Leaderboard

I heard that on October 31st she was giving out candy to children to get them to come to her house.

The font is too small. Try using Times New Bullshit second Dipload Edition.

Trump Nominates Pam Bondi for Attorney General After Matt Gaetz Withdrawal https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/11/21/trump-nominates-pam-bondi-for-attorney-general-after-matt-gaetz-withdrawal/

The hate has always been there, and i pretty sure Israel really does not give a rats ass what the other countries say or do... I also very sure nobody really gives a rats ass what the UN has to say about anything...not since UNRWA had members take part in the raid into Israel and took hostages, are responsible for teaching HAMAS propaganda in their schools...Ya i don't think Israel really cares what they say....UN is run by third world dictators...

HUNT: “The province ordered us to destroy our data — I objected!” Dr. Julian Somers, director of the Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction at Simon Fraser University, says that despite the thin evidence in support of these experimental programs, the BC government has aggressively expanded them — and retaliated against dissenting researchers. Safer supply programs claim to reduce overdoses and deaths by distributing free addictive drugs — typically 8-milligram tablets of hydromorphone, an opioid as potent as heroin — to dissuade addicts from accessing riskier street substances. Yet, a growing number of doctors say these programs are deeply misguided — and widely defrauded. Ultimately, Somers argues, safer supply is exacerbating the country’s addiction crisis. And if you dare speak out your attacked or canceled. This is more evidence of the ongoing tendency for governments to repress scientific evidence that doesn't suit their ideological agenda while at the same time demanding that people follow the science.

I'm taking the under on Trump getting sick of Elon's shit before inauguration day.

That and stripping away worker and consumer protections, ending environmental regulations, that sort of thing.

It is funny because the election official who made that decision to count the ballots admitted she was breaking the law and didn't care, there was no interpretation of the law she knew exactly what she was doing was illegal.

Wait a minute... if you rearrange pam bondi it spells.... P -DOMAIN! PROOF! PROOF SHE"S TRYING TO TAKE OVER..... (it's a trap!)

I can't help but wonder if there's going to be some kind of rape accusation coming out a month before the election. Our MSM would love nothing more than a chance to slander Poilievre, they just need to find a crisis actress to play the role.

I heard that on Dec 24th she fills her stockings with candy, and then gets kids to just reach in there and grab them.

Well there is going to be lots of happy conservatives on election day....there is that.....and that should last for a least 4 years....and i suppose the left will fill up all the mental health spots left, with all the crying and whining...but hey according to August we all will get along. Me i'm opening up a stand in the mall to give give out hugs to those lefties that just need a few seconds of understanding...at 20 bucks a pop, it could the new thing...at least for the next 4 years...

OMG! One of the Penguin's handpicked henchmen is having second thoughts? He'll have to turn on his TV and pick another!

Part and parcel of getting nominated to any cabinet position or judicial position by the GOP is the left's obligatory rape accusation. "Oh mah Gawd, it was the worstest thing that evah happened to me. It was in about 1992 or '93, sometime between spring and fall, in the early evenin' or mornin', and I was out jogging or walking in the park in either Chicago or Boston or something like that. I was so ashamed that I never told anyone. I have PTSD from it, and to this day I still can't walk or jog in public parks, I have to rollerblade or ride a bike."

Democrats will cook up any ol' bullshit story to get power. What a bunch of f*cking scumbags.

Social media platforms such as Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, X and Snapchat, among others, would be affected. Australia launches bill to ban social media for children under 16 Should it be only with parental consent?

Is deplorable worse than “leftard” or “snowflake” which is what you call 50% of the voting population? And what else do Republicans say about democrats? Communists. Marxists. Secretly plotting to enslave society by making them dependent upon government. Secretly control government through the “deep state”. Secretly controlling the mainstream media…somehow. Deliberately emptying third world insane asylums and prisons to smuggle them into the country to cause havoc. Secretly wanting to destroy first world countries. You say People who vote for them are “Sheeple”. You say black people are too gullible and stupid to understand their own interests and as an entire race they have been tricked by democrats. Can you point to the last time any prominent republican respectfully disagreed with a Democrat or simply said he thought democrats were well-intentioned but foolisj misguided? It’s been a generation now since the. Demonization has always been a conservative hallmark: the left isn’t just wrongheaded, they’re actually EVIL. They’re wrong and they know they’re wrong but they’re doing it anyways for sinister motives. The rhetoric of mainstream republican politicians and pundits FAR exceeds that of mainstream democrat politicians and pundits both in terms of how extreme the language and accusations are and in the frequency in which these things are said. “Deplorable” is not even close to being the worst thing you can call someone and Hillary only said it one time. Trump has made hateful personal attacks, name-calling, and viscous lies his trademark which he repeats at every rally and his acolytes in the republican party and propaganda outlets imitate him.

Don't know where you find the patience....

That's oddly specific. Did you have a bad experience or something? LOL - well if that's the best you could come back with it would appear you agree with me

Bottom of the barrel comments like that quickly diminishes any credibility you may have had. I wish you a merry Christmas and a happy time getting the sand out of your ears.

Social media was scarce when I was growing up. I remember that I was 17 when I logged on to my first bulletin board. It was around 1992. I'm not sure when I first started using the internet, but I do know that Netscape didn't even start until 1994. Now, there's a lot more choices. I remember that my sister, who had her first kid in 1998, did put some restrictions on how much they could use their smart phones that at least one of her daughters didn't always agree with, but I never heard of her outright banning them from using them. So based on this rather limited dataset, I think Australia's going too far. If parents don't want their kids to use social media, they already have the power to do that. I don't think the government should outright ban people under 16 from using them.

He died 40 years ago.

You are comparing rhetoric from some random people on the street toward a politician in the spotlight with rhetoric from a politician about random people on the street.

Your lack of position does not survive my understanding This isn't a question about your position this is a question about facts. You claim your argument was one thing when it very clearly wasn't and you're very clearly doing it to change the channel from the fact that you were wrong. And now you can't address that so you are trying desperately to make it my fault that you behaved in a stupid and childish fashion, which is entirely common on the left. We see it all the time. You're wrong and stupid therefore it's somebody else's fault. Do better next time. This level of stupid isn't even entertaining it's just boring. It's like watching a puppy pee itself.

Lol...poor Pup. Cry for us Pup. Whine as loud as you can. Oh and...I heard Kamala wants her knee pads back. Would you please return them?

BONDI is related to BUNDY! She changed her name to hide that fact! She helped murder all those people and now she's taking over the DOJ to kill illegal aliens and women that have abortions! Oh, and Muslims!

Ok... you know that just makes the Guffaw BS worse right? Are you and Herb twins?

So you spent all night scouring the internet for dirt on Bondi when it's always been on the beach.

Well, thanks very much, you can read it after I've removed all the words that might cause you to have a triggered negative reaction.

It's possible that he doesn't know. I think he spends most of his time jerking off to Hitler videos.

Imagine that, another moronic thread from DUI...

I too was raped back in 1944. Wasn't alive back then and have no proof but I swear it happened

John Wayne Gacy was a Democrat soooooo.

We saw similar media attacks this time out, and frankly biden hardly showed his face in the public. The polling also did not suggest that there was radical enthusiasm to vote for him. There was far more energy for Obama. And considering the media hype for Kamala which was absolutely through the roof she should have been a lot closer if that was the motivation. What we do know is that there were a number of rules which were relaxed for covid and would have made it easy to do significant ballot harvesting without detection. There were other flaws as well that were deemed to be necessary because of the covid crisis. If suddenly a bunch more people had voted for trump and it looked like a bunch of the previous democrats had moved over and it explained most of the difference that I could understand, but that's not the case. For the most part it says if about 7 million democrat voters, or approximately 10% of the democrat supporters, just vanished off the face of the earth after suddenly appearing out of nowhere the election before. Well that is not proof that election fraud happened it is a very very powerful suggestion that something went awry. Numbers like that just don't happen. It's not every US president that gets blamed for the deaths of 1M Americans or whatever it was. Plus they mass-mailed millions of unsolicited ballots in 2020, and it's possible that a lot of them legitimately came back from the people they were intended for, but I doubt anyone really knows who voted with those. And it appeared that they all showed up to vote as near as I can tell

It does not matter what the results are. We are all posters of the year, on this forum.

" The title "Anti-Semitism in the United Nations" was carefully chosen. It does not charge the UN, an indispensable world organization, with anti-Semitism. Rather, it suggests that there is a considerable anti-Semitic component behind the policies pursued there and expressed without challenge (except by the United States) in its fora. Emergency Special Sessions of the United Nations General Assembly are rare. No such session has ever been convened with respect to the Chinese occupation of Tibet, the Indonesian occupation of East Timor, the Syrian occupation of Lebanon, the slaughters in Rwanda, the disappearances in Zaire or the horrors of Bosnia. In fact, during the last 15 years they have been called only to condemn Israel. Whereas Arab states have traditionally used UN fora to demonize and isolate Israel (for example, they routinely attempt to deny Israel its credentials), they now believe they enjoy "Western" support which emboldens them. The latest Emergency Special Session, called to address Israeli construction at the Har Homa site, set in motion steps to de-legitimize Israel and to bring it to its knees. During its July meeting, the Session considered a resolution that requested member states "not to allow any import of goods produced and manufactured in occupied Palestinian territories, including Jerusalem" -- a virtual boycott and collective sanctions against the state. During its November meeting, it took a further step towards making Israel an outlaw state. In a vote of 139 to 3 with 13 abstentions, it set in motion the eventual convening of states parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention, which grew out of the Nazi occupation of Europe. Thus, that Convention will now be employed against the people who were Hitler's victims. The resolutions of the November meeting requested that the Swiss government, as the depository of this Geneva Convention, convene by February 1998 a meeting of experts to initiate the process of condemning Israel for violating the Convention. This was done despite the admonition of Switzerland's UN Observer that such action could damage the peace process and politicize international humanitarian law. As a result of such bias, the UN has lost credibility. It is no surprise that the Oslo agreements were negotiated outside of, and contained no role for, the UN. Though Israel has been the subject of aggressive wars in 1948, 1967 and 1973 and the victim of countless terrorist attacks, the Security Council and the General Assembly have never once censured its assailants. As Thomas M. Franck, Professor of International Law at New York University, has written, "...the UN is a place of convoluted realities. The Assembly's majority has also done its best to achieve an anti-Israeli politicization of the Secretariat." It is not just an issue of anti-Israel bias; it is difficult to ignore an anti-Jewish bent in many instances. For 50 years the UN has condemned virtually every conceivable form of racism. It has established programs to combat racism and its multiple facets -- including xenophobia -- but had consistently refused to do the same against anti-Semitism until 1993, and then, only under intense US pressure. Instead, the General Assembly established two Special Committees and two "special units" in the Secretariat devoted exclusively to Israeli practices, costing millions of dollars yearly. These produce anti-Israeli and Anti-Zionist pamphlets, booklets, papers and films, which are even distributed in the UN's six official languages to school children around the world. The intense hostility that Israel faces in the UN and the anti-Semitic reverberations are illustrated by two events that occurred at the Commission on Human Rights in 1991 and 1997. During the 1991 session, the Syrian Ambassador repeated the Damascus Blood Libel that Jews killed Christian children to use their blood to make Matzoth. The Western democracies could not be stirred to challenge this age-old anti-Semitic libel (which the Ottoman Sultan as the ruler of Syria, denounced when it surfaced in the 1840s). It took intense US pressure to procure a challenge to this libel in the record, and then only months after the Syrian representative emphasized to the Commission, "it's true, it's true, it's true." On 11 March 1997, the Palestinian representative charged, in a chamber packed with 500 people including the representatives of 53 states and hundreds of non-governmental organizations, that the Israeli Government had injected 300 Palestinian children with the HIV virus. Despite the repeated interventions of the Governments of Israel and the US, and UN Watch, this modern Blood Libel stands unchallenged and unrefuted on the UN record. No appropriate action by any UN body or official has been taken to date. The Chairman of the Commission on Human Rights, a Czech, agreed to place on the record his letter to the Ambassador of Israel, sharing his "concern as to the charge made" against Israel -- "an allegation made without evidence, on the basis of a newspaper article ... proved completely false." The Chairman reneged on his agreement after he was called to task by a delegation of Arab Ambassadors and received no support from other regional groups -- including Western Europe. Blood Libels are vicious and persistent carriers of anti-Semitism. The "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" were but a fiction of the Czarist police in the 1890s. Yet they are a well of anti-Semitic pollution -- published today in thousands of copies world-wide. The Damascus Blood Libel was raised 150 years later in the Commission on Human Rights. The latest PLO Blood Libel bears the imprimatur of the UN record and has yet to be removed by consolidated action of the Commission or by any UN agency or official on the public record. (Nor was there any rebuke in 1992 to a UN document circulated in the Commission by the PLO observer, which stated that Israelis "celebrating ...Yom Kippur, are never fully happy even on religious occasions unless their celebrations, as usual, are marked by Palestinian blood.") The treatment of Israel in the UN is often dismissed as realpolitik -- the power of Arab numbers -- and recently, as a reaction to Israel's Likud government and Prime Minister Netanyahu. Yet even during the hopeful days of the Rabin/Peres peace negotiations there were the usual anti-Israel resolutions passed each year in the UN General Assembly and 5 in the Commission on Human Rights. Since the Oslo accords, 259 Israelis have been killed and 5000 injured by Palestinian terror attacks. During the same period, 34 resolutions deploring Israel were passed at the UN, but not one against the terror attacks. The unique treatment of Israel cannot be explained on purely political grounds. Though anti-Semitic canards can go unchallenged in the UN, the mere reference in the 1997 Commission on Human Rights to an allegedly blasphemous reference to Islam, by a UN expert and from an academic source, brought a rebuff by consensus by the Chair, and the deletion of the offending sentence. The viciousness with which Israel is attacked, and the reluctance of even democratic states to defend Israel or to accord it the same latitude for mistakes and wrongs that it freely and reciprocally accords other states, has a special quality and origin. There is ample justification for the conclusion of Professor Anne Bayefsky of York University, Canada, writing of the UN Human Rights system: "It is the tool of those who would make Israel the archetypal human rights violator in the world today. It is a breeding ground for anti-Semitism. It is a sanctuary for moral relativists. In short, it is a scandal." The infamous "Zionism is Racism" resolution was passed in 1975 when Yitzhak Rabin was Prime Minister. Describing the circumstances of the passage of the resolution, a representative in the chamber stated that "hatred was crawling on the floor." Although the resolution was rescinded in 1991, anti-Semitism in UN fora is still a force to be reckoned with, bearing in mind that 25 Member States voted against repealing the resolution and 13 abstained. Anti-Semitism is not dead. Although anti-Semitic incidents have declined and a multi-cultural acceptance has produced wider tolerance in many states including the US, a 2000-year-old virus has mutated, and lives on, often in a disguised form. And the existence and achievements of the Jewish state in an area of relative backwardness stimulate anti-Semitism and furnish a respectable cover. Once anti-Semitism had a religious basis but, with the declining significance of religion in the West, anti-Semitism in church circles has relatively little standing as such. Hitler exploited anti-Semitism with deadly consequences for Jews and the world. But racial anti-Semitism has been tabooed after the Holocaust and the Nuremberg trials. Now the existence of the state of Israel permits anti-Semitism to assume a political form, safe from challenge as intolerance or racism. How many times one hears: "I like Jews but I can't stand Zionism," or "I have nothing against Jews, but I don't like Israel." The existence and achievements of Israel offer a visible and irresistible target for dormant anti-Semitic feelings aroused by a focus on Israel's mistakes and misdeeds, which are characteristic of every state including the US. Some Arab states appear to have now found a way to accomplish a purpose that the unrepealed PLO Charter, pledging the destruction of Israel has not achieved. Wars with Israel have been disasters and are much too problematic to repeat. The attempt to bring Israel to its knees through sanctions and boycotts at the Security Council faces a US veto. However, these Emergency Special Sessions of the UN General Assembly, in which all but 3 states have joined in a collective denunciation, show the possibility of a slow but sure de-legitimization of Israel and the hope of some for its eventual strangulation. Israel stands at the precipice of being treated at the UN as South Africa during apartheid. It is certainly not comparable, considering that Israeli Arabs are citizens, vote and sit in the Knesset. The challenge to Israel's right to exist as an equal state may soon move from the PLO Charter to the UN. The adjourned Emergency Special Session of the General Assembly is a harbinger of worse to be attempted. The world faces a dilemma. The UN exists, and there is no present alternative. As Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, former US Ambassador to the UN warned long ago, "the UN is a dangerous place." The United Nations held their first ever conference on combatting anti-semitism on Thursday January 22, 2015. Barely half of the UN's 193 member states attended the informal meeting, which was planned four months ahead of time in hopes that many members would be able to attend. All 57 Islamic nations represented at the UN unanimously condemned "hatred, anti-semitism, and Islamophobia," in a move that US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power called "extremely significant." Speakers including French philosopher Bernard Henri Levy delved into historical anti-semitism and made the case that European anti-semitism today is as dangerous as ever. Levy stated "In Paris, just a few days ago, we heard once again the infamous cry 'Death to the Jews' and cartoonists were killed because of cartooning, police for policing and Jews just for shopping and being Jews. In other capitals in Europe and elsewhere, faulting the Jews is once again becoming the rallying cry of a new order of assassins, unless it is the same but cloaked in new habits. This assembly was given the sacred task of preventing those terrible spirits from re-awakening, but they have returned and that is why we are here." The most common theme of the day was that anti-semitism is the first step down a long road of racism, bigotry, and discrimination. At the meeting, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon said that "Grievances about Israeli actions must never be used as an excuse to attack Jews." The meeting concluded with a panel discussion featuring a group of CEO's of human rights NGO's. Source: UN Watch; Jerusalem Post (January 22, 2014); Time Magazine (January 23, 2015)" Anti-Semitism in the United Nations

Dem votes by year: 66M - Obama 2012 66M - Hillary 2016 81M - Biden 2020 74M - Kamala 2024 I would say it's possible to go from 66M votes to 81M in 2020, just because of the level of hatred towards Trump that the MSM was able to create with their covid BS. I don't there was ever a concerted media attack like that in all of human history. Not even during WWII. It's not every US president that gets blamed for the deaths of 1M Americans or whatever it was. Plus they mass-mailed millions of unsolicited ballots in 2020, and it's possible that a lot of them legitimately came back from the people they were intended for, but I doubt anyone really knows who voted with those. Of course, more Americans died of covid while Biden was president, but there wasn't a covid death ticker running on CNN 24/7 while Biden was POTUS.

Ya i can blame the Canadian government, who else is responsible for our entire nations security apparatus... do you think Iran has tried to assassinate a US congress member...why is that, most likely it is becasue the US would bomb them for 40 days and 40 nights...what do you think Canada would do...shit we could not even get the two Michaels released by china....We do not have a voice on the global stage, our nation can not be trusted in any alliance it has signed on to. we are part of the G-7 not becasue we deserve to be there but becasue of a invite only to maintain a balance in the organization... this government has been in charge for 8 plus years, they could or should have done a lot more, instead they only weaken our current security apparatus...Blaming Iran for our weak security apparatus, that embolden them to take such drastic action, with no chance of Canada to retaliate it was a no brainer...if you need to flex some power or muscle, why not do it on the weakest member of the clan, Canada is the weakest member...because that is what we want, or we would change that...

I was totally pwned.

Am I being sarcastic? I really don't know. Sometimes it's just easier this way.

That's the most American thing I ever heard of before lol.

You sure showed me.

What are you talking about? During his first administration so many of his top people he selected quit or got fired it was a joke. He couldn’t keep anyone in office. No US administration has had so many people come and go in a single term That sure doesn’t sound like he’s amazing at hiring too talent And Most of the senior people Trump selected for his first administration absolutely despise him and say he is a disaster No president has had so many of his own staff hate him on every level A 2-term president might be at polite odds with 2 or 3 former staffers. But Trump is unique in having dozens who just loathe him and personally attest to hi incompetence: “unfit to be president” “ a despicable human being” a “fascist to the core” “prefers the dictator approach to government” “hasn’t got the brains” “pretty undisciplined – doesn’t like to read, doesn’t read briefing reports” “His understanding of global events [and] his understanding of US history was really limited.” “should never be president again.” Those are just a small sample of direct quotes from those advisors you say he chose “very well”

Millions and millions of democratic voters don't just disappear. I've never been a big believer in the election was stolen in 2020 theory, I assume that the higher vote was just an increase in population combined with particularly motivated voters but when you look at all the variables there's no way that those numbers make sense. Something happened in 2020 that was definitely not normal and it benefited the democrats exclusively.

I'll stop there. Why?

You have some nerves calling other low intelligence when you believe in god, you peasant.

Lol...you keep trying to make me out to be some sort of Russian. Unfortunately I am Canadian. If the USA and NATO had any strategic concern for Ukraine, they'd have accepted the Ukrainian application. They did not. Brandon has now tried to eliminate any peace deal Trump has in mind. But that's not gonna work. All it's gonna do is give Russia a reason to level Kiev. Trump will bring peace. I'm sure you understand what that will mean. So enjoy your little war. It's got a limited shelf life now, and then you can call Trump a Russian asset. Enjoy that.