CdnFox

It is. THis has been explained to you in detail. And just the other day i posted research showing this from dalhousie. I know math is your kriptonite but lets go through it. Fertalizer man has to pay 5 in carbon tax. He cannot claim it back, so he adds it to his costs. He marks it up because that's how it works. So his stuff costs 45 dollars, plus 5 dollars carbon tax, He sells to the farmer for 100 after mark up, so 10 of that is carbon tax generated. Farmer pays for fertilizer and also pays carbon tax directly. now pays 20 dollars in carbon taxes, marks that up to 40, plus marks up input costs which included 10 dollars that the fertilizer guy had built in, so now 20 dollars for a total of 60 dollars in carbon tax. Supplier pays 10 dollars in carbon tax shipping to store. Marks that up to 20. Also marks up the 60 that was part of his costs from previous carbon tax. is now 140. consumer doesn't see any of this, pays much more for food. 140 + 60+20 is what the carbon tax cost, even tho it was charged less and only one time per 'step' Actual carbon tax charged, 35. Actual impact 220. Now i made that math easy for you but you should be able to work it out. Carbon taxes wind up getting built in then marked up again and again. This is economics 101. This is simple stuff. There's nothing controversial about this. You can't do math but take it from those who can, the carbon tax winds up multiplying again and again. It is a stacking tax.

Pretty bald faced lie kiddo He did deals and or substantially expanded trade with china, india european union, a number of african nations, saudi arabia, AND did the softwood lumber deal with the us which everyone thought would be impossible. He most certainly did NOT make it "hard to trade with anyone but china" in the slightest He did, and we profited from it tremendously. We got more than we gave, and that's how trade deals SHOULD go for us, either equal or to our advantage. Nope. Most of those deals were just putting the sigunature on deals harper had done. Meanwhile trudeau cost us india, got us a worse deal with the us, screwed up the last part of the eu deal and cut trade with saudi arabia substantially. which means he did nothing. All sources agree that there weren't any issues with the federal case. What he ORIGINALLY promised is that he'd work with the provinces to eliminate PROVINCIAL trade barriers. Released a report showing that this alone could replace most of the lost us trade. Then he ran away from that. Utter failure on his part What he SHOULD be doing right now is flying from province to province to solve THAT problem. It could actually make a difference. Instead hes spending billions flying to foreign countries to expand his list of contacts and bringing home bad deals.

Of course there was slavery. Slavery happened all over the world. Just not in Canada You get fixated on the weirdest things, you really need to watch that

Oh, you're doing that thing where you pretend to ignore people rather than try to address their legit arguments? Ok ,

Mine was entirely accurate. You constantly obsess over it. Nobody else brings it up. Many others have pointed out how weird it is you do. But every single time you lose an arugment you obsess over it Which is pretty much every time we talk. Would you say that's because of your compulsive behavior issues or the vacuum in your life? Just curious. And carney still didn't hit is 2 percent with new spending. Sorry. I know he's disappointing you and you're DESPERATE to change that channel but that's ANOTHER fact you'll have to learn to cope with

Sounds like your deep rooted insecurities talking And Carney still lied about increasing military spending

It certainly does, maybe you should go back to school and fix that?

Wheeee!!! Lookit her go boys!

Oh i couldn't agree more AI Overview Relentlessly obsessing over another person’s online post count, follower count, or engagement metrics often indicates that the observer is struggling with their own insecurity, jealousy, or a need for control . This behavior frequently stems from a desire to compare, social competition, or a distorted, competitive view of social media where numbers are wrongly equated with personal worth or social status. According to experts and psychological observations of online behavior, this type of obsession may suggest several underlying issues: Deep-Rooted Insecurity and Comparison: The obsession is rarely about the numbers themselves but about the person's own insecurities, often resulting from social comparison theory where one compares their life to another's digital metrics. The "Validation Trap": If the observer is also trying to grow their own profile, they may use another person's metrics as a benchmark for their own worth, leading to obsession when they fall short, as numbers can become a "drug" requiring higher levels to feel satisfied. A "Vacuum" in Real Life: Intense monitoring of another person's online activity can suggest a lack of purpose, passion, or meaningful engagement in the observer's own life. It is a form of displacement, where energy is poured into a virtual, controllable situation to avoid facing real-world issues. Compulsive Behavior and Rumination: Relentlessly checking or analyzing someone else's activity can be a sign of a compulsion, often associated with a need to resolve doubts or anxieties, sometimes linked to obsessive-compulsive tendencies or "relationship OCD," where the person feels a need for certainty about the target's actions. Parasocial/Predatory Dynamics: If the obsession is focused on a specific, non-reciprocal target, it can lean into what is described as "person-focused obsession" or a parasocial relationship, which can become predatory or, in more extreme cases, reflect a desire for control. In essence, such behavior often points to a "mental emptiness" and an unhealthy, addictive need for digital validation, rather than genuine interest in the person being monitored. Sounds like you two have some issues to work out

As has been explained to you a trillion times that doesn't Explain why Canada went down against all of the other western nations. You enjoy lying and pretending that this is something to do with social media but it doesn't. All of the western nations have social media, they have the same social media. Yet Canada fell twice as far as America for example The fact that you continue to lie shows that you know it's your beloved liberals that are the problem

His weird thing about lying about his link and what it says is utterly baffling to me. I just don't understand the level of self-delusion. I can understand somebody not being educated on a subject but to actually deny the very facts that they themselves have presented even when it's explained and shown and gone through an excruciating detail, I just can't understand how it's even possible

Nope all you've done is try to distract from the fact that carney was dishonest. But the fact is Carney was dishonest Oh, and you also had a little emotional meltdown where you seem to be claiming that my post count was being mean to you LOLOL That was pretty funny

Were you worried we thought you were intelligent and you wanted to make sure that you dispelled that myth or something?

I knew you would eventually, I figured pictures would help. I couldn't find any crayons LOLOL of course we do The funny bit is that Stupid fcuks like you don't realize... you're the monkey

HAHAHA!!!!!! CLASSIC Moonbox melt down when you get called out on your bullshit And once again YOUR stupidity is my fault!!! Oh Dear!!! LOL Nice try kid. But despite your desperate attempts the fact is carney did not reach 2% military spending with new military spending. And all your whining and crying and attempting to distract doesn't change that But it's nice to see I can still cause you to have these emotional meltdowns so easily, it's always entertaining

Carnions shares and has massive share future options in that company. He's met with the executives of that company since becoming prime minister and is expected to go back to that company after his political career So he owns the hunk of it, he still meets with the executives from it, and he plans to go back to it. How exactly is it an ex company?

Obviously. You know damn well I'm qualified to be able to speak on the subject the only reason you brought it up was to try and distract from the fact you knew I was right. Here's some fun, explain to me your qualifications to determine whether or not I'm qualified. In order to determine that any answer I give represents sufficient qualifications you will have to be qualified to be able to analyze that so by all means share your qualifications I'm going to guess ahead of time that you don't It wasn't a real question. It was an attempt to distract which is why I didn't answer it Instead I'll just point out the carney had ever had any intention of meeting the native quota by increasing military spending. He insisted he would increase military spending specifically to meet that goal but didn't And that's the fact that you're trying desperately to avoid Why don't you talk about that?

Prior to Trudeau we were diversifying our trade, the liberals were the ones that put a stop to that. But regardless, we cannot diversify our trade enough to make any substantial difference. At least not within the next 10 to 20 years. The united states represents such a huge part of our trade that anything else is a drop in the bucket. Which doesn't mean we shouldn't continue to do diversification just as harper originally intended. But it's not going to get us out of this fix, we need to find a way to deal with the states It may never be the same but we will never solve that problem with external trade anytime in the next 20 years. We might be able to substantially offset it by improving our own internal trade. We buy a lot of things we could make here, and barriers between provinces make it difficult for us to sell to each other Carney was all about that during the election but then completely caved on it afterwards and it's done nothing. Solving into provincial trade would require a lot of leadership and strong incentives and he's just not capable of either The trip he's making around the world are not to replace American Trade, they're to promote his own brand name.

No it isn't, it is vastly left of Tommy Douglas and Ed Broadbent Tommy Douglas thought healthcare should be universal and gov't' run. That's pretty left-wing. Avi thinks that grocery stores should be universal and gov't run. That's WAAAAY more left wing, pretty much communist.

Still don't click your links kiddo

No you weren't. And we both know that. In other words no matter what I replied you weren't going to take it seriously. Even if I provided documentation or a long list of my credentials you were just going to laugh and had planned to do so even before you seen it Which is proof that I was right and you guys weren't serious in the slightest asking for credentials. You just knew I was right and couldn't argue the point There's no new spending in this budget, there was never intended to be, carney isn't actually going to spend a lot of money on the military. Which is what I predicted from the beginning

Liar. What you did is try to change the channel because you knew what i was saying was true and you couldn't argue the point. Pathetic. I'm sure your cheezy 'debate skills' really wow all the kids at recess. Why don't you try honest discussion for once in your life? Or is that just beyond your skill set?

Awwwww look! cranky crying leftie is cranky and crying It's always obvious when you've realized you're entirely wrong, you break out the cheap grade 3 insults The facts are simple. We don't actually have a deal, at best we have an understanding which is what I said in the beginning. And it's taking you this long to finally have to face that fact. In the meantime we're opening up I made your sector to them that they've never had before and we're getting nothing for it. All they've committed to is to promise to not bully as quite as much for the next 5 seconds. Maybe. And while this understanding helps the farmers in the very short term it hurts the automakers permanently That's a simple truth. You can cry and whine and call me all the names you want but it'll still be true at the end of the day This was not a good deal for us napkin boy

You only got 4 words into that sentence before you were wrong