Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/09/2025 in all areas

  1. Cuckoo for coconuts! Typical low IQ response.
    2 points
  2. That's pretty damn heartbreaking. Some guy gets out on liberal bail and while he's on bail he kills your aunt that you love. So you do the right thing and move to have the laws changed and work really hard politically giving up your whole life for a campaign to try and bring about change. And the guy you help get elected spits in your face without so much as an I'm sorry. This guy is a complete and utter scumbag. This wasn't some minor volunteer, he had to know her story. He just doesn't care.
    1 point
  3. This is why the Department of Government Efficiency should be made permanent. I guarantee you democrats and republicans are in on this.
    1 point
  4. Just The News J6 Shocker: FBI informants warned of armed violence, Antifa presence before riot, lawmaker reveals ********* Loudermilk made it known that the FBI had a lot of intelligence that indicated violence would have been worse on J6. Some of the intelligence indicated armed violence. Some indicated ANTIFA would be embedded in the crowd. All of it is intelligence that came from informants. Not all of it was accurate. But it does show that DC and the Capitol police should have accepted Trump's informal offer of NG troops.
    1 point
  5. No it was the nucleosynthesis of hydrogen and helium that was produced during the big bang.
    1 point
  6. You brainwaves reflecting from your skull interfere with your ability to even comprehend beyond someone must have created everything. You can use this example of thousands of years old thinking as proof against evolution someday.
    1 point
  7. Human brains and science came up with a better less complex explanation than the Bible. It fits on one page.
    1 point
  8. Anything's possible. Right now and since the day of the election in fact the liberals are talking to every single MP that will sit down with them for more than 3 seconds and offering them the sun moon and stars to switch sides. All the parties and peas have noted that this is the case and the liberals are working as hard as they can to buy those extra couple of votes. But the fact is a bear majority can fall as well for several reasons. A number of MPS are quitting next year from the liberals as cardi pushes out some of the Trudeau loyalists and while it's likely those seats will go to the liberals it certainly not guaranteed. People get sick people have to step down for other reasons by elections happen. So you never know Remember that harper went through this too. Harper thought he was going to bring the government down in Belinda stronich across the floor and gave the liberals the extra vote they needed to survive Honestly I don't believe this government is going to last four or five years. I believe we will be back to the polls within 2 years of the last election. Or at least I believe that's the most likely circumstance. But it's Canadian politics and you never know Here's one thing I can tell you, if there are any more defections coming they will most likely happen early January. If he makes it through his leadership review and there are no further defections that there are probably not going to be any If there are more to come they're going to happen early January when they will do poilievre the most harm in his leadership review. If the liberals were to steal two more votes from the CPC and give themselves even a week in majority it's almost guaranteed that Poilievre would lose the leadership, and then we spend a year and a half going through a leadership race and giving the new leader time to get ready which means the government basically gets two for years where they don't even have to think about it
    1 point
  9. You can find stories like this under any government, right or left. They don't prove anything.
    1 point
  10. Not voted out. Kings and other nobles had power as long as they could hold on to it. But more importantly it isn't really about how much power the leader has. That ebbs and flows in democracies. The really important point is that under a king, you're not a citizen but a subject of the king. That is controlled by having a costitutional monarchy. Ours is an odd mixture- the King is had of state but we passed the citizenship act in 1977 to make us citizens. But monarchy - antithetical to Americans since 1776 at least.
    1 point
  11. Yes...there are clearly enough crazy right wingers to make the electorate cautious. Conservatives need to scrape them off.
    1 point
  12. It came to be thru the same material physical processes we can see and measure all around us all the time. Not according to supernatural notions that have no basis in reality. I just did.
    1 point
  13. Sure, except the crazies do exist and of course your awareness of them applies to the future - by providing insights and clues to what the future may hold. You've never based a prediction on what's happening at the moment? How do you even manage to get out of bed? Is that what you think you're doing? LMAO!
    1 point
  14. But a live bomb that nearly killed the VP elect wasn't worth investigating. 🤔
    1 point
  15. Yeah, as Professor Jeffrey Sachs says, Nuland is quite representative of the deep state. She started with Bush Jr. and went all the way up to the Biden Administration, wrecking the U.S. relationship with Russia during the entire trajectory. Here's the transcript of the start of an almost hour long interview with him and Professor John Mearsheimer: ** University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer and Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs discuss why Republican Dick Cheney feels ideologically comfortable endorsing Democrat Kamala Harris during a conversation at the "All-In Summit" with David Sacks and the other hosts of the "All-In" podcast: ** Full transcript, along with the video: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/09/16/sachs__mearsheimer_there_is_basically_one_deep_state_party_of_cheney_harris_biden_victoria_nuland.html
    1 point
  16. Absolutely nobody in the professional world seems to like this budget. My guess is carney had a lot of ideas as to where he wanted to go and a lot of his people who are still ex-trudeau Didn't like it and what we're seeing is a budget by committee that just didn't work out well. Why in the hell they decided to take the taxes off of luxury yachts and personal aircraft utterly flabbergasts me. Honestly, that was the big priority to make life more affordable? And during a time of housing crisis why did he take the tax off of vacant homes? A lot of the other policies start off as good ideas but the implementation is horrible. Being able to immediately depreciate Capital expenses is great but it doesn't cause investment in new business or expansion given the regulatory environment which the big companies have already said is a deal killer. So some domestic businesses are going to be able to write off their new computers but they would have bought those anyway. And he's starting up about four or five new bureaucracies above and beyond the ones he's already in announced. Special organizations with their own budgets to deal with everything from AI to charity housing of which they already had four. All of those cost money and all of them will be wasteful And anything in the budget that might actually work won't work for another 3 years or so. That's when you might start seeing some of the benefits maybe if they materialize, but in the meantime people will see all this money going out the door and won't see a single benefit from it. It is a simply staggering amount of money with no path to return to balanced budgets ever. He claims operating will begin to slowly reduce to still over what should I was spending but that's just smoking mirrors. This is just horrible. There's just not much to say. All we can hope is that Canadians will notice that they're getting no benefits and that inflation is still going up thanks to this kind of budget and get sick of carney before any severe damage is done
    1 point
  17. Not surprising all things considered. Credible threats on j6? Meh it's just rumors. Unsubstantiated vague accusations in a faked dossier provided by the democrats? MY GOD - ASSIGN 63 AGENTS NOW AND IF YOU HAVE TO LIE TO GET A WARRANT YOU DO IT!!!!! yeash.
    1 point
  18. You don't know what 'State of awareness' means apperently it doesn't apply to hypothetical future events. You can't be aware of something that doesn't exist. Why am i always having to explain english to you? And it played no role whatsoever in the last election. Ahh. You've been drinking. Got it As will be your head in the morning i suspect
    1 point
  19. Trying to understand the nature of reality and seeing things as they truly are free from delusions and supernatural nonsense for sure. A preferable way of being - appropriateness - right up there with doing unto others yadda. yadda.
    1 point
  20. That's what the government agency told you to spread — disinformation. AI isn't programmed, it uses information recognized as true, as known by science. You're a paid liar, and I doubt you're even being paid right now with the shutdown — you're just having fun lying for the sake of it
    1 point
  21. Well, it is programmed with a thought process and it is trained with data that is presented to it. AI is still a computer. Garbage in, garbage out. What ever crap it was trained with is what it is going to out out. It cannot recognize flawed data. It does not differentiate from honesty and lies. Just because you found some AI that repeats the lies you want to believe, does not mean the lies are true.
    1 point
  22. It's more a state of awareness really and it isn't rare at all. Its an awareness that helped sink Poilievre's election chances. And with 3 years still to go Trump's reign of craziness upheld by a sycophantic Congress will put an aversion for the right wing into North Americans especially, and humanity in general, that will persist for decades. As people have known for centuries, the path to enlightenment is always painful.
    1 point
  23. If you said that the Liberal gov't was secretly working for someone else against the Canadian people, I don't know what anyone could point to as proof that the Libs were really on our side.
    1 point
  24. Every nation was built on stolen land, in one shape or another....What is different is some how Canada thinks it should give back those lands, because it makes leftists fell better about themselves...most of which did not have ancestors here at the time who did not take part in these historical wrongs....my point is how far back in history do we have to go back to correct all of this, and if we go back far enough do we make indigenous people also give back territory they conquered from other tribes...
    1 point
  25. Really didn't. Everyone says it was a failure of a law and won't resolve the issue. In fact they voted against a decent bail reform law when the conservatives put it forward And again, typical liberal." How dare the little people complain just because I walked all over them! No your place peons!" That's the liberals for you
    1 point
  26. And there it is. In the past immigrants came here looking to be a part of what we had. Not force us to be a part of what they were fleeing. Sure they would share some of their cultural elements so that was great but they didn't attack our own values that have made our country great in the process. Now everyone we let in seems to want to protest violently, bring their petty little squabbles and wars to our shores, and demand we follow their law. And I really don't care what color their skin is I'm not interested in that.
    1 point
  27. Have you ever stood for anything Mike? Look out the window to see which way the wind blows . . . that's your direction at the moment.
    1 point
  28. There was no risk under JB. And they didn't know they were coming to be slaves. They are being pushed out because they broke the laws, raised housing prices and the cost of food, strain our school systems and welfare programs and (did I mention?) they broke the law.
    1 point
  29. OH My...taxi is insulting people again...what a surprise....NOT !!!! LOL You are such a lowly mind walling in such shallow waters
    1 point
  30. Nope, far from it, but I realized doing my best against a fool like you is a worthless endeavour. LOL AHA!!! another name calling posts and swearing from the taxi LOL You have so little to offer is an embarrassment to all conservatives LOL
    1 point
  31. Agreed...this is the historical context. Since the Revolution, American presidents have slowly gained more and more unchecked power (Executive Branch), if only because of the huge scope of the job and the reluctance of Congress to reign things in. Congress tends to be more reactive while real world domestic and foreign policy events require power immediacy in many instances.
    1 point
  32. They didn't publish correct publish corrections on any of that stuff. They all had to get sued. And yes there is plenty of evidence that they were sued for hundreds of millions of dollars Sorry Robo. You just proven that you're a liar again
    1 point
  33. And now the SC decides to allow the culling and destruction of someones livelihood on the Ostrich farm but allows the pedos to roam free. Sick stuff
    1 point
  34. No Kings has a very American, historical context, neither ceremonial or sub-Saharan African. The irony in all this is that any modern American president has far more applied and potential power via the Executive Branch than any king.
    1 point
  35. And after all that, Rosemary Barton will still love him, and then she will treat the next LPOC leader like her own prodigal child returned while she heaps scorn on the opposition.
    -1 points
  36. Insults is the only thing that you can really understand. They seem to get my darling little comrade troll all riled up. I love it. 🤡 They have your number alright and they now know that they have an imbecile fool on the hook. Keep sucking up the WEF Zionist billionaire bloody bullshit and lies, commie. They like having useful idi0ts like you around, sucker. 🤪
    -1 points
  37. Sounds like he's going to be giving them the extra money anyway doled out over each year. Their budget went up handsomely during this "Time of austerity" The conservatives are in great shape, getting rid of the Deadwood benefits them. Carney's got a bigger problem. And it showed up in his budget nicely. He's obviously trying to be both stimulating to business and an environmentalist and it's not working. This is definitely a budget by committee and absolutely nobody who's professional likes it
    -1 points
  38. There's no way in hell that you're an actual adult who is of retirement age, Down-Arrows Syndrome Boy. At the very most you're 15.
    -1 points
  39. Holy shit kid, you've completely lost it. Maybe you should take a rest and try again later. And i'm not sure a guy who ran the country for 10 years can be called a 'loser'
    -1 points
  40. To be honest that's one thing that's a little weird. Almost all of the benefits won't be seen until much later down the road even by the budgets own admission. And they will generally be very macroeconomic with the hope that it'll trickle down to the microeconomic. I would have expected that they would have thrown at least a few goodies in the people could look at and say "okay well at least that makes my life better tomorrow.". A tax cut or something spending on something that will immediately benefit people or something. But it doesn't do a single thing to help with affordability right now and that's going to make it a pretty hard sell to people across Canada. I mean if this budget falls nobody's going to be sitting there saying "dammit, i lost that luxury airplane tax break" or " I was SOOO looking forward to depreciating my computer in a much lower time!" Risky move seeing as this may well turn out to be a budget they have to fight an election on.
    -1 points
  41. No, again that's not what awareness means. The best you could claim is that you are aware of the potential. Your problem is that you always want to sound cool and knowledgeable but you struggle with it a bit so you pick up gobbledygook words and use them inappropriately to sound insightful. But it just sounds like you don't know what you're talking about. I'm aware of what's happening at the moment. I predict the future. I'm not aware of the future because it hasn't happened yet. Honestly I'm going to start charging you for tutoring Well in the sense that I'm explaining, but I suppose if one were to explain something to a goat and the goat was incapable of understanding would you really be able to say that you were explaining it to the goat? Anyway I hope your head feels better this morning. Whatever the hell you were drinking obviously wasn't high end
    -1 points
  42. The billions in subsidies to big oil disguised as climate action suck so does scrapping taxes on the rich. Money for more fire fighting planes makes sense.
    -1 points
  43. But almost the same number of people voted for the conservatives as for the liberals. So that would mean there are enough crazy left Wingers to make the electorate equally cautious
    -1 points
  44. As if you have ever offered anything here that ever made any sense. Insults are the only things that arse holes like you understand. It is the Marxist lieberals like you that are an embarrassment to Canada. All you Marxist lieberals have done for Canada and Canadians in the past ten years is to try and destroy what once was a great white English speaking country and try instead to turn Canada into a Marxist multicultural 3rd world hell hole. Come on, lieberal, prove me wrong, comrade troll. I am still waiting for you to TRY and tell me as to what your darling sweet lieberals have done in the past ten years to try and make Canada great. Instead, you prefer to skip a reply to that question and instead always keep trying to avoid answering that question and you then prefer to find some excuse to blame conservatives for all of Canada's problems. You are the problem comrade troll. Phk awf. 🤮
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...