Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
43 minutes ago, Politics1990 said:

lol you in fantasy land dude was no  election fraud to overturn the state.. also i am a proud canadian :) 

Not enough to change the results. What a limp, traitorous position to take.

"Oh it was just a little election fraud."

A proud traitor.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Failure to sign ballot RECEIPTS doesn't prove FRAUD like YOU'RE ASSuming.

It does not prove fraud but it is evidence of fraud. An unsigned document is either unsigned because they forgot or because they couldn't forge the signature. Now that we know where those ballots come from, we can review the footage and interview the employees/volunteers and get the full story. Either it was legitimately a mistake or it is fraud. Either way, we can know and put it to bed. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Not enough to change the results. What a limp, traitorous position to take.

"Oh it was just a little election fraud."

A proud traitor.

Your ad hominems are your USUAL BUPKIS cause you got nothing intelligent to post.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Not enough to change the results. What a limp, traitorous position to take.

"Oh it was just a little election fraud."

A proud traitor.

the hell you on about  they find the odd ballet each election... but if you actually think there was enough votes to change it to trump winnning your brain is mush

Edited by Politics1990
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Politics1990 said:

the hell you on about  they find the odd ballet each election... but if you actually think there was enough votes to change it to trump winnning your brain is mush

Lol...ya...sure...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

LDF Strongly Condemns Raid of Fulton County Elections Office Intended to Validate Debunked 2020 Election Claims

Quote

On Jan. 28, FBI agents executed a search warrant at the Fulton County, Georgia, elections office. This raid follows years of President Trump attempting to manufacture evidence of election fraud related to the 2020 presidential election, and directing false claims of voter fraud against cities with large Black communities. When pressed on the warrant’s justification, federal agents refused to provide further information to county officials or the press.

In response to the FBI raid, Legal Defense Fund (LDF) President and Director-Counsel Janai Nelson issued the following statement:

“Notwithstanding overwhelming evidence that the 2020 election was fairly run, this administration has made it clear that they will continue to pursue false narratives about voter fraud — and that the facts will not stop them. Their actions demonstrate utter contempt for the electoral process, the rule of law, and the safeguards that protect public trust in our elections.

“We cannot allow this violation of our democratic norms to continue. This reprehensible targeting of Fulton County and similar localities with high percentages of Black voters must end. LDF firmly denounces this raid and any other attempt to suppress the free and fair elections that form the foundation of our democracy.”

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

also i am a proud canadian :) 

Maybe although Canada is not proud of you.

Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

Lol.. backwards world. Preventing fraud is very very bad

No fraud has been proven. Strong evidence of Trump's fraudulent attempt to get the vote count changed by threatening the GA SoS with legal jeopardy.

Did you hear what he said on the phone? LMAO

33 minutes ago, Legato said:

Maybe although Canada is not proud of you.

Of course in no way do you speak for Canada, except in your IMAGINATION.

Posted
2 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

well most of canada hates trump so i think i am doing good with them thanks

You do know what thought did.....

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

No fraud has been proven. Strong evidence of Trump's fraudulent attempt to get the vote count changed by threatening the GA SoS with legal jeopardy.

Did you hear what he said on the phone? LMAO

Of course in no way do you speak for Canada, except in your IMAGINATION.

Imagination is way ahead of your false reality.

Posted
6 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

You remember when Democrats spent 8 years trying to prove that Russia stole the election from Hilary?

You don't remember that Mueller is a Republican and the investigation he lead was authorized by Republican Rod Rosenstein, so you're LYING about "Democrats."

Posted

Let's also note that there is a long list of conservatives, non-Democrats and even Republicans who have called out Trump... including Lindsay Graham and JD Vance....

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
On 1/29/2026 at 8:00 AM, Michael Hardner said:

Maybe they'll declare Trump won in 2020 and then he'll be awarded a third term

He'd probably settle for a Nobel.

  • Haha 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
13 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Let's also note that there is a long list of conservatives, non-Democrats and even Republicans who have called out Trump... including Lindsay Graham and JD Vance....

$10 says Vance will come around.

  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted (edited)
On 1/29/2026 at 7:48 AM, Michael Hardner said:

Everybody heard the tape of Trump trying to interfere with the elections and the public statements of the Republican governor.

Trying to rewrite the past to make Trump the hero isn't going to reverse the terrible direction America is taking.

My advice to his team is to do a coup now since their politics is turning out to be even worse than their ability to manage...

That's the left4rd opinio in a nutshell, so thanks for reminding us how you guys feel about this, but for your information: uncovering fraud and crime isn't "re-writing history", it's "correcting the historical record" and possibly bringing criminals to justice.

Is your opinion that "If people committed a crime and got away with it, we should just ignore it now and move on, because I like the status quo"? Don't you think that election integrity is more important than protecting criminals?  

Edited by WestCanMan

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
27 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's the left4rd opinio in a nutshell, so thanks for reminding us how you guys feel about this, but for your information: uncovering fraud and crime isn't "re-writing history", it's "correcting the historical record" and possibly bringing criminals to justice.

Is your opinion that "If people committed a crime and got away with it, we should just ignore it now and move on, because I like the status quo"? Don't you think that election integrity is more important than protecting criminals?  

Every now and then, he lets out an opinion divulging definitively how much of a leftist he is.  

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

  Don't you think that election integrity is more important than protecting criminals?  

Why would it not have come out 5 or 6 years ago?

  • Like 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Why would it not have come out 5 or 6 years ago?

Is this even a serious question?

Who was going to investigate it 5 or 6 years ago?

 

 

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, User said:

 

Who was going to investigate it 5 or 6 years ago?

 

Didn't Georgia have a republican Governor? I thought I read that.

  • Like 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Why would it not have come out 5 or 6 years ago?

Because the cheaters won, Michael. 

What would be the point of cheating if they were just gonna fess up?

Not only that, they got to slander Trump and J6ers for years based on those election results.

Did you think that the liars and cheaters in the FBI, who were embarrassed and caught lying and committing crimes multiple times, were gonna tell the truth, or do any work to help Republicans, when they didn't have to?

The FBI lied and cheated like psychopaths for years to stop Trump, and you thought that they were suddenly gonna switch to the side of democracy and law & order?

The FBI came up with the Whitmer kidnapping plot, then went full entrapment mode and used that all as an October surprise. Then they had their lies/deceit/stifle-the-truth campaign regarding the laptop before that election. That was all following their Russian collusion lies and crimes. Actual crimes. 

Then came all the lies from the FBI about the agent provocateurs they had embedded in the crowds... The guys like Ray Epps who were BLATANTLY COMMITTING TEXTBOOK SEDITION but were never charged for it?

The feds were throwing people in jail for nothing, and leaving them there for months at a time. The Dems, FBI and CNN were accusing everyone within a country mile of the capitol of committing sedition, but not even one of them said it about THE GUY WHO WAS OPENLY COMMITTING SEDITION.

How is it possible that among ALL the weasels on ALL the bogus news channels in NA who were calling everyone a 'seditionist', and all the hyperbolic leftard politicians who were using their shiny new word "sedition" to describe everything from from kittens and breakfast cereals to protesters, none of them thought to call the one person who was actually caught committing sedition on video, multiple times, a "seditionist"?

 

So after all of the FBI's lies and deceit to influence the election against Trump during Russian collusion, the Whitmer entrapment scheme, the laptop scandal, and their J6th lies & no-trial prison sentences scandal, you thought that they were going to undo all of their own hard work to influence the election, by doing hard work to tell the truth? Do you also believe that OJ was really trying to find Nicole's murder? Do you think it's common for murderers to o to great lengths to uncover evidence of their own murders for police, when they don't have to?

 

Your problem is that, after all this time, and a multitude of known lies and crimes by the FBI (even a judge said that), you refuse to believe that the FBI was lying and committing crimes.

We both know that you won't challenge me on a single one of these facts, Michael, because you know that I have court-documented proof of all of it and I will blow you out of the water. You will respond with an ad hominem attack, maybe cite some CNN propaganda, appeal to the unfathomable, and engage in a bit of pettifogging. 

Just remember, we all had to wait years for the Russian collusion witch hunt to reach its inevitable conclusion (hahaha @BeaverFever you cultist shmuck), you can wait to see what the criminals at the FBI come up with regarding the possibility of Fullton County election cheating.

Oh, and one more thing: it's the FBI making this accusation now, and by your own standards, you don't consider any FBI allegations slanderous, regardless how serious and how devoid of evidence their claims are. 

 

Edited by WestCanMan

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

 ... it's the FBI making this accusation now, and by your own standards, you don't consider any FBI allegations slanderous, regardless how serious and how devoid of evidence their claims are. 

 

Makes no sense. The FBI just flips back and forth between conspiracies? 

Every time I read this stuff, it strikes me that it's really absorbed by people who've never worked in large organizations and bureaucracies.

 

Edited by Michael Hardner
  • Like 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Didn't Georgia have a republican Governor? I thought I read that.

Yes... did you have a point?

Mine was pretty clear. You are playing a game as if the fact that no one investigated anything before somehow discounts this investigation now. 

 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...