CdnFox

But the science does. And the science says i'm right and you're not. So there you go. Well based on the numbers over the last year "My kind" will kill vastly fewer trans people than trans people will kill by shooting up a school or the like. So there you go. You're still 'murder positive' math wise.

That alone should be worth watching, if it was a republican they would all be rending their garments and gnashing their teeth. Let's see how strong the believe all women proud is with this

No, it did not. Sorry. And actual science papers and medical research papers prove otherwise. This research done in 2023 shows that the primary cause of the stress and isolaiton is their disassociation as a result of their perception of what is "normal" for their perceived gender vs their actual sex. (PDF) Gender Dysphoria, Its Causes and Symptoms: A Review in other words, They don't feel like they fit in and that has nothing to do with people accepting them or not. Society says boys don't wear dresses, girls wear dresses. They know that physically they're a boy but they want to wear dresses and they feel like a girl and so they feel isolated and depressed. This is REGARDLESS of how they are accepted by society. Period. Which is why surgery, to try to bring their physical body more in synch with their mental perception, is something many crave. It's not enough to be a boy who's accepted for thinking like a girl, they want to be a girl and if they aren't it causes stress. I'm sure that someone actually abusing them for being trans makes it worse but that's not the big problem. That's the fact. People with gender dysphoria are going to suffer mental health issues NO MATTER WHAT others think. They will be depressed and lower functioning. THat's what makes it a disorder. Awww muffin, you have a cookie and a nap, you'll be fine.

I really don't believe he's an adult. It's possible that a family member served in the air force or the like and he heard some stuff from them, But there's just too many indicators but he's not that old. Older people that have had a professional career simply don't post pages and pages of the same repetitive nonsense he does. He frequently doesn't get cultural references that someone who's over the age of 40 should. There are very substantial and distinct holes in his knowledge of politics, history and how the military works that just wouldn't be there if he actually was an experienced adult as he claims. I mean, if i say a reference to you like "Ward, talk to the beaver" if you're over the age of 50 you know exactly what i'm refencing. He thinks it's some women asking for oral sex. That sort of thing. It's the internet so who knows, but i believe he's a young person, someone between 14 and 21 probably. I don't think he's ever personally served in the air force. Cadets maybe.

It's not an opinion, I'm referencing what you posted is supposed proof and they're findings. So here's what appears to have happened. As is often the case with you you started with an answer and tried to go to the web to find data that supported your answer, instead of starting with a question. You read some headlines and thought "That sounds like it proves my case" Without bothering to actually read it. Now you're mad that it doesn't say what you thought it said There is no evidence that the mental distress individuals feel is from anything other than the gender dysphoria they are experiencing. Gender dysphoria is a negative mental health state that is present in most transgender people. There is no Substantial evidence that points to transgender people killing themselves With any significantly more frequency. There is substantial evidence that they think about suicide more and feel severely depressed and suicidal more but that is a result of their mental health problem and simply proves my point about it being a serious mental health issue I know you want it to be everybody else's fault but it just isn't

Sorry kiddo but this goes Way Beyond what we've had in the past. Think about it. If we were already doing it why would they need to sign an agreement to do it?

But the benefits still don't add up to 90 billion. Not for the amount of traffic it's likely to support. Never mind the 120 to 150 is likely to actually cost And even you, arguably the fiercest proponents here, haven't made a business case that makes sense for it. Thousands of people will have their homes and property seized and be forced out, and for what? So a handful of people can make a Transit between one city and another quicker? There's no universe where that's worth $90 billion 90 billion dollars can fix almost all of our Healthcare problems. 90 billion dollars added to our military budget would allow us to properly equip a modest military with top of the line gear in planes, AA, vehicles etc. And because we have to borrow the money every single year it costs ANOTHER 2.7 BILLION dollars in interest!! Every FCUKING YEAR!!! And that's if interest rates don't go up. AND if it comes in on budget AND if it can be operated without a loss which it can't. There is NO universe where this makes sense in the slightest.

The liberal definition of a 'real' leader is somebody who can't do the job but can swindle his way into power, pretending. then once he gets in he bends or breaks whatever rules necessary to stay there. I think we're probably going to go with trying to find someone who can do the job and then once he gets in bends and breaks every rule to stay there. The pendulum always swings. Count on it

In essence. She was trying to argue what the words" have jurisdiction over' mean. Basically the US constitution refers to ctiizenship at one point has 'Having allegance ' in essence. If a person is born to parents to who have allegiance to the state then they must be citizens. Some interpret that to mean the country to which you hold your allegiance or citizenship. If you are 'beholden' to a country or a citizens of that country then that country has jurisdiction over you, even tho you may be subject to the laws of another country while you are there. There is a strong argument for that. She is arguing that because the state can impose it's legal powers on you while you're visiting, you are therefore in that state's "jurisdiction", meaning that you are subject to it's laws and that this equates to 'allegiance' albeit temporary. And she argues that because of this any child you have while you are in that state must therefore be a citizen. Hence the rebuttal "does that mean if i commit a crime in japan and i'm subject to their laws i'm japanese?" Basically the argument is silly, if it were accepted as true then any tourist visiting the us would be a citizen. She's trying to argue that while they're in america they're under american jurisdiction and the constitution would recognize that as being the same as having allegiance and therefore any births while in the US would automatically be citizens as well, being the children of temporary citizens so to speak. Basically she's a dumb binch.

Pretty much. Although it can be said that trump is the latest in a very long line of presidents who have pushed the boundaries of the power of the office. Many who have come before him have put their finger on that scale a little bit. Obama did quite a bit. Some might rightly say it feels a little bit more lopsided these days with the president being slightly more empowered than the founding fathers originally intended. But you can't pin that on trump, of dems and republicans have been allowing that for ages But as you say, regardless trump will come and go and the earth will continue spinning its diurnal travels around the sun

Veeerrrryy suspicious. Lets see.... which is more believable.... dems setting someone up on fake sex charges to ruin their political career...or dem politician is pervert who abuses women. Yeah there isn't a lot of daylight between those two choices, we're gonna have to see if more info comes out.

Cool story! Now do 'cognitive dissonance"

Well I've noticed you talked to yourself quite frequently here so I can only assume you're an extremely Pious man First thing I thought when I saw his post

Well that makes him dumber than a dyslexic snail that's been run over by a cement truck, but that doesn't mean he's abused women. I'm always slightly skeptical when a gaggle of women come out and accuse a political figure all at once many years later. That does not by any stretch of the imagination mean that what they're saying is not true but we should probably remain slightly skeptical till we see a little bit more of the evidence and the story. Like I say, the fact that a brain worm would starve if locked in this guy's cranium doesn't mean he's a predator or pervert

Here's the thing. With the left anything they don't like is terrible awful lowbrow no good very bad. Anything that came before the thing they don't like was very good much appreciated super better. In fact many on the left have criticized Lincoln tremendously I said what a terrible person is, yet here we go watching a person on the left to try and praise the same person because they decided they don't like trump more Trump is hardly the first president to swear. And as far as his vision for America we'll see how enlightened it was or wasn't when the dust settles.

Translation - I saw some stuff from somone I liked and i was happy and then i saw stuff from someone i didn't like and i was sad. Cool story.

Don't really know of the man but we'll have to see if the women's claims are credible or likely. Can't condemn the guy just yet without more info even if he is a dem.

Sure Exflyer.

Nobody knows what you're talking about now but it sounds like you are the one making up crap Sure kid 🙄🙄🙄🙄😏 Precisely what you said Precisely what you said I get it, I'd be embarrassed as shit if I said that kind of crap too. But the allies are quite correct not to assist America in this war and that includes airspace. It's also true that they've been fantastic allies whereas you claim otherwise Sorry if that hurts your feelings

For god's sake kid nobody is claiming you said they were the same thing. But you are saying that they involve similar logic and for the last bloody time the point is they are not remotely similar in logic or reality. Don't make me get crayons and explain it to you again And my logic works everywhere. When something new is created that never existed before then it doesn't have a past history prior to its creation. That's true of countries, that's true of children, that's true literally every single thing that is created. When two people get married nothing is created. The two people are exactly the same as they were before and they existed before. Nothing new is created. When several colonies come together with different histories and different parent countries and they form a new entity, that entity is at that moment created It cannot. Something cannot be both new and old. That's literally a contradiction. Something that was just created cannot be a continuation of something that already existed. You could say it was born of those things or you can say that it is descended from those things but it is not a continuation of the same thing When a baby is born it is not a continuation of its parents You cannot have a continuity of origin. That is literally a contradiction in terms In an absolute and literally every sense. Canada did not exist in any form or shape prior to its confederation. It has never had slavery. The people that created it also never had slavery as individuals. Nor were any of the people that were associated with the previous:Ies allowed to have slaves when it was created Canada has never had slavery. That is absolutely 100% true in every single sense of the word

I don't make up any crap about you and Believe me when I say that I'm not the only person laughing at you right now Sorry this didn't go your way kiddo but everything I said was true and having a temper tantrum about it isn't like you. You complained and cried about the fact that America's allies aren't helping and suggested that they never do anything. I pointed out that you're wrong and that the allies have done quite a bit and you should be grateful Simple enough. That doesn't seem to suit your agenda today and you're having a weird kissy kid about it and it would be great if you would stop that, we see more than enough from the left America has been blessed with wonderful allies. But you can't treat them like shit and expect them to come running when you start a war

They don't have a thing that actually supports what you're saying. If they do point it out, there's nothing there That's how you lose about 90% of your arguments. All you do is highlight copy and paste without actually reading or understanding anything And that's why you can't provide any science to back up your claims. Global warming will not result in a reduction in population. Nor will it result in massive amounts of refugees. These are just lies you like to tell yourself to support your weird little fantasies

LOL that's what you're reduced to at this point? Ok well there you go