Leaderboard

Implying that Democrat states are committing crime indicates a culture war stance that is about scapegoating, and is anti-discussion. The OP should really leave this site. And - furthermore - reasonable posters like Robosmith please put these types on ignore and stop feeding the trolls.

Was he FULLY vaxxed? IF he was, he was an extreme outlier. Of course the COVID vaccines don't work for anything called the "Obama virus" whatever that is. Yeah, we've heard all about id iots attending COVID parties and ending up in the ICU. You must be watching Fox Lies. I will wear a mask when I go flying on a jet. That's how my friend's brother ended up in the ICU just as the pandemic was starting here. You never know who you're sitting next to on a jet. During the height of the pandemic in Nov 2020, I few 30+ hours on jets without getting COVID thanks to my custom P100 mask.

Sorry, guys, you are all wrong, it wasn't the vaccine or drugs ... it was a genetic defect from inbreeding. Because who needs medical professionals or any facts about the health or circumstances of a person to determine their cause of death?

Relevance to US Federal Politics? She probably took some kind of drug, since she was attending a show business party this week. It would be smart to get vaxxed before attending a party esp if going maskless.

Slippery-slopes are weak rhetorical devices. They're usually referred to as examples of bad logic. Nobody is saying anything about individuals. We're saying that public servants are paid to serve the public, not their own best interests. There's a conflict of interest in public servants plugging for the Party that plays nicest with them. The Liberals benefit from this probably more than anyone, so if you want your tax dollars to go towards folk who are going to advocate and propagandize for the Party that pays them the most and holds them to the lowest standards, be prepared for our young people to get indoctrinated by charismatic teachers who post their own videos online.

“knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials..” Can a prosecutor prove that Biden KNEW the documents were being removed and, since Biden returned them immediately upon their discovery, prove that Biden INTENDED to keep the documents? No way, UNLESS a credible witness comes forward to that effect. OTOH: Did Trump KNOW that the three palettes of documents were being removed? YES. Some were right in his desk drawer. He KNEW he had the documents. Did Trump INTEND TO KEEP the documents? YES. Clearly, because the Archives asked him to return them many times, got a court order seeking their return, we’re lied to, and then he even sued to keep the classified documents which weren’t his. That is INTENT.

I can read. No quote from Biden in your story.

That part is true, but too often silly conspiracy theories and narratives are framed under the line, "We're just asking questions here. " ? In the initial days especially, there was a lot of uncertainty and assumptions and not all of it bore out. Most of the people who were "raked over the coals" were doing more than "just asking questions". Everything you see on the news should be taken with a grain of salt. Everyone has a bias. The problem with the conspiracy clown parade is that their skepticism is amped up to hysteria for anything that comes from the establishment/mainstream, and turned off completely for anything/everything that flies against it. If they applied even a tiny fraction of their reasoning power and skepticism towards the theories they try to peddle, they'd not be peddling them at all. It's too stupid to fathom, if you're actually fathoming it at all.

That's what everyone's goal should be. They have no narrative and your's is pure hooey.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with skepticism and asking valid questions. There was a lot of misleading and/or false information regarding Covid and a lot of that came from governments all over the world. Many that dared to question official government narratives got raked over the coals. Canada was no exception. I can't help but feel that so much from governments and the MSM should automatically be taken with a grain of salt.

I never said 87%. I said 85.7%, which is accurate to within 1/10th of a percent, and I said 86%, which is rounded off to the nearest 1. Stop pretending you can't do basic math, you grew up in Canada. It's embarrassing to our whole country.

I've already given a credible link. Learn to read.

Their group says that their goal is to eliminate anything covid-related that doesn't support their narrative, so there's that.

It's a problem across the whole country, already very bad situation made worse by our response to Covid. What I find disturbing is that no politician is speaking out about solutions either short or long-term. Why do we have government again? Canadians are too complacent and need to apply political pressure to governments when they are disfunctional, which is all the time.

So far, no Woke goose stepper here qualifies as a sane person. Pretty much the usual low information TROLL crowd here, always getting emotional when they lose an argument.

What to do with a thread that only has one balanced poster and was started by a copy pasta chef ?

On the one hand, it seems irresponsible to say you want to balance the Federal budget, but you don’t want to fund tax collection. On the other hand, the CBO said that this defunding will cost $117 billion over 10 years. It doesn’t make sense to spend $8 billion a year to collect just $11.7 billion. Something seems askew in that.

We need to conclusively determine whether the cause of death was her being from a conservative state or dying in a liberal state. Because that will prove whether it’s better to be conservative or liberal.

Lol.. you've destroyed whatever little credibility you have by calling Robobot "reasonable"

A BABY is born. It is the ninth month. The BABY is outside the womb. Killing that baby is not completing the abortion. It pre-meditated MURDER. You are a Nazi and a monster.

There is no implication here. I provided factual sources. What is it with you? Posters told me YOU were the one who always demanded links for EVERY single opinion posted. So far I've never seen you post ONE single link, liberal or otherwise. And Robosmith is about as reasonable as an AIDS infected wombat. I have this bad habit of being a mainstream Conservative, (the type which makes America work and pays for everything.) I have opinions that the uneducated here may not like. That does not make me a troll. It makes me someone with a differing point of view. If your KARENS here cannot handle disagreement, (especially disagreement backed up by reliable sources) they are the ones with the problem, NOT the professor.

You sound boosted.

He has a right to do what he wants, i guess. But being a police officer, he should have known better, that's the problem.

What he said was done on his own time. Cannot an RCMP officer have a right to his own opinion on his own time. What he said should have no bearing on him in his doing his job. Does this mean that if I criticize someone on my own time, off from work, could I lose my job because the boss did not like to hear my personal view on something? At least we now know that we have one smart thinking cop around who sees the WEF Marxist in Ottawa for what he is. Pretty much a liar and a thief. This has nothing to do with any discriminatory views but just another honest Canadian calling it out as he sees fit. But I do know that here in Marxist Canada we know that cops like him will no doubt be paying the price for his daring to speak freely. ?

It was probably 6-8 years ago, regarding the Lyndsey Shephard debacle at Laurier. I thought Peterson was great back then. You already had moved on decided he was a sellout. Sometimes it's an absurd overreaction, and sometimes it's not. If we take it on a case by case basis, as you say, we should be able to come to reasonable conclusions, but sadly both sides are prone to extreme hyperbole. Either way, I think public servants should be held to a higher standard, particularly considering how much job security they have and that many of the folks they may be "disparaging" are taxpayers and citizens whose job it is to serve.

Look it up on google. It's all there for you to see. That is my link.

I never said that he attempted to murder anyone. Stop lying. I said that "he approved funding for g-o-f research on the coronavirus to make it more transmissible among humans", which, like everything else I ever said, is 100% true.

Nobody is saying he did anything illegal, nor is he being charged with anything criminal. Who's grasping at straws here? ? I know. You're not actually here to debate anything, but instead to rant angrily and ignorantly about things you find upsetting about the world you live in.

It doesn't matter. What he does in his own time reflects on who he is as a person and the type of people who work for the public service he represents. If his off-duty behavior undermines public trust in his character, it's not appropriate. Can I ask you how you would feel if we found out that he was in crippling debt due to casino-gambling, or that he married a mafia boss's daughter, or burned a Bible and a Canadian flag online for one of his videos? The point is that your personal and professional life cannot be fully segregated. One leaks into and influences the other, no matter how much you'd like to believe otherwise.

No, I'm saying there are limits to it. If you can agree that it's not acceptable for CAF Officers to record and promote videos of themselves marching in Goose-Step with red arm bands and raving about Jews, you should be able to appreciate that the quote above is poor and reductive reasoning.

Good government is subjective. They tell Canadians what they want to do and what they're ideology is, and we decide if we want them to govern or not. That's it. If I had a dollar for every time an ignorant goof who didn't understand the Charter tried to wave it cluelessly in my face on this site, I could probably by a new car. If you knew anything about our Charter, you'd understand that Section 1 of it is the most important part. Unlimited freedom of speech is not guaranteed by our Charter. If you weren't so busy twisting your panties into a knot, you'd have realized that my previous post clearly highlighted the dangers of teachers (in particular) being able to do or say whatever they want online and indoctrinating our young people with *gasp* their progressive ideology.

Politicians are chosen by taxpayers to enact a mandate or ideology. They're 100% biased and generally expected to be. If we don't like what he's doing, we can vote to turf him. We can't do that for a police officer, or a teacher, or a nurse etc. How would you feel if you had a charismatic teacher posting anti-christianity videos online and being followed by a plurality of students?

When you have gunk like this mucking up your thoughts is it any wonder you can't think straight?

Some of his stuff is actually funny but it is not something a police officer should be doing.

While I don't think it's appropriate to disallow political commentary/criticism in general, that's not really what this is. When you have a federal police officer spending his private time publicly ridiculing the government over identity-politic issues like immigration and LGBTQ+, you open yourself up to accusations of bias and impartiality. These sorts of things are absolutely the type that an attorney would use in a courtroom to discredit an officer or even worse his entire unit/institution. Perhaps, but a case-by-case application of rules/standards leads quite a lot open to interpretation. Having political opinions and expressing them like an adult is one thing. Being a hyperbolic mouthpiece over wedge-politics online is another. Folks need to keep in mind that for every police officer or soldier there is complaining about the Liberals, there are 10x as many teachers, nurses and civil administrators ready to tell everyone how racist and corpo-friendly the conservatives are, and how they hate students, want to privatize health care and are destroying the environment. There's an inherent conflict of interest in this sort of political advocacy, and as a public servant who represents your organization, you IMO have a responsibility to recognize this and maintain a degree of public impartiality and professionalism. These groups know which Party butters their bread, and spending their free time plugging for the one that tends to support and pay them more is, IMO, highly inappropriate.

Race and skin color is so important to you. You feel low about yourself. You are trying to raise your feeling about yourself by emphasizing on things that may not matters to others at all. Like being an Aryan (which you no longer are since 1400 years ago)

How is putting a bunch of ignorant goose steppers in their place a matter of anger? I'm not angry when I present truth to the imbeciles here, any more than I'd be angry to a fifth grade class when I present their teacher's lesson plan to them. The fact that I seem to be a superior intellect to the left wingers here isn't a matter of emotions. It's just the way things are. I'm right and the liberals here are wrong. And they don't seem to have any problem with the insults and namecalling they throw at me. Oh, and there isn't time in my life for yoga classes. I work two jobs (two jobs that I really like.) You could say this forum is my yoga class, except there are no cute honeys in stretch pants on mats next to me.

What offends a libbie is when someone questions the great priests of leftdom

At least when Bill Clinton went after single moms, it wasn't with tax policy.

The fact that I watch Fox (LIKE MOST OF AMERICA) has very little to do with my state of mental health. I know you don't LIKE Fox News because it is not THE VIEW and it actually allows some opinions in there you don't like (UNLIKE THE NAZI MINISTRY OF PROPAGANDA sources you agree with, like CNN, MSNBC, THE VIEW). FoxNews is the highest rated news source in the world. It has the best journalists and give the public balanced reporting, WITH BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE getting equal time. I know that offends your goose stepping nature of giving ANY time to someone who disagrees with you, but the ADULTS here think it's important.

Consider a scenario in which an RCMP officer publicly expressed negative views on immigrants and then arrested an immigrant on thin/no evidence, and the case was later thrown out in court. Wouldn't this officer's public statements make the RCMP more liable if the victim chose to sue? I would think knowingly letting a biased officer interact with the public might not be in the RCMP's best interest. It's an interesting case, imo. If the RCMP gives the boot to this individual, would he be able to sue for wrongful dismissal? Hope the story is followed long enough to learn the outcome.

Yeah, I agree that he shouldn't be allowed to publicly comment on his own department, ie RCMP. He has inside knowledge and direct access to the leadership structure. But disallowing criticism of government in GENERAL is ridiculous overreach and not appropriate for a democracy IMO.

Interesting that George Soros gave over a hundred million to democrats... the guy who became a billionaire by destabilizing Hungarys economy... but its just a conspiracy theory tho eh.

Excuse me, BAT GUANO FOR BRAINS. Nobody is talking about doing away with the IRS. You are a LIAR.

Trump will be re-elected. Then the fun will begin. Thousands will be out of work.

That is true. And for now, the Democrat ECONOMY DESTROYING machine has been stopped. There will be no more bills that cause gas prices to go up, increase inflation, weaken our borders, etc.

So after 15 rounds of grovelling and kowtowing to the lunatic fringe and the direct intervention of the Traitor In Charge, the GOP proves that even an ugly political slut can get their way if they suck hard enough,

Haven't you heard? Trump told me he's a dirty Kenyan.

You misunderstand, the things that make cognition so dissonant in others is what interests me. When the dissonance persists in the face of no evidence, as if does in things like your delusion about the vast media/government/corporate conspiracies your thinking is pickled with it becomes amusing. Still makes a lot of sense too given vaccinated people are consistently 4 - 5 times less likely to end up dead if they're sick enough to need hospitalization compared to unvaccinated people. No, I don't have to agree with this at all. The individual and collective benefits of being vaccinated far far outweigh the discomfort of minor adverse effects and the remote minuscule chance of something more serious. Nope I didn't notice anything, I take it the silence was deafening was it? Says the guy who's beliefs have him trapped in a cognitive feedback loop that's swinging farther away from reality with every loop.

Here's something else your midwestern-doctor posted in regards to COVID. Oh look, he actually draws in critical thinkers who question narratives. Wow....the deep collective consciousness of our culture.... Can anyone else hear that Theremin playing in the background or is it just hearing-aid feed-back?