:

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/08/30/british-government-rules-safe-use-of-pfizer-covid-vaccine-in-pregnant-women-cannot-be-provided/

The British government has recommended against pregnant and breastfeeding women receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, admitting that “sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine” for the demographic “cannot be provided at the present time.”

I guess they finally had a look at the trial documents Pfizer was forced to cough up which clearly stated it was not recommended for during pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article was in the Sunday Times (UK) last Sunday.  The link to the original article cannot be read without a subscription, so I found this link: 

Little by little the truth of lockdown is being admitted: it was a disaster | Comment | The Sunday Times (archive.ph)

Quote

 

Lockdown was a policy conceived in the early days by China and the World Health Organisation as a way of suppressing the virus altogether (so-called zero Covid). The WHO quickly abandoned this unrealistic ambition. But European countries, except Sweden, eagerly embraced lockdown, ripping up a decade of pandemic planning that had been based on concentrating help on vulnerable groups and avoiding coercion.
At first Britain stood up against the stampede. Then Professor Neil Ferguson’s team at Imperial College London published its notorious “Report 9”. Sunak confirms that this was what panicked ministers into a measure that the scientists had previously rejected.

 

I posted before on this forum about Neil Ferguson and his disastrous "models".

He hasn't been right once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here was my post on Neil Ferguson on the "Returning to Normal" thread:

Quote

 

Do you know who Neil Ferguson is?  You should.

This whole fiasco started with a modelling prediction from him.

His report is what all countries (except Sweden) based the lockdowns on.  He predicted that unless the entire planet locked down for 18 months in complete isolation, there would be massive deaths.  His report stated that just isolating the vulnerable elderly population would only reduce deaths by half.

Unfortunately, no one checked his background.

He had already demonstrated on numerous occasions that he was unable to predict anything. In 2002 he predicted that 150,000 people would die of Mad Cow Disease, but only 2704 died.  His estimation was 55 times higher than the real number.  A few years later, he predicted that 65,000 would die of Swine Flu and only 457 people died, his estimate was 142 times higher than the real number.  His prediction that 200 million would die of the bird flu was 439,560 times higher than the real number of 455.  He has a long history of overreacting and overpredicting.

He predicted that by June 2020, there would be tens of millions dead of covid.  But by that time, the real number was 494,179, not tens of millions and even this number is questionable.  This time he was off by millions.

The average age of death for covid is 80, with almost all who died having comorbidities.  The virus has had little effect on young, healthy people.

Mr. Ferguson resigned in disgrace when he was caught having his mistress over for sexy time when he was supposed to be locked down and isolating, like the rest of the population was doing on his recommendation.

We are trapped in a lie.  And the powers that be are desperately trying to make it seem like this was all worth it.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this Martha Fulford that has been interviewed a few times.  Her interview about the child jabs was very good, too.

A CTV article, too. :)

Infectious disease experts aren’t all on the same page about COVID booster mandates (iheartradio.ca)

Quote

 

“It has become clear that COVID vaccines are not stopping onward transmission,” she said, referring to the spread of variants such as Omicron and sub-variants.

When it comes to determining the need for booster shots, it would be easy for each person to have an individual risk assessment with their family physician, Fulford said. “But we’re not going to see a public health benefit in terms of a decrease in onward transmission,” she said.

“If you’re going to mandate something, regardless of whether you agree with that person’s individual decision, there has to be a very compelling public health or medical rational for that. It’s just not there anymore for the COVID vaccines and certainly not for boosters.”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep forgetting to post the "How to make HCQ at home" recipe.

This is for prevention, as well as if you get covid.

Quote

 

3 organic grapefruits

3 organic lemons

Peel the skin off them and put them in a big pot with a glass lid.  Fill pot with filtered water and let simmer for 3 hours, adding more water, if necessary.  Then let it cool for 2 hours and drain with a sieve into glass jars, no plastic.

Take 4 tbsp a day.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B5.thumb.jpg.5a7f23f79b55ac5fd2b72f5be0af50de.jpg

 

I'll try to start posting more of the GOOD NEWS! in the hopes of combatting some of the fear-porn propaganda we're continually being subjected to.

Published yesterday at NEJM.org

See the BA5 variant in orange at the end there?

This was based on 11.5 million sequenced samples through June 19, 2022.

It shows a rapidly dwindling threat.  This means the bivalent boosters are not medically necessary, nor clinically indicated at this point.  No RCT demonstrating safety or efficacy.

They should not be a viable consideration for clinical use.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The above information should show everyone how asinine it is for universities in Canada to be mandating boosters in order for students to attend classes.

We should be sticking up for our youth in Canada.  I've written emails to every university who has been in the news for mandating boosters.  Stop the fear-porn.  Start living in reality.

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it's good that they are finally (quietly) admitting it.

But how many people died because they withheld treatment, removed doctor's ability to prescribe it under threat of losing their licenses, removed it from pharmacist's order forms and silenced the doctors and scientists who were having success with it from the beginning, before the inoculations came out?

Over 88,000 subjects, and a 92% reduction in death.

https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-for-covid-19-led-up-to-a-92-reduction-in-covid-19-mortality-rate-in-a-dose-response-manner-results-of-a-prospective-observational-study-of-a-strictly-controlled-population-of-88012-subjects?email_share=true&expedited_modal=true&fbclid=IwAR1T32Pt9OXa2YjNm8w25sXB-ve2GErwHaunCbM9G7Aim6srrc5fQl81agU

 

And now after doing all that, after all the senseless deaths, the NIH adds it to their recommended list of medications for covid treatment.

https://gellerreport.com/2022/09/watch-ivermectin-the-truth.html/?fbclid=IwAR3mHVQXFpvNrP_aHjhas80m9PPrYSZ-_o6Jd5g0hR1TFhFQt_kwLvw2JtQ

 

And why?

Because if there was a treatment for covid, they couldn't have gotten the Emergency Use Authorization and then - no great experiment could take place and Big Pharma couldn't have milked governments world-wide for billions of dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2022 at 4:10 PM, Goddess said:

I'm not a Trump Supporter, but he was lied to about covid and the jabs by everyone - Wallensky (CDC), Fauci, etc...even Brix has admitted she lied to him about everything and now is saying she "knew the vaccines wouldn't work."

People are gonna thrown under the bus on this and these are the people already in butt-covering mode.

We are now only starting to learn more about the truth about these experimental gene therapy altering vaccines. From the very beginning I felt there was something wrong with all of this covid nonsense. It smelled like a rotten rat to me at the time and now I was right in my thinking all along that this was just one big planned scamdemic. Event 201 on the internet told me this. Look it up on the internet while it is still there. 

As far as I am concerned, all those lying politicians, so called health experts, many doctors who went along with this scamdemic and the liars in the MSM needs to be all arrested and charged with crimes against humanity and thrown in the gulag for life. Nothing less will do for those scumbags. They are all responsible for destroying millions of innocent peoples lives. They must all not be allowed to get away with this major crime that has been committed by them. They must pay. Works for me. ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 6:51 PM, TreeBeard said:

You think the vaccines don’t work at all, or don’t work 100%?

Did you not just read what Goddess just posted? Walensky said that she knew that the vaccines would not work. what more do you want? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 7:08 PM, OftenWrong said:

Quebec is now issuing their 5th booster, and recommending people get a shot every 3 months.

Quebec will offer 5th dose of COVID-19 vaccine to ...

Ever heard of a vaccine like that, fella?

Is it any good? I think by now we can say... naah. The risk of dying from myocarditis approaches the risk of dying from covid, but is actually higher in the 20-30 age group.

Doesn't mean I'm saying don't take the shot, if you want to.

Fill one's boots, as it were...

;)

Only idiots and buffoons on a suicidal course will continue to take more of those deadly covid vaccines. People are not dying from covid. They are suffering and dying from the vaccines. Sadly, there are way too many people out there who keep allowing themselves to be frightened all the time by their doctors(who shall do no harm)their lying politicians and the liars in the MSM. Those people who have been pushing the vaccines on we the peasants should never be believed or trusted anymore. They have all proven that they are all professional liars and nothing more. 

Indee-de-doo. For those who still want to take as many jabs as they can get, well yes, let them go fill their boots. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2022 at 11:47 AM, sharkman said:

So now the British government is warning pregnant and breastfeeding women against taking the shot.  Two years too late:

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/08/30/british-government-rules-safe-use-of-pfizer-covid-vaccine-in-pregnant-women-cannot-be-provided/

The British government has recommended against pregnant and breastfeeding women receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, admitting that “sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine” for the demographic “cannot be provided at the present time.”

A warning just a little too late alright. Miscarriges have been happening way more than what they should be happening. It's getting hard to believe that people out there are not getting the message about the dangers of those covid vaccines. 

We cannot allow those lying politicians off the hook. They were all in on the covid scamdemic farce. There have been many politicians that have said that they have caught covid two or three times and yet they keep telling us to go get boosted two or three times. WTH? 

Do those lying politicians use catching covid again and again as an excuse to get to stay away from work or are they just pretending that they are getting covid to try and get people to take more vaccine jabs and make more money for them and big pharma from doing so? I know that Marxist Turdeau is getting kickbacks from every vaccine jab taken by some fool out there. I will never believe our politicians and the MSM anymore. They pretty much all lie. Deplorable so called human beings. ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

N-acetyl cysteine: A tool to perturb SARS-CoV-2 spike protein conformation | Theoretical and Computational Chemistry | ChemRxiv | Cambridge Open Engage

NAC is what I take.  When my kids were growing up, I gave it to them also.  It's a great over-the-counter antiviral that you can take regularly, especially during cold and flu season.

Quote

Proteomics data showed that N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), an antioxidant and mucolytic agent been widely in use in clinical medicine, forms covalent conjugates with solvent accessible cysteine residues of spike protein that were disulfide bonded in the native state.

 

Layman's version:  It prevents the spike protein from bonding with your cells.

 

Quote

Antiviral assay using VeroE6 cells showed that NAC caused 54.3% inhibition in SARS-CoV-2 replication.

Get some while you can.  The alphabet entities are trying to ban it.  On Amazon, the Organika or NOW brands are both good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...