CdnFox

There's absolutely consensus. There's a handful of flat earth types who still deny the science for political and personal reasons but the world has come to a decision. Canada is just about the last hold out and it's fading fast. Let me guess. You also believe the earth is flat, there's no such thing as climate change, and the moon landing was faked. The science is not only mature on the issue with several papers and research docs out there, but it makes sense. ANd there's a tonne of anecdotal testimony on top of it from people who changed too early and then came to regret it. But you will apparently put children at risk and do permanent harm to them to satisfy your own delusions. What kind of person does that make you.

Heard it from you for well over a year. Since back when you said that hamas was exercising his human rights when it's slotted civilians I suppose technically you said that here too so maybe you're right

Well that would be fine if it was just a big conspiracy theory that I had Unfortunately many experts have spoken out and my opinion comes from their concerns CSIS says China is more of a concern in the Arctic than Russia | National Post Liberals’ Enthusiasm For China Trade Deal Should Raise Alarms - USW Canada And then there's THIS guy Carney says China is a foreign interference threat In fact I can fill a pager to. Experts around the world agree that canada's new deal with china is extremely dangerous for Canada But it will make lots of money for carney and his friends. And that's why we did it

True. They seem more interested in lining their own pockets. Which is kind of what you expect from a banker incidentally. And everybody you just mentioned was a banker Meanwhile security services and others who actually worry about such things are raising the alarm left right and center. So the people who will make billions are all for it. The cops who fight this kind of thing think it's a bad idea Are you figuring this out yet? Do you need me to make it jump a little higher for you?

I'm sure you daydream about loss of possible scenarios.

Why are you denying the science? I provided a ton of it. The vast vast majority agree with what I've said and what I posted. You would have to be extremely dishonest and Hate trans people to pretend that the tiny minority who think it's worth considering a more likely to be correct than the vast majority that does not Based on science. Which is pretty cut and dry. Almost all the countries around the world have had their medical professionals come back and say we shouldn't be doing this to children. There might be one or two really rare extreme cases where it's a good idea but everybody's saying it isn't I'm relying on the science. Why aren't you? You have no experience either, you're just some TWiT on the internet who can't read a science paper to save her life Pot meat kettle. Kettle pot. And it's not done in Kruger if all I'm doing is quoting the actual experts who say you're nuts You mean you don't like being wrong and I prove you wrong every single time. The fact that you're a lying sack of shit that actually hates trans people but enjoys virtue signaling to pretend that you are disgusting Proclivity to hurt children is somehow justified does not dictate my actions You are the worst kind of enemy that trans people could have. So much so that as I said before I honestly think you are a false flag agent a lot of the time The last scientific consensus is that we shouldn't be doing hormone therapy or transition surgery for children. It's harmful. Now explain why you want to harm children so bad?

No, it's because you're simply not that bright my pointing that out has nothing to do with it. In this case it suggests that you believe that lying and extreme exaggeration are suitable replacement for intellect and reasoned discourse. But we knew that I'm able to post a lot because I'm smart and voice dictation lets me type it about 70 or 80 words a minute. It seems like a lot to you because you just used two fingers and it takes you 4 hours to think of a reply I hardly ever rage bait, I mostly just laugh at you guys Right punkin? How's those math lessons

Whereas you were hoping it was true because they'd use the nukes on the israelis. From the river to the sea, amirite?

That's obvious, the question is why not. They do not appear to have the best interests in Canada at heart

Just kind of a big deal, I don't think people get how serious our situation is getting. We are becoming less and less relevant and it is really hard to ever gain that back

NO we are NOT!!! The ENTIRE Ei program pays out 26 billion A YEAR IN TOTAL from every single cliam! We're not even paying a couple of billion for steel workers! You're talking about 50 to 100 years of EI payments. I think it's safe to say they'll stop collecting by then 🙄 And the fact is there already is programs in place in the vast majority of those people will retrain Oregon jobs if they are forced to leave the steel industry And there are many projects we can do to keep them working that don't cost between $90 and $150 billion A pipeline would cost max $20 billion and would produce even more steel That's nice but that doesn't justify this project. It's the kind of cheesy thing people say when they know they're wrong and they can't prove their point but they want to say something that sounds defensible. You offer no specifics, no facts no evidence this will adderess those needs effectively, If we spend 90 billion does that solve all the future problems? Because we probably won't have much left for anything else There is not the demand to justify the cost for this project. If the day comes when there is then we build it. In the meantime there's a million other things we could do with that money that would actually benefit our economy and grow our freaking economy while we're in trouble with the Americans The trains are fine and the highways can be expanded for a teeny fraction of what you're talking about money wise This train can only handle so many people and from what the estimates are that it can handle there is no way this is worth it Once again you cannot make an argument to justify this other than in the most general possible of terms.

You should move there. You qualify

He is easily stopped. Just quit voting for him

That's a lie. They said they did significant damage to it, and they are very expressly said they would keep an eye on it and if they tried to rebuild it then they would take for their action. But pretty much everyone said they couldn't be sure how much damage was done and that it would be possible to get it going again if they put in enough of an effort So yeah a year later it looks like they were rebuilding that program and making progress. It seemed universally accepted last year that they were getting uncomfortably close, with about enough material for about 9 bombs with a little more enrichment. I'm sure the attack last year was a major setback but even then they stated they didn't know for sure how bad they'd damaged it. Now they say they'd recovered and were getting closer. I don't trust anything without proof when it comes to WMD's but it's a credible claim that would be in keeping with the data we do know. So it's plausible at least.

No need, we're conservatives and don't need to do that Also that's not your pinky. Weirdo. Meanwhile, here's who you think should be running canada hard at work Carney government plans to water down fundraiser rules

A parent. End of story. That is where the final responsibility for such things lie unless the state can prove that their actions specifically represent a failure to produce the necessaries of life (canadian legal phrase). However it's also the advice of the pros. Social media misleads young on gender transitioning, says England review leader | Transgender | The Guardian Canada one of the world's last holdouts on transing children | National Post The Myth of Expert Consensus is Finally Being Challenged in Canada - CANADIAN GENDER REPORT "We did what the experts told us" - A Canadian family shares their story - CANADIAN GENDER REPORT Canada's Paediatric Gender Medicine Must Follow Evidence There's a 10 more as well including some well noted Canadian doctors. Canada has restricted surgery so this point to 18 and older and some provinces have restricted blockers, for 'political reasons' there's been a bit of a hold out but the science seems to be universal around the world: it does more harm than good. I'm fine with it when they hit 18. Their call. And it's a medical procedure necessary to treat a serious condition so i don't mind our health care paying for it (i think my health plan at work also covers it so i guess i'm paying there too). The train professionals agree with not transitioning kids. However you do have to accept the fact that trained professionals are every bit as susceptible to bias and prejudice as any other group. And people absolutely are 100% within their rights both legally and morally to question the decisions of experts. I can give you a hell of a lot of examples in our relatively recent history where the experts got it wrong and people who spoke out against them were right. Remember when a panel of 10 expert top doctors in the states testified to the senate that tobacco and nicotine was not addicting? I do Have you expect people to respect your decisions and your opinions then you have to be equally respectful of theirs hear them out and address them honestly

Hahah well @bush_cheney2004 there you go LOLOL turns out that old myth is true, if you say something 'stupid' three times, robo appears

Truth. Given the previous history of declaring war over wmds that turned out not to be there I could even understand if somebody came forward and said I don't believe with certainty that Iran was close to a nuclear weapon I think they would have a tough time defending that but given the circumstances you might make that argument But at the end of the day we do know with certainty that Iran had a nuclear program, they were pursuing that program we're going to get a nuclear weapon. Whether it was next week or 10 years from now maybe a questionable thing but they definitely are moving towards that So it's pretty difficult to suggest that trump wasn't legitimately concerned about the state of their nuclear program Yet somehow democrats and anti-trump zealots insist there was no possible other reason whatsoever that was even conceivable other than he wanted to distract from the Epstein files. They don't even try to claim that Iran wasn't close to nukes, they just claim that there's no possible way trump would be concerned about a nuclear Iran, it must be in order to distract from his performance at home. I just don't understand how somebody gets there.

You quoted me but I don't think you meant to quote me there, just for the record you're actually quoting treebeard

Why on earth is that funny? What are you talking about? Canada supports that and not a single conservative has spoken against it. "Yes, gender-affirming surgeries are covered by public health insurance in most Canadian provinces and territories. Coverage generally includes genital surgeries and mastectomies for individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria." Where conservatives have a problem is when you start doing that kind of surgery on 10-year-olds. And when teachers began to try and insist on the right to do that kind of thing as well as hormone treatment without parental consent. Which is a line we won't cross. And most of the countries in Europe have also followed suit and are denying that kind of surgery or any drugs which have a permanent effect and leave the kids sterile before puberty is done and they're adults enough to make a decision. There's a great deal of research to suggest that perhaps not shockingly children aren't qualified to make those kind of adult decisions and often regret it later in life. But there are still strong support for letting boy children dresses girl children if that's what they want You don't know anything do you? You just assume there's all these terrible people out there trying to get you and you haven't done a single inch of research Yeah. Once they're an adult and not a child. It has been noted that it is a significantly effective method of treating gender dysphoria, agenda dysphoria is a serious mental health issue. When have you ever heard me say otherwise? I mean since the entire time you've known me Canada's had a policy paying for this, when did you hear me complain about it? I don't like being threatened to be sent to jail if I call somebody by the wrong pronoun. And I don't like the idea that men can compete in women's sports just for saying that they're in touch with their inner vagina or some damn thing. But that's not really anti-trans that's more standing up for other people's rights. I should have the right to call you on man just like I've got the right to call you a twat. Women should have the right to participate in women's sports with Biological women only and should have the rights to not have to stare at a penis in the public showers But generally speaking I don't have a problem with transgender people, I'm friends with a few transgender people where I had grown up with them being one sex and they transition to a different one and unless I'm making a specific point or something I always refer to them as the gender to which they now receive themselves to be. I'm not doing the Z or zir crap but a transitioned female can expect to be called ms, gal, her, etc and a transitioned male will probably be referred to as 'buddy' or the like But you were so busy being a heterophobic twat that you never even asked what my views are. You're a sexist and a bigot.

That's true, the truth doesn't change and we keep speaking the truth. Only a liebral would somehow think that's an insult LOLOL!!!

Mexico-US Trade Hits US$147 Billion as China, Canada Volumes Drop Carney is losing the trade war to the Mexican president. We're in almost identical circumstances but she's bandaging to work around it and get record trade while we're falling further and further behind We are no longer America's number one trading partner. That is now Mexico And yet all those liberals who voted for Carney because he was the best possible negotiator in the world to deal with trump will still be out there making excuse after excuse for him cuz our country gets flushed down the toilet by a liberal who only cares about funding his own retirement after he steps down

We have a lot to deal with that specifically. If there is a constitutional crisis as a result of such a thing then the government is required to enter into good faith negotiations with the party involved. International law and policy has always recognized people have a right to leave a country if they want to. So constitution aside you can't declare somebody is a slave for the rest of existence because of a constitution.

So your solution is to spend all of their money on a freaking train? And then we can't afford infrastructure or roadway upgrades and people won't be able to afford to maintain a vehicle anyway Again I don't think you understand the scope of how much money we're talking about here. I don't think you get how badly this will deplete our federal ability to spend money on other things. Perhaps you think money is infinite and it's not possible to over spend? I assure you that is not the case. BC just had it's credit rating downgraded and the feds are on track for that. There is NO way this kind of expenditure makes sense even during good financial times, but right now? When our Debt to gdp is historically high? While the provinces are going broke as well? While the libs are set to rack up endless deficits around 80 billion or so for every year with just their CURRENT spending? WIth the trade war and the world facing an economic downturn? FFS, think about it!

Lying your ass off and attacking other people without any consideration for the facts true or the actual needs of the transgender community? Sounds believable. Because I agreed with the medical data and science that has been produced which I cited? Sure Nobody has claimed that you could. Like literally nobody. That's something you are making up that nobody has said because you're losing an argument so you want to try and introduce something you think you can win with even though it's not an issue In other words that thing I never did or said has convinced you! I think you're having trouble distinguishing what I say versus what the voices in your head say And you're some binch that hates trans people but loves to pretend that she's standing up for them. What a line sack of crap you are. You have no idea what I believe or what kind of person I am, you never even asked. You've never even once asked my opinion. You can't address the science I provided you with because it disagrees with you and that's too emotionally upsetting. You definitely don't give a crap about trans people. At the end of the day you always wind up crying and peeing yourself in the corner because you can't cope. Most transgender people experience gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria is a Negative mental health state which can be dangerous if not treated. They will experience that regardless of support from their immediate family or anyone else. Your study which shows that transgender people are more likely to commit suicide if they have been fired from a job four times in the last year is useless because it doesn't address the fact that literally everybody would be more depressed and likely to commit suicide if they were fired from a job four times in the last year Those are simple facts you can't argue with. We could have an intelligent conversation about how transgender treatment can or cannot be effective or what things we could or could not be doing but your claim that transgender people would be happy and cheerful if it weren't for the fact that somebody was mean to them which causes them to kill themselves is beyond puerile. Sounds to me like you actually hate trans people and this is your way of lashing out at them while pretending to actually give a crap. "Maybe if i pretend to like trans and then act like a total twat i can turn people against them".