Donald vs Hillary

[Argus]

Just now, DogOnPorch said:

Slave labour does have its advantages.

They're not slaves but an apartment probably costs $10 a month to rent over there.

[BC_chick]

2 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

 

If you listened to the debates, attended one of her rallies, or gone to her website, then you would know. If you listened to the main stream media, then you would only hear the Donald Trump rantings. The media was against Hillary, and working for Trump.

Inadvertently and in hindsight maybe but it was definitely not their intention. 

[Wilber]

2 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

Slave labour does have its advantages.

Just different standards. Probably more realistic standards. The earth can't support its entire population consuming like North Americans.

[?Impact]

42 minutes ago, Argus said:

They're not slaves but an apartment probably costs $10 a month to rent over there.

Where did you get that from? An apartment in the city in China cost about 4,029.03 ¥ ($600 - 1 bedroom) to 4,238.40 ¥ ($1200 - 3 bedroom), prices outside of the city are about half of those. 
 

[OftenWrong]

5 hours ago, ?Impact said:

 

If you listened to the debates, attended one of her rallies, or gone to her website, then you would know. If you listened to the main stream media, then you would only hear the Donald Trump rantings. The media was against Hillary, and working for Trump.

Ironic that the media was against Trump, but mainly showed and talked about him, and ultimately this may have been in his favour. Some say Trump knew what he was doing, knew how to get that "sound bite" out there because of his TV experience. Any press is good press?

[Smallc]

Doubtful - I don't think Trump ever intended to be president.

[DogOnPorch]

5 hours ago, Wilber said:

Just different standards. Probably more realistic standards. The earth can't support its entire population consuming like North Americans.

 

The Alphas are on notice as I already mentioned. Dump your bonds!

[OftenWrong]

"Different standards" demonstrates the leftist thinking. They're not wrong in the way they live, just different.

Many third world countries that produce cheap goods for westerners to use have a high rate of child labour. Child labour isn't a problem. Just different standards. Probably, more realistic standards.

Edited November 15, 2016 by OftenWrong

[OftenWrong]

Rampant pollution without environmental controls in these third world countries -which they use to their advantage to lower the cost of production. To hell with the environment, right? Just different standards. Probably, more realistic standards.

[DogOnPorch]

18 hour days in the textile factories getting poisoned by dyes...slave fishing ships...indentured labour building dream skyscrapers in the desert...it's all good for us.

[Wilber]

Child labour and pollution are issues that need to be resolved but if you think 7.4 billion people can live like the average North American, you are dreaming.

[DogOnPorch]

Who said any such thing?

[Wilber]

1 minute ago, DogOnPorch said:

Who said any such thing?

OK but being able to produce at lower cost isn't just about child labour and pollution. 

[DogOnPorch]

3 minutes ago, Wilber said:

OK but being able to produce at lower cost isn't just about child labour and pollution. 

It's the Alphas that will have to become Betas. At least a bit...

The Gammas are going to climb.

[Charles Anthony]

Folks, 

 

Please avoid thread drift. 

[The_Squid]

51 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Rampant pollution without environmental controls in these third world countries -which they use to their advantage to lower the cost of production. To hell with the environment, right? Just different standards. Probably, more realistic standards.

You think Trump is going to raise environmental standards ?

[OftenWrong]

5 minutes ago, The_Squid said:

You think Trump is going to raise environmental standards ?

Well, since the thread is about Donald vs. Hillary I would say, Trump doesn't need to raise the standards for things produced here. Hillary on the other hand would represent the status quo. Production will remain outsourced to India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and all those places where the workers suck toxic fumes every day, so that you can wear a pretty pair of blue socks for $3.

Edited November 15, 2016 by OftenWrong

[BubberMiley]

On ‎2016‎-‎09‎-‎02 at 7:41 AM, betsy said:

 

CNN called her out!

Hillary Clinton called out by CNN for not having press conferences

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_t11jMXU0E

WHEN?

She's ducking! And she's got a huge reason to.

After 255 Days Of Hillary Dodging The Press, Bob Woodward Wonders About 'Transparency'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3-wimcaXDU

If not, why won't she oblige, once and for all, put this matter to rest?

When you were so concerned that Hillary, as a presidential candidate hadn't had a press conference in a while, were you worried that you would have to look like a hypocrite when Donald the president-elect would go months without a press conference? Do you think he will ever have one? Do you really care about press conferences or was that just another parroted talking point that you were just repeating without thinking much about it?

[Argus]

3 hours ago, BubberMiley said:

Do you really care about press conferences or was that just another parroted talking point that you were just repeating without thinking much about it?

Yes.

[?Impact]

3 hours ago, Argus said:

Yes.

Would you like steak or chicken for dinner?

[cybercoma]

On 2016-12-02 at 6:16 PM, ?Impact said:

Would you like steak or chicken for dinner?

Yes.

[bush_cheney2004]

On 11/4/2016 at 4:06 PM, TimG said:

.... I would expect a major stock market collapse if Trump gets in simply because no one with money to invest trusts the guy to be rational

 

Follow-up to this prediction....U.S. stock markets have responded well to Trump's victory...at least in the short term.   Predictions were false, for now.

 

[Omni]

1 hour ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Follow-up to this prediction....U.S. stock markets have responded well to Trump's victory...at least in the short term.   Predictions were false, for now.

 

Take a closer look. It ain't trumpy boy, it'd OPEC cutting production.

[bush_cheney2004]

Just now, Omni said:

Take a closer look. It ain't trumpy boy, it'd OPEC cutting production.

 

OPEC didn't agree to cut until last week.  

[Omni]

9 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

OPEC didn't agree to cut until last week.  

I doubt Trumps little piss ant 500 jobs at Carrier will speak anywhere near as loud as OPEC cutting over a million bbl/day.