CdnFox

A fraction of the people, they have less people than british columbia. A homogenous society, they don't have provinces that take advantage of other provinces, they don't have a first nations to worry about, they don't have scumbags like you who hate democracy and support corruption. a tiny landmass. You could fully fit 2 Norways into alberta. Imagine alberta was half it's size, no natives and few foreigners, and they still had oil. ALberta already benefits largely in the same way as norway just from royalties but if you halved the landmass and 'diversity' which slows them down they basically woudnt' have to pay taxes as is. But when you expand that to all of canada and you've got the various special interests and you've got quebec demanding no oil and alberta demanding oil and first nations to keep happy and all the rest.... it doesn't work. Never has, never will. Petro can provde that nicely and trudeau drove that stake home. Not complicated But your premise is the very thing driving alberta separation. They feel if they kept their oil money and the rest of canada couldn't interfere they'd be rich and wouldn't need to pay taxes to provide collective services Congrats, you're as smart as an alberta separatist now.

thank god, we've got enough to be embarrassed about or intelligence. Or logic. Or reason.

No liberating the people was never actually a stated goal. It seems to be something you kind of made up Trump did say that the Ayatollah needed to be punished and couldn't get away with slaughtering so many of his people. The guy was blown into bite-sized pieces so that does seem to have been accomplished

You say that because you're a loser who can't make your own argument. I just did debate you clearly and with salient points every step of the way and when you realize you were wrong you had a little meltdown and started attacking me personally. And then you started acting like such a child you just kept repeating the same thing over and over again because apparently you think that's what adults do Kid. You have the intellectual capacity of a 12-year-old girl. Everybody else makes good solid arguments and you wither and die and spin around and get angry and have hissy fits I have bad news for you. It ain't everyone else, it's you

Sure I do. That's why you get so mad and frustrated and wind up needing your cookie in your nap. In fact the opposite is true. So I can only assume you're talking to your mirror I constantly advocate for people to participate more in the political process. I regularly point out that voting day is the tail end of the process and people need to participate in all the other parts even more than voting day. I constantly beat you over the head with the fact that it is the voters job to hold the political parties and politiicans to account by using their vote to punish unethical and corrupt behavior. I'm a massive proponent of people having power over their gov't. I get mad that people don't exercise that power more YOU on the other hand have said there shouldn't be elections, elections are pointless, participating in the process is pointless and once again here were slagging the idea that voting has an impact. And when you get frustrated and feel stupid one thing you like to do is accuse others of your own failings. I'm all about pro power to the people, you're all about repressing them and shutting them up, and killing them if necessary which you've also frequently advocated for. Sorry kiddo

Well first off last year was what we are talking about. 2025. So yeah. That's our point. And while it's now under the military budget nothing changed. This is not new spending, it's just relabelling existing spending. So yeah. you're pointing out what we said is true. Thanks, really wasn't necessary, we already knew Absolutely blatant lie and the last organization to listen to the accountants is the military It was moved from one purpose and one purpose only, to be able to include its budget when calculating the military spending for NATO purposes. The move had absolutely nothing to do with actual military, none of it is a new spending, it is just relabeling existing expending so that it counts towards nato. Which is fine, but it's important that we acknowledge that it's not actual improvements in military spending.

I know sweetie, it's easy for you to be intimidated

That's the 'therapy' industry right? They're not really your friends, technically they're your medical professionals. I know it hurts you to be wrong and I understand. You really wanted the fact that animals can be homosexual or commit murder or rape to be proof that how you live your life is justified. And you're disappointed that it didn't turn out to stand up to logical examination But if you feel you're a bad person you can always try and get better

He's in full denial mode, he's been giving all of this information and more already. He's just repeating lies that have been proven to be false again and again This is how the liberal mind works. When it faces facts that don't support its position it breaks. Sadly he's broken

I get it, You feel like you've "lost" to me intellectually and it turned out your premise was entirely wrong. So now you're behaving like a child because you've failed as an adult. Honestly you can't compare yourself to me like this. Of course I'm going to win an argument, just like hulk Hogan would beat Urkel in a physical conflict It's where you think you have no value as a person so you try and create a false value based on your race or other common characteristic It's sad that you're self-esteem is so low that you feel that you don't have any value in and of yourself

Like I said, only children do repetitive Behavior. You're literally proving what kind of person you are to everyone reading this it is not a good look for you

You're the liar here kiddo. I said he knew Gislaine Maxwell You said the pictures were fake and I said they were real She is Epstein's girl So absolutely there is a tie in and he did meet with her after his conviction. You used to be a halfway decent thinker for a lefty at least part of the time but now you just: Full-blown liar and fact denier You're pathetic. Being liberal really does rot the brain over time Back to your cult little boy, the adults are talking

it absolutely was and you've been given proof. The coast guard for example. You're just a brainless liar at this point.

Sure there is. That was the whole liberal stick for ages, we have to transition and leave the oil in the ground. That would be the specific end goal and everything would move towards that, with the industry getting smaller and smaller as fast as possible. And if climate change is a crisis, and if anything we can do will substantially affect it, then why can't you or anyone else who's asked provide ANY scientific data to show that If mankind were smart enough to do the right thing we would never have had trudeau.

I think he means this guy:

I don't click on your random links kid

You've literally been provided with quotes from military representatives saying it's 100 percent true. It didn't. So they 'relabelled' some things And i think that was the auditor general who said it, Not that it was "aduited". Sorry kid i never said that. I said there were photos of him and Gislaine. And that turned out to be true and he's offered explanations. "Based on available information and fact-checking, there is no evidence that Mark Carney was friends with or had a close relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, though they were photographed together at a public event in 2013." The 2013 Photo: A real, authentic photo exists from August 2013 showing Carney, his wife Diana Fox Carney, and Ghislaine Maxwell at the Wilderness Festival in Oxfordshire, England. He is also mentioned in the Epstien files but not in a way that suggests he did anything wrong "Yes, the name of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney appears in the documents known as the "Epstein files," " So even there it turned out i was quite correct. He did know her as an acquaintance, they WERE photographed together. LOL but thanks for brining it up again so i could show everyone i'm right and you're wrong Kid, you have gone full delusional about this. The trees were not military trees. The spending was not new military spending. They took spending from tonnes of things that had NOTHING to do with the military and simply relabled it, the military did not benefit from that Time to stop lying and get your head out of your ass. This is exactly what i said would happen and exactly what did happen.

Translation: "YOu're right and i now it but i don't want you to be right and it's your fault" Yawn Nowhere near the same. Literally every element is different. It was not an option in Canada. I know, i know you're big mad that communism never caught on here but sadly for you it just never would have worked. And why would that be pathetic? Trudeau guaranteed that our own industries were destroyed, so if we wanted the e (and we did) that's what was left to us Sorry the truth hurt your feelings i gues?

You mean the one who thinks democratic representation is good. Yeah, that'd be me No you, that's for sure. But thanks for admitting it Awww.... sounds like mr cranky pants needs his cookie and his nap for the day LOL

Oh dear, you're at the point where you have to just randomly lie to yourself to get over your pain at being made a fool of again I tell the truth kid. You're the one who has to flip things around trying desperately to justify your position No, it's not on the producers. it's on the customers. It shouldn't' be on either, Ahhh no, that's the new channel you're trying to switch to. No, that was never a choice we had. Different situation entirely. LOL we all know you're not kid It's pretty easy to see,

LOL still smarter than you kiddo, at least i'm not stupid enough to pretend that all i'm going to "Give" is a video then give quotes and an explanation Only children endlessly repeat themselves, and you're endlessly repeating yourself with a picture that endlessly repeats itself LOL you could be a PROFESSIONAL twat, you're that good at it

All done before he got there and most of which won't actually resolve the issues you're talking about. But nice try This is the truth. Carney has already taken the steps necessary to make sure a project will never move forward. He wants to appear open to it but in reality he's closing the doors. And I think smith overplayed her hand. She was obviously trying to look like she was really believing what carney said so that she could look betrayed later when it turned out he was full of shit. But she went too hard on the simpering and praising, and it's going to be too long between when this was announced or when she eventually has to admit it won't work. She'll wind up wearing some of the blame for it

Riiiiightttt, it's not the gov'ts fault they're failing at their jobs, it's the people! Poor innocent liberals who suffer relentlessly under the hands of the evil voters!

They paid more than enough but I'm glad to see that you just did a complete 180 reversal on your previous position They don't know what's a nickel. Canada was largely built on that kind of oil revenue. Nobody's contributed more than the oil companies per capita But the tax isn't on the oil company. The tax is on the consumer. Again you know you're wrong whenever you try and change the channel Not even a little bit. We've benefited tremendously and we wouldn't have the country we have now without it. We basically be Venezuela which is inevitably where you're kind of thinking leads countries Cry harder It's wonderful

You just graduated to being the stupidest person on this board The military has admitted directly and pointedly that these trees were part of the previously funded liberal tree planting program. That is the end of the debate. This was not new military spending this was spending for environmental purposes which had already been allocated and has absolutely nothing to do with the military and they changed the label to make it look like military spending but it wasn't You now look like the biggest twat on the board and we've got Robo Smith