Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Kyle Rittenhouse vs Alex Pretti! - the right

When Kyle was arrested he surrendered his firearms and submitted peacefully to the police and then fought the issue in court and won.

You have to be over 11 different types of stupid and hypocritical to suggest that there's any similarity. If anything it proves that the right is consistent Comm if you're being arrested by a police officer comply and pursue your legal recourse. It's the left that are Hypocrites. 

Kyle was a perfect example of what to do right. If your life is threatened by criminals defend yourself. When the police come to arrest you or question you you submit peacefully and follow their lawful instructions Alex is a textbook example of what an entitled scumbag loser does. Picks a fight with the police while armed and then gets shot in the situation he created himself

  • Like 2

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
On 1/31/2026 at 1:47 PM, BeaverFever said:

FACT: Kash Patel and Pam Bondi are massively unqualified MAGA nutjobs who believe in 2020 conspiracy lies

Joe Biden was the president ffs, dummy, and you pretended that he was fit for that, so stfu. Oh, and then you pretended that Kamala Harris was capable of running the country, so no one gives a shit what you think about the capabilities of Bondi and Patel.

Go bully your kids or something if you want someone to believe you, because adults don't listen to you. 

  • Like 2

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You have to be over 11 different types of stupid and hypocritical to suggest that there's any similarity.

No similarity. Some punk wannabe carries an AR-15 to a protest, kills 2 people and gets away with it.

Versus a protestor shot 11 times by untrained, masked thugs.

That's the Right these days.

Posted
2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

No similarity. Some punk wannabe carries an AR-15 to a protest, kills 2 people and gets away with it.

Versus a protestor shot 11 times by untrained, masked thugs.

That's the Right these days.

Do you understand that in both cases you are arguing that the law abiding should be held accountable and the law breaking should not? This is why the left should be ignored. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted

Hilarious. 

Now the limp Libbies are deflecting to ICE shootings. 

Too funny.

Hey Libbies. Can you sopping wet fembots do anything without cheating?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
4 hours ago, Barquentine said:

No similarity. Some punk wannabe carries an AR-15 to a protest, kills 2 people and gets away with it.

Versus a protestor shot 11 times by untrained, masked thugs.

That's the Right these days.

Wrong. 

A kid brings an AR-15 to a riot and shoots two wokejobs in self defense. 

Versus an armed obstructionist who thought he could take control of the scene: "Hey fellas, I'm armed too. Release those people and we'll talk it out". 

That's the Left these days. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Barquentine said:

No similarity. Some punk wannabe carries an AR-15 to a protest, kills 2 people and gets away with it.

Versus a protestor shot 11 times by untrained, masked thugs.

That's the Right these days.

Nope. Apparently being a limp Libbie also means lying at will.

A perhaps overly concerned citizen was asked to help protect private property, while you psychologically unbalanced tore the city up, gets attacked by these wackos and defends himself when a gun is pulled on him.

Versus

A wacko who has previously fought with federal officers, brings a gun and 2 extra clips, out to obstruct justice. He attacks federal for the second time, a gun is found on him. The officers open fire.

I can see some disciplinary action for the officers, but where were the local cops? 0h right, the mayor told them to not have anything to do with federal officers. That makes the little twit partially responsible for this tragedy.

Local crowd control is still a function of local police...isn't it? Sure it is.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 hours ago, Barquentine said:

No similarity. Some punk wannabe carries an AR-15 to a protest, kills 2 people and gets away with it.

Versus a protestor shot 11 times by untrained, masked thugs.

That's the Right these days.

"gets away with it"

Yes, he got away with defending his life. As it should be. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Barquentine said:

No similarity.

I am happy to hear you are fewer than 11 kinds of stupid :P LOL

 

Quote

Some punk wannabe carries an AR-15 to a protest, kills 2 people and gets away with it.

Sure, they were't trying to hurt him or anything, they didn't shoot first or anything, he just randomly shot people and 'got away with it' :) 

My mistake, you must have meant you were MORE than 11 kinds of stupid ;) 

Quote

Versus a protestor shot 11 times by untrained, masked thugs.

Sure, he wasn't resisting arrest, he didn't have a gun on him that he obviously tried  to draw and dropped, he wasn't interfering with a police operation, they weren't legally appointed police officers, they didn'g get almost 3 months of training at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.  

Sigh.  I guess what you say is true IF you ignore the facts, reason, logic, and reality in general. 

 

That's the Right these days.

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
7 hours ago, Barquentine said:

No similarity. Some punk wannabe carries an AR-15 to a protest, kills 2 people and gets away with it.

Versus a protestor shot 11 times by untrained, masked thugs.

That's the Right these days.

The problem that you're running into here is that your simplistic understanding of these events leads to your poor understanding of the application of all the various laws concerned.

Both were allowed to carry the guns that were in their possession, true.

Legal Carry:

  1. Kyle's carry didn't require any permits that he didn't have in his possession
  2. Pretti's carry did require permits that he didn't have in his possession
  3. ICE obviously had the legal right to carry

That's neither here nor there though, from Pretti's POV, because that would never have been a factor until after his arrest. It was a central factor in Kyle's situation though. He had every right to have that gun with him at that point in time.

Carrying during the commission of a crime:

  1. Kyle was not committing any crimes while he was in possession of his gun.
  2. Pretti attacked law enforcement officials while carrying his gun.
  3. ICE obviously weren't committing any crimes

Self Defence:

  1. Kyle was defending himself from people who were clearly attacking him, with weapons, including a handgun
  2. Pretti was not defending anyone, he was attacking police officers who were executing a legal arrest
  3. It has yet to be determined if officers had cause to legitimately/reasonably feel a threat to life and limb at the moment the officer decided to start shooting. That's not to be confused with the moment the first shot was fired, which is half a second later. There's a brief period of time between "need to shoot" and "don't need to shoot anymore"... 'pumping the brakes' is a separate thought process which doesn't always happen faster than the shots start being fired. 

This is clearly another situation where the dishonest/inflammatory/seditious statements from Walz, Frey and other DNC/MSM cult leaders have goaded their lemmings into rioting, and the poor little buggers are getting themselves into situations where they make officers fear for their lives, while they don't fully comprehend the consequences of making that type of mistake, just the same way you don't fully comprehend the consequences of making that type of mistake.

 FYI if you make LEO's fear for their life, they can use lethal force to stay alive.

Did you see the video of Good's dummy wife, right after she was shot, shrieking "You guys have real bullets????". 

That's what we are dealing with: people who have no idea whatsoever how serious the threat is from a LEO POV, and how dangerous this is for them. More ICE agents have been killed than Good/Pretti types, just FYI. 

  • Like 2

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The problem that you're running into here is that your simplistic understanding of these events leads to your poor understanding of the application of all the various laws concerned.

Both were allowed to carry the guns that were in their possession, true.

Legal Carry:

  1. Kyle's carry didn't require any permits that he didn't have in his possession
  2. Pretti's carry did require permits that he didn't have in his possession
  3. ICE obviously had the legal right to carry

That's neither here nor there though, from Pretti's POV, because that would never have been a factor until after his arrest. It was a central factor in Kyle's situation though. He had every right to have that gun with him at that point in time.

Carrying during the commission of a crime:

  1. Kyle was not committing any crimes while he was in possession of his gun.
  2. Pretti attacked law enforcement officials while carrying his gun.
  3. ICE obviously weren't committing any crimes

Self Defence:

  1. Kyle was defending himself from people who were clearly attacking him, with weapons, including a handgun
  2. Pretti was not defending anyone, he was attacking police officers who were executing a legal arrest
  3. It has yet to be determined if officers had cause to legitimately/reasonably feel a threat to life and limb at the moment the officer decided to start shooting. That's not to be confused with the moment the first shot was fired, which is half a second later. There's a brief period of time between "need to shoot" and "don't need to shoot anymore"... 'pumping the brakes' is a separate thought process which doesn't always happen faster than the shots start being fired. 

This is clearly another situation where the dishonest/inflammatory/seditious statements from Walz, Frey and other DNC/MSM cult leaders have goaded their lemmings into rioting, and the poor little buggers are getting themselves into situations where they make officers fear for their lives, while they don't fully comprehend the consequences of making that type of mistake, just the same way you don't fully comprehend the consequences of making that type of mistake.

 FYI if you make LEO's fear for their life, they can use lethal force to stay alive.

Did you see the video of Good's dummy wife, right after she was shot, shrieking "You guys have real bullets????". 

That's what we are dealing with: people who have no idea whatsoever how serious the threat is from a LEO POV, and how dangerous this is for them. More ICE agents have been killed than Good/Pretti types, just FYI. 

You are a shameless liar.

Posted
On 1/31/2026 at 1:47 PM, BeaverFever said:

FACT: Kash Patel and Pam Bondi are massively unqualified MAGA nutjobs who believe in 2020 conspiracy lies

FACT:  They have already tried UNSUCCESSFULLY to persecute Trump’s enemies with baseless and unwarranted investigations and prosecutions. 
 

FACT:  They haven’t provided any evidence to show this investigation is warranted

It’s obvious Trump is on a wild fishing expedition, they don’t even know what they’re searching for, just hoping to find something ANYTHING that they can prosecute those 2 black women who MAGA tried and failed to go after previously and ended up having to pay millions in damages to for their defamation and harrowing.

They really want the voter data to facilitate tampering with the next election.

Posted

 

Just now, robosmith said:

They really want the voter data to facilitate tampering with the next election.

You JUAR said in another post there's no problems whatsoever with the voting system and it can't be manipulated :) 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

They really want the voter data to facilitate tampering with the next election.

Explain how. How does that work exactly?

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Joe Biden was the president ffs, dummy, and you pretended that he was fit for that, so stfu. Oh, and then you pretended that Kamala Harris was capable of running the country, so no one gives a shit what you think about the capabilities of Bondi and Patel.

Go bully your kids or something if you want someone to believe you, because adults don't listen to you. 

But the ^baby feels the need to (attempt to) refute him.

Tells what makes Kash Patel qualified to be FBI Director besides his willingness to LIE FOR Trump..

And Bondi couldn't even hack it as Florida AG. 

Posted
6 hours ago, robosmith said:

But the ^baby feels the need to (attempt to) refute him.

Tells what makes Kash Patel qualified to be FBI Director besides his willingness to LIE FOR Trump..

And Bondi couldn't even hack it as Florida AG. 

Grow up, robo.

Nothing compares to Biden's inability to do his job.

In the entire history of the world, there has never been a person whose capabilities were as woefully inadequate for the magnitude of their station as Joe Biden's were. 

You could hire an infant to drive an F1 race car at the Monaco GP and it would be less of a job-skills mismatch.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
On 2/2/2026 at 10:30 PM, West said:

Now Democrats are trying to bully and intimidate Tulsi Gabbard from uncovering their crimes. Sad 

The only crime in the Fulton county election was Trump's attempt to coerce the SoS to change the vote count with threats of legal sanctions. 

Posted (edited)

 

41 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The only crime in the Fulton county election was Trump's attempt to coerce the SoS to change the vote count with threats of legal sanctions. 

Wrong again 

Edited by West
Posted
37 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your failure to understand the recordings of Trump's phone call to the GA SoS don't make me wrong.

True.  You were wrong BEFORE he listened to the recordings :) 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...