America under President Trump

[sharkman]

34 minutes ago, Argus said:

I'm big on reality. The supporters of Trump fall principally into four categories.

Alt-right: racists, militia loons, KKK members, white pride groups, and the mob of faceless nobodies who might not be members, but like to say 'nigger', 'kike' and 'faggot' without anyone making disapproving sounds.

Blue collar fools: People who don't know much about politics, don't know much about economics, don't know much about government, don't read the newspapers, but 'know' that things aren't right, and those damn Chinese are eating our lunches. 

Fox Fools: Idiots who principally get their news from Fox and other right wing outlets, and, like the above group, know virtually nothing about almost everything. They do know, however, that Hillary Clinton was a Satan worshiping feminazi who loves to murder Americans and whores herself to everyone with a dollar, especially foreigners.

Bible Thumpers: All they care about is abortion. Trump could promise to sacrifice virgins atop his tower every day as long as he'd agree to ban abortion. These anti-abortion people are fixated. They don't care about real people, or even real babies. They only care about fetuses. 

This is precisely why the left will lose at the mid-terms.  A failure to grasp the simple reality that they lost, not because of a small minority of extremists on the right, but because their agenda doesn't work.  Obama proved it beyond a doubt, and this is what was rejected at the polls.  Keep crying in your beer and lashing out at imaginary foes, we'll take it from here.

[BubberMiley]

3 minutes ago, sharkman said:

This is precisely why the left will lose at the mid-terms.  A failure to grasp the simple reality that they lost, not because of a small minority of extremists on the right, but because their agenda doesn't work.  

Actually, Hillary got almost 2 million more votes than Trump.  Trump 2012 said that fewer votes = loss.

[BubberMiley]

23 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

In four to eight years...perhaps more. This is juuuuuust beginning.

Hillary's retirement?

[DogOnPorch]

Better luck next time: re a politician like Hillary. Keith Ellison sounds like the current favorite...you're free to fan-boy all over the dude.

[DogOnPorch]

11 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

Actually, Hillary got almost 2 million more votes than Trump.  Trump 2012 said that fewer votes = loss.

How many were either:

a] Dead

b] Illegal Immigrants

?

[bush_cheney2004]

Maybe Hillary Clinton should have promised election reform...like another foreign leader did.   President Trump is probably happy with the Electoral College now, just as that foreign leader backed down on election reform after winning.  

[Argus]

1 hour ago, sharkman said:

This is precisely why the left will lose at the mid-terms.  A failure to grasp the simple reality that they lost, not because of a small minority of extremists on the right, but because their agenda doesn't work.

I'm not on the Left. And much of the economic problems experienced by the American middle class is not because of Obama but because of a brainless adherence to the philosophy of cutting taxes by the Republicans, and shifting the cost of what services they're willing to pay for off the wealthy and onto the shoulders of the middle class.

[Argus]

1 hour ago, DogOnPorch said:

How many were either:

a] Dead

b] Illegal Immigrants

?

I'm surprised at you embracing this nonsensical meme. There has never been any known incidence of election fraud in a federal election other than the occasional isolated person. Unless, of course, you take into account all the gerrymandered districts in places like Texas and Florida.

The Republican move to enhance voter ID was clearly intended to dissuade as many poor and minorities from voting as possible. And Trump's claim of fraud was so much bald faced bluster with nothing behind it.

[bush_cheney2004]

9 minutes ago, Argus said:

I'm not on the Left. And much of the economic problems experienced by the American middle class is not because of Obama but because of a brainless adherence to the philosophy of cutting taxes by the Republicans, and shifting the cost of what services they're willing to pay for off the wealthy and onto the shoulders of the middle class.

 

Ahem...President Obama continued the "Bush era tax cuts"...except for the highest incomes.   Wealth is not the same as income.

[DogOnPorch]

1 hour ago, Argus said:

I'm surprised at you embracing this nonsensical meme. There has never been any known incidence of election fraud in a federal election other than the occasional isolated person. Unless, of course, you take into account all the gerrymandered districts in places like Texas and Florida.

The Republican move to enhance voter ID was clearly intended to dissuade as many poor and minorities from voting as possible. And Trump's claim of fraud was so much bald faced bluster with nothing behind it.

Oh, why not?

1984 is here.

[Topaz]

I wonder how many of his supporters are going to be peeve off because he's saying he's not going after Hillary?    Make sense when NO PRESIDENT has gone after the another, its  a golden among them and it looks like corruption will  survive another 4 years.

[Wilber]

25 minutes ago, Topaz said:

I wonder how many of his supporters are going to be peeve off because he's saying he's not going after Hillary?    Make sense when NO PRESIDENT has gone after the another, its  a golden among them and it looks like corruption will  survive another 4 years.

The President can't "go after" anyone, that is up to the Dept of Justice and the FBI has said twice that there is no case. If he could use the Dept of Justice  "go after" his political enemies, the US would be just another dictatorship or banana republic. Like much of his campaign, it was BS, as is his threat to sue the NYT and all those women. 

 

DoP might not be far off when he says 1984 is here.

Edited November 22, 2016 by Wilber

[OftenWrong]

Does Donald Trump use Oil of Olay?

"Keep them guessing..."

[sharkman]

7 hours ago, Topaz said:

I wonder how many of his supporters are going to be peeve off because he's saying he's not going after Hillary?    Make sense when NO PRESIDENT has gone after the another, its  a golden among them and it looks like corruption will  survive another 4 years.

Some will be upset, no doubt, as will many of the bitter lefties.  But the president could never "go after" anybody.  However, it's not up to the president to go after anybody, and by publicly saying this Trump is putting space between him and whatever the FBI and the IRS may dig up down the road several months.  Clinton's Foundation is what you might call a target rich environment, and no doubt investigators are carefully monitoring the situation as the Clintons try to cover their tracks now that they realize that they can't use the presidency to build a wall around their illegal behaviours.  

Time will tell.

[msj]

7 hours ago, Topaz said:

I wonder how many of his supporters are going to be peeve off because he's saying he's not going after Hillary?    Make sense when NO PRESIDENT has gone after the another, its  a golden among them and it looks like corruption will  survive another 4 years.

Ha ha, do people seriously think this "campaign device," as Newt Gingrich called it recently, was real? 

That #draintheswamp is anything but rhetoric? 

My gawd people never learn. 

4 more years! 4 more years! 

[msj]

7 hours ago, Wilber said:

The President can't "go after" anyone, 

I dunno, if she were brown and left the country I'm sure a drone could take her out. 

 

[bush_cheney2004]

Hillary Clinton is still facing several lawsuits and FOI inquiries concerning her actions, regardless of what Trump may or may not do.   It was these separate inquiries that helped to force her very stupid decisions into public/political view.

[The_Squid]

13 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Hillary Clinton is still facing several lawsuits and FOI inquiries concerning her actions, regardless of what Trump may or may not do.   It was these separate inquiries that helped to force her very stupid decisions into public/political view.

Yes, yes.... and president Obama literally created ISIS..... . when does the trial start???

[bush_cheney2004]

2 minutes ago, The_Squid said:

Yes, yes.... and president Obama literally created ISIS..... . when does the trial start???

 

Lawsuits don't always go to trial.....Clinton is still facing plenty of them.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/09/clinton-losing-the-election-doesnt-mean-her-scandals-will-go-away/

[DogOnPorch]

1 hour ago, The_Squid said:

Yes, yes.... and president Obama literally created ISIS..... . when does the trial start???

 

Ah yes...the JV squad...no need to do a darn thing about such amateurs. Ooooops...wait...

Edited November 23, 2016 by DogOnPorch

[DogOnPorch]

9 hours ago, Wilber said:

The President can't "go after" anyone, that is up to the Dept of Justice and the FBI has said twice that there is no case. If he could use the Dept of Justice  "go after" his political enemies, the US would be just another dictatorship or banana republic. Like much of his campaign, it was BS, as is his threat to sue the NYT and all those women. 

 

DoP might not be far off when he says 1984 is here.

 

Oh it is. How deep down the rabbit hole...? So far it looks normal...

Solution: more Islam.

[DogOnPorch]

5 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

Does Donald Trump use Oil of Olay?

"Keep them guessing..."

 

Dunno about that...but one look at that Ivanka says the ol' gene pool ain't too shabby.

Trigger Warning!!!!

Hubba Hubba

[BubberMiley]

7 hours ago, sharkman said:

Some will be upset, no doubt, as will many of the bitter lefties.  But the president could never "go after" anybody.  However, it's not up to the president to go after anybody, and by publicly saying this Trump is putting space between him and whatever the FBI and the IRS may dig up down the road several months.  Clinton's Foundation is what you might call a target rich environment, and no doubt investigators are carefully monitoring the situation as the Clintons try to cover their tracks now that they realize that they can't use the presidency to build a wall around their illegal behaviours.  

Time will tell.

No, they have nothing on the Clinton Foundation. You were just gullible again. Maybe it was the MSM that misled you. That was just a distraction to draw attention away from the actual illegal fake charity that builds statues and portraits of Trump and calls it "charity" or has fundraisers for "veterans" that just feed their general revenues to fight Trump's lawsuits.

There will be no investigation of Hillary. We don't need time to tell us his. Conned again.

[Wilber]

8 hours ago, msj said:

I dunno, if she were brown and left the country I'm sure a drone could take her out. 

 

Ok, he can't use the justice system to go after personal enemies. If it turns out that he can, the American system has failed .

[Wilber]

10 hours ago, sharkman said:

Some will be upset, no doubt, as will many of the bitter lefties.  But the president could never "go after" anybody.  However, it's not up to the president to go after anybody, and by publicly saying this Trump is putting space between him and whatever the FBI and the IRS may dig up down the road several months.  Clinton's Foundation is what you might call a target rich environment, and no doubt investigators are carefully monitoring the situation as the Clintons try to cover their tracks now that they realize that they can't use the presidency to build a wall around their illegal behaviours.  

Time will tell.

Trump just paid 25 million to make a fraud suit go away and has 75 other suits pending against him. Wonder how many of them Mr. "I don't settle" will also pay to go away. Plus all those threatened suits he has threatened which will never happen. On the other hand, two FBI investigations with no charges. But, but, but Hillary.

Alt Right = Alt Universe.

You have been gamed Sharky, everyone has.