User Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 43 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: So he acted before there was danger this time because he was bad at his job last time. Maybe let the moms go and focus on the more dangerous illegals? Be more sneaky. Marching on people like it’s Kent State University isn’t going to nab you Nester the Molester. The car was coming at him, that is not acting before there was danger. Quote
robosmith Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 32 minutes ago, Shady said: Totally justified. POLICY specifically prohibits placing yourself in front of a vehicle and violating that POLICY means Ross placed HIMSELF in HARMS WAY. Duh Quote
robosmith Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 34 minutes ago, ironstone said: Firstly, she put her foot on the accelerator when he was in front of the vehicle and he reacted justifiably. Nope. He VIOLATED POLICY which prohibits placing himself in HARM'S WAY in front of the vehicle. AND he KEPT FIRING AFTER SHE PASSED HIM. You don't know the RULES. 22 minutes ago, ironstone said: You statement indicated you did not think Roberto Munoz should be considered 'a dangerous illegal' despite what he was convicted of. So if Munoz doesn't meet your threshold, just where do you draw the line? Comparing ICE to Brownshirts is just so inappropriate given what the Nazis did. Brown shirts ran the holocaust gas chambers? 1 Quote
User Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 21 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nope. He VIOLATED POLICY which prohibits placing himself in HARM'S WAY in front of the vehicle. AND he KEPT FIRING AFTER SHE PASSED HIM. You don't know the RULES. There was no HARMS WAY until she back up and tried to drive into him. 28 minutes ago, robosmith said: POLICY specifically prohibits placing yourself in front of a vehicle and violating that POLICY means Ross placed HIMSELF in HARMS WAY. Duh Quote the policy you think exists here. Quote
CDN1 Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 (edited) 35 minutes ago, robosmith said: POLICY specifically prohibits placing yourself in front of a vehicle and violating that POLICY means Ross placed HIMSELF in HARMS WAY. Duh Nope. You guys already tried this with Ta' Kiya Young. The officer was acquitted and cleared of any wrongdoing after investigation. There are so many similar examples. Edited January 9 by CDN1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 28 minutes ago, CDN1 said: Nope. You guys already tried this with Ta' Kiya Young. The officer was acquitted and cleared of any wrongdoing after investigation. There are so many similar examples. Your FAILURE to provide a cite for your CLAIM means you got BUPKIS. Minnesota is NOT right wing Ohio. Derek Chauvin was CONVICTED in Minnesota. The times they are a change'n 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 5 hours ago, Barquentine said: AI Overview Police protocol prohibits officers from standing in the path of an occupied vehicle or shooting at a moving vehicle unless there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm that cannot be otherwise avoided. You can see from the video clearly that they were crossing in front of the vehicle to approach and he wasn't directly in front of the vehicle until she backed up and then lurched forward. At that point with a vehicle now pointed in his direction and moving forward specifically it was an immediate threat and he shot and killed the dumbass who thought it was a good idea to back up and then charge a cop. Hard feeling your part. That's what happens when you trust AI to try and take a generalized statement and make it specific. She turned and backed up, now the vehicle was in line with him. then she accelerated. Pow. Look at the video again. When the car is stopped the agent is NOT in front of it. She aligns the car with him and then accelerates forward Were there any other pretzel moves you'd like to try or are you about done looking like a twat? 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
TreeBeard Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 1 hour ago, ironstone said: You statement indicated you did not think Roberto Munoz should be considered 'a dangerous illegal' despite what he was convicted of. So if Munoz doesn't meet your threshold, just where do you draw the line? You’re wrong. Get the molestor. You don’t do it by confronting citizens and antagonizing entire neighbourhoods. It’s silly that you really think the way to nab an individual is to send in 50 masked, undertrained imbeciles to march through the streets. The individual probably looked out his window, saw the shooting of people who weren’t him, and just drove away. This narrative is so transparent it’s funny. They are there to antagonize citizens. Quote
User Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 5 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: You’re wrong. Get the molestor. You don’t do it by confronting citizens and antagonizing entire neighbourhoods. It’s silly that you really think the way to nab an individual is to send in 50 masked, undertrained imbeciles to march through the streets. The individual probably looked out his window, saw the shooting of people who weren’t him, and just drove away. This narrative is so transparent it’s funny. They are there to antagonize citizens. You have no desire to engage honestly here and you hide like a coward from me because I call you out on it. Quote
robosmith Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 11 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: You’re wrong. Get the molestor. You don’t do it by confronting citizens and antagonizing entire neighbourhoods. It’s silly that you really think the way to nab an individual is to send in 50 masked, undertrained imbeciles to march through the streets. The individual probably looked out his window, saw the shooting of people who weren’t him, and just drove away. This narrative is so transparent it’s funny. They are there to antagonize citizens. They are there to normalize Trump's private army for use to suppress the vote in the next election. 1 Quote
ironstone Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 13 hours ago, robosmith said: Masked men with guns storming a car tend to make women freak out. Freaked out? She appears to have a smirk on her face. 1 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
TreeBeard Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 7 minutes ago, ironstone said: Freaked out? She appears to have a smirk on her face. She looks like a terrorist! Oh wait…. she looks like someone who doesn’t think she is about to die and isn’t trying to run anyone down. 1 Quote
ironstone Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 24 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: You’re wrong. Get the molestor. You don’t do it by confronting citizens and antagonizing entire neighbourhoods. It’s silly that you really think the way to nab an individual is to send in 50 masked, undertrained imbeciles to march through the streets. Munoz is clearly a dangerous man. He has a history of reacting in a violent manner when faced with the risk of apprehension. By their actions, the protesters are in effect, protecting a child molester. ICE agents are clearly not the one's engaging in antagonism. If you bothered to watch the cell phone video you can clearly see that it's this woman and her partner who are trying to antagonize the agents and prevent them from doing their job. Renee Good had willingly 'trained' for this day. Renee Nicole Good was Minneapolis ‘ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting https://nypost.com/2026/01/08/us-news/renee-nicole-good-was-minneapolis-ice-watch-warrior-who-trained-to-resist-feds-before-shooting/ Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
User Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 25 minutes ago, robosmith said: They are there to normalize Trump's private army for use to suppress the vote in the next election. WTF are you talking about? This woman blocked the road to harass and interfere with ICE and when they respond to arrest her... it is *checks notes* to suppress the vote in the next election? You are certifiably insane. 8 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: She looks like a terrorist! Oh wait…. she looks like someone who doesn’t think she is about to die and isn’t trying to run anyone down. And yet... she ran into an Officer. 1 Quote
Hodad Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 22 hours ago, WestCanMan said: The dead ho that was killed was the author of her own tragedy. The person you call a "dead ho" was a wife and mother of three with a car seat and stuffed animals along for the ride, you grotesque farking ghoul. Even a basic human like yourself should be capable of basic human decency. You are what's wrong with the world. 2 1 Quote
User Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 18 minutes ago, Hodad said: The person you call a "dead ho" was a wife and mother of three with a car seat and stuffed animals along for the ride, you grotesque farking ghoul. You called Kirk a professional a$$hole when you came back to the forum just for that post after he was brutally murdered! He was a father and husband. 2 Quote
Deluge Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 On 1/7/2026 at 4:49 PM, eyeball said: It looks like the shooter was beside her vehicle when she drove away. You can see the reflection of him on the road surface crossing the street before she drove off. He wasn't in front of her or in any danger at all. If he was he'd be too busy getting out of the way to have time to also pull his weapon, aim and fire three shots. The fact she waved at ICE to drive past her a couple of seconds before certainly doesn't speak to any intent to turn her car into a weapon. I guess this is going to be like George Floyd all over again. You mean the lady had a criminal record, was passing counterfeit money, and had drugs in her system? 1 Quote
ironstone Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 We knew this wouldn't take too long. In another thread we discussed the subject of the lefts propensity for violence. They shout it out loud. "Kristi Noem will hang!" and "Save a life, kill an ICE!" No surprise coming from the side that justifies any and all atrocities by Hamas as 'resistance' that they now call for violence against government officials and law enforcement officers. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
CDN1 Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 (edited) 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Your FAILURE to provide a cite for your CLAIM means you got BUPKIS. Minnesota is NOT right wing Ohio. Derek Chauvin was CONVICTED in Minnesota. The times they are a change'n I gave you a name that will deliver plenty. Pick your source and Google search it yourself, bud. Edited January 9 by CDN1 Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 Latest released video shows officers perspective....wife tells Good: "Drive baby drive" https://www.facebook.com/reel/1910127999622693 2 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
eyeball Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 1 hour ago, Deluge said: You mean the lady had a criminal record, was passing counterfeit money, and had drugs in her system? No the paid radical professional agitator. And yes it's true she had a traffic ticket alright. I'm surprised she wasn't wearing an ankle GPS bracelet. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
ironstone Posted January 9 Report Posted January 9 People in here make the foolish argument that ICE agents should not cover their faces and in fact, should openly show their ID. There has been a significant increase in threats against ICE agents recently. According to reports from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the following alarming trends have emerged: Key Increases in Threats Death Threats: An 8,000% increase in death threats against ICE officers. Assaults: A 1,300% increase in reported assaults, with figures rising from 19 assaults in 2024 to 275 in 2025. Vehicular Attacks: A dramatic 3,200% increase in vehicular attacks, with 66 incidents reported recently compared to merely 2 in 2024 We know full well which side all these threats are coming from. 2 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
BeaverFever Posted January 10 Report Posted January 10 22 hours ago, CdnFox said: n this case the vehicle was still in motion, still in contact with the police officer and the bad guy was still quite capable of committing harm. I was in motion AWAY from the agent and not still in contact with him. The shots 2 and 3 were from the side and rear. Quote
User Posted January 10 Report Posted January 10 10 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: I was in motion AWAY from the agent and not still in contact with him. The shots 2 and 3 were from the side and rear. Let’s play a game! I’ll drive my SUV to your house, you stand in front of it and I’ll start accelerating. You can guess if I’m going to the right, to the left, or straight ahead. Maybe you can stand there and see which way my wheels are pointed. Let’s see if you guess right before I run you over. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted January 10 Author Report Posted January 10 5 hours ago, TreeBeard said: You’re wrong. Get the molestor. You don’t do it by confronting citizens and antagonizing entire neighbourhoods. It’s silly that you really think the way to nab an individual is to send in 50 masked, undertrained imbeciles to march through the streets. The individual probably looked out his window, saw the shooting of people who weren’t him, and just drove away. This narrative is so transparent it’s funny. They are there to antagonize citizens. That's about the dumbest thing I've read today. Congratulations. You win the Groovy Guy of the Day Award. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.