Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

If that war was wrong, why didn't Canada save the people of Iraq?

 

In fact, why didn't the world stopped America?

 

And when I say stop I don't mean protesting, I mean "stop it"....

Edited by paulagnes1745
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Because they lacked the means and will to do so.

 

But weren't they angry about that? They can find their will through that....

 

And even today, they are still angry.....

Edited by paulagnes1745
Posted

Canada so Britain was OK with invade of Iraq because of the potential of oil reserves that they can steal.

"You cant ask people about their belief, its none of your business, its between them and their God but you have to ask them whether or not they need something or they have a problem to be solved." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

"We are not intended to conquer someone's lands but we want to conquer hearts." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, paulagnes1745 said:

 

But weren't they angry about that? The can find their will through that....

 

And even today, they are still angry.....

 

Agreed...they were very angry about the invasion of Iraq, but there was no political will or military capability to do anything about it.   Canada did not even try to get the UN General Assembly to pass a resolution to stop the invasion, mostly because Canada is very dependent on exports to the United States.

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
32 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Agreed...they were very angry about the invasion of Iraq, but there was no political will or military capability to do anything about it.   Canada did not even try to get the UN General Assembly to pass a resolution to stop the invasion, mostly because Canada is very dependent on exports to the United States.

Chretien basically said that he hoped the "Coalition of the Willing" would win, since they're our allies, but that Canada didn't want to participate in the war in Iraq because the reasons to invade Iraq were dubious.  Canada was right.

Posted
2 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

Chretien basically said that he hoped the "Coalition of the Willing" would win, since they're our allies, but that Canada didn't want to participate in the war in Iraq because the reasons to invade Iraq were dubious.  Canada was right.

 

Chretien was more than happy to support the invasion of Iraq in 2003 if the UNSC authorized the use of force.    Canada still provided material support to the war.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

They had no military power to do so is the real answer. America spends more on the military than the next 10 largest nations combined.

Canadians are not low iq enough to support a senseless war. Its not our job to stop the Americans from being stupid.

The only thing the world can or could do to stop America, is what they have done, get America in a protracted military conflict with locals.

Posted
17 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Chretien was more than happy to support the invasion of Iraq in 2003 if the UNSC authorized the use of force.    Canada still provided material support to the war.

That's true.

Posted
On 9/23/2018 at 4:15 PM, h102 said:

They had no military power to do so is the real answer. America spends more on the military than the next 10 largest nations combined.

Canadians are not low iq enough to support a senseless war. Its not our job to stop the Americans from being stupid.

The only thing the world can or could do to stop America, is what they have done, get America in a protracted military conflict with locals.

So...... get America in a protracted military conflict......... and when that happens, America will be gone and everything will be happy?

Posted
17 minutes ago, paulagnes1745 said:

So...... get America in a protracted military conflict......... and when that happens, America will be gone and everything will be happy?

 

No...the Americans have only grown stronger with additional military conflict(s). 

The USA was born with war, expanded with war, and is now the world's lone military superpower.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

C’mon, Iraq was a mess.  You can draw a direct line between countries having to accept hundreds of thousands of refugees and the war in Iraq, which, along with pro Shiite support in Iraq, spawned ISIS.  Countries like Canada are now dealing with that fallout.  The US has turned its back to some extent. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

C’mon, Iraq was a mess.  You can draw a direct line between countries having to accept hundreds of thousands of refugees and the war in Iraq, which, along with pro Shiite support in Iraq, spawned ISIS.  Countries like Canada are now dealing with that fallout.  The US has turned its back to some extent. 

 

Canada is a minor player with no national interests in the region besides more oil services contracts and SNC-Lavalin bribes.

Nobody is forcing Canada to take in more Syrian refugees except Justin Trudeau.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, paulagnes1745 said:

So...... get America in a protracted military conflict......... and when that happens, America will be gone and everything will be happy?

America will be weakened and learn their record.

Posted
10 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

C’mon, Iraq was a mess.  You can draw a direct line between countries having to accept hundreds of thousands of refugees and the war in Iraq, which, along with pro Shiite support in Iraq, spawned ISIS.  Countries like Canada are now dealing with that fallout.  The US has turned its back to some extent. 

 

So why didn't Canada stop America then?

Posted
On 9/24/2018 at 5:09 PM, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Canada is a minor player with no national interests in the region besides more oil services contracts and SNC-Lavalin bribes.

Nobody is forcing Canada to take in more Syrian refugees except Justin Trudeau.

Actually accepting legitimate refugees is a good thing to do as long as the country can afford it, which it can.  So can America.  

Posted
14 hours ago, GostHacked said:

It's like telling an alcoholic not to drink. You cannot tell the USA anything.

 

NO! I'm not asking you to tell them what to do.... I'm asking you why you didn't physically stop them and save the people of Iraq?

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 9/22/2018 at 4:55 PM, Altai said:

Canada so Britain was OK with invade of Iraq because of the potential of oil reserves that they can steal.

Funny we forgot to steal any...must've slipped our minds.

"We're not above nature, Mr Hacker, we're part of it. Men are animals, too!"

"I know that, I've just come from the House of Commons!"

[Yes, Minister]

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,891
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    armchairscholar
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...