Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/03/2024 in Posts

  1. This whole trial and all the BS convictions never would have happened if Trump just had just listened to the advice of Mykola Zlochevsky.
    3 points
  2. The circumstances, the intent are completely different, as I explained. Because there has never been anyone as debased and compromised as Trump. Cite please False. In fact they called 2 witnesses and could have called more. Why would they need a change of venue? Crimes are usually tried in the jurisdiction where they occur. And he is a national figure, it’s not like there is a venue where nobody has heard of him or has an opinion about him. It’s not normal for a person to recuse themselves because of their child. That’s usually for spouses or where there is a direct financial interest at stake . And Republican USSC justices Alito and Thomas actually have spouses who are outspoken partisan extremists and yet they never recuse themselves. No that’s your imagination again. There’s not been any twisting of the law. He was caught on tap plotting it. His co-conspirator, his former lawyer, already was convicted for it and testified against him. As per his usual schtick, he has no defence against reality so he screams conspiracy and demands you not pay attention to the facts being presented. Like Ive said his supporters don’t even deny he committed the crime they just demand their messiah is above the law and be granted complete immunity. It’s certainly plausible that other presidential candidates committed similar or perhaps worse crimes and made the allegations go away by discretely “playing ball” or pulling strings behind the scenes but Trump is unique in the myriad ways in which he is legally compromised, he isn’t isn’t just implicated in one scandal, he has many unrelated criminal investigations into his conduct and abuse of office. Also he is uniquely unhinged and clueless nature and he instinctively makes his own situation worse with his public personal attacks, rants and lies against any authority figure scrutinizing his activity. Also interesting hypocrisy that the people who claim to admire Trump specifically because he ignores and defies norms and conventions are now complaining about an alleged convention that wasn’t followed, don’t you think?
    3 points
  3. No, I'm not. You can pick any one of those claims and see with a few minutes of basic research that they are false. My favorite is you blaming Biden for "surrendering" to the Taliban, when it was the Trump administration that literally signed the deal giving back Afghanistan and agreeing to withdraw troops--and actually withdrawing 90% of them. When Biden came into office the "surrender" was already a done deal. The papers were signed, the Taliban were rolling across the country, and the US had just 2500 troops in the country. Trump "surrendered" and you blame Biden. And every one of those claims is as blatantly false.
    2 points
  4. Michelle Softener finds left-wing propaganda much more to his/her liking.
    2 points
  5. This is a broad generalization, and at a time of critical choice, when the reason and responsibility have to be in the forefront of any important decision, what good does it do to speak in vague generalities as opposed to precise and concrete specifics of the problems? Is America, and West in general facing an uncertainty? Almost certainly. This is a product of the decades of the development of a society that wanted only to please itself, party and forget about any troubles. So it's running into a slow phase and eventually, dead end. It always works this way in evolution. Lose your edge, ignore the need to change and adapt and you begin coasting, then into slow decline and so on. Is Biden the cause of it, the ultimate evil? That's the "thinking" of an underdeveloped baby or the throat for brain cult. Just dumb: or deceitful. Have both parties, the self-centered and caring political system contributed to this state of affairs? Definitely. Is there a simple, magical word way out of it? Yes. That of hot steam loudmouth bullshit claims and promises. Will it work? Yes and no: for the bullshitter quite possibly, for you: no. Never has. Not me, only the history. See, we know something already. Who are "progressives"? How do you define this group? Yes there may be people who hate him and those who see him for what he is: a loudmouth zero principles and integrity populist throat full of itself that loves to cuddle with dictator thugs. Just loves them, naturally. With understanding, there's no need for hate, see? Back to reason and responsibility: I understand and insist that no one making this decision out of these considerations will make this choice. Impossible. Just doesn't match. Two plus two is not zero. Zero cannot be stretched to not zero by any lying words and any volume of those. Just doesn't match. And no hate here. Easy?
    2 points
  6. Well, lets see here. You claim D'Souza is a horrible person for making wild claims without proof while making some wild claims and offering no proof? I'm not going to spend time looking up and debunking claims if you can't even prove those claims were made.
    2 points
  7. Pro Trump lies and propaganda cannot be discussed rationally. They are spread by agents who only accept their own paid sources. As such, posters please ignore.
    2 points
  8. You have all heard about it by now. Donald Trump writes: ""Highly respected Dinesh D'Souza, working together with Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote, just released a trailer to their new movie, "2,000 Mules," that shows the world exactly how the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged and Stolen. The movie exposes the lies of the Democrats, RINOs, and Fake News who say it was the "most secure election in history." It was, perhaps, the least secure in history. The ballot box was stuffed, and stuffed like never before—and it's all on video. Ballots were trafficked and sold in a massive operation in each Swing State. The evidence is so damning, what will the cowards who sat and did nothing about the stolen election say now? The way our votes were taken away is a disgrace to our Nation. It must be fixed." Do you want to see it for free? Well, here is the trailer: https://2000mules.com/ Sadly, the fascists at Youtube have banned all mention of it, so I cannot insert the video here. As soon as this forum accepts Rumble and Bitchute video players I can. And now, thanks to an enterprising individual, the entire documentary is here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/zZRf03sOTNl9/ Enjoy, and fear. The world last superpower is now ruled by an illegal Marxist Junte. You Canadians should be very afraid.
    1 point
  9. The solution is simple. Rule Trump ineligible at the convention and select a candidate that gives the public an sensible choice. The deranged can write in Satan, Cthulu or the AntiChrist to save them from the woke leftist bogeyman.
    1 point
  10. He was arraigned by political hacks. That jury was probably threatened or paid off.
    1 point
  11. To me at the best of times they sound like those secret code phrases they used to play on the radio in ww2 for the resistance to hear . "the brown rooster crows at 3:17 am! Schnitzel and bratwurst! The chocolate bunny has no teeth! Why? Because we can! What? Roust! Roust! I'm sure it means something to someone but to the average listener he just sounds like a loon.
    1 point
  12. Most of its' posts are poo-poo, pee-pee, farts and butt sex, etc. I'm convinced it's a 12 year old boy.
    1 point
  13. It was sent here to shill the masses, just like robowoke does.
    1 point
  14. Moonbat is a loser. It has no moral compass and no intellect. Which is why its wrong consistently.
    1 point
  15. They've cheated on debates, had the FBI commit crimes and run show trials for them, had activist judges run kangaroo courts to persecute their political opponents, used the National Guard and razor wire at Capitol Hill for fear mongering photo ops, pushed false narratives to cause racial division & incite mass rioting and bloodshed, and then after 4 years of them pretending that the 2016 election was illegitimate they won a dodgy election with truckloads of midnight ballots and then declared election skepticism to be a crime. Still, after all that, they don't appear to be on track to win the 2024 election. Do they have another trick up their sleeves? How much deeper into the role of banana republic governance can they possibly go, without openly going into full-authoritarian mode? TBH, a lot of their cultists are ready for it. The Dems could run every Republican congressman and senator into prison and the cultist dolts here would march along in lock step with all of their excuses for it. "They were gonna do some more insurrection stuff! They were gonna get some more seditious mobs to attack the capitol!" What do you think the Dems will do if they're still losing come October?
    1 point
  16. Yes, I don't remember your positions on every single thing. Why would I ? If you doubt my honesty, don't exchange with me.
    1 point
  17. Moonbat believes that only left-wing diapered psychopaths are allowed to throw insults at others. lol
    1 point
  18. Maybe I'm mixed up, but I don't remember August being such a nonsense poster years ago. He's been on this forum longer than most of us, but I don't recall it being pointless, nothing-blather like it usually is now. 🤷‍♂️
    1 point
  19. You don't even understand what the trial was about, just like your recount of the rest of ^your DRIVEL. AKA, NOT about Trump's dick, it was about Trump LYING to the public with falsified business records and campaign finance violations. If you look up NY campaign finance law, you will see it is illegal to donate large amounts to your own campaign without REPORTING IT among OTHER THINGS. IF you paid attention to the EVIDENCE, you'd see that Trump never bothered to payoff Stormy until AFTER the Access Hollywood video came out. He clearly believed his campaign could not survive ANOTHER sex scandal or he never would have cared about Stormy's story.
    1 point
  20. Hodad can put two and two together, and understand that the sort of man who raw-dogs porn stars when his wife is recovering from child birth might not be the upstanding martyr you clowns make him out to be. 🤣
    1 point
  21. I would agree with that. Another Republican candidate other than Trump would defeat Biden with not much suspense. Biden as about as vanilla or moderate as they come.. hence his lack of appeal. He is the 20th repetition of the same show... predictable at every turn.
    1 point
  22. propaganda by its nature is not a reliable source of information.
    1 point
  23. @Venandi Here is some info on the p53 - the tumor suppressor protein that may lead to increased incidences of aggressive cancers: 1. S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study - ScienceDirect 2. SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells | bioRxiv The scientists set out to determine if the S2 component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with a tumor suppressor protein called p53. This particular protein is called the ‘guardian of the genome’ for its important role in DNA damage response and repair. The authors found that S2 had a suppressive effect on p53, which suggests that “the SARS-CoV-2 spike causes an altered DNA damage sensing and repair response in cancer cells.” This finding “provides a potential molecular mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infection may impact tumorigenesis, tumor progression and chemotherapy sensitivity.” In other words, a component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can lead to the development of tumors and may inhibit positive effects of cancer therapeutics. 3. Rubio_Casillas_Methylpseudouridine_Promotes_Cancer_Wow_2024.pdf The above study was behind a paywall, but I found it in PDF. The authors were pressured to retract it, but it does agree with the findings from the other papers. 4. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro - PubMed (nih.gov) This may have been the right scientific conclusion to draw at the wrong time. The paper was retracted in May 2022 under strange circumstances, a move that appeared to be politically motivated. Arkmedic covered this paper and the scandal surrounding its retraction in a post: (17) Welcome to Gilead - by Dr Ah Kahn Syed - Arkmedic's blog Here are 3 discussions on the subject of p53 activation: Dr. Jessica Rose: S2 of SARS-2 spike buggers up p53 - by Jessica Rose (substack.com) Dr. Peter McCullough: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-new-manuscript-concludes?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Professor of Oncology, Dr. Angus Dalgleish: The covid booster cancer time bomb - The Conservative Woman
    1 point
  24. It’s taken multiple FOIA lawsuits, but new, newly disclosed NIH data shows the agency and its scientists collected an eye-watering $710 million in royalties, just during the pandemic, between late 2021 and the end of 2023. Up till now, the NIH refused to say how much in royalties its taxpayer-compensated scientists have earned, insisting there’s no law requiring them to disclose that, and citing public servants’ privacy (even though you had to disclose your jab status to buy a cheeseburger). So, the very same people pushing jabs, lauding their safety and efficacy, and helping justify vaccine mandates, passports, and databases were raking it in the whole time, laughing all the way to the bank, earning multiples of their government-approved salaries in covid shot royalties. No wonder they tried to bury it. The burden of proof has now shifted. The NIH must now convincingly demonstrate that it was not acting improperly, and did not let its financial incentives influence its scientific judgments and public health policies. If NIH can’t prove that, it deserves the harshest possible sanction, especially given the life-and-death stakes. But the scandal also raises essential questions about whether NIH scientists should receive royalties in the first place. I mean, what are we paying these people to do? If a scientist worked for a private boss, guess who gets the royalties for whatever the employee scientist invents? The boss does. That’s why he hired the scientist in the first place. Duh. So why are NIH scientists entitled to royalties? Why aren’t NIH royalties paid back to the public treasury, since the taxpayers are the boss in this scenario? The disclosure of nearly a billion dollars in jab royalties shared by a couple hundred well-connected NIH government scientists exposes an unholy symbiosis between a captured agency and the industry it regulates, a shadow system tirelessly working behind a public façade, extracting wealth and freedom from duped citizens. The pandemic response, with its dire combination of corporate profiteering, administrative overreach, and the suppression of dissent, has exposed the workings of this infernal machine in stark detail. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. NIH scientists made $710M in royalties from drug makers, a fact they tried to hide (nypost.com)
    1 point
  25. Please remind him to bring his cue cards, steel walker and lots of adrenaline needles. 5 months is a very long time for a decrepit old pervert to be on the campaign trail.
    1 point
  26. No, you just promote their agenda and spend years arguing on behalf of their closest allies. The fact that you're too stupid to know what you're doing is irrelevant. More comedy. In a thread where you're defending the criminal behavior of a twice-divorced, orange sleazebag who raw-dogs pornstars while his young wife is recovering from child birth, you are questioning other people's moral compass. 🤡🤡🤡
    1 point
  27. Awwww, poor Snowflake can dish it out, but can't take it. Half your posts on this board include sexual innuendo--the simplistic quality reminiscent of a playground bully rom the 70s--but an occasional dose of the same leaves you indignant? GTFO. Nevertheless, that's exactly the nature of your relationship. Your crooked "strongman" gets held accountable for just a fraction of his actions and suddenly you're on your knees. dropping even the facade of support of democratic constitutional government. The truth is that you've never cared a whit about American values. You don't understand them. They are as foreign to you as you are to America. So stamp your feet and shake your fists in impotent fury in your own country. Here, you don't matter at all. Not even so much as a single vote.
    1 point
  28. Indeed. Laziness (mental including) plays an essential role in the evolution but we never know where to stop. Spot on. The nature works by trial and error. It means that some will be wrong and have to be remembered to do better in the next one. That's wrong! We disagree! Let's vote no rebel against the evolution yes we can. And so the story goes.
    1 point
  29. Great post. The root of the problem is a theme of coddling and perpetual affirmation that tells folks they're never wrong. You see many posts on here (RePolitics - which is ostensibly a forum for better dialogue) delegitimizing entire viewpoints and cultures rather than talking about solutions. It's a symptom of politics' degeneration into angertainment and insult sports.
    1 point
  30. Never bring a knife to a gun fight. These Libbies have no conscience. No morality. Rules mean nothing to them. All they care about is power. They've learned that adults will do just about anything to stop a baby from screaming, so they've turned politics into a scream-fest. They lie and cheat at the top of their lungs, just waiting for the adults to go, "Ok OK, have it your way. Just stop screaming." They've turned it into a "swamp". To "drain the swamp"...to coin a phrase...you have to be willing to get mud on your hands. These swamp creatures will never play straight. They must be removed. Bureaucracies, FBI, DOJ, the politicians...all of these destructive b1tches. They have set the legal and operational precedent. IMO, conservatives have to point their own "new normal" right at them. But this time, no empty threats. Pull the bloody trigger! Prosecute Hilary...follow through and send Hunter to jail...attack these Tweenkies with all the zeal and volume they use...and then some. The Libbies have declared war. It's time we recognized that.
    1 point
  31. You're in classic form here, just repeating the lies as fast as your can. Why don't you show us how Merchan's daughter relies on "his abuse of the legal system?" I'll wait. But I won't hold my breath. Because you usually just tuck tail when challenged to support your lies. Merchan was actually composed and professional in spite of the circus Trump created. He could have very easily sent Trump to Rikers for contempt. It was more than earned. But he showed remarkable restraint.
    1 point
  32. This could be the election virus, the one that "forces" heavy mail balloting and looooooong counting delays. If they can get Trump in prison, get this virus rolling with restrictive lockdowns and curfews and keep Biden away from the mic, it might be enough!
    1 point
  33. I don't really think he will, no. The thinking of most here, including you, seems to be that aside from gutting the CBC, there won't be major changes. Do you?
    1 point
  34. I would find it troubling. Going after anybody personally: as opposed to serious violations of law cannot be the objective of democracy. Still, the system has checks against arbitrary prosecution. Grand jury, jury trial. The mob wants to throw it all away for one reason that it went against their wishes. That brings to the fore the essence of this issue: the mob wants to control the outcome of justice. It wants to run it, plain and clear. They say it, openly. And that would be the end of democracy. Obviously.
    1 point
  35. I just bought two 5 gal containers to catch the Dem tears. Can be used as paint stripper or cleaning out septic tanks. Caution...Must wear a hazmat suit.
    1 point
  36. Since Trump put Cohen in jail for his part in the same plot, it would be only fair if Trump also served some jail time. Esp after he violated the gag order 10+ times. They ought to tack on at least 10 days for that.
    1 point
  37. Your knife is blunt, polisher has 60 grit sandpaper, bell has lost it's clapper. How can ones truth be disparaging.
    1 point
  38. YOU finding "conclusions are still plausible" doesn't mean they're NOT LIES. There are many more claims made in the movie which are NOT PLAUSIBLE. For example, specifically the extensive usage of inaccurate cell phone tower pings to determine the paths of thousands of supposed "mules."
    1 point
  39. No, none of the 2,000 mules story, created by a convicted felon election fraudster is plausible. Your attempt to argue that that just because one of his baseless accusations was proven to be a fabricated lie doesn’t mean their other unproven baseless claims are untrue. If only the brainwashed cultists would apply that same logic to their judgment of Democrats / the FBI / the media / anyone who doesn’t worship Trump as a holy man. Lets recap: The felon D’Souza said he would release all his evidence shortly but to date has not released any - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he would release evidence proving cell phone data can track people to with an accuracy of no more than 18 inches, contrary to literally every non-partisan industry technical expert, who were all smeared as being Democrat operatives simply for disagreeing with the non-expert election fraudster D’Souza. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he would release evidence showing how they had “eliminated” innocent people who appeared to make frequent trips near a ballot box from their data simply because they pass by one that is near where they live or work. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. -The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed to have video footage showing the same people making multiple drops at ballot boxes and/or “stuffing” a large number of ballots, and that he would soon release the footage So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. Every piece of video footage released only shows the person making one single visit much like the innocent man smeared by the lying felon and his cult goons who is now suing. No footage of anyone “stuffing” a box or returning multiple times has ever been shown - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he had evidence tracing the “mules” back to addresses that are known “Democrat” safe houses affiliated with DNC or left-leaning organizations. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. He has not released the addresses or explained in what way these alleged locations are connected to Democrats -The convicted election fraudster D’Souza has yet to explain how he knows said “mules” were stuffing the boxes with Biden ballots rather than Trump ballots or why no fraudulent / invalid ballots were ever detected The only way to cast a fraudulent vote is to steal the vote of another registered voter or to register someone who is not eligible to vote and neither of those occurred in any unusual numbers compared to previous elections. In summary, 2000 mules was an absurd and implausible lie from a convicted felon who previously plead guilty to election fraud, and it was sold to gullible suckers as “just take my word for it without question, I will provide the evidence later” which of course he never did because it’s all fabricated lies that couldn’t possibly be true. They couldn’t possibly be true because they defy basic logic and the reality of how cell phones and voting actually work.
    1 point
  40. This isn't a porn forum. Take your disgusting imagery else where.
    1 point
  41. The Dems already have the FBI committing crimes for them, and the mainstream media ignores it. Now the courts are openly compromised. The only thing standing between the Dems and a total chokehold on democracy is the supreme court, and they've openly advocated for just stacking it with 4 new demonrat judges. If the Demis can cheat enough to win a strong majority in congress and the senate, there will be 4 new Demonrat judges appointed. The wooden stake was never shoved through the heart of that argument.
    1 point
  42. Not to mention that despite the lie from the now-banned conservative troll who created this thread, D’Souza is not “highly respected” but rather a convicted felon who pleaded guilty to election fraud. It’s funny how all these right wing lies and fake news stories getting debunked time and again never gives these right wing dupes pause before they fall for the next one. I have a friend who is like this: somehow he’s not a MAGA supporter but he is a populist who is always falling for fake news and hoax claims on facebook from random strangers like the well-known “ farmer giving away free horses due to (x current event in the news)” , even some from satire websites that are clearly meant for humour and say so right in the web page. No matter how often they’re debunked and he admits to being fooled it doesn’t stop him from falling for the next one Its a psychological phenomenon.
    1 point
  43. And it did. He was found guilty on all counts by a jury.
    1 point
  44. I love it when the left tells us how we have to react to their tin-pot dictator. That's totally democratic. Did you tell blacks they can't think cops are out to get them too?
    1 point
  45. I doubt the government will do any screening. In practice, we have no standards any more. Canada has become a haven for terrorists from all over the world.
    1 point
  46. Did he have any evidence for those claims? What was the substance of them, any, objectively speaking? Fox News admitted they were "false statements". If not, they have to be one and the same thing: the difference is only what completely made up "truth" comes out of one's finger. You need to see things for what they are, and "grow up".
    1 point
  47. How would it be so different though from " the election was stolen" claim, without a single piece of evidence thrown out by dozens of cases and still all of the MAGA and half of Republicans (seemingly) believe it? If one has moved from the standard of fact and objective truth, to "whatever serves me best becomes, is made into the truth", how much sense does it make to fish for the lowest bottom? There wouldn't be any, obviously. Every new low will be breached by the next enthusiast of false news and manufactured lies.
    1 point
  48. It's a war, little girl. Just because you think that Russia should be ducky with NATO in Ukraine doesn't mean that the Russians have to agree: it's their border. They literally have the right to determine whether or not they want to go to war and your crocodile tears don't mean squat. Ukraine has the right to offer a surrender on Russia's terms or fight. Hamas had the right to start a war, but they chose a terrorist attack instead. Now Israel is at war, and Hamas has to either fight or surrender on terms that Israel accepts. Get it?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...