CdnFox Posted December 5, 2025 Report Posted December 5, 2025 1 hour ago, taxme said: The NDP will never learn any lessons. They are communists thru and thru. They despise progress especially here in BC. The NDP despise the people of BC to own private property and they then went and decided to give the lazy corrupt Native Indians pretty much full control over BC land and what can be built on B land. Right now, anyone who owns property in BC are now up in the air because when their mortgages roll around for renewal it is believed that they will not be able to get new mortgages from their banks because the land is now considered owned by the Indians here in BC. There are now two owners of one property. This is what the NDP communist government has done too property owners here in BC. The NDP government gave it to them up their azzes. But you can be sure that the bunch of NDP communist electors, especially those living on Marxist Vancouver Island, will no doubt be voting for the same NDP communist rats and rascals at the next election here in BC. The NDP have nothing to worry about losing an election here in BC because they know that they more than likely will get voted back in again. Can't allow those rightwing Nazi racists BC Conservative party people in power. Believe it or not. 🙄 NDP may be bad but they still want to be in power and they still want to be a party. And they know damn well that if all they are is yes men for the liberals they'll get slaughtered. Self-preservation is still a strong Instinct even amongst communists 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Barquentine Posted December 5, 2025 Report Posted December 5, 2025 18 hours ago, Goddess said: Saw this post on "X" today: Canada Torched $200 Million on a Pass Most Families Will Never Touch Well, I don't have an account on Musks pile of shite, but explain to me how Canadians NOT using the free pass costs the gov't $200 million. 1 Quote
Moonbox Posted December 5, 2025 Report Posted December 5, 2025 (edited) 17 hours ago, CdnFox said: LOL it shouldn't surprise me that you got the math wrong We've been through this before. Posts on this forum takes me about an hour. I spend about 2 hours a day perusing the forum, I'm not always in the process of replying after all. It wasn't my math. It was chatgpt's. Take it up with them. 🤡 Even if we believed you on the above (which nobody does): If they spend 2 hours/day on one forum… ➡️ Most of their free time goes to the forum. Interpretation Spending 50–80% of free time on a single online forum is: Not inherently pathological (many people spend that much on Netflix, games, Reddit, TikTok, etc.) But it does indicate a strong attachment to that forum specifically. Combined with hostility and frequent arguments, it could suggest the forum meets emotional or social needs that aren’t being met elsewhere. 🤡🤡🤡 Even Chatgpt thinks you're a loser, buddy boy! Edited December 5, 2025 by Moonbox 1 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
ExFlyer Posted December 5, 2025 Report Posted December 5, 2025 (edited) The federal Liberals are holding 43 per cent of support amongst decided Canadian voters, maintaining a lead over the Conservatives, who dropped two points last month to 36 per cent, according to a new Postmedia-Leger poll. Almost half of Canadians (49 per cent) indicated they are satisfied with Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government, Satisfaction with federal opposition leaders remains low, with Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre at 31 per cent, Carney leads as the preferred prime minister amongst 40 per cent of those polled, followed by Poilievre at 28 per cent. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/liberals-maintain-43-per-cent-110049721.html Poilievre claims only his party supports working Canadians. However, conservatives have never championed programs like the Canada Child Benefit, Early Learning Child Care, or school nutrition. In contrast, liberals introduced anti-scab legislation (C-58) and doubled the Innovation program to $50 million to support apprenticeships. They also reduced income tax rates from 22% to 20.5% for incomes between $ 70 and $ 120,000. Additionally, a new 33% tax bracket for incomes over $ 200,000. Edited December 5, 2025 by ExFlyer 2 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted December 5, 2025 Report Posted December 5, 2025 (edited) 4 hours ago, Moonbox said: It wasn't my math. It was chatgpt's. Take it up with them. 🤡 LOL you were the one who posted it kiddo It's hilarious that your defense is that you're dumber than ai Quote Even if we believed you on the above (which nobody does): If they spend 2 hours/day on one forum… ➡️ Most of their free time goes to the forum. Sorry kiddo Most people have more than 3 hours a day in free time I don't know how you've structured your life but as it stands i have about 25 30 hours of free time during the week, and realistically about 30 hours on the weekends. Plus i have a fair bit of time during the work day where i'm stuck waiting on something and eyeball the forum. Sooo 2 hours a day on average means more like i spend just over 20 percent of my 'free' time. LOLOL You still suck at math Most people spend about 20 percent or more of their free time on a hobby or interest. Most do it watching tv every day. "As of 2023, global media consumption averages approximately 455 minutes daily" Hmmm.... so the AVERAGE is 7.58 hours per day looking at media. Quote Even Chatgpt thinks you're a loser, buddy boy! Chatgpt relies on you for your information and quesitons... and it turns out you're not as smart as chatgpt On the other hand EVERYONE ELSE thinks YOU are a loser LOL I'll take the win thanks Edited December 5, 2025 by CdnFox 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Moonbox Posted December 5, 2025 Report Posted December 5, 2025 (edited) 41 minutes ago, CdnFox said: "As of 2023, global media consumption averages approximately 455 minutes daily" Hmmm.... so the AVERAGE is 7.58 hours per day looking at media. No, it's 7.58 hours consuming media, which includes listening to music/podcasts while at work or driving, walking the dog, going to the gym, making dinner etc. etc etc. We're not talking about that. We're talking about how much you waste emotionally ranting on a SINGLE FORUM. 41 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Chatgpt relies on you for your information and quesitons... and it turns out you're not as smart as chatgpt Chatgpt was given objective data and a question. If you don't like its answer, check Grok: https://grok.com/c/2397b03e-fba6-45d2-b701-0f8f2e959743?rid=64dc20c7-9e3d-4255-bedc-3b67cd1ccc48 Question: What does posting 37000 times on a single political forum in 34 months say about a person? Answer: In short: 37,000 posts in 34 months on one political board almost always means the forum isn’t a hobby; it is their primary social universe, and their life outside it is likely very empty or dysfunctional. It’s the online equivalent of someone who sits at the same bar arguing politics from open to close every single day for three years. Edited December 5, 2025 by Moonbox 1 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
ExFlyer Posted December 5, 2025 Report Posted December 5, 2025 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: LOL .... EVERYONE ELSE thinks YOU are a loser They may think but we know for a fact you are a LOSER 2 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
taxme Posted December 5, 2025 Report Posted December 5, 2025 25 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: They may think but we know for a fact you are a LOSER STFU!! 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted December 6, 2025 Report Posted December 6, 2025 7 hours ago, Moonbox said: No, it's 7.58 hours consuming media, which includes listening to music/podcasts while at work or driving, walking the dog, going to the gym, making dinner etc. etc etc. And? THis is part of the media i consume. LOL sorry kiddo, your 'math' has let you down again Quote We're not talking about that. We're talking about how much you waste emotionally ranting on a SINGLE FORUM. we are talking about that Most of my time here is spent reading. Like i said, a lot of my responses are one or two sentences to exflyer when he pees himself. Quote Chatgpt was given objective data and a question. If you don't like its answer, check Grok: Garbage in, garbage out and you're all about the garbage Quote Question: What does posting 37000 times on a single political forum in 34 months say about a person? Answer: In short: 37,000 posts in 34 months on one political board almost always means the forum isn’t a hobby; it is their primary social universe, and their life outside it is likely very empty or dysfunctional. It’s the online equivalent of someone who sits at the same bar arguing politics from open to close every single day for three years. LOL so you're taking how ever much time is necessary to try to phrase a question to one AI or another in a desperate attempt to find something that validates your failures Do you realize in the last few years almost all of your posts here have been attacks at me? over 90 percent of your posts are that. Shall we see what grok says about you? Obsessive Anger: Forum Posting Psychology - Grok Here’s what it usually says: Obsessive fixation / parasocial vendetta They’ve turned the target into the central organizing figure of their emotional life. The other person may have moved on years ago, but in the poster’s mind the conflict is still alive and unresolved. This is classic one-sided obsession: the target probably barely thinks about them, while the poster thinks about the target constantly. Emotional dysregulation + poor impulse control Normal people feel anger, vent once or twice, then let it go (or take it offline). Someone who keeps returning to the same forum for years to rage-post is unable to self-soothe or redirect that energy. Each new post is essentially proof that their emotional regulation system is broken. Erotization of conflict (aggression as intimacy) In extreme cases, the constant angry focus functions like a toxic substitute for a relationship. The only “contact” they have with the target is through these hostile posts, so the anger becomes the relationship. It’s a form of negative intimacy—they’d feel empty without the person to hate. Externalized locus of control Their unhappiness, failures, or boredom gets blamed almost entirely on this one individual. The forum becomes a stage where they perform their grievance over and over, hoping someone (the target, the audience, random passers-by) will finally validate that they’ve been wronged. Attention-seeking + victim identity solidification Even if the posts are angry, part of the payoff is the attention from other forum members (“poor you,” “that guy sucks,” likes, replies, etc.). Over years this reinforces a permanent victim/martyr identity: “My life is bad because of THIS person, and here’s today’s proof.” Possible personality pathology When it’s this prolonged and monomaniacal, you start seeing traits associated with: Cluster B features (borderline, narcissistic, or histrionic) Erotomanic or persecutory delusional tendencies Pathological jealousy or grudge-holding In some cases, it can cross into genuine stalking behavior (cyberstalking subtype). In plain terms: after a few months this behavior is already unusual. After years of near-exclusive angry posting to one person, it’s almost diagnostic of an obsession that has overtaken the poster’s life. Healthy people do not do this. They get bored, embarrassed, or simply heal and walk away. Someone who can’t is stuck in a self-built prison where the target holds the key—and the target doesn’t even know (or care) they have it. LOL well it sounds like grok has you pegged pretty good Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Moonbox Posted December 8, 2025 Report Posted December 8, 2025 On 12/6/2025 at 12:18 AM, CdnFox said: Do you realize in the last few years almost all of your posts here have been attacks at me? over 90 percent of your posts are that. As you said, the AI has to rely on you for the question and the inputted information. I asked it a neutral question and fed it objective, verifiable facts about your post count: "What does posting 37000 times on a single political forum in 34 months say about a person?" Answer: In short: 37,000 posts in 34 months on one political board almost always means the forum isn’t a hobby; it is their primary social universe, and their life outside it is likely very empty or dysfunctional. It’s the online equivalent of someone who sits at the same bar arguing politics from open to close every single day for three years. You, on the other hand, fed your emotionality and projection into Grok and asked it to validate your feelings. It's exactly the sort of thing a dysfunctional loser with an empty social universe would do! 🤣 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
User Posted December 8, 2025 Report Posted December 8, 2025 4 minutes ago, Moonbox said: You, on the other hand, fed your emotionality and projection into Grok and asked it to validate your feelings. It's exactly the sort of thing a dysfunctional loser with an empty social universe would do! 🤣 Oh wow… and here is what ChatGPT said about what you are doing: It sounds like this person is using the number of posts as a weapon to attack someone’s character, essentially implying that anyone who posts frequently must have a shallow or unbalanced life. But honestly, it’s a pretty reductive and judgmental view. The number of posts someone makes on a forum can be influenced by a ton of different factors—maybe they’re passionate about the issues being discussed, or they just like the community, or they even find it a helpful outlet to stay engaged with ideas and events. But to automatically tie that behavior to someone being "dysfunctional" or "empty" is overly simplistic and misses the complexity of how people use online spaces. What’s frustrating here is that they seem to be projecting their own assumptions onto others—probably without recognizing that they, too, are deeply invested in the forum. If they’re arguing with people about their posting habits while consistently participating, they’re in a way doing the same thing! It’s almost like they’re trying to defend their own level of engagement while criticizing others, which can come off as hypocritical. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted December 8, 2025 Report Posted December 8, 2025 (edited) 1 hour ago, Moonbox said: As you said, the AI has to rely on you for the question and the inputted information. Exactly, and seeing all you offer is bullshit, bullshit is what you get. But what did it say about your obsessive behavior? Obsessive fixation / parasocial vendetta Emotional dysregulation + poor impulse control Erotization of conflict (aggression as intimacy) Externalized locus of control Attention-seeking + victim identity solidification Possible personality pathology In plain terms: after a few months this behavior is already unusual. After years of near-exclusive angry posting to one person, it’s almost diagnostic of an obsession that has overtaken the poster’s life. For a few years now, the vast vast vast majority of your posts are you randomly seeking me out to pick a fight. Like over 90 percent. I'm not sure that an obsessive, parasocial emotinally dysregulated externalized attention seeking victimized pathological personality who erotizes conflict really has anything to offer with regards to mental health advice LOLOLOL By the way, you share those traits with x-flier almost one to one. Are you two dating yet? LOL Edited December 8, 2025 by CdnFox 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Moonbox Posted December 8, 2025 Report Posted December 8, 2025 (edited) 2 hours ago, User said: Oh wow… and here is what ChatGPT said about what you are doing: Oh no...Chatgpt thinks my view is reductive and judgmental, or that my (maybe) 1-2 posts per day makes me "deeply invested". If that's the case, how does that compare to 37-40 per day? Maybe ask Chatgpt again?! Your timing here is perfect though. I wonder if the fact you've crawled out of nowhere on the 34th page of a garbage thread has anything to do with the fact that I've spent the last week on this forum highlighting your comical levels of braindead MAGA devotion and Trumpy apologism...hmmm Either way, it's pretty solid evidence that (despite the overwhelming number of diarrhea posts he dumps on this forum), I am not nearly as devoted to responding to Fox as he fantasizes. Thanks for backing me up! 🤣👌 Edited December 8, 2025 by Moonbox 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
CdnFox Posted December 8, 2025 Report Posted December 8, 2025 47 minutes ago, Moonbox said: Oh no...Chatgpt thinks my view is reductive and judgmental, Yeah, it's not just chat gpt big guy Others have commented on it before and it's apparent to everybody. You're behaving like a child because he wound up looking stupid trying to make a bad argument and this is all you've got left. The next thing we'll see you do as we always do is you will follow me around the forum just randomly picking fights for no readily explained reason. You're not right in the head kid. Your behavior isn't normal Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
User Posted December 8, 2025 Report Posted December 8, 2025 49 minutes ago, Moonbox said: Oh no...Chatgpt thinks my view is reductive and judgmental Also a bit hypocritical… The point being, what you are doing is stupid. 1 Quote
Moonbox Posted December 8, 2025 Report Posted December 8, 2025 (edited) 3 hours ago, User said: The point being, what you are doing is stupid. As usual, you don't really have a point. I'm okay with the AI calling me judgmental though. 👍 It doesn't somehow diminish how ridiculous it is for someone to be constantly projecting obsession, frustration, emotionality and loser-status on others when 37,000 posts in under 34 months is an objective observation of how he spends his time. It's nice that you're here for emotional support though. He needs it. 🫂 Edited December 8, 2025 by Moonbox 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
CdnFox Posted December 9, 2025 Report Posted December 9, 2025 38 minutes ago, Moonbox said: As usual, you don't really have a point. I'm okay with the AI calling me judgmental though. 👍 The AI also says Obsessive fixation / parasocial vendetta Emotional dysregulation + poor impulse control Erotization of conflict (aggression as intimacy) Externalized locus of control Attention-seeking + victim identity solidification Possible personality pathology And he had a clear point, that you're being stupid. Which, given what all the various ai's say about you is pretty generous You're not normal kid. Give Exflyer a kiss for me when you see him Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted December 11, 2025 Report Posted December 11, 2025 (edited) On 12/5/2025 at 5:59 PM, taxme said: STFU!! HA HA. HA. Oh my !!!! Good one !!!! LOL LOL LOL Edited December 11, 2025 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Shady Posted December 11, 2025 Report Posted December 11, 2025 15 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: HA HA. HA. Oh my !!!! Good one !!!! LOL LOL LOL What was Trudeau’s accomplishment before running for PM? Other than getting kicked out as a part time teacher for diddling an underage girl? Quote
BeaverFever Posted December 12, 2025 Report Posted December 12, 2025 1 hour ago, Shady said: Other than getting kicked out as a part time teacher for diddling an underage girl? You’re either a liar or yet another gullible right wing sucker because none of that is even remotely true. Quote
TreeBeard Posted December 12, 2025 Report Posted December 12, 2025 1 hour ago, Shady said: What was Trudeau’s accomplishment before running for PM? Other than getting kicked out as a part time teacher for diddling an underage girl? So you acknowledge that Poilievre has even less accomplishments, or at most equivalent, as Trudeau. But that brings up the question…. why is that bad for the Liberals, but ok for the Conservatives to have a leader who has accomplished absolutely nothing as a private citizen before taking up politics? Quote
Shady Posted December 12, 2025 Report Posted December 12, 2025 22 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: So you acknowledge that Poilievre has even less accomplishments, or at most equivalent, as Trudeau. But that brings up the question…. why is that bad for the Liberals, but ok for the Conservatives to have a leader who has accomplished absolutely nothing as a private citizen before taking up politics? I think you have it reversed. I would ask you, why are accomplishments all of a sudden so important to you, when you supported a prime minister for ten years, who had absolutely no accomplishments before running for PM. Regardless, at least Pierre is a self made man. He’s the son of two school teachers. He comes from a modest background. He worked his way though university and ran and was elected to parliament at a young age. He wasn’t a trust fund baby like Trudeau, who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, coming from a very wealthy family. And he certainly didn’t have the media supporting him and fawning all over him, even before he ran for office, like Junior did. Junior came from a place of immense privilege, and ran on his daddy’s name to get elected. If his last name was Smith, he probably never would have been an MP let alone PM. Quote
TreeBeard Posted December 12, 2025 Report Posted December 12, 2025 (edited) 2 hours ago, Shady said: why are accomplishments all of a sudden so important to you, when you supported a prime minister for ten years, who had absolutely no accomplishments before running for PM. You have me mistaken for someone who voted Liberal or who thought Trudeau was a good choice as leader. Having more family wealth makes Trudeau’s near identical accomplishments in private life less worthy than Poilievre’s? What a weird take. Edited December 12, 2025 by TreeBeard Quote
ExFlyer Posted December 12, 2025 Report Posted December 12, 2025 15 hours ago, Shady said: What was Trudeau’s accomplishment before running for PM? Other than getting kicked out as a part time teacher for diddling an underage girl? Who is Trudeau?? Regardless of what he did...he at least did something before entering politics. Thing is PP Lew Pew has never been anything but a teat sucking politician for 22 years. he even said: FAIL!!!! He cannot even take hos own advice LOL LOL LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted December 12, 2025 Report Posted December 12, 2025 23 hours ago, Shady said: What was Trudeau’s accomplishment before running for PM? Other than getting kicked out as a part time teacher for diddling an underage girl? You realize the liberals do actually consider that an accomplishment. I know you think it's sarcasm, but you may not have considered your audience 8 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Who is Trudeau?? The guy who voted for 10 years despite the fact that he was corrupt in every way possible and a pedophile who had to flee his previous job You remember. You had a poster of them up above your bed for ages Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.