First a trickle....Now a flood

[WestCanMan]

On 10/21/2024 at 11:54 AM, Goddess said:

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

OMG, I love it. 

[WestCanMan]

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-has-disappeared-worldwide-during-the-covid-pandemic1/

I can't believe that article is still up 😂

That's one of the covid lies that I totally forgot about.

@Goddess Do you still have that info about the covid jab suppressing cancer-fighting cells?

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

It's entirely inaccurate to say that. At least 60 Canadian kids under the age of 18 were killed by COVID.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1228632/number-covid-deaths-canada-by-age/

No, 60 kids died while they had covid. 

"covid deaths" were not recorded where covid was the cause per se, just when people tested positive for it and there was a POSSIBILITY it MAY have been some sort of CONTRIBUTING factor. 

In fact we don't know that any of those kids actually died from covid. 

[eyeball]

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No, 60 kids died while they had covid. 

Go take your grievances up with statista. You don't have any issue with dinglenuts when he cites them.

Edited May 12, 2025 by eyeball

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, eyeball said:

Go take your grievances up with statista. 

It's not a grievance, you just misquoted what they presented.  I can see why, they quoted it poorly but as they say in their notes:

Figures do not represent the total number of deaths in Canada due to COVID-19. Adapted from Statistics Canada, health-infobase.canada.ca, As of May 2, 2023. 

And we know the methodology used by the health info base, it includes people that had covid but didn't die from covid.

So I wasn't complaining, I just corrected you. Don't get mad at me just because the numbers say something slightly different than you thought they said

[eyeball]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And we know the methodology used by the health info base, it includes people that had covid but didn't die from covid.

Sure, the point however is that it's inaccurate to say "healthy kids in Canada weren't dying of covid at all".

Statistas notes simply reflect the reality that a final definitive number will always be fuzzy one way or the other...go take it up with Heisenberg I guess.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Sure, the point however is that it's inaccurate to say "healthy kids in Canada weren't dying of covid at all".

 

Probably.  but we can't tell that one way or another from the data you posted. 

Here, in the interests of fairness i did find this:

Previously healthy baby, less than two months old, dies of COVID-19 in Montreal hospital

It's kind of interesting, apperently babies are highly susceptible to any form of respitory virus. So the 'preexisting condition' is literaly being a baby. Not sure immunizaiton would have helped. but  it's still at least one childs' death so you're correct. 

[Goddess]

On 5/12/2025 at 10:11 AM, WestCanMan said:

@Goddess Do you still have that info about the covid jab suppressing cancer-fighting cells?

Further to the studies I've posted and discussed here about the p53 issue, IGg4 antibody switch, T-cell suppression, SV40 presence in the vaccine, DNA contamination found in the vials, etc. 

These things have all led many scientists and researchers to speculate that the jabs would increase cancers.

There have been 69 studies now showing that to be the case.  This major study, just released and peer-reviewed, examines all those studies and more.

IMPORTANT TO NOTE:  The covid vaccine was never evaluated for carcinogenicity, genotoxicity or multi-dose long term effects.  At all.  This is actually in the package insert.

Here is a link to a dropbox with the paper, as it is being massively suppressed and difficult to find online:

oncotarget-v0i0-28824-C19-C19-vaccine-and-cancer-published-plus-supp-1-3-2026.pdf

 

The authors of this paper are not Twitter gadflies.

Dr. Kuperwasser is a senior cancer biologist at Tufts University whose work focuses on microenvironments, metastasis and immune system-cancer interactions.

Dr. Wafik S. El-Deiry is an oncologist and molecular cancer researcher at Brown University, former president of the American Association for Cancer Research and the world's leading authority on p53 signaling and cancer therapeutics.

Their DAY JOBS are spotting early cancer signals.

 

The 69 other peer-reviewed papers, from 27 different countries, covered 333 patients and several large population datasets.

It found:

• unusually rapid cancer progression,

• reactivation of previously controlled disease,

• odd tumor clusters near injection sites or draining lymph nodes, and

• a striking overrepresentation of lymphomas, leukemias, aggressive solid tumors, and virus-associated cancers.

From the paper:

 

"In addition, the COVID mRNA vaccines work by instructing the target cells to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This occurs by introducing a synthetic, modified mRNA (mod-mRNA) which incorporates non-natural pseudouridine into its coding region to prolong the stability of the mRNA beyond that of natural mRNA.

Introduction of the mod-RNA is accomplished using lipid-based transfection in the form of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The result is highly efficient transfection of the mod-mRNA into target cells with biochemical and pharmacological behavior different from naturally occurring mRNA. Consequently, the mod-RNA is transcribed into the foreign spike protein (as well as other frameshifted protein products), which elicits a robust immune response.

Given the stability of pseudouridine modified mRNA, along with the residual DNA in the mRNA vaccine formulations, the mRNA vaccines are delivering exogenous genetic material (DNA and RNA (in the form of engineered nucleic acids)) into a patient’s cells. The COVID19 mRNA vaccines produce Spike protein that is encoded by a stable mRNA and has been found to be long-lived in the human body. These nucleic acid elements have been reported to contribute to Post-Covid Vaccine Syndrome (PCVS/PVS).

Thus, these vaccines fit the definition of gene therapy."

They painstakingly catalogued an inventory of case reports (and a few small series studies) of cancers linked to jabs— including lymphomas, leukemia, sarcoma, carcinoma (pancreatic, prostate, lung, colon, breast, etc.), melanoma (eye and skin cancer), glioblastoma (brain cancer), and the catchall, other.

 

As you can see, they also confirm what myriads of other studies have shown - that the vax does not stay in the arm, as promised.  The main places it travels to, again, is the heart, reproductive organs and brain.

This is early safety-signal literature.

The researchers' conclusion was simple and stark: “The collective world-wide evidence from 2020–2025 underscores a biologically plausible connection between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer.”

 

Anecdotally:

Like Ed Dowd, who surmised early on that effects of the jabs like disability and death would show up in insurance actuary reports before it would be admitted to by authorities, I follow another guy's substack who is a top-level salesperson for a Pharma company.  His job is selling cancer medicines.  He surmised early on that cancer med sales would tell the tale early on, as well.  He has been reporting on the skyrocketing increase in cancer meds, all over the world.

Which would explain Big Pharma's new interest in buying up cancer med companies.

 

Edited January 12 by Goddess

[WestCanMan]

22 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Further to the studies I've posted and discussed here about the p53 issue, IGg4 antibody switch, T-cell suppression, SV40 presence in the vaccine, DNA contamination found in the vials, etc. 

These things have all led many scientists and researchers to speculate that the jabs would increase cancers.

There have been 69 studies now showing that to be the case.  This major study, just released and peer-reviewed, examines all those studies and more.

IMPORTANT TO NOTE:  The covid vaccine was never evaluated for carcinogenicity, genotoxicity or multi-dose long term effects.  At all.  This is actually in the package insert.

Here is a link to a dropbox with the paper, as it is being massively suppressed and difficult to find online:

oncotarget-v0i0-28824-C19-C19-vaccine-and-cancer-published-plus-supp-1-3-2026.pdf

 

The authors of this paper are not Twitter gadflies.

Dr. Kuperwasser is a senior cancer biologist at Tufts University whose work focuses on microenvironments, metastasis and immune system-cancer interactions.

Dr. Wafik S. El-Deiry is an oncologist and molecular cancer researcher at Brown University, former president of the American Association for Cancer Research and the world's leading authority on p53 signaling and cancer therapeutics.

Their DAY JOBS are spotting early cancer signals.

 

The 69 other peer-reviewed papers, from 27 different countries, covered 333 patients and several large population datasets.

It found:

• unusually rapid cancer progression,

• reactivation of previously controlled disease,

• odd tumor clusters near injection sites or draining lymph nodes, and

• a striking overrepresentation of lymphomas, leukemias, aggressive solid tumors, and virus-associated cancers.

From the paper:

 

"In addition, the COVID mRNA vaccines work by instructing the target cells to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This occurs by introducing a synthetic, modified mRNA (mod-mRNA) which incorporates non-natural pseudouridine into its coding region to prolong the stability of the mRNA beyond that of natural mRNA.

Introduction of the mod-RNA is accomplished using lipid-based transfection in the form of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The result is highly efficient transfection of the mod-mRNA into target cells with biochemical and pharmacological behavior different from naturally occurring mRNA. Consequently, the mod-RNA is transcribed into the foreign spike protein (as well as other frameshifted protein products), which elicits a robust immune response.

Given the stability of pseudouridine modified mRNA, along with the residual DNA in the mRNA vaccine formulations, the mRNA vaccines are delivering exogenous genetic material (DNA and RNA (in the form of engineered nucleic acids)) into a patient’s cells. The COVID19 mRNA vaccines produce Spike protein that is encoded by a stable mRNA and has been found to be long-lived in the human body. These nucleic acid elements have been reported to contribute to Post-Covid Vaccine Syndrome (PCVS/PVS).

Thus, these vaccines fit the definition of gene therapy."

They painstakingly catalogued an inventory of case reports (and a few small series studies) of cancers linked to jabs— including lymphomas, leukemia, sarcoma, carcinoma (pancreatic, prostate, lung, colon, breast, etc.), melanoma (eye and skin cancer), glioblastoma (brain cancer), and the catchall, other.

 

As you can see, they also confirm what myriads of other studies have shown - that the vax does not stay in the arm, as promised.  The main places it travels to, again, is the heart, reproductive organs and brain.

This is early safety-signal literature.

The researchers' conclusion was simple and stark: “The collective world-wide evidence from 2020–2025 underscores a biologically plausible connection between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer.”

 

Anecdotally:

Like Ed Dowd, who surmised early on that effects of the jabs like disability and death would show up in insurance actuary reports before it would be admitted to by authorities, I follow another guy's substack who is a top-level salesperson for a Pharma company.  His job is selling cancer medicines.  He surmised early on that cancer med sales would tell the tale early on, as well.  He has been reporting on the skyrocketing increase in cancer meds, all over the world.

Which would explain Big Pharma's new interest in buying up cancer med companies.

 

It will take me hours/days to research/process all of that. Wow.

[WestCanMan]

28 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Dr. Kuperwasser is a senior cancer biologist at Tufts University whose work focuses on microenvironments, metastasis and immune system-cancer interactions.

Dr. Wafik S. El-Deiry is an oncologist and molecular cancer researcher at Brown University, former president of the American Association for Cancer Research and the world's leading authority on p53 signaling and cancer therapeutics.

Their DAY JOBS are spotting early cancer signals.

But Hodad said...

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It will take me hours/days to research/process all of that. Wow.

It used to take me a long time too, but I've been doing this for so long now......it's gotten easier.  And I follow a lot of scientists and researchers who make it easier.

[Goddess]

@WestCanMan

There is actually an X space in a half hour that I'll be listening to with the 2 scientists who just authored a paper on their RNA:DNA hybrid hypothesis and that Pharma's selection of the wrong clean-up enzyme was intentionally wrong.

When you also consider the fact that they are selectively looking for KAN and not SPIKE - even though they do have an assay for the latter - it's impossible to believe that this is the product of ignorance.

They will also be talking about Pharma using the wrong choice of plasmid. They selected to produce bacterially methylated DNA (m6A).

Think chronic inflammation and cancer pathway induction. 😢

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Consequently, the mod-RNA is transcribed into the foreign spike protein (as well as other frameshifted protein products), which elicits a robust immune response.

I want to clarify for people that this "robust immune response" is not what the layman thinks.  It is NOT A GOOD THING.

This video will explain it a bit:

 

This is why I kept harping on how they were misleading people by claiming the jabs "produced antibodies" in testing and therefore SUCCESS!  No.  No.  Pretty much anything you inject into your body will produce antibodies.  The question is: what antibodies, in what quantities and what are they doing to your immune system.

The video shows why multi-jabbed people are getting covid many more times than unjabbed people and how they are damaging the overall immune system, making you less able to fight ANY infection that comes along after.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

@WestCanMan

There is actually an X space in a half hour that I'll be listening to with the 2 scientists who just authored a paper on their RNA:DNA hybrid hypothesis and that Pharma's selection of the wrong clean-up enzyme was intentionally wrong.

When you also consider the fact that they are selectively looking for KAN and not SPIKE - even though they do have an assay for the latter - it's impossible to believe that this is the product of ignorance.

They will also be talking about Pharma using the wrong choice of plasmid. They selected to produce bacterially methylated DNA (m6A).

Think chronic inflammation and cancer pathway induction. 😢

I'm gonna take your word for it right now. 

Maybe one day I'll say "Yeah, someone already told me that, but I had no clue what she meant at the time."

Edited January 13 by WestCanMan

[Goddess]

Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination

This paper is a case study - the first of its kind - that documents evidence that the mRNA "vaccine" genetic code integrates into the human genome.

As I have long said, these are not vaccines in the traditional sense.  They are genetic therapy, delivered by injection.  That's what the technology was invented for, that's what its purpose is.

A previously healthy 31-year-old woman developed rapidly progressing Stage lV bladder cancer within a year of completing a 3-dose Moderna injection series. (Thus why these cancers have been termed "turbo cancers".)

Bladder cancer is exceedingly rare in young women and the aggressive nature of this is unheard of.

From the paper, what they discovered:

• Direct genomic integration event: Within circulating tumor DNA, a host–vector chimeric read mapped to chr19:55,482,637–55,482,674 (GRCh38), in cytoband 19q13.42, positioned ~367 kb downstream of the canonical AAVS1 safe harbor and ~158 kb upstream of ZNF580 at the proximal edge of the zinc-finger (ZNF) gene cluster. This sequence aligned with perfect 20/20 bp identity to a segment (bases 5905–5924) within the Spike open reading frame (ORF) coding region (bases 3674–7480) of the Pfizer BNT162b2 DNA plasmid reference (GenBank accession OR134577.1).

• Oncogenic driver hyperactivation (KRAS, NRAS, MAPK1, ATM, PIK3CA, SF3B1, CHD4) — unleashing uncontrolled proliferative and malignant signaling cascades.

• Critical DNA repair pathway collapse (ATM, MSH2) — leaving the genome acutely vulnerable to instability, double-strand breaks, and catastrophic mutations.

• Severe transcriptomic and proteomic disarray across plasma, blood, and urine biospecimens — consistent with systemic molecular breakdown.

 

What this means:

Her chromosome 19 now carries a NON-HUMAN spike gene sequence - a perfect 20/20 bp match.  This is where 2 sequences of base pairs are identical in length and composition - a feat only achieved by genetic engineering.

You may be wondering why the paper identifies it as a PFIZER plasmid reference, when the patient only received Moderna.  This is because Moderna has never deposited its proprietary plasmid in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information), so only Pfizer's proprietary plasmid is registered.  BUT - both Pfizer and Moderna's vaccine use the same stretches of nucleotide sequence within the Spike ORF coding region.

Again, from the study: 

Integration in this unstable genomic context raises concern for transcriptional disruption, fusion transcript formation, and oncogenic potential.

Oncogenic potential  👈 that means cancer-causing.

The probability of a random 20-base sequence perfectly matching a pre-defined target is.....1 in a trillion.

 

Combined with the temporal proximity to vaccination, multi-omic evidence of oncogenic signaling, and direct genomic integration, the case establishes a biologically plausible pathway by which synthetic mRNA vaccines could contribute to cancer development.

 

This paper...... :  

Full article: Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada

......identified BILLIONS of residual plasmid DNA fragments, exceeding regulatory safety limits by up to 627-fold.

 

Edited January 13 by Goddess

[Goddess]

Interesting follow-up:

Dr. El-Deiry revealed that on Jan. 5, he was offered a job by......Pfizer.  So he is obviously not some crank doctor.

 

And that......is how the system works.

No doubt, the job would come with a large binder of NDA's and non-disparagement contracts that would ensure that he never, ever uttered another word about any problems with the mRNA shots.

Can you smell TheScience?  That's the odor of SHUT UP.

Few of us ever find out what our principles cost, because we are never shown the number.  Kudos to Dr. El-Deiry.  He was shown the number and still chose his principles.  That's maybe 1 out of 1000 people these days.

[Goddess]

Synthetic messenger RNA vaccines and transcriptomic dysregulation: Evidence from new-onset adverse events and cancers post-vaccination - PMC

 

This paper, led by Dr. John Catanzaro, physician-scientist, systems biologist, founder and CEO of Neo7Bioscience precision surveillance architecture, computational stack and translational analytics.

Neo7 employs a multi-disciplinary team of bioinformaticians, molecular scientists, systems engineers and clinical analysts.

These complex transcriptional signatures have captured in living patients in this study.

Collaborators also include:

• Dr. Peter McCullough - internationally recognized cardiologist, epidemiologist and the most published physician-scientist in history.
• Nicholas Hulcher MPH - a leading public health analyst and investigative researcher whose work involves epidemiology, data synthesis and translational risk assessment.
• Dr. Kevin McKernan - expertise in next-generation sequencing and molecular forensics.

 

Bulk RNA sequencing is applied to real-world vaccine injured patients and reveals:

• widespread mitochondrial failure
• profound transcriptional chaos
• genomic instability
• activation of oncogenic networks
• immune reprogramming
• cellular stress including misfolded proteins (the "prion" diseases I discussed here before)
• systemic inflammation

In this study, severe genetic disruption is linked to cancer and chronic disease, due to prolonged spike protein expression, immune activation and off-target effects.

 

CONCLUSION

Shared and distinct molecular signatures in both cohorts demonstrate underlying mechanisms contributing to post-vaccine symptomatology and complications, including oncogenesis and or progression of malignant disease. These findings underscore the need for a deeper investigation into the long-term safety of mRNA vaccines and host response variability.

 

[User]

On 1/13/2026 at 8:36 AM, Goddess said:

Dr. El-Deiry revealed that on Jan. 5, he was offered a job by......Pfizer.  So he is obviously not some crank doctor.

LOL, do you have any idea how recruiters work?

This was not a job offer.

Recruiters spam people with invitations and requests, trying to find candidates. They very rarely are doing anything more than looking at whatever public information the people they are looking at made available on things like their LinkedIn profiles. 

These are not job offers. Its just some recruiter trying to spam people hoping to find anyone they can to fit a job opening description they have to start the process of seeing if they can be the person for that job. 

 

[User]

On 1/12/2026 at 3:14 PM, Goddess said:

The video shows why multi-jabbed people are getting covid many more times than unjabbed people and how they are damaging the overall immune system, making you less able to fight ANY infection that comes along after.

What evidence do you have for such a claim that not only were unvaccinated people were getting COVID less than vaccinated, but many times less?

 

[User]

On 1/12/2026 at 1:47 PM, Goddess said:

These things have all led many scientists and researchers to speculate that the jabs would increase cancers.

There have been 69 studies now showing that to be the case.  This major study, just released and peer-reviewed, examines all those studies and more.

From the paper you quoted:

“This scoping review was not designed to estimate cancer risk or incidence, nor to draw causal inferences, but rather to systematically assemble, categorize, and contextualize published reports of malignancies temporally associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, User said:

What evidence do you have for such a claim that not only were unvaccinated people were getting COVID less than vaccinated, but many times less?

 

For one, the Cleveland Clinic study, which I posted extensively about there when it came out.

Look, you do know that these shots were experimental on 2 technology levels - the mRNA platform and the LNP delivery system, right?  They were not tested for oncogenicity, toxicity, what happens with multi-dosing, timing between dosing....none of it.

Hell, when they were deciding whether to mandate them for children and members of the committee were warning that the shots had not be tested for any of those things in children, one of the ACIP members commented "Well, we won't know until we start giving them."

That means the results of the experiment will continue to trickle in.

Don't get mad at me.  I didn't sign up to be experimented on.  I'm just interested in the results.  And I tend to favour independent scientists, researchers and data analysts over Big Pharma's claims, given their propensity to commit fraud and fudge data.

 

[User]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

For one, the Cleveland Clinic study, which I posted extensively about there when it came out.

So... can you provide a link to that study and quote the relevant sections?

5 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Don't get mad at me.  I didn't sign up to be experimented on.  I'm just interested in the results.  And I tend to favour independent scientists, researchers and data analysts over Big Pharma's claims, given their propensity to commit fraud and fudge data.

I am not mad at you, just calling out your BS for what it is. 

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, User said:

From the paper you quoted:

“This scoping review was not designed to estimate cancer risk or incidence, nor to draw causal inferences, but rather to systematically assemble, categorize, and contextualize published reports of malignancies temporally associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

OK.......??   And.....??

Since the jabs were never tested for oncogenicity before forcing them on billions of people, this is the start of them being tested for oncogenicity.

The testing of these aspects of the jabs will be cumulative, you realize that's how science works, right?

Why do you think this testing is a bad thing to do?

The so-called turbo cancers cases are piling up.  They're starting to gather data and try to find out if there is a mechanism for how and why this would happen.  And you're.......against this?  

 

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, User said:

can you provide a link to that study and quote the relevant sections?

Already done, my friend!  Many times.  And I discussed it extensively here.

Sorry you're late to the party.  As usual.

[User]

Just now, Goddess said:

Already done, my friend!  Many times.  And I discussed it extensively here.

Sorry you're late to the party.  As usual.

So... no, you can't. Like just about every time I call you or West out, you balk and can't back up your stuff. 

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

OK.......??   And.....??

You were trying to use this as evidence to push your claim about COVID causing/increasing risk of Cancer. It was not. 

Do you actually have anything to back that up or to support your assertion about "many" doctors?