Leaderboard

Oh look the guy who thinks we should have more 'accountability' is dismissing it when we find out about liberal crimes AGAIN. In fairness he did once claim that he wanted it so he could hold CONSERVATIVE gov'ts accountable, not left wing ones like the libs. "I WANT ACCOUNTABILITY!!!!" 'ok - these guys did some crimes and we've caught them at it". "WE DO NOT NEED TO HOLD THESE PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE, THIS IS EVERY DAY CORRUPTION THAT SHOULD BE TOLERATED!" Sigh this is why we can't have nice things.

Wow! You read that whole report in mere minutes! Or, like usual, you feel the need to jump in immediately with little thought or preparation, to defend your beloved Liberals.

IF WCM read the law regarding falsifying business records, he surely did NOT understand what it says. LMAO That's a hell of thing to demonstrate for a guy pretends to be an expert here on most everything.

I think what Trudeau is trying to do is poison the well. If he makes things so bad that it takes 10 years to even begin to put it right then people will blame the conservatives in the end for getting that it was Justin who caused all of the problems and then the liberals will be able to return to power. If I were Poilievre, I would be coming up with a strategy to address that because it's clear that Justin intends to fiddle for the next year and a half till the election

You can say whatever your little heart pleases, but none of those folks have to fold reality in on itself to shield themselves from basic facts on the ground, or to reconcile with the compulsive and obvious lying of a bullshit artist who's still complaining about make-believe election fraud. The evidence is that the low-information donkeys who hang on every word Trump says have been convinced by 8 years of his deliberate and constant undermining of the legal system. Go figure! It's no mystery why most of the folks who believe this trial was unfair are the same folks who still believe the election was stolen. 🤡

"global cooling" was NEVER a consensus of climate scientists like GW has been for decades. There were a few stories about it published in popular magazines. There was cooling 70 years ago due to particulate emissions primarily from diesel engines, but MAJOR PROGRESS was made cleaning up the long haul trucks. The cause of GW is completely different: fossil fuel CO2 emissions which have NOT been cleaned up yet, though progress is being made with electric cars and renewable energy sources.

Ok. Are you saying a movie in 2012 represents a real view on Climate? Also I looked up Kenneth Watt. An ecologist speaking on Earth Day in 1970, so who knows... The Greenhouse effect has been known for 200 years and there's no major challenge to the theory that CO2 is driving Climate Change. A handful of climate scientists dispute the degree to which humans are involved but as both temperature and CO2 emissions climb there are fewer and fewer. There's been nothing close to consensus on cooling of the Climate... That's a falsehood.

^Post has the stench of a Russian propagandist spreading disinformation to help his war effort and steal Ukrainian resources.

Your cult is going to burn.

There is a simple solution. Drill baby drill. Leave farmers, miners and forestry alone. Stop spending money we don't have. Close the border. Do that...and watch the Canadian economy take off.

Trump just got convicted on 34 counts on what was a misdemeanor that got turned into a felony. Passed the statute of limitations too. A sharp contrast to Hunter, who the DOJ tried to give that sweetheart deal to, on what was an actual felony lol.

Because the <40% who don't think it's fair are the same MAGA donkeys who believe absolutely everything that fat orange baboon says no matter what. They're the same unthinking rubes who still believe the election was stolen. They were never going to think it was fair, nor will they think it's fair if he loses the election. Justice...against the people we don't like. Democracy...but only if our guy wins. That's the dopey logic you're peddling here. The American public didn't lose faith in the legal system. Donald Trump's MAGA apes did, because he spent the last 8 years doing everything he could to undermine their faith in it, and they can't think for themselves. Everything is crooked, everything is rigged - the election, the jury, the trial, the WHO - it's all out to get poor Donald. 🙄 They didn't have to bend the law. Donald Trump leaves a trail of folks he's ripped off, bullied or betrayed wherever he goes, and he's too dumb to not talk himself into trouble. Michael Cohen was his fall guy back in 2018, and now he's reaping his whirlwind.

Rallies for years to lock up the Clintons and the Bidens for "crimes" not in evidence... then cries persecution when he's prosecuted for blatant crimes that he clearly committed. Pretends that President Biden has politicized the justice system... while Hunter Biden is undergoing his own felony trial., And his followers blindly nod along, because they'll believe anything he says.

I suppose. Governments have been lying to us forever and we still can't seem to do anything about it. Oh well if by we did we'd probably only bring some new dystopian freakshow into existence.

None of that is possible - I paid my carbon tax!!! I was told that would definitely fix global warming !

So you, by your own admission "don't know" if Biden should have abandoned 2500 US troops to the Taliban forces? Well, that should be a pretty farking easy question to answer, but let's stipulate that, indeed, you can't figure it out and don't know. And then let's agree that if you don't know what you're talking about, you're not really in any position to be blaming Biden for Trumps "surrender."

No, you drooling halfwit, not all falsified business records are falsified for the same reasons, but they are all the same crime. No, you inbred troglodyte, Trump was indeed charged with felonies. It's right there in the paperwork for the indictment, arraignment and conviction. Have someone read it to you. And no, you knuckle-dragging Neanderthal, Trump was indeed accused of violating New York Election Law Section 17-152, a felony he certainly intended co commit. No federal law required.

You don't need a PhD here: only common sense that most of the readers will understand: if you have one event at a certain place A (the bat research project, if confirmed); then the likelihood that another, entirely unrelated one: natural development of a virus: happening at the exact same time and in the exact same place has to be minuscule to non existent. On the other hand, the probability of a mishap is always present. So it's all down to the confirmation of the project. If there is a reasonable ground to believe that it was taking place at the place of the origin of the virus, the probabilities would be stuck squarely in favor of the lab origin simply by the law of probabilities.

I don't.

It was vaccines actually. He paid a couple hundred million dollars to help them develop a vaccine because a Montreal investor owned a part of the company in china that was doing the development. They were guaranteed to be allowed to buy the vaccine as soon as it was ready. Then the Chinese completely pulled the rug out from under him and failed to deliver and told him to p*ss off and didn't give the money back. We actually sent our protective gear to china in the beginning if you'll recall. The upshot of all of this was that while everyone else was shopping for moderna and Pfizer vaccines we expected to get our vaccines from china. When that didn't happen we had to scramble and try and buy vaccines after the fact and go to the end of the line. Consequently we were several months late getting vaccines compared to other countries. So for those who believe in the vaccine program and believe that vaccines saved lives, it could be said with certainty that Trudeau's decisions would have cost lives.

Watching the NISCOP committee meetings. that's how I know this is not "lobbying". It's treason.

Why would Hollywood reflect current scientific thinking? It doesn't make sense to try and draw a line between actual science and what tickets they're selling at the movies.

I was starting to think it was only me who noticed they went from global "cooling" to global "warming". Nobody else even batted an eye.

In NY State, no, but I'm not the one who said that "because no one has ever been charged of that before, no one ever can be". That was the dipsnit I quoted. Trump will eventually have this overturned at the SC, probably 9-0.

It depletes their historically biggest enemy?

Read the f'ing NY state LAW. Why do you restate what I wrote AND GET it WRONG? You just DESTROY YOUR CREDIBILITY. LMAO

In America, where NAZIS dress up as Democrats and use the court system to take down political opponents who are too high in the polls. Seig Heil, DemoNazis.

LOL yes but he's like that guy from 'home improvement', where the neighbour explains things to him over the fence and then he runs off and completely screws it up when he repeats it to someone else. Lefties: "PSSST robosmith .... tell them that Biden's fiscal acumen has lead to showers of gold for people. Robosmith: BiDeN HaS lEaD teh PEOPLE to GOLDEN SHOWERS ThAnKs tO FiXaL Aqua-man!!!!! PROOOOF!!!!!"

https://www.thedailyscoop.com/news/retail-industry/doomsday-addiction-celebrating-50-years-failed-climate-predictions In 1970, as greenhouse theorists pushed a rise in average temperature, plenty of prognosticators asserted a big freeze. Kenneth Watt sounded the ice alarm, speaking in Pennsylvania at Swarthmore College: “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but 11 degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” In the Seventies, I spent quite enough winters in the Rust belt, places like Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, etc. I got PLENTY of cold weather to last me a lifetime. Did you ever notice that when the lies of the EnviroNazis are revealed, these bozos try to change the argument, change the subject, invent a new crisis?

They are the same people that vote in the liberals. They may be complete brain dead losers but at least they're consistent

Do you even pause to think before you post this inane nonsense? A. Trump (and those acting at his behest) falsified business records. That's "what he did." And the same DA's office has prosecuted 437 other cases not just criminally, but with a felony charge for falsifying documents in the last 10 years. Just that one office. Trump may have told you that this doesn't happen, but you know he's a pathological liar, right? It happens all the time. B. Get it through your head, this prosecution and conviction did NOT rely on federal law, and no federal charges were applied. FFS, go read the damn jury instructions. The case works just fine with NY law. C. The charges WERE NOT past the COVID-extended statue of limitations. You seem absolutely committed to lying about this point, so I suppose this is mentioned for honest people playing along at home.

Even while he's smoking crack in the car, he is still miraculously getting paid millions of dollars when he's in that condition.

Again, you made the claim that there is precedent for jailing someone in a comparable case. But you have not provided one single comparable case in all of US history. So, as usual, you’re completely full of BS, aren’t you? You make up nonsense and then challenge someone to prove you’re wrong, instead of proving that you’re right. You’re full of shlt, you’re lying, Hunter Biden walks, boo hoo.

Dude I was making fun of Biden's rewriting of history. Remember in the interview when Biden claimed that inflation was at 9% when he took office and he brought it down.

You are not correct. The charges were raised to felony by the PROSECUTORS, not the judge, because the they aided in the violation of a New York State law, to wit: ”Prosecutors said that other crime was a violation of a New York election law that makes it illegal for "any two or more persons" to "conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.” So it boils down to this: Why did Trump pay Stormy Daniels? To protect his marriage, his business, his social reputation… or, was it to prevent a scandal which could have cost him the election? That was the key question, and at least two witnesses, Cohen and Pecker, testified that the election was the reason for the payments, and THAT is what raised the charges to felony, under New York State law, not federal law.

The US border IS open! Would you try to call Tim Scott a "white supremacist"? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/05/09/tim-scott-trump-biden-border-2024-debt/70195825007/ You truly are a bonified id1ot.

The odd thing about these people is that they're often discussed as though they have a 'free ride' 50% in Ontario is about $35K which gives you NET pay of about $2,200 a month. This is the so-called 'middle class'. This is the economy that the Trudeaus, the Chretiens, the Mulroneys and Harpers have given us. https://www.thekickassentrepreneur.com/income-percentile-calculator-by-province-for-canada/

He's in far left country. It'll be interesting to see if they apply their screams for gun control to a member of their own or if what we all suspect is just a political talking point will be confirmed

There is a book which may shed some light on things like pandemics. I am not saying the Covid virus had anything to do with this or that it was deliberate. The book is called "Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America" written by two People's Liberation Army (PLA) officers. This is the People's Liberation Army manual for unrestricted or non-conventional warfare that can be carried on without the enemy even thinking they are at war. The book is available for Kindle readers on Amazon. The hardcover is available for $23.85 Can. The Kindle version is $8.99 Can The Amazon description of the book says: "A sobering and fascinating study on war in the modern era, Unrestricted Warfare carefully explores strategies that militarily and politically disadvantaged nations might take in order to successfully attack a geopolitical super-power like the United States. American military doctrine is typically led by technology; a new class of weapon or vehicle is developed, which allows or encourages an adjustment in strategy. Military strategists Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui argue that this dynamic is a crucial weakness in the American military, and that this blind spot with regard to alternative forms warfare could be effectively exploited by enemies. Unrestricted Warfare concerns the many ways in which this might occur, and, in turn, suggests what the United States might do to defend itself. The traditional mentality that offensive action is limited to military action is no longer adequate given the range of contemporary threats and the rising costs-both in dollars and lives lost-of traditional warfare. Instead, Liang and Xiangsui suggest the significance of alternatives to direct military confrontation, including international policy, economic warfare, attacks on digital infrastructure and networks, and terrorism. Even a relatively insignificant state can incapacitate a far more powerful enemy by applying pressure to their economic and political systems. Exploring each of these considerations with remarkable insight and clarity, Unrestricted Warfare is an engaging evaluation of our geopolitical future." We are seeing interference on our elections in at least the past two elections. So this should not be taken lightly and nothing can be ruled out.

Not surprising lefty DAs are targeting conservative news outlets. They are doing it to churches as well.

Daszcak requestèd grant money from Fauci, to work on creating a new coronavirus at the Wuhan lab. I posted his request on the Trickle thread. His proposal involved: Using an existing coronavirus from a bat Hotwiring it with 2 particular enzymes, which he named Creating a furin cleavage site at a particular place in the genome, which he named Hotwiring the ACE receptors to make it integrate with human cells easier Lo & behold, a year later, a bat coronavirus emerges a few blocks away from the Wuhan lab that contains the same furin cleavage site, ACE receptor abilities, the exact 2 enzymes from Daszaks proposal and the same genome from his proposal. This isn't a conspiracy theory. It's a conspiracy FACT. The chances that this is Daszaks virus are very high. The only reason we have a 95% probability and not 100% is because the Chinese have destroyed records and "disappeared" some of the people involved.

Of course it was politically motivated. It was election-related fraud by a former president whose made a career out lying and talking trash. He has the emotional self-control of a 5-year old and can't stop himself from saying dumb shit that gets him in trouble. He couldn't have made himself a more obvious and welcome target for investigation if he'd been trying. Politically motivated, however, is not the same thing as unfair. Imagine that. Folks who blindly follow a man who's spent the last 8 years undermining the legal system, have lost faith in the legal system. Everyone else? Different story: They actually changed the laws to be able to go after Al Capone. He was an obvious criminal who flouted and ridiculed the law, but he had expensive lawyers and accountants and could spend his way out of trouble and hide his trail. Sounds like someone someone we know... They've already lost their goddamn minds. If they're only going to trust the election results if their guy wins, they don't actually believe in democracy, do they? Why are they all bragging about the polls right now?

All your posts imply that you hate Eastern Europeans. Let's just be blunt. You are woke, and hate all White people, but that seems to be the flavour of the day. Holy projectionist, Batman!

If you answer one question, the buzz will throw ten more. It's not the answers they are seeking: only the buzz, the wider and louder the better.

No. O'Donnell didn't commit a felony. She donated too much, too many times, but did it openly in her own name and listed her occupation. This is a routine matter, and an entire page is dedicated on the FEC's website on how to remedy excessive contributions: https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/candidate-taking-receipts/remedying-excessive-contribution/ D'Souza, on the other hand, used straw donors (mules) to donate in secret. That's a felony. Once again, the upstanding journalists at the NYP and Fox News are spinning tales for low-info donkeys to squawk about.

In the caldera, I presume. Good spot. If you smell sulfur, grab your camera. It probably means that some of Hillary's cousins are coming to the surface.

You know i'm canadian. Or is your short term memory issues acting up on you again I swear sometimes you have the attention span of a goldfish. Every election's a change, and they're all critical. Elections matter. Often the people involved try to suggest that whichever one is the next one is the MOST CRITICAL SUPER IMPORANT ONE EVER IN THE HISTORY OF EVER!!!!! And that's silly as a rule. But - they are important, they do bring about critical change and that is a fact.