Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood


Recommended Posts

Checkmate - by Aaron Kheriaty, MD - Human Flourishing (substack.com)

In light of the Universities in Canada requiring boosters for students, this is an interesting read.

This guy was fired of U of California because he didn't want the inoculations, as he already had natural immunity from a previous infection.  At the time of his lawsuit, the CDC was refusing to recognize natural immunity, mush the same as Canada is still currently refusing to acknowledge it.

But now the CDC admits there IS such a thing as natural immunity to covid.

Quote

 

The University’s rational basis argument to the court essentially boiled down to one simple fact: the CDC had not acknowledged natural immunity in its recommendations. Therefore, the University’s mandate did not need to recognize it either. The judge concurred that this was sufficient, end of story. The scientific evidence on either side was entirely beside the point and need not be considered in the courtroom.

And that’s where my case stood until this week, when the CDC published its new covid guidelines.

Quote

"CDC’s COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur, though they are generally mild, and persons who have had COVID-19 but are not vaccinated have some degree of protection against severe illness from their previous infection."

 

Quote

I’m looking forward to the next legal round. Honestly, I don’t need to win any victory in court, though I anticipate now that I will prevail this time. A clear conscience is enough. Thank you to all of you subscribers for standing by me and supporting me on this adventure for the past year.

And his final bit of advice:

Quote

What have I learned in the last twelve months? Do the right thing, even when it’s unpopular. Stand by your convictions, even when you appear foolish to many. When the other side retaliates, don’t flinch. Be patient. Bide your time. Eventually, the truth will out, so play the long game.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hearings | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee (senate.gov)

This was a Senate hearing on Gain of Function research, that took place in August.  You know, the GoF research that Fauci fully supports and funded in Wuhan against the ban by the US government.

I'm posting the part that pertains to the virus being leaked from the WIV first:

Quote

Steven Quay, the CEO of Atossa Therapeutics, said the SARS2 virus that causes Covid-19 “has features consistent with synthetic biology gain-of-function research.” He added that “two features involve acceptable academic gain-of-function research” while one region of the virus “has features of forbidden gain of function research: asymptomatic transmission and immune system evasion.” According to Quay, the permissible gain-of-function features were aspects of research that the United States and Wuhan Institute of Virology had proposed in 2018, while the forbidden features were aspects of research that was already going on at the lab.

If you don't want to listen to the entire hearing, here are the highlights: 

Quote

 

Richard Ebright, laboratory director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology and hearing witness, said gain-of-function research involves changing pathogens to make them more dangerous. “Gain-of-function research of concern is defined as research activities reasonably anticipated to increase a potential pandemic pathogen’s transmissibility, pathogenicity, ability to overcome immune response, or ability to overcome a vaccine or drug,” Ebright said.

This research has multiple risks, Ebright added, and limited benefits. It results in new health threats because it creates “new potential pandemic pathogens.” He said that “if the new potential pandemic pathogen is released into humans, either accidentally or deliberately, this can cause a pandemic.”

Another risk, according to Ebright, is that once this gain-of-function research is published, people can use it to construct pandemic pathogens from synthetic DNA for well under $10,000. “Publication of the research provides instructions — step-by-step recipes — that can enable a rogue nation, organization, or individual to construct a new pathogen and cause a pandemic,” Ebright said.

Kevin Esvelt, another witness who is a biologist and director of the Sculpting Evolution group at MIT Media Lab, said this is a risk whether scientists are creating potential pandemic viruses through gain-of-function experiments or simply researching naturally occurring ones. He estimated that once the genome of a potential pandemic virus is published, there are 30,000 people with doctorates in the United States alone who would be able to create the virus in a lab.

Trying to identify potential pandemic virus is supposed to help prevent natural pandemics, Esvelt added, but he calculated the research is likely to kill a hundred times as many people as it saves because the likelihood of the research being used maliciously far outweighs the likelihood of it helping prevent a pandemic.

 

 

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, the survival rate for Covid is 99.7 percent for unvaccinated adults, 99.9 percent for vaccinated adults, and 100 percent for unvaccinated children.

They convinced many that the threat of hospitalization or death is exponentially higher than it actually is. 

Maybe keep that in mind before you continue to advocate for and blindly obey vaccine mandates, passports, restrictions, lockdowns, masks, social distancing, ArriveCan, digital ID acceptance and all the other things they've done to us, just to stoke the fear so you didn't notice while they were stealing your money.

The main purpose of the mask mandates was to promote fear.   Masks were an excellent weapon they could force on you to help spread their message of constant fear, division, and dehumanization. 

That was the primary purpose. That’s why they were all so fired up about it. That’s why they were all so desperate for you and everybody else to wear them.

It’s important we have our heads around that because it will help us avoid letting them do it again in the future.

It wasn’t just about control.

It wasn’t just about dividing and dehumanizing us.

It wasn’t just about turning us against each other and forcing us to deny science so we could devastate each others’ social, psychological, and emotional health.

All of those were just welcome byproducts to the “public health experts” and other elites who to this day claim masking provides value. But the primary purpose was to promote fear, and to stifle your speech and expression so you perpetually signaled that fear to everyone else.

“I’m afraid, and you should be too.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

I will say that if they invent a digital ID for politicians that tracks government spending, MP expenses, time in Parliament, private jet use and broken promises....I would fully get behind that one.

 

We have data that you dumped your allotted bug paste out onto the sidewalk Citizen #2966777677. In light of this, further rations for the month of Sept 2030 have been curtailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

I mean, c'mon people.

Surely your gut has to be telling you that something is massively wrong in all this.  Even with the monumental propaganda and fear-porn that we've all been subjected to for the past 2 1/2 years, lots of us have figured this out by now.

 

The ends justify the means. One of the very first things the Nazis did was identify their targets. For that they needed data. Where are we on this list? Some say as high as #6. Who is the Us and who is the Them? The compliant vs the non-compliant? They do NEED compliance to proceed with their plans...

1*pyy_sGXQ078pCwzjaWaCBw.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dialamah said:

What percentage of the control group (non smokers) got Covid, do you remember?  

I’ve been trying to find anything on the French study, it’s amazing how things get wiped off the internet.  I’m pretty sure the answer to your question is over 90%, but I can’t find it now…

 

Here’s another study, similar results:

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.668995/full
 

Our monocentric study shows that the rate of daily smokers is significantly lower amongst the patients with symptomatic COVID-19 compared to the French population. This was regardless of the patients' admission status. The SIRs of daily smokers in the outpatients and inpatients groups were identical at 0.24 [0.12–0.48] and 0.24 [0.14–0.40], respectively, which is 76% lower than that of the French population (after adjusting for age and gender).

Edited by sharkman
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covid test near me: People forced to urinate, defecate outside due to long lines | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site

The Australian government’s mandates and the rapid spread of omicron cases have caused long lines outside of testing centers nationwide. Since there are not enough toilets at these testing centers and the wait times have been so long, some people had to relieve themselves in public by defecating in their cars, or consider wearing adult diapers.

That free people in a developed nation allowed the state to humiliate them in this way is both embarrassing and depressing.

It's also frightening how much Western democracies have adopted Chinese communist style "zero covid" policies.  They are just cruel, harmful and dangerous.

There's not much the Chinese people can do about their lot, but here in Canada, we can reject Trudeau's "zero covid" Chinese-style policies by writing our MPs, attending protests, speaking up at every opportunity and vote that dictator out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sharkman said:

I’ve been trying to find anything on the French study, it’s amazing how things get wiped off the internet.  I’m pretty sure the answer to your question is over 90%, but I can’t find it now…

I found this, but I don't think it's the same study you were referencing.  This one was ongoing till June of 2022, I didn't see any results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sharkman said:

I’ve been trying to find anything on the French study, it’s amazing how things get wiped off the internet.  I’m pretty sure the answer to your question is over 90%, but I can’t find it now…

 

7 minutes ago, dialamah said:

I found this, but I don't think it's the same study you were referencing.  This one was ongoing till June of 2022, I didn't see any results.

Check my previous post if you missed it, I edited it to add a different French study finding much lower Covid infections among the smoker population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One Canadian's experience, from Kingston, ON.  Experiences have to be told in "code" or these groups are deleted.

Some use "carrot" for the jabs, some use a pineapple emoji for the 2nd shot, some use a duck emoji for the "quack" jab.

Less than a year ago, these groups were full of people who chose to be unvaccinated.  Now there are a lot of this kind of post - people who have experienced jab injuries or jab deaths in their family. People asking for help because the medical community basically ignores their symptoms and they are being told it's just "anxiety" and getting sent home.

In the last couple months, there are getting to be a lot of nurses on these groups.  They are seeing the damage being done and are not okay with it.  It's weighing heavy on their consciences.  They don't know what to do because doctors lose their jobs if they report injuries.  There is no support for the vaccine injured, no acknowledgment of the injuries.

Canada's vaccine injury fund is a friggin' joke.  Most of these vaccine injured have been unable to work for almost a year now.

Quote

Immediately after the First 🥕 I felt quite unwell but thought hey, that’s normal for a bit so I slept for three days and felt so so but able to get up and eat. That week, I experienced sharp nerve pain in my feet, the kind that makes one jump it’s so intense and painful. I thought again hey, just part of the process and ignored the pain thinking it would pass. Then around day 9 post 🥕 I had intense pain behind my knees and down a bit…just Incredibly painful. It woke me up and I couldn’t sleep at all that night. In the morning My legs were very swollen and spongy like Idema swelling. Doc sent me to ER for blood clots but tests came back negative. They sent me home saying, “come back if you get worse.”shortly after maybe a day, I woke up and immediately fell when I tried to walk. My feet were not getting the signal from my brain or at least that’s what it felt like. I would imagine that a stroke would feel very similar to my experience. In fact I thought I was having a stroke at the time. My body was completely uncoordinated I couldn’t walk, couldn’t balance. My doctor then directed me back to the ER with concerns about Guillain Barre. The doctor I saw agreed That I was presenting with GB and sent me over to another hospital for a spinal tap to test for GB where I underwent a rash of basic neurological test from 20 year old interns, like asking me to try and walk, running a pencil up my the bottom of my foot that sort of thing but no spinal tap was performed which is unconscionable because if you have GB you can very easily die from it. So they sent me home again. Before I left I asked the doctor if he had ruled out GB and he said “well no we haven’t ruled it out but again if you get worse come back” He Also said, “it seems like you have the sniffles so maybe it’s from that.” just imagine writing off all these symptoms to the sniffles. they sent me home with the horrific idea that my body could slowly become paralyzed from GB. It was the most frightening imaginable experience of my life. So over the next few days the paralysis moved up to my bladder and to my bowel to my back and then it finally landed in my throat and I couldn’t swallow which are classic symptoms of GB that the hospital obviously missed. I couldn’t swallow for weeks. I slept with large signs at my door for the paramedics saying “if I can’t breathe or swallow I have GB” just in case I could manage to call 911 in the event that I was actually dying. What my doctor told me was that People with GB who die, have lung paralysis and they can’t breathe and that’s the end of them because you can’t even pick up the phone and make that phone call because your lungs and arms are paralyzed. So that’s what I was living with for days on end. Because I kept getting sent home from the hospital I just couldn’t go back and put myself through that experience again, being tossed around from one doctor to the next and really not being believed or even diagnosed. Once again I was sent home with the message that if it gets worse come back. I put myself in great harms way by not going back. I realize that now. So for weeks on end I couldn’t walk properly….my balance was terrible. I would topple over and fall and I had a lot of body pain with the severe nerve pain, cognitive disfunction, memory problems confusion, fatigue. On top of all that I had a thing called Syncope which is when your body fades out of consciousness and you’re literally gone for maybe 10 seconds and then you come back so it’s like having a small death every 15 minutes. it was absolutely terrifying. What I was most discouraged about besides the obvious physical and mental pain, was the lack of care Because of thestaffs complete and utter denial of any connection to the 🥕. So they offered absolutely no support for me, no diagnosis and they ignored what was right in front of their faces which was classic GB symptoms. they didn’t test for it and I could’ve died because of their bias and ignorance. I went to a homeopathic doctor out of desperation and to this day I still believe the only reason why I didn’t die of GB was because of her intervention. So now I live with a rash of challenging symptoms that are ongoing and often quite debilitating But grateful to still be here in spite of the medical negligence I experienced in Kingston Ontario. I am NOT an anti 🥕. I got the first 🥕 and this was my experience. I can never be 🥕again. Would love to hear from anyone else who developed GB post 🥕 I’m not sure why but I can’t respond to anyone’s replies. Thank you for the kind words and support.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

My 44 year old son in law was a NYC EMT. He was told if he did not get🥕he would no longer get OT and would no longer be able to teach. He felt very sick after first but doc at work said he had to get second. He gave in and died eight days later. When i saw batch listings of the most lethal batches his were at the top. Now my 7 year old granddaughter has to grow up without a Dad😭

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

I've played tennis for 20 years. I was healthy and taking no medications. Let me also that I'm a RN and you know how the medical field were required to get it or lose your job. 2 weeks after getting the first one I had a stroke. The stroke was located in the pontine/brain stem area of my brain. This type of stroke can mimic bells palsy and guess what one of the main side effects is? I wonder how many people actually had a stroke and was told it was bells palsy? I knew it wasn't just bell's palsy. Bells palsy doesn't cause you to have memory issues, speech issues, or weakness. My reason for this post is that I have a theory on the athletic people that are throwing clots. I think that even mild dehydration can exacerbate the possibility of stroke or death. I looked at my labs from the hospital and I was a little dehydrated just like many times before I'm sure. No other issues with the lab work. No issues with my heart. The difference was the 🥕 I had 2 weeks before. Like I said, it's just a theory but everyone please stay HYDRATED

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

I worked for the nhs for 30 years and planned to stay until I retired (I'm 47 years old). For the latter 16 years, I was a practice manager in a GP surgery, 13k patients and 40 staff. I was the only one who refused the 🥕 and argued with the GPs and clinical staff about how they could say it was safe with no data, the lack of consenting and the general acceptance of essentially an unknown outcome. I left 1 year ago and now work for a trade union. Since I've left:
1 the chief pharmacist lost her husband from a heart attack (found dead in bed) 50 years of age
2 the chief pharmacists best man, died of a heart attack whilst on holiday, also 50 years of age
3 pharmacy technician lost her son from a heart attack, 38 years of age
4 head nurse, recently diagnosed with breast cancer, the size of a grapefruit,
The frustration of seeing people not connecting the dots is unbelievable .... people that are capable of critical thinking and more worryingly ignoring what is going on

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jacques Attali, 1981, then advisor to François Mitterrand, in a book of interviews with Michel Salomon, stated the following:

 

Quote

 

"In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as he exceeds 60-65 years old man lives longer than he produces and he costs society dearly.

Then the weak and then the useless who bring nothing to society because there will be more and more, and especially finally the most stupid. Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases.

Of course, we will not be able to execute people or make camps. We will get rid of it by making them believe that it is for their own good.

The population too large, and for the most part useless, is something economically too expensive. Societally, it is also far preferable for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorate.

Nor will we be able to pass intelligence tests to millions and millions of people, you think so!

We will find something or provoke it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the obese, it does not matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe in it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.

The selection of idiots will be done on their own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own. »

 

 

[ The Future of Life – Jacques Attali, 1981 ]
Interviews with Michel Salomon, collection Les Visages de l'avenir, éditions Seghers.

For your information and in response to those who wonder, there has been a second edition of Michel Salomon's book, redacted from the most disturbing elements. The words quoted in this post and attributed to the benefactor of humanity Attali, no longer appear in the new edition of the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2021/21_0123.htm Preventing Chronic Disease. Underlying Medical Conditions and Severe Illness Among 540,667 Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19, March 2020–March 2021

From 2020-2021

They already knew who was most at risk, but they deliberately tried to convince everyone that we all faced the same risk.

Why?

Note one of the risk factors for severe illness in the Results section:

Quote

anxiety and fear-related disorders (aRR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.25–1.31),

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Booster Nations:  The Never-ending Onslaught of Covid Booster Shots
 
 
Robert W Malone MD, MS
 
Guest commentary and opinion by Jeremy Harrigan
 
 
Quote

 

When I think back to my childhood and all the injections I received as a kid, and then fast forward to my time served in the Army for 20 years, I can remember some of the shots I had prior to deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan involving some boosters that they told me were necessary, so of course I just stuck out my arm like a good boy or a good soldier and didn’t think much of it.
First, a quick flashback to the Pill Scene from original film “The Matrix”, from 1999: Morpheus (Lawrence Fishburne) offers Neo (Keanu Reeves) the choice of taking the Blue Pill or the Red Pill. If Neo took the blue pill, he could wake up in his bed and believe whatever he wanted to believe about the world he lived in, basically just living out his life going through the motions, being a good citizen, a hard worker, and always giving blind obedience to authority. But if he took the red pill, the scales would be lifted from his eyes and would come to know the truth that he was born into bondage, a slave to a system of tyranny and absolute control over human beings embedded inside a fake reality computer program called The Matrix. Out of sense of curiosity but also a leap of faith, of course Neo takes the Red Pill and he becomes a total bad-ass, and you know the rest of the story if you watched the movie and its sequels.
Sadly, so many people around the world want to continue taking the blue-pill, or are taking the blue-pill whether they even realize it or not. Sure, no government institutions or media outlets are perfect, but they must still be looking out for my well-being (they reckon to themselves), so I will keep doing what I’m told; I’m sure everything will work out just fine. Whether it is from a sense of pride, arrogance or stubborn ignorance, they continue to fall for a counterfeit, and thus bury their heads in the sand as time marches on.
Now, having been red-pilled for over ten years when it comes to the greed and corruption of Big Pharma, especially when it comes to the push to vaccinate the world in general, it seems this unbridled Covid booster campaign just keeps gaining speed. The other day, I went to the coronavirus.house.gov press releases webpage and was blown away by a statement Rep. James E. Clyburn, Chairman of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis issued following a statement after the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) authorized Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech single dose bivalent coronavirus vaccines for use as a booster at least two months following primary or booster vaccination for virtually all Americans 12 and older by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). You can read the statement HERE. The narrative still gets pushed forward, and the drug manufactures still receive impetuous, lavish praise.
Summary of key points:
  • COVID-19 vaccine boosters have been generating a lot of controversy
  • COVID-19 vaccine boosters have not undergone any human trials, not even on mice
  • The expected harms caused by the boosters likely outweigh any benefits to public health
Mandated Booster Shots Cause More Harm Than Good
Despite the narrative surrounding Rep Clyburn’s statement which continues to brainwash blue-pilled America, I had to a double-take and read again the part where the FDA is authorizing this new single dose bivalent coronavirus vaccines for use as a booster at least two months following primary or booster vaccination. Are you kidding me? The booster I had two months ago is no good, and now they are telling me I need another one? What the heck is going on here? Most fully-vaccinated should have an easy time remembering whether they had the first shot, or had their first two shots with 4-6 weeks between each one. But I suppose there are those out there who may be asking themselves “Wait a minute, gosh how many boosters have I had now, gee I’ve lost count”. In Canada, public health authorities are suggesting Canadians will need COVID-19 vaccines every 90 days. It just goes on and on.
According to Dr. Anthony Fauci, it’s full speed ahead with the booster protocol, who stated on CBC this week “We don’t have time to do a clinical trial because we need to get the vaccine out now,” pointing to how about 400 Americans are dying per day with COVID-19 and thousands of others are in hospitals with the disease. Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, said that Fauci’s comments were hypocritical because randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were required for the original vaccines, when the mortality of the virus was much higher. You can find the rest of what Dr. Risch had to say in response to Dr. Fauci, who is echoing other top U.S. officials, including CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, on this page.
When is the world going to wake up and begin to realize some very basic, rational common-sense arguments: if social distancing works, why do we need masks?’ If masks work, why do we need social distancing? If both social distancing and masks work, why do we need to take a vaccine? If the vaccines work, why do we need social distancing and masks combined or if the original first two jabs worked and were really that good, why would anyone need boosters, even if they considered themselves to be high-risk? And this far into the pandemic, if my last booster did some necessary clean up or repair from the injection I had before that, why then do I need another booster? And another? And yet another?
Voluntary boosters are one thing, but when mandates are superimposed onto boosters such as on our college campuses right now, our young people become most vulnerable. Any young college student who already considers themselves fully-vaccinated are in peril. They may feel compelled or directed to undergo boosters just to enroll and start fall classes. It’s a trap, because there is no recourse for vaccine-injured young adults—the very people who will be running our country in generations to come. Other repercussions from these mandates on our young people are becoming more widespread and will have lasting effects.
In Canada, Justin Trudeau is threatening that COVID tyranny will return this fall if 90% booster shot compliance isn’t achieved. In other words, OBEY OR BE LOCKED DOWN…again! With summer about to close in, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is already threatening to reinstate more lockdowns, mask mandates, and “vaccine” requirements for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) if not enough Canadians voluntarily line up for the latest “booster” jab. And he expects maximum compliance.
In a statement he provided to the press inside what appeared to be a hospital room, Trudeau argued that Covid is “not done with us yet,” even though the vast majority of the world is done with it. “We might want to be done with it, but it’s still around,” Trudeau stated. “And yes, we have a lot more tools, a lot more understanding, a lot more knowledge on how to keep ourselves and our loved ones safe. But we also know that as winter comes, and as people get pushed back indoors, there is a real risk of another serious wave of covid.” The only solution to that potential “wave,” according to Trudeau, is “to ensure that everyone is up to date on their vaccinations,” otherwise provinces will have to “make decisions about restrictions and mandates.”
“The recommendation is you should be up to date on your vaccinations if you have had a dose within six months,” Trudeau added. “Everyone who has been a while since their vaccinations should look at the fact that we have new vaccines coming out this month that are tailored against Omicron that will provide better protection, and everyone should get out and get vaccinated.”
“If we are able to hit that 80, 85, 90 percent of Canadians up to date in their vaccinations, we’ll have a much better winter with much less need for the kinds of restrictions and rules that were so problematic for everyone over the past years,” he went on to blab.
“But every step of the way, government’s responsibility is to keep people safe, to prevent our health care systems from getting overwhelmed, and that’s where individuals choosing to make sure they’re up to date on their vaccinations with these new vaccines is going to help us all.”
You can watch Trudeau say these crazy things here.
The Freedom Convoy trucker protest is when I really started tuning in to what Justin Trudeau was saying, how he was behaving and the tyrannical decisions he began making. Trudeau has been on an extreme tyranny kick the past few years, and really seems to be enjoying himself and his ability to impose whatever nightmarish scenario he wishes with seemingly minimal pushback from Canadians.
He invoked the Emergencies Act (passed by Parliament way back in 1988) and shut down people’s bank accounts, not just of the truckers but even those who supported and aided the truckers. I would suspect Trudeau is going to be met with resistance from the people if he thinks another round of plandemic theater is justified. In the video above Trudeau uses a mixture of wild hand gestures, frequent bug eyes, and spastic verbal inflections which show how truly deranged this manchurian candidate with a dictator complex is becoming.
With the booster rollout already unfolding, we can expect the medical tyranny dial to be turned to maximum this fall and winter. Perhaps this booster obsession may finally turn on the light bulb for the masses who have lined up willingly to take the initial 2-3 jabs, that they would come to their senses and say enough is enough—no boosters for me, something is just not right here.
And by the way, they are not booster doses anymore. It’s an ‘updated vaccine’ and you will need it 8 weeks after your last shot, or so says the White House. Inconveniently, the FDA specifically calls these products “updated boosters”, but corporate media will be quite glad to use the language recommended by noted immunologist and vaccinologist Dr. Karine Jean-Pierre, who currently serves as the Chief spokesperson for the executive branch of the United States government.

 

 
Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SSRN-id4206070.pdf (canadahealthalliance.org)

 

Covid-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments Against Mandates at Universities - Canada Health Alliance

Quote

University booster mandates are unethical because: 1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5) mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialization and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support. 

 

Please stand up for our young people in Uni.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NIH Inspector General Finds More Than Half of Clinical Trials During Covid 'Did Not Comply' with Federal Requirements - Becker News

Quote

 

The NIH’s IG found that more than half the clinical trials did not meet the requisite federal reporting guidelines, either by failing to meet the deadline or by not reporting the results at all. The Table summarizes the number of clinical trials requiring results to be submitted in 2019 or 2020 that were submitted on time, late, or not submitted at all.

62107000-scaled.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/5/2022 at 3:07 PM, Goddess said:

So, Trudeau has announced that, going into fall, he expects 80-90% of Canadians to be "up-to-date" on covid vaccinations, specifying that no matter how many you've had to this point - if your last shot was 6 months ago, you need another one.  Veiled threat given that if 80-90% of the population do not comply, lockdowns and restrictions will happen this winter.

So let's look at the trial data for the new bivalent boosters.  Because he certainly didn't.

To start, the study done on the boosters was completed on mice, not humans.  Here's the kicker - do you know how many mice were in the study?

Eight.

That's right - 8 mice.

The trial consisted of injecting these 8 mice with the concoction, and then testing their blood for antibody titers.

That's it.

Now, previously, I have explained how "antibodies" are not a good measure of efficacy because they are not the main defense against viruses, your body's natural immune system is and a couple of other areas.  Antibodies are a bit further down on the list, so they really don't tell you if the concoction will create immunity for you.  All it tells you is that Hey, you have some antibodies.

The only data about these mice is in the last 2 pages of Pfizer's presentation.

Here is the relevant chart:

727658375_booster1.thumb.jpg.f531bacf1963ad79260b71595ba01327.jpg

This picture shows the outcomes of 3 different concoctions:

In blue - BNT162b2 which is the  original covid shot.

In red - OMI BA 4/5 which is based on the variant spikes only.

In purple - both of these combined.

The purple set is the one we are interested in.  What do the bars show?

Each bar shows the ability of the given vaccine to produce neutralizing antibodies.  Each bar represents a different variant - original Wuhan, BA1, BA2, BA2.12.1, and BA4/5.  The higher the values on the bar, the higher the antibody titers.  The "Consistent" arrows show where the booster was consistent and the "Inconsistent" arrows show where there was inconsistency.

The circled set of bars shows that the BA5 bivalent booster was incredibly consistent at producing antibodies against the Wuhan variant (which doesn't exist anymore).

However, the bivalent booster was incredibly inconsistent when producing antibody responses to the BA5 variant.

Here is a close up of the right hand bar so you can see the problem:

1373815294_booster2.thumb.jpg.da6e1e72b74bca3f34cc5ac8a27addd7.jpg

You can see the antibody titers are all over the place.  One mouse had a titer of 300, 2 had titers of 700, 2 more had titers of 1500, one had a titer of 3000, one had 7000 and the last mouse had titers of 22,000.

So the 8 standard lab mice, while reacting identically to the Wuhan strain, reacted WILDLY DIFFERENT when producing BA5 antibodies.  One mouse produced 300 titers, while another produced 73X more - at 22,000 titers.

Did the mouse who got greater reaction feel sicker?  Did the mouse who got the least get no protection?  Pfizer is not sharing that data.

Now, think if this was not mice, but PEOPLE.  One person gets X amount of antibodies, the next person gets a 73X more intense or severe reaction.  Will that 73X greater reaction lead to myocarditis?  Will the first person receive NO protection?

We have no idea.

But we are going to give (and possibly force) billions of doses of this inconsistent concoction to people based on these 8 mice.  This means, roughly 1/8 of them will expereince a 73X more intense reaction.  Does that bother you?

We are all different - different ages, different races, different immunological histories, different varieties of covid infection or no infection at all.

I can already hear what some here would say - "Mice are not people!"  Exactly.  I agree.  So why would you not test it on people?  I think we all know that boosters are going to mandated soon.  

Oh, and here's another thing - the FDA refused to convene the VRBPAC, the committee that approves these types of things.

Are you wondering what happened to the mice in the end?  For the same reason why mRNA vaccines have never been marketed to humans because the animals died after being reinfected, the mice all died when reinfected.

The FDA defines medical quackery as "health fraud drug products with unproven effectiveness that claim to treat disease or improve health."

How is this not medical quackery?

 

I read that all the mice died after being given the jab. WTH? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/5/2022 at 3:07 PM, Goddess said:

So, Trudeau has announced that, going into fall, he expects 80-90% of Canadians to be "up-to-date" on covid vaccinations, specifying that no matter how many you've had to this point - if your last shot was 6 months ago, you need another one.  Veiled threat given that if 80-90% of the population do not comply, lockdowns and restrictions will happen this winter.

So let's look at the trial data for the new bivalent boosters.  Because he certainly didn't.

To start, the study done on the boosters was completed on mice, not humans.  Here's the kicker - do you know how many mice were in the study?

Eight.

That's right - 8 mice.

The trial consisted of injecting these 8 mice with the concoction, and then testing their blood for antibody titers.

That's it.

Now, previously, I have explained how "antibodies" are not a good measure of efficacy because they are not the main defense against viruses, your body's natural immune system is and a couple of other areas.  Antibodies are a bit further down on the list, so they really don't tell you if the concoction will create immunity for you.  All it tells you is that Hey, you have some antibodies.

The only data about these mice is in the last 2 pages of Pfizer's presentation.

Here is the relevant chart:

727658375_booster1.thumb.jpg.f531bacf1963ad79260b71595ba01327.jpg

This picture shows the outcomes of 3 different concoctions:

In blue - BNT162b2 which is the  original covid shot.

In red - OMI BA 4/5 which is based on the variant spikes only.

In purple - both of these combined.

The purple set is the one we are interested in.  What do the bars show?

Each bar shows the ability of the given vaccine to produce neutralizing antibodies.  Each bar represents a different variant - original Wuhan, BA1, BA2, BA2.12.1, and BA4/5.  The higher the values on the bar, the higher the antibody titers.  The "Consistent" arrows show where the booster was consistent and the "Inconsistent" arrows show where there was inconsistency.

The circled set of bars shows that the BA5 bivalent booster was incredibly consistent at producing antibodies against the Wuhan variant (which doesn't exist anymore).

However, the bivalent booster was incredibly inconsistent when producing antibody responses to the BA5 variant.

Here is a close up of the right hand bar so you can see the problem:

1373815294_booster2.thumb.jpg.da6e1e72b74bca3f34cc5ac8a27addd7.jpg

You can see the antibody titers are all over the place.  One mouse had a titer of 300, 2 had titers of 700, 2 more had titers of 1500, one had a titer of 3000, one had 7000 and the last mouse had titers of 22,000.

So the 8 standard lab mice, while reacting identically to the Wuhan strain, reacted WILDLY DIFFERENT when producing BA5 antibodies.  One mouse produced 300 titers, while another produced 73X more - at 22,000 titers.

Did the mouse who got greater reaction feel sicker?  Did the mouse who got the least get no protection?  Pfizer is not sharing that data.

Now, think if this was not mice, but PEOPLE.  One person gets X amount of antibodies, the next person gets a 73X more intense or severe reaction.  Will that 73X greater reaction lead to myocarditis?  Will the first person receive NO protection?

We have no idea.

But we are going to give (and possibly force) billions of doses of this inconsistent concoction to people based on these 8 mice.  This means, roughly 1/8 of them will expereince a 73X more intense reaction.  Does that bother you?

We are all different - different ages, different races, different immunological histories, different varieties of covid infection or no infection at all.

I can already hear what some here would say - "Mice are not people!"  Exactly.  I agree.  So why would you not test it on people?  I think we all know that boosters are going to mandated soon.  

Oh, and here's another thing - the FDA refused to convene the VRBPAC, the committee that approves these types of things.

Are you wondering what happened to the mice in the end?  For the same reason why mRNA vaccines have never been marketed to humans because the animals died after being reinfected, the mice all died when reinfected.

The FDA defines medical quackery as "health fraud drug products with unproven effectiveness that claim to treat disease or improve health."

How is this not medical quackery?

 

I just recently heard about sudden death syndrome and that many people are suddenly dying and that doctors cannot understand why? Well duh, could it be because of the covid vaccine, fools? Even insurance companies are having to pay out huge death benefits which they say is way out of whack. And funeral parlors are getting plenty more business these days. Only idiots and fools will want to take any more covid vaccine jabs with what we are hearing about those vaccine jabs today. This is all about the money and what big pharma and what our dear Marxist leader in Ottawa can make from pushing more vaccines on the public. It's not covid that is maiming and killing people, it is the vaccines that are doing just that.

Many of those peasants have to take their heads out of their arse holes and start listening instead of just following what their dear lying Canadian politicians, the lying Canadian media, and those lying so called health experts in the government have to say. They have already proven that they are nothing but liars. Wake up, for Christ sake's. 🤔

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,648
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ccarina
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • CDN1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Darrin earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • MikhailinNorthBay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • CDN1 earned a badge
      First Post
    • DUI_Offender went up a rank
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...