Leaderboard

He has been caught yet again coddling terrorists. His supporters still love Dear Leader, though. He's so dreamy.

This PM is such a loser. A terrorist loving cos-play actor. What else is there to say?

Having dodged the IRA, I hope to at least also dodge Islam. But those importing this Nazi-like ideology into my Canada are going to give-it the ol' college try it would seem.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/sarai-trudeau-atwal-meeting-1.4548705 If this is true, it is totally unacceptable that our Prime Minister be made vulnerable to a physical attack because it's too difficult to properly vet all attendees. Something needs to be done about this. For starters, how about reducing the number of attendees so that vigorous vetting be stepped up to identify any potential threats?

I knew you would try to avoid the question. That's why I used all caps. I'll try again to emphasize how determined you are to avoid answering. DO YOU FEEL THERE SHOULD BE ANY LIMIT WHATSOEVER TO THE DEGREE OF WEAPONS ALLOWED UNDER THE SECOND AMENDMENT? If yes, what is that limit? If no, then you are saying there is no point to even try and nobody would ever want nuclear weapons anyway and smart phones are watching us and what about abortion?

Justin Trudeau has fallen on hard times....even Trump has better approval ratings !

He resigned for not engaging the threat inside the building. Maybe he can get a job in Toronto area schools.

You said it, my friend.

Once again the simpletons response, the common low brow insult. You know absolutely nothing of me. Your attempts to inpugn my character merely reflect poorly on you. I have noticed that you never address a point, you just insult. I think I'm done with you now. If you should grow up a little I might lower myself to engage you further.

So you believe anyone offended by blatant race bating lies is a hillbilly? How very Liberal of you. It just never ends with you does it. You'll defend the indefensible, and when shown to be foolish in such a course you simply jump to generalizations and insults. Here's a clue, it doesn't work, nor does it make you look very good or credible.

Jagmeet Singh is a supporter of the terrorist who was responsible for the Air India bombing. Already well known and documented. Link Another reason for Indians to view Canada as a haven for terrorists, and not to be trusted.

A quick google search shows that some states already have laws allowing teachers to carry guns, and quite a number of teachers have come forward expressing interest in doing it. Colorado to arm teachers in classrooms (June 2017) Arkansas district will arm 20 teachers and staff (2013) More Ohio schools arm teachers to shoot attackers (2016) Utah: More Teachers Authorized to Carry Weapons in Classroom (2014) Armed Teachers: Over 600 Have Applied for Training (2013) There's plenty more.

There is no such thing as 'Thou Shalt Not Kill' in the Quran...a bit of a problem when combined with the Quran's 'Slay The Unbeliever Wherever You Find Them'. That's me....an unbeliever.

I have had my whole life to master the english language and have not done that yet. lol

The AR-15 is just the M-16 which can't, without adjustment, go full automatic. But here's the thing, soldiers rarely ever used full auto when they fired the M-16 because that runs you out of bullets too fast and most of them miss. So for all practical effects, the AR-15 is the M-16, the assault rifle the US military used for decades.

Until they do. There are reasonable gun measures that people want. Measures that have extraordinary strong support Nationally. But the approach people in the GOP take is that if they can't stop all gun crime, they shouldn't try to stop any gun crime.

That is entirely beside the point now, and doesn't offer any useful solution to the question of how to stop crazed madmen from going on a rampage. Ordinary folk, of which I assume millions have guns in the US, are not presenting a problem.

I accept your surrender.

They're still bitching....and moaning.....and ranting......about us. I suppose what else is there to talk about in an echo chamber?

Oh so you can fight off a Modern Military power already? Must have a swoot compound. Would love to visit sometime.

Flint-Lock Muskets > Fighter Jets and Tanks It's ironic that the same people that are soooooo suspicious of their government are the same that want the Military to get blank cheques to make weapons they don't need.

It's adorable that you guys think your measly semi-automatic weapons would make it impossible for your government to kill you if they wanted to.

Da, komrad!!!

Ahhhh...the longing for a perfect world where only the criminals and our masters have the guns. That would be perfect...perfect...

I took the time to read it. There's still nothing to hang your hat on in this thread. Remarkable. I think you can say anything in this thread and not make it any clearer. It's like trying to multiply pi by an integer and hoping to get a rational number.

California liberals grandfathered AK-47s before banning them....talk to the hand: https://www.revealnews.org/article/despite-ban-thousands-of-assault-weapons-remain-legal-in-california/ Correct, and it has been changed many times, but not to take away firearms, because they are already highly regulated by the Feds and states.

Plenty have been mentioned time and time again, but the gun nuts have the Republicans in their pocket.

When all is said and done, Trump will have done more for this issue than Obama and his supermajority congress. Guaranteed!

Already done...decades ago. Firearms that are illegal to possess or sell are already well defined in federal and state laws. Trump did not create the issue.

U.S. cities already have gun buyback programs...voluntary. U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Americans have a constitutional right to own and bear firearms.

I highly recommend this book if you can find it re: tales of the conquest of Western Canada. https://www.abebooks.com/Tales-Conflict-McKelvie-Bruce-Alistair-willus/3321977680/bd

That is exactly what happened. Jews suffering under Nazi Germany were shipped from Europe to what used to be called Palestine. In reality a piece of Germany should have been taken and given for these Nazi victims to settle but under British rule they moved to Palestine and Arabs some were terrorised to leave and become Palestinian refugees for decades in Jordan and Egypt. I champion Arabs!!!!!!. Don't make me laugh. And how did Israel formed? So I support Hamas, PLO, and Taliban and Al quaeda and ISIS and Ayatolahs and brotherhood and Bashir Assad and Russia... Who else do I support? All because of my unbiased statements?

Wrong. Start wars with Israel...get ass kicked long time. Any questions ?

That's not what happened, of course. The Arabs you champion all attacked Israel upon its formation. Israel didn't start the war. But, you're free to support Hamas and the PLO over Israel. It doesn't matter to me.

Sore loser, eh ? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5422315/Canadian-womens-hockey-player-takes-silver-medal.html

Ahhhh so only hire good guards. Maybe pay them more than the teachers. Or more likely, pay them minimum wage.

Don't have to....armed and unarmed SRO's have been a fixture on school campuses for many decades, including Canada and Europe. There is more to security and safety in schools than just freaking out over the "mass shooting" threat. http://www.crime-prevention-intl.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/2005-1999/2004.ENG.Police__Schools_and_Crime_Prevention_A_Preliminary_Review_Of_Current_Practices.pdf School districts clearly have invested in and believe that armed security resources are worth the cost.

Can't take guns away from people. So just blame people who get shot for not having guns of their own.

The NRA's answer is MORE guns. The idea of arming school teachers instead of reducing the number of guns in the country and banning semi automatic and automatic weapons of war is sheer lunacy. Some of students who witnessed the shootings have also been receiving death threats for speaking out.

There's a thread on here right now about how to get passports and visas. Easy peasy.

Trudeau is clearly unglued right now. Just heard him on a radio clip in remarks to some audience in India that Canada has just celebrated its 100th anniversary as a country. He's losing it.

In the CNN link I posted above, it says India is looking into how he was issued a visa to enter India. If he was an Indian citizen, why would he need a visa to enter his own country. Unless he is really a dual citizen and was traveling on a Canadian passport. Hmm...

Canada is clearly falling apart under Trudeau. How else do you explain losing to the US in hockey and curling on the same day???

Islam is a religion and a political doctrine. It isn't a skin colour nor race of people.

Let me get this straight. You say details are needed. You say it's just anonymous allegations. You say a tweet is no the way to launch an investigation. Yet you persist in insisting Brown is some monster who abused women. You base this on...wait for it...basically the same points you claim are not valid in this situation. It must really hurt to be you. The human mind is just not designed to be twisted into such illogical pretzels.

Now that's the biggest pile of sh*t posted here for quite a while. Trudeau swift? How about his swiftness in dealing with Monseff? Her citizenship and passport problems still linger and haven't been dealt with. Nor do they appear to be any sort of priority for her or Trudeau. How about Hehr, he didn't deal with those repeat problems in a swift manner. The list of painstakingly slow swift actions goes on and on with Trudeau. As for your non point of it not being his government. well it didn't seem to matter when it was Brown accused. He certainly was swift with that one. He was pontificating about it before you could blink. So no, not partisan bullcrap, as you so eloquently put it. Rather a legitimate question. He didn't hesitate to weigh in and engage in some more vacuous virtue signaling when it was Brown. So why wouldn't he do the same now? Wait a minute! I know why. He did say he waits for people to tell him what's going on, doesn't follow silly stuff like the news. Maybe he just hasn't been told yet. I expect we'll hear from him soon when someone tells him, after all he didn't need any facts or proof in Browns case.

If you're not alleging a crime then this plain gossip. He said, She said. And it seems Brown can poke holes in the story. I'm just very concerned that we live in a place where a decade can pass and women can make claims about sexual encounters that will ruin people's lives. AND they can remain anonymous and aspects of their story don't have to be true.