Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Some versions say rape... The KJV version was changed to "seduce"....

Of course it is open to interpretation.... now...

Originally, these things were very literal. People were stoned to death for a myriad of things... women probably had to marry their rapists... no one suffered witches to live.

When society changes for the better, it drags the church along with it and suddenly things are open to interpretation that previously weren't.

I'll ask again. Where is what you're saying in Vatican II? That's the doctrine that the Catholic Church follows. I'm not sure why that's so hard for you to understand.
  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

I'll ask again. Where is what you're saying in Vatican II? That's the doctrine that the Catholic Church follows. I'm not sure why that's so hard for you to understand.

Already answered... Vatican II claims the Old Testament is still sacred. What do they say about marrying your rapist? Probably nothing. Apparently, those passages are open to interpretation, like much of the, divinely inspired (yet surprisingly vague) bible.

Edited by The_Squid
Posted

Unless he was among those who did actual cover-ups, why woud he "own the sins of others?"

He can take steps though to repair the damage, and to ensure that offending priests get booted out to protect not only would-be victims, but also the church.

Then of course, it would be his sins too. I guess the cover up would continue.

There was a priest sentenced to 11 years today, in Canada.

Posted (edited)

Then of course, it would be his sins too. I guess the cover up would continue.

There was a priest sentenced to 11 years today, in Canada.

I don't follow.

If he was involved or in favor of cover ups is one thing (I am not comfortable in saying that he sinned - since I wouldn't know the reasons behind such actions - only God can really judge what is sinful to Him). However, I could say that he would then be similar to those who'd committed crimes dictated by the law of the land.

If there is no reason to suggest that he was in favor of any cover ups.....why would you think that the cover ups would continue? Perhaps it is best to give the new Pope the benefit of the doubt, as we grudgingly give elected politicians from our opposing political party.

The new Pope seems to have walked the talk in his fight for poor people. And one of his first message that urges the church to not be influenced by the modern world is indeed a very encouraging message....since it hints at the new Pope's courage, and activism.

He's known to have been an activist against the government in Argentina, opposing gay marriage and abortion.

The cover ups will most probably continue due to the cabal that's within the church - members of the cabal protecting fellow members. Since this has gone on for decades at least (who knows when it started really), this rot is so deeply rooted that it can also compare to how corruptions is so ingrained in third world countries.

Edited by betsy
Posted

He's known to have been an activist against the government in Argentina, opposing gay marriage and abortion.

But supporting the government when said government was a murderous military dictatorship.

Posted

Please someone show me the exact passage in the Bible demanding that a human-being is elevated to a position of a semi-God. You can't show such a passage because it does not exist. Similarly, nowhere in the Bible is there any demand that people must build places of worship.

Posted (edited)
How about this:
Matthew 16:18–19

And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)

But supporting the government when said government was a murderous military dictatorship.

Allegations. Which I'm more inclined to believe are being brought up by the leftwing in order to discredit him. Right after his election, womens' group protested saying they should have had a say in the conclave. rolleyes.gif

The Pope clearly stated where he stands, which direction he'll take the church - and definitely it wouldn't be to support gay marriage, abortion and feminism! Declaration of his intent alone is enough to galvanize his enemies.

They want a leftwing pope.

Edited by betsy
Posted (edited)

Please someone show me the exact passage in the Bible demanding that a human-being is elevated to a position of a semi-God.

As far as I know, jesus was the only 'human' that was ever elevated in the bible as a demi-god status.

Edited by Sleipnir

"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."

- Mark Twain

Posted

"He who does not pray to the Lord, prays to the Devil."

-Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

"If you're not with us, you're against us."

-George Walker Bush.

Jorge, I christen thee Pope Dubya the First!

-k

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)

Posted

"He who does not pray to the Lord, prays to the Devil."

-Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

"If you're not with us, you're against us."

-George Walker Bush.

Jorge, I christen thee Pope Dubya the First!

-k

Bush isn't Catholic.

Posted

Bush isn't Catholic.

And?

-k

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)

Posted

As far as I know, jesus was the only 'human' that was ever elevated in the bible as a demi-god status.

If you're referencing the Bible, Jesus was not elevated as a "demi-god." He was God!
Posted

If you're referencing the Bible, Jesus was not elevated as a "demi-god." He was God!

Isn't it amusing when atheists try to talk about religion?

Posted (edited)

Isn't it amusing when atheists try to talk about religion?

Do you even know what a demi-god is? Obviously not. Edited by Sleipnir

"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."

- Mark Twain

Posted

Allegations. Which I'm more inclined to believe are being brought up by the leftwing in order to discredit him. Right after his election, womens' group protested saying they should have had a say in the conclave. rolleyes.gif

The Pope clearly stated where he stands, which direction he'll take the church - and definitely it wouldn't be to support gay marriage, abortion and feminism! Declaration of his intent alone is enough to galvanize his enemies.

They want a leftwing pope.

I don't want a left wing Pope. I want no pope, no cardinals, no sexually repressed old men dictating the life choices of millions of the world's poorest people while living high off their own ill-gotten gains.
Posted (edited)

I don't want a left wing Pope. I want no pope, no cardinals, no sexually repressed old men dictating the life choices of millions of the world's poorest people while living high off their own ill-gotten gains.

Are you a Christian?

If not, you got no pope! No cardinals. And you need not have to listen to any sexually repressed old men's dictates either - whether they be cardinals, or the likes of Dawkins! laugh.png

Edited by betsy
Posted

I don't want a left wing Pope. I want no pope, no cardinals, no sexually repressed old men dictating the life choices of millions of the world's poorest people while living high off their own ill-gotten gains.

The Church isn't going anywhere anytime soon, though. Take the good when it comes, I suppose.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted (edited)

I don't want a left wing Pope. I want no pope, no cardinals, no sexually repressed old men dictating the life choices of millions of the world's poorest people while living high off their own ill-gotten gains.

Just think of them as a kind of government. Except that people have a choice as to whether they want to listen to them, follow what they say, and give money to them.

Edited by Shady
Posted

Just think of them as a kind of government. Except that people have a choice as to whether they want to listen to them, follow what they say, and give money to them.

But don't talk about them if you don't believe them?

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...