Leaderboard

His logic is that there are candidates on the ballot now who are opposed to democracy itself and who will install corrupt voting systems. Always remember that Adolph Hitler was elected. He just suspended all the elections once he obtained power. January 6 was not normal. Donald Trump lost by over seven million votes. His Vice President told him so, his Attorney General, children, lawyers and campaign advisors told him he lost. The Supreme Court and Congress told him he lost. Over 60 lawsuits told him he lost. Trump lost. And when you lose, you stand aside for the other guy.

This is about bringing America's problems here and calling them our own.

They merely recite the opinions that they were told to. I don't think that their memory is an issue at all or they could be reminded of what the definition of a vaccine used to be, and/or what the original covid "vaccine" claims were. You can put it all in black and white, right in front of their faces, complete with with videos of Fauci et al saying those things, and they don't "remember" squat, they just regurgitate the newest vax propaganda. It's either next-level ignorance/denial or outright lying. In either case it has nothing to do with memory, science or facts. You're 100% correct. I'd argue that even if, for the sake of argument, we all just agreed that the vaccine offers 20% better results for the people who are in the covid death demographic, which is possible, it's still an absolute certainty that it absolutely doesn't do anything which justifies mandatory vaxxing of infants, pre-schoolers, school-aged children, or anyone else for that matter. If it helps in some way, then it's obviously an attractive option for the people who are at risk and it's worth the chance of side-effects for them. That's where you're gonna hit a brick wall lol. If there's one thing that vaxtards are certain of it's their own moral superiority, facts be damned. That point has been hammered home to them for almost two years now and it's impossible for CTV/CBC/CNN drones to let go of their emotional beliefs.

That wasn't the BS. The BS was you trying to cover up what my claim was with a diversion to a tiny factoid that didn't actually matter. What was my actual claim? Here ya go. Also from my link: My point was don't take first reports as gospel. I could also have mentioned Jussie Smollet, Nick Sandman. NASCAR driver Bubba Wallace's lynch noose hoax or too, too many other warnings of why not to take early news to heart. BTW:

I understand he's also a 9/11 truther.

Sounds pretty confusing at present. Lots of conflicting details. For example he either entered with a hammer or took the hammer from Pelosi in a tussle. Might be a name mix up as well. For now I imagine people will be grabbing the detail they like for partisan purposes and running with it.

I am not a fanatic so I can see how that small video made me take what I liked and ran with it just like Fox and CNN does -> to fit their BIAS. so yes, the logic now it makes sense here if this is what he meant. anyhow, i don't trust men like Bernie, his style is similar to some messaging I ran away from. Looks good on paper, hope he never gets power to see the practical. It can be opposite.

I think you're misunderstanding his meaning. He's not saying that the results of this election (how they turn out) will indicate that whether the US is currently a democracy. He's talking about the slew of midterm candidates (and particularly down-ballot races) which are running on a explicitly pro Jan-6 platform--that unfavorable election results should simply disregarded. An express train to authoritarianism. He's saying that this crop of candidates could actually be the last that is freely elected in the United States as we know it. There's some hyperbole there, but not as much as I wish. It's more of a worst case scenario. There are people who really, honestly have that plan. They actively are trying to execute it.

A LOT has changed in the US SINCE 2020. Anti-democracy has become the fashionist in the Republican Party.

Have you HEARD from ALL the Republican election deniers on the ballot what they plan to do next time the election doesn't go THEIR WAY? MANY are saying they will REFUSE to certify results THEY DON'T LIKE.

Mr-Nationalist-For-Me-But-Not-For-Thee. Why haven't you chosen Chauvinist or Imperialist as your nickname instead?

My bad. Sorry.

Remembrance Day is a day to celebrate the sacrifices of our veterans. I don't think it's particularly political. My grandfathers served in WWII. The one I knew was a true Canadian [email protected], i've never really met anyone like him. That generation were raised in the depression and then came of age overseas in warfare or praying their brothers & friends & classmates came home. My grandmother kept a scrapbook of newspaper clippings of the obituaries of boys she knew in her neighborhood and in her school that were killed in the war, she showed it to me when we were cleaning our her house when she was moving into her retirement home. That really hit home for me. Even though my grandfather served he refused to take a dime from the Legion, or use his veteran status to get any kind of discounts or freebies. He served with true honour. Imagine if our politicians served their country with that kind of integrity? They won't even put their jobs on the line for this country, let alone their lives. That said, I don't begrudge anyone that takes those things if they also do it honestly. I think the vets who see real action and put their lives on the line should be set up for life by our gov. Treat them like the heroes and martyrs they are as long as they serve with honour. The recruitment problem we have tells us a lot of things, but the bottom line is that young men and women don't want to serve and defend this country like they used to. Apparently even some of our vets even turn their backs on this country ; ) This country has failed them and failed you.

Nationalist is a weird pseudonym, not really fitting to yourself when you are mad against a People not pledging allegiance to a foreign entity, don't you think, Mr. Nationalist?

no, I favour disbanding the entire Canadian Forces Canada totally relies on America for its national defence Canada should stop wasting $20 billion a year on the pretense that it actually defends itself

No. In the meantime every graph you've posted works just fine, that the unvaccinated, all 14% of you, account for around half the deaths. It takes 86% of us to account for the rest. Take your last graph for example, Total deaths 21861 110061 vaccinated =50.1% 10800 unvaccinated = 49.1% For some reason you don't believe or can't make sense of our own source and yet I'm the idiot.

Canada also has many language laws. It didn't kill Canada's economy, and Québec economy is thriving more now than ever, having an even lower unemployment rate than Ontario's. Québecois have good incomes, and the cost of living is one of the lowest in the country. We're average income wise, but have lower expenses such a food and housing. We have many provincial successes, such as having 2 universities in the top 100 of the whole world for a province of only 8 millions inhabitants, and are very accessible price wise, especially compared to Ontarian universities. We have also a very clean energy production which is independent from price fluctuations in the energy market, because unlike Ontario which heats its housing system with natural gas, we use hydroelectricity which is owned and subsidized by the government which makes our electricity cheap. For instance, my condo costs only $40/monthly of heating AND electricity for a 1000 sq foot size, which is amazing. I think we have many flaws, but we clearly aren't as low as you think we are. Give us the respect! 😆

a frigate is not and never was an arm of a decision the purpose of a frigate by definition is simply to conduct patrol & escort duties at minimum, every navy requires frigates, as the basic all purpose warship the submarine battle would have to be fought & won before you sent frigates into the area of operations Canada is never going to have nuclear submarines never mind that Canada could simply not afford them on the Canadian budget but the Americans will not allow Canada to have nuclear submarines the last time Canada even toyed with the idea, the Americans flat out told Canada that they couldn't have them the main reason being, America is using Canadian claimed waters for SSN operations in the Arctic the Americans don't want Canadian submarines up there snooping on what they are doing Canada is not a trusted partner at the that level of strategic operations and America disputes Canada's claim to the Northwest Passage, invoking Freedom of Navigation therein F-35 Lightning II is Canada's best option, the 5th Generation fighter is the most bang Canada can get for the buck it's a turnkey solution, designed to be plug & play for allies, so ready made for Canada and aerial bombing is actually Canada's forte since the Second World War, Canada has sought to bomb the enemy, in order to keep Canadian boots off the ground for as long as possible since Canadian Confederation cannot actually withstand the strain of heavy casualties Sic Itur Ad Astra

I give money to the cadets at the liquor store but I don't wear a Poppy, nor do I attend Remembrance Day parades anymore in terms of supporting veterans, if there is a brother who needs my help, I will come to his aid in the breach whatever is in my power, I will bring those means to bear upon request or alarm

You don't think people target shoot with hand guns? It's an Olympic sport. Once the current crop of Canadian shooters retire, there will be no more Canadians competing in that discipline. No one "needs" golf clubs or skis either. No one "needs" high powered cars and they kill a lot more people than legal hand guns. God help us when people like you get to decide what others can use based on what you "need".

What do you think Trudeau means when he says everyone get the jabs so we don't have to give restrictions like last time? If someone said to me, "Eat this apple so I don't have to punch you in the face." wouldn't that be a threat? What part of this is difficult for you to understand?

So what you're saying is that 14% of Canadians still account for nearly half the deaths in Canada. Yes that's right but this is only significant to you because you insist on also believing that 14 and 86 are equal. Once again, 14% of Canadians still account for close to half of all deaths in Canada. 🤣

Hey, at work today, I've seen some women cutting half an inch of their hair and sharing it to our group chat in our Teams chats. It was so moving, and it sure will help liberate Iranian women from blood thirsty islamists. It sure showed them, right?

I too saw a cow climb a tree this morning.

Is that what we learned? Trudeau, I suppose, was also responsible for China's zero-COVID policy and all of their factory shutdowns, right? He's why container ships were waiting days outside of major pacific ports, and why global oil prices have skyrocketed. Trudeau et al are the sole reason.... 🥱🙄

Why don't you explain this assertion, West? Tell us how the bad man Trudeau caused all of the global supply chain disasters. 🤣

This is not something new, this goes back decades i mean the pandemic made this crystal clear to everyone, are we not smart enough to catch it then, or where consumers so hooked on cheaper goods. when we were importing oil form Arab countries, becasue we were not smart enough to build infra structure to span the country. shit we were not even smart enough to build refiners to refine our own bitumen instead shipped it to the states at record low prices and then purchased it back at full price when it was refined. it is like we designed our own down fall. or we are just not that smart.

I agree. I'm just trying to get you to recognize how hyperbole isn't helping your argument. Take that to heart, or don't. 🤷‍♂️

Yes, I agree with this. Elon Musk did in 48 hours for Ukraine what other countries are asking for years, support. Months after to be cursed off by some ambassador, "trolled" by Zelenzkyy and accused by people that all the money is coming from the taxpayers. The costs adsorbed and the effort made by his company are often forgotten by certain interests.

When you’re such an extreme pro-elite ultra-predatory capitalist that even the extreme pro-elite ultra-predatory capitalist IMF has to denounce you for being an extreme pro-elite ultra-predatory capitalist. I mean she wasn’t even peddling conservatives’ current version of trickle-down voodoo economics, what she was peddling sounded more like Maggie Thatcher’s discredited version 1.0 from the 1980s.

Nope and never will. A movie is for entertainment and not to use for factual discussion or argument. Retelling of historical events, visually, is done in documentaries. Movies are fiction, stories, that describes imaginary events and people. You never suggested a source, you quoted a movie... a Hollywood movie for gawd sake LOL I am thinking I know why you live in dreamland if you believe movies are real events (and facebook and tweets and ticktok).

Election currently being denied is 2020. Some 300 Republican pols are doing that. Fewer are on record for refusing to certify future elections. You know how to google? A majority of GOP nominees — 299 in all — deny the 2020 election results