CdnFox

So let's see the science on that. Once again you're making up fake bullshit because all the left noses fear and hatred There will be no refugees, climate change will not fix the world's population problem.

Absolutely false. The vast majority of time throughout our history ontario has been the one who takes Most of our federal money is spent in Ontario, the west is deliberately shut out of things to benefit Ontario. During covid one of the world's more promising medical labs prove that they could produce a covid vaccine extremely quickly and all they asked for was 10 million to set up shop from mass production and the liberals wouldn't even talk to them. Other experts around the world commented on how ridiculous this was because they were well known as being a top of the line lab. But,,,, they were in Edmonton. And Ontario and Quebec did not want to see the growth of a strong pharmaceutical industry in the west For ages it cost more money to ship things on rail to the east than it did to ship them west just to protect Ontario Industries Petrocan stole massive amounts of money from Alberta to win votes in Ontario and Trudeau's own people admitted that later. Dion referred to Alberta saying that "they didn't want to KILL the cash cow...." Ontario occasionally gives to Quebec but that's about it. Otherwise everything is geared towards making sure that Ontario has the resources and the money at the expense of everyone else Have you never thought that it was weird how blow the population is in the west compared to Ontario? There's a reason for that The rail line will not be paid off by users. That will never happen. Certainly not in our lifetime The Olympics were specifically designed to improve our standing on the world stage and increase the amount of business done with Canada regardless of province. And most of the money was paid for by the province that it occurred in which covered the cost of the infrastructure This will be 100% paid for by taxpayers who will never get a benefit and it will never benefit them internationally or anything of the like It's this kind of thing that fuels western separation and Alberta's desire to break away. This is nothing but theft from canadians to buy votes in Ontario and it's disgusting and you should not be supporting it. If the province is want to do it then they can

Sorry but I'm right. You just weren't paying attention I said it was deeply associated with mental health issues. Not that it was a mental health issue. And this is 100% true The vast majority of people who have transgenderism also have gender dysphoria. Gender disphoria is mentioned in DSM-5-TR and is considered a mental health issue related to stress. As one doctor says. you can't have a pathology without an illness. I merely put into words what your picture is actually say. It seem like a good idea to make sure you understood how you looked to other people And I love that you think somehow that's more strange than simply reposting the same picture over and over and over again like a toddler LOL and then try to sell the idea that you don't have mental health issues Anyway now that we've established that transgenderism is in fact deeply associated with mental health issues maybe you should think about how wise it is to prove that point repetitively with your replies?

Then don't bring it up. An analogy is an effort to explain one thing by showing something that is very similar. There's nothing remotely similar about a marriage and the creation of a new country. And yet you persist with it. Get it through your head a marriage is not the same thing as the creation of something brand new. When two people get married the law does not recognize their marriage as a separate legal entity. They were two people, now there are two people with an agreement. They retain their individual legal rights as people and their own individual legal commitments When a country is formed the participants give up their legal rights and a new thing is formed that has its own unique legal existence. In addition it has its own laws its own customs etc. When a baby is born of two parents the baby does not inherit the parents' history as its own If Mom was a skier the baby is not a skier and has no history of skiing. If Dad robbed a bank the baby did not rob a bank. That is what we are talking about here. This is not a marriage this is the birth of something new that did not exist prior to this There are no word games here. This is simple fact You seem desperate to make it seem like canada had slavery. That's very left wing of you, and i have no idea why you're being so dishonest. But Canada never had slavery. And the colonies who at one time had allowed slavery had abolished it so far in the past that those who created canada would not likely have been old enough to ever have even met one never mind owned one. There was no slavery in the colonies when they gave birth to Canada, and Canada never had slaves This is simple. You're trying to argue that black is white and i'm worried about your safety at the next zebra crossing

Don't do your own either apparently Anyway I looked into the matter and it turns out you're wrong. There, homework done So in other words you lie And you just hope everyone else will believe it. Well you got busted But they don't have any, you've already admitted to lying about that

Not scientific fact that's for sure. The science says that transgenderism is deeply associated with mental health issues. You know, the kind that might make somebody post nothing but a video repetitively 😆😆😆😆 As to the constitutionality, that's always about interpretation. Abortion was a constitutional right until it wasn't. I'm sure when trump is done with the illegal immigrants he'll come for your kind

I'm absolutely amazed that the fact that you lost an argument while trying to claim that humans have the same morality as animals is causing you this much grief. He's kind of self-esteem issues don't just happen. Were your parents abusive to you growing up or the like? That's what he's doing but it's definitely not what you're doing. All you're doing is making a complete ass of yourself and behaving like a child. As a self-proclaimed representative of the transgender community you're making them look like severe mental health issues.

No there isn't. The two things that are still there are the things that were there since the beginning. nothing has changed. They have an agreement but they are still exactly what they've always been. There's nothing transformative about it. They are still two people they don't magically become one person Unless of course you mean that they might have a child. But that child has its own unique history it's not the history of the parents is it Your analogy is starting to get a silly as the idea that if I steal a wallet in Japan I'm Japanese. They just changed their names. In fact one of them didn't even bother to do that When they got married they still exist. When the:Ies came together to form Canada the:Ies ceased to exist. Their laws cease to exist, the rights and titles ceased to exist. A marriage is absolutely nothing like a Gestalt. It is simply a partnership. Plus I bet dollars to Donuts you didn't even know what a Gestalt was before I mentioned it and now you're trying to use the word. What? I am certainly not the one trying to pretend the marriage existed before it did and now you're just making no sense. Kid. Canada never had slavery. And Canada did not exist before it existed I'm sorry this is causing you such brain damage but it's as simple as that.

The conservatives won the popular vote for two out of the three of the last elections And almost did this last time as well The party in power has an advantage. The liberals pull every dirty trick to milk that advantage. And they managed to buy off the NDP otherwise we would have an conservative government right now as you well know Conservatives just have to learn to be better at cheating the system and be more like the liberals when they get in.

You're not an older twat, you're just a dumber twat Chuck norris isn't keaton or redford. And if you weren't a dumb twat i wouldn't have had to explain that.

Great news about the second pilot for sure! I have little doubt the dems are upset that they "Missed" an opportunity to cry fake tears and attack the president, but i suspect even many of their supporters are happy about this ending. IT's a war. Sometimes the bad guys are going to have a good day too. I doubt we've seen the last casualty, but hopefully we'll see more stories like this than bad ones.

Sounds like bullshit. If anything arms have been flowing in the other direction. I need to see some pretty compelling evidence of that, facebook simply isn't reliable source of military intelligence

Sure she did. Her Partnerships with other people are relevant, all that really changed was her name as far as who she is and her history But when many groups of people come together to form a new country something is born that was not there before. It is a new entity. What's your arguing is the same as pretending that America is just Britain with a name change and it's still Britain, we just call it something else That's really not how it works. Candida did not change its name. Different people's and different:Ies with different laws and different histories came together and created something new. Canada is a Gestalt, it is more than the sum of its parts. It was new and wondrous and has its own history just as you were born of your mother and father and yet are something new and have your own history As much as you want to pretend the candidate existed before Canada existed, Canada did not exist before Canada existed That's just the way it works. Canada never had slavery, and even the groups of people who would eventually come together and form Canada had abolished slavery long before they gave birth to Canada. Canada has no history of slavery

It is in the nature of the left to spread chaos and fear

Valid but there are many things we could do that would achieve the same thing but would benefit Canadians as a whole rather than a very very select group within a specific limited geographic area No, the vast majority of the people in those two provinces would not have access to this. This is not going to substantially benefit someone in thunder bay. Now not all projects benefit everyone obviously but this will be a very small number of people for 90 BILLION dollars. To put that in perspective that's about 4 major pipelines that would produce jobs and revenues that would benefit every single canadian in a major way through severely increased tax revenues and employment revenues. So all taxpayers will be required to pay a MASSIVE amount of money for something that will cost more than it will produce and will benefit a tiny number of people. That's about 2200 for every single man woman and child alive today. ANd that's if it's on budget, given the liberal track record what do you think the chances of that are? The only infrastructure out west they ever invest in is pipelines. And that was once. And they benefit from massively more tax money than they spent. Fcuk off with that shit. Most of the 'infrastructure investment' trudeau did was in ontario. They buy your votes with OUR money and always have. Why would i give a shit? They're STILL demanding almost a hundred BILION DOLLARS for something while in the meantime our gas prices out west are going up every year to carbon taxes making transport harder and more expensive. All the more reason not to do it unless there is a massively clear financial benefit. Most of them don't cost over 100 billion. You need to sit back and think about how much money that is. Money we don't have and we'll have to borrow because we're not out of balanced budget already. To put that amount in perspective when harper left office every single cent that had been borrowed by every single prime minister in the history of Canada up to that point was 500 billion dollars. That was how far in debt that we were You're talking about going into debt 20% of the entire amount of money borrowed by every prime minister in history combined...... and it won't even make us money or pay for itself And it doesn't benefit anybody except a handful of people This isn't just a bad idea it borders on being evil. This is strictly speaking raping the western other parts of Canada to buy votes in ontario and Quebec and that's not okay. It is somehow could generate enough revenue to pay for itself that would be different but it will be a money loser that our children will have to pay for for generations to come and will not benefit us at the slightest It does not deserve your support

If she doesn't just change her name but also transforms into a new life form then yeah. Canada didn't just 'change it's name". A bunch of different colonies each with different laws and different histories decided to create something new. Something which had not previously existsed, something independent of the previous attachments and shackles. THat new thing was .... wait for it.. a new thing. And no, it does NOT have the history of the other colonies before hand that decided to end their existence to create this new thing AND slavery had LONG been abolished in ALL of those colonies before this happened. You're smart and you're generally a good debater but you're starting with an answer and trying to work your way back to an argument and you're getting slaughtered. Canada never had slavery. At all. Not even a little.

Repetatively posting the same thing to someone you're 'crushing' on or obsessed with is the kind of thing we see children do but normally by the time you get to be an adult you grow out of it. Sadly it seems like you've still have a little emotional growing up to do

I don't believe any of that is true. I'm entirely open to being proven wrong but just saying those things doesn't make them accurate and I don't see any numbers or any studies or any even logical argument that strongly supports that In fact the most optimistic number I've seen, and it is optimistic, is that it might produce 36 billion in new gDP. But it's going to cost us 90. And we both know it they say it's costing 90 it's actually going to cost closer to $120 to 180. That's not good math for us And to top if off, it will ONLY benefit that very small region. A TINY number of people will benefit directly from this. So why am I paying for it? If it's such a great idea why aren't ontario and quebrec doing it themselves? Why do I have to buy them a fast rail system out of my own pocket as a taxpayer federally but ALSO have to buy the ferries my province needs?!? To me this just looks like more "liberals ripping off the west to buy votes in the east' again.

That's always the risk you take when you put yourself out there, but trust me it can't be worse than you're making yourself look now.

That doesn't seem to be true EAST HAWKESBURY, ON, March 31, 2026 /CNW/ - Canadians have not granted a clear mandate for the $90 billion Alto high-speed rail project, according to a recent nationwide survey (Abacus Data, March 19-24, 2026). Only 25 per cent of Canadians strongly support the project, and one in five remains unsure. Support for the project is strongest in Ontario and Quebec but declines in the West and Atlantic Canada. Forty per cent of respondents said the Alto issue would influence their vote, while 46% say it would have no impact. An Ontario citizens' association that opposes the project, ALTNO, commissioned the survey and says it indicates support is lukewarm. "The survey suggests that high-speed rail is not a top priority for most Canadians," said ALTNO member, Kathleen O'Connell Renaud. At best support is lukewarm and I think the more people think about it the more it goes down not up

Sure. Whether the Iran adventure was necessary or not, it's playing out as an unforced error that leaves an opening So far the dams don't seem organized enough to exploit it though. We'll see what happens Ask your suppositions anything is possible. But they're just suppositions and not necessarily supported by any observable facts. So while they may be logically sound as far as an argument goes we just don't know the truth. We'll have to see how this plays out

Yeah, that's not uncommon for those with serious self esteem issues. Obviously you're deeply concerned about what i think of you or you wouldn't bother replying at all. This is just a very submissive way to do it that's emotionally lower risk. I guess you're what they refer to as a 'bottom' emotionally

Well, let's keep it real. You don't like the guy and there's a certain level of bias in your opinion with regards to that And fair enough. It would be the wrong of me to suggest that there aren't legitimate concerns or that things appear to be going completely smoothly that's for sure Regardless, the ticks are indeed tocking and the midterms are coming, and while it looks like the dems don't have their crap together either he's got to be looking to put this behind him pretty soon.

It's painfully obvious that you're desperate for recognition from those who you perceive as being your betters. It's a common problem that we see with people on the left. However, while I can certainly understand your obsession with me I do have concerns about your mental health

I doubt anyone is measuring uS based on that. There has to be a business case for it and I don't see one currently. And those two cities are actually very far apart, there are some countries that would fit within the distance between those two cities. I'm not above doing projects for the purpose of national pride and world exposure but I just don't see how this one is worth it