Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/22/2018 in all areas
-
Trudeau is clearly unglued right now. Just heard him on a radio clip in remarks to some audience in India that Canada has just celebrated its 100th anniversary as a country. He's losing it.3 points
-
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/22/asia/extremist-scandal-trudeau-india-visit-intl/index.html Trudeau is destroying Canada's relations with India. He could have avoided this train wreck by staying in Canada to fix our many domestic problems. But no. He thinks he's royalty and leaves his minions to fix things at home. Can't wait to see the details of this family holiday. Should be a hefty bill for taxpayers.3 points
-
The fallout has been swift on this one. The guy who was invited is portrayed as a terrorist and murderer in the Indian media, and Trudeau as a sympathizer. Witless Trudeau has been set up by a cabal of Sikh separatist ministers whom he naively empowered in his own cabinet: Canada seen a "Terrorist Hotspot" - Why India doesn't trust Canada To protect Trudeau's image, MP Randeep Sarai has been instructed to fall on his Kirpan.3 points
-
Funny how anyone who feels assault weapons should be protected by the second amendment can never make an argument why the second amendment doesn't apply to nukes. That's an argument they cower from and try desperately to avoid. Ask it and they start creating Twitter posts about how you're an actor being paid by Soros, because they know they're completely out of their depth.3 points
-
This PM is such a loser. A terrorist loving cos-play actor. What else is there to say?2 points
-
Good to know, take them away too.2 points
-
He was invited by a Liberal MP, one of the Sikhs Trudeau brought along. Kinda makes his pleas to the Indians that none of the Sikhs in his cabinet are sympathetic to Sikh separatism seem phony, doesn't it?2 points
-
He was set up by one of his own MP's, someone who would have known full well the history of the guy and the implications for him to attend Trudeau events. He was scheduled to attend several more events with Trudeau during his visit to India. The worm turns for all-inclusive, "hug-a-terrorist" Trudeau.2 points
-
Exactly. Ultimately your position argues that American jihadists have the right to a nuclear militia. And changing the subject to Canada doesn't make that argument any less stupid. I don't think your Russian bot-masters are going to give you the coherent argument you are looking for though. Perhaps an anecdote about Trudeau will help you feel better about yourself.2 points
-
Yes they have fallen...because of the states that brought in gun control laws have seen reduced gun deaths....its not because there are more guns.2 points
-
I hear trudeau is getting the cold shoulder in india, where trump jr is getting the royal treatment. Also reported was trudeau is just having about a days worth of meetings and the rest if a family vacation,while the indian media is running stories that castro is trudeaus father. LOL2 points
-
I thought I did answer, but I guess I'll dumb it down. The AR-15 is a semi-auto rifle, just like any other semi-auto rifle that you can purchase here in Canada at your nearest Cabelas. I can accept these rifles as they are, where I draw the line is with automatic rifles and guns such as AK-47s or UZIs (those that do fire hundreds per minute) or accessories that do speed up the firing of AR-15s. I'd also be in favor of smaller magazines. I draw the line at anything that fires automatic. There are relatively few people who get killed by AR-15s, as I said they're just the most popular right now. It's the same argument as when people look at dog attacks and decide that anything looking like a Pit Bull should be eliminated.1 point
-
Calling people names is never an argument. It just shows a lack of ability to discuss the issue. I would ask whether there are any weapons you feel should be restricted, but I don't think you've thought the issue through enough to provide a response. Perhaps an anecdote about Trudeau would make it seem like you know what you're talking about.1 point
-
No, it is not a deflection to point out the failed logic of gun grabbers.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Hello. The Indians were slaughtering each other long before the white man showed up. The Indians were no strangers to killing other Indians. But we won't mention that, eh? Our secret.1 point
-
When the questions get too embarrassing to answer, it's always best to change the subject to Canada.1 point
-
Let's see....which "North American" city put armed police officers in secondary schools almost ten years ago ? Answer: Toronto, Ontario1 point
-
1 point
-
Crap. You show what you are and what you stand for. You use the expression THE JEWS and the State of Israel as meaning one in the same thing,. This coming from someone who has lectured on this board that I should not assume all Jews and the state of Israel are synonomous. The fact you use THE JEWS to make any reference to the state of Israel illustrates how you use discussing Israel's existence as an excuse to criticize, generalize, stereotype, denigrate ALL Jews by calling Israel, THE Jews. You are pathetic in how you try justify your attacks and smeers and all Jews switching back and forth from THE JEWS to Israel. You show yet again your pathetic passive aggressive attacks on all Jews trying to hide behind the word Israel. Your agenda which is to smeer and insult THE JEWS at this point is blatant. You are a pathetic THE JEW hater.1 point
-
If you say so...doubt anyone cares what you think, mind-you. What it boils down to is that had the Micmac not slaughtered British settlers for their French masters, there would have been no need to offer a bounty to the pro-British tribes for Micmac scalps...of which there was like...two...three...total handed-in. Not many, either way. Blown out of proportion next to the slaughtered settlers....more of them total. But, hey...they're the wrong skin colour for you to care about that...1 point
-
1 point
-
Untrue. The short, compact nature of assault rifles does make them more dangerous. The after market accessories targeted to these weapons also make them more dangerous. Most important, the entire culture that has been created by these weapons demonstrates their owners make them the most dangerous of all.1 point
-
It even made it to sex and gender issues. I guess our problems with equality go much deeper when a lesbian can't get a passport.1 point
-
There's a thread on here right now about how to get passports and visas. Easy peasy.1 point
-
I'm more interested in what a gun will do than I am about it's name or how intimidating it looks. The AR-15 on its own is no more or no less dangerous than any semi-auto rifle, it just happens to be the name brand that people choose.1 point
-
Why do you draw the line after the AR-15? If it's "obvious" some should be banned, why not make that line those weapons like the AR-15 that (by design or through modification) are capable of discharging hundreds of rounds in a minute?1 point
-
So you are saying there should be some sort of arbitrary limit set for the types of weapons allowed under the second amendment?1 point
-
Can there be ever more insanity? Where does this all end? This genius now wants 20% of teachers to have gun... President Donald Trump elaborated on his proposal to arm 20 percent of teaching staff at schools in a series of tweets Thursday: http://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/donald-trump-school-shootings_us_5a8ec224e4b077f5bfebf0941 point
-
According to CTV the PMO actually tried to make the invite list a secret citing "privacy" and "security". Can't wait for the damage control on this one. Manveer Singh is one of the official journalists with Team Trudeau, check him out and his role with TV84. The "Modi is a Terrorist" has a nice ring to it for a journalist with the Trudeau entourage, PM Mondi should kick him out of India.1 point
-
Next time I hear about some nutcase murdering 17 children at a school with a carton of cigarettes or by forcing feeding them hamburgers, I will be on your side. For now, I will just say what you said.1 point
-
Canada is clearly falling apart under Trudeau. How else do you explain losing to the US in hockey and curling on the same day???1 point
-
No, never address. Still waiting. Can't find a coherent argument? Try changing the subject to Canada. The irrelevant statements about your "self" failed to distract from your inability to make an argument.1 point
-
Yes, assault rifles are only a small part of the problem. I agree that handguns are a much more serious issue, although one does not negate the other.1 point
-
What terrorists has Trudeau let in? What are you even talking about? Are you just making up unrelated anecdotes to change the subject from your willingness to maintain the status quo for future school shootings?1 point
-
Are they equal opportunity 'assholes' to Judaism and Christianity which also have murderous nature...written right into their 'holy texts'?1 point
-
There is no denying that he misspoke and that the truth is 750 million is going to India and 250 million is coming to Canada. Maybe not a lie but still misspoke which doesn't bode well as a display of confidence. Maybe he should have worked full days instead of making it a family vacation and he would know the details of the deal?1 point
-
You are a racist which is clear from all your comments. You feel its perfectly acceptable to be a racist as long as it suits your prejudices. You also ignore how the law works living in some fantasy racist world that a jury must be of the same appearance as the accused otherwise you can automatically assume this jury is untrustworthy. Nothing you have said makes any sense. You are a classic example of someone who feels because you think you are a leftist, this automatically means you can be a racist and a fascist because if it comes from your mouth you get to define which race or ethnic group it is you spew hatred about. You don't represent anyone but your own hatred.1 point
-
I am not sure what the Canadian laws are around restricted weapons. Is there a requirement that they be locked up at a gun club or rifle range? Hunting rifles have a restriction that only allow them to hold something like 5 cartridges in the clip. Same with shotguns. They are classified as non-restricted firearms. The advantage of requiring certain firearms locked up at a gun club is they can only be accessed at certain times and used only at the gun club. They cannot be removed from the premises. And someone else such as the authorized officer of the range must unlock it and be responsible for seeing it is not taken off the range.1 point
-
The French allied natives were just sitting there...minding their own business...when Darth Cornwallis showed-up with the Death Star....zapping poor defenseless...non-violent...natives due to his inherent hatred of all things brown. Is that close to your version of history?1 point
-
To bad, earn it. We have already seen the failure when you give people jobs they do not deserve.1 point
-
You're free to attempt to seize Israel with your army and hand it all over to the PLO. That's how it works.1 point
-
That's wonderful. My point stands. The Arabs started a war and then promptly LOST...not in the plans. Now they want a do-over. Do you think Germany should be given a chance to 'get it right'? Give Germany back the regions it lost to Poland during the war. Ethnically cleanse all the Poles out of Prussia and Pomerania and then let Germany run the show. What if they decided to conduct a terror campaign to convince us all that this should happen? Would that be okay?1 point
-
1 point
-
Then so are the "vast majority" of police officers in the United States....so they all need "assault rifles" too, right ?0 points
-
Guns are means of protection, and for hunting. That it can kill, isn't the problem. It's still the people who's handling them. If you're going along that line of argument - you should scream for cigarettes to be banned. They serve no other purpose but for enjoyment. And while you're at it - scream for processed food too, to be banned. Btw, you can always scream that we go back to the cart-and-horse mode of transportation. Not that it will eliminate accidents, I'm sure. And, aren't those people trying to kill their enemies - or anyone they want to? Who's been making threats wanting to annihilate a whole nation with nukes? For religion? Or, ideology? You think Fat Boy isn't mentally unstable????? If you can't differentiate NKorea from us.......oh boy, is it safe to give you any guns? What a silly comment.0 points
-
And here we go again... Convicted attempted murderer invited to formal dinner with Trudeau in India http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/politics/jaspal-atwal-invite-dinner-sophie-1.45458810 points
