Potential for the Liberal government to fall in a matter of weeks.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Yabut don't we have an Accountability Act for preventing that sort of thing now? We've practically been promised this just can't happen anymore.

 

No, we don't.

It would be a pretty hard law to write as well. How would you even word it?  You'd basically have to say that a prime minister isn't allowed to do business before or after he's in office. 

And Carney is a slimeball who's ripping off the people...  and he's also prime minister who's the only guy who can really change the law from a practical point of view  

THat's why we kept TELLING you not to vote in the weasel to guard the hen house. 

[Legato]

7 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Pierre Poilievre is so freaked out by Carney having worked running one of Canada’s largest & most successful private companies after years successfully running national banks is simply because Pierre has never worked anywhere at all, never mind successfully. LOL LOL LOL

Yeah just imagine how much more successful it would have been without him.....annnnnd..... his Bank of England tenure was not without effups.

But you know all this so why keep on with the regurgitation.

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, Politics1990 said:

come on now he tossed papers at peoples doors

LOL only liberal supporters are thick enough to cliam that decades of experience doing the job is somehow the same as no experience doing the job  

When you go look for a doctor, do you want one who's been doing it for years or someone who was a plumber until last week? LOLOL

[ExFlyer]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Still crying and begging for attention    Have you looked into the big brother program in your area? 

I'm pretty sure the topic is "exflyer is a crybaby and having a panic attack and emotional crisis"   That's what your last 15 posts have been about  

Awww poor little confux...a LOSER and whiner and cryer LOL LOL LOL

You are such a  sad little man that you are blowing off your hero PP Le Pew HA HAHA

Love it when you got defeated and said  "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons "  and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party."

I need to rub your statement into your face...I will do it as long as you keep responding to me so, sick it up LOSER HA HA HA

 

5 minutes ago, Legato said:

Yeah just imagine how much more successful it would have been without him.....annnnnd..... his Bank of England tenure was not without effups.

But you know all this so why keep on with the regurgitation.

Ohhhhh, you no like the facts. ...again

HA HA HA. PP Le Pew.. a ZERO and you are one of his LOSERS HA HA HA

[CdnFox]

Just now, ExFlyer said:

Awww poor little confux...a LOSER and whiner and cryer LOL LOL LOL

 

 

LOL  that'd still be you projecting little guy   You just call everyone around you a loser because you're deseperate to have someone you can relate to  

And pp's got you so scared you have to mention him every two minutes  If you really didn't like him you woudn't think about him night and day

You'll understand when your voice stops cracking  and you start having to shave  

 

 

[Legato]

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

Awww poor little confux...a LOSER and whiner and cryer LOL LOL LOL

You are such a  sad little man that you are blowing off your hero PP Le Pew HA HAHA

Love it when you got defeated and said  "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons "  and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party."

I need to rub your statement into your face...I will do it as long as you keep responding to me so, sick it up LOSER HA HA HA

 

Ohhhhh, you no like the facts. ...again

HA HA HA. PP Le Pew.. a ZERO and you are one of his LOSERS HA HA HA

Seems like you have an odd way of skirting around any facts that go against obsession with Harry Potter scripts.

[Goddess]

25 minutes ago, eyeball said:

If Conservatives put forth a plan that included cameras. microphones, process guardians, criminal charges and jail time for corrupt politicians I'd campaign door to door for them.

Fuque your cameras and microphones.  As I told you, the Liberals just investigate themselves and find themselves innocent every time.

We need legislation so the government can't investigate itself and keep finding itself innocent.

And you dont' want it.

[eyeball]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

It would be a pretty hard law to write as well. How would you even word it? 

It seems pretty clear to me we'll have to open up the Constitution to reform.  I'd have it worded by an assembly of citizens picked at random like a jury.

Of course Conservatives have proven to be pretty useless at opening up the Constitution but...that's no excuse for not trying again.

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You'd basically have to say that a prime minister isn't allowed to do business before or after he's in office. 

I'd say they can't unless there's someone keeping an eye on them who can observe, record and report back to us that its all above board.

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And Carney is a slimeball who's ripping off the people...  and he's also prime minister who's the only guy who can really change the law from a practical point of view

And that's why we need to enshrine transparency and accountability in the Constitution - so that the only way slimeballs can make our governments opaque and unaccountable again is to open the Constitution for that specific purpose.

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

THat's why we kept TELLING you not to vote in the weasel to guard the hen house.   

FIFY, you forgot to put your silly shit eating smiley face where it usually goes.

[eyeball]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Fuque your cameras and microphones.  As I told you, the Liberals just investigate themselves and find themselves innocent every time.

We need legislation so the government can't investigate itself and keep finding itself innocent.

And you dont' want it.

Nope we need to open up the Constitution so governments can't perennially get away with this nonsense.  Legislation won't ever cut it I'm afraid.

$10 says you'll be against that too.

[ExFlyer]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL  that'd still be you projecting little guy   You just call everyone around you a loser because you're deseperate to have someone you can relate to  

And pp's got you so scared you have to mention him every two minutes  If you really didn't like him you woudn't think about him night and day

You'll understand when your voice stops cracking  and you start having to shave  

 

 

Oh WOW...the LOSER is back!!! HA HAHA

Love it when you got defeated and said  "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons "  and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party."

PP has me scare??? HA HA HA.  What are you gonna do when your hero is gone?? PP has you scared cause there is no one on the complainatives that can take over and win so, you guys will be 5 times LOSERS LOL LOL LOL

 

[CdnFox]

30 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Pierre Poilievre is so freaked out by Carney having worked running one of Canada’s largest & most successful private companies after years successfully running national banks is simply because Pierre has never worked anywhere at all, never mind successfully. LOL LOL LOL

On the contrary, he's watching carney fail because he doesn't understand politics and he smells blood in the water

The person who's freaked out is you...  PP seems to scare the pee pee out of you

[Goddess]

Just now, eyeball said:

Nope we need to open up the Constitution so governments can't perennially get away with this nonsense.  Legislation won't ever cut it I'm afraid.

$10 says you'll be against that too.

I support anything that would bring about accountability in gov't.

It's you that doesn't.

Don't project your ignorance on me.

[ExFlyer]

11 minutes ago, Legato said:

Seems like you have an odd way of skirting around any facts that go against obsession with Harry Potter scripts.

Huh??

You stuck on some fantasy script?? Like PP would be a good PM??/ LOL LOL LOL

[CdnFox]

Just now, ExFlyer said:

Oh WOW...the LOSER is back!!! HA HAHA

 

Yes, we can see you kiddo 

Quote

Love it when you got defeated and said  "totally and completely defeated and even admit that "

That never happened  LOL you're having weird fantasies again  

 

I'm not happy with him for other reasons "  and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party."

Quote

PP has me scare???

Yeah, you seem to pee yourself regularly worrying about him 

Quote

HA HA HA.  =

I accept your admission of defeat  

[eyeball]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

I support anything that would bring about accountability in gov't.

It's you that doesn't.

I just don't support your lame assed solutions and suggestions.

An x on a ballot every 4-5 years to combat the breadth and depth of corruption you're up in arms about is like gargling bleach to cure COVID.

Completely useless.

[ExFlyer]

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

On the contrary, he's watching carney fail because he doesn't understand politics and he smells blood in the water

The person who's freaked out is you...  PP seems to scare the pee pee out of you

HA HA HA PP Le Pew the LOSER and confux wipes up behind him HA HA HA

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Nope we need to open up the Constitution so governments can't perennially get away with this nonsense.  Legislation won't ever cut it I'm afraid.

 

LOLOL holy crap     YOU were the one who insisted 100 times over that legislation was perfectly fine and the constitution didn't need to be changed  LOL  

I was the one who kept telling you legislation can't do it. 

Unfortunately you'll never get the constitution changed. Just not possible. Changing legislation is not htat hard, you can vote for a party that supports the changes. But the constitution requires all the provinces to buy in AS WELL as the gov't and it's always a disaster when they try. 

The only practical form of accountability is the voters.  They partiicpate in the parties, they select the leaders they put the parties in power and they can take them out and punish them. 

If only we could get you to stop voting "yes" for corruption we might do something .But you've made it clear you don't believe in democracy in the first place and won't be supporting honest gov't anytime soon. 

 

[ExFlyer]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Yes, we can see you kiddo 

That never happened  LOL you're having weird fantasies again  

 

I'm not happy with him for other reasons "  and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party."

Yeah, you seem to pee yourself regularly worrying about him 

I accept your admission of defeat  

Wow...a lot of nothing trying to explain why you are so defeated LOL LOL LOL

So sad you had to bail out on your hero HA HA HA

Here is is, right from the confux mouth "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons "  and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party."

HA HA HA

Gotta go for a dump now and hatch a bunch of little LOSER confuxes LOL

 

Edited November 28, 2025 by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I just don't support your lame assed solutions and suggestions.

An x on a ballot every 4-5 years to combat the breadth and depth of corruption you're up in arms about is like gargling bleach to cure COVID.

Completely useless.

In the last 25 years how many times have we gone 4 years between electins? 3. The rest were all minorities. We hare a minority now. 

I know you feel we should just do away with democracy. Which is how i know you don't actually have a problem with corruption.  

[Goddess]

10 minutes ago, eyeball said:

An x on a ballot every 4-5 years to combat the breadth and depth of corruption you're up in arms about is like gargling bleach to cure COVID.

Completely useless.

Then why do you do it?

And why do you oppose the only party that wants to even attempt to tackle accountability?  It was an important enough issue that they campaigned on it and already had draft legislation.

Instead, you vote for the parties who want to continue corruption.

Your claim to want to bring about accountability, while voting for parties that have no interest in ending it....is quite bizarre.

Edited November 28, 2025 by Goddess

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

Wow...a lot of nothing trying to explain why you are so defeated LOL LOL LOL

LOL aww are you still crying kiddo? I guess i hit a nerve you're getting more and more worked up  

Quote

HA HA HA

Yes, i accept your defeat   Now to tell your mommie i said you could have a cookie and a nap   

[Goddess]

I feel like we need an age requirement on this site.

Pages and pages of 12-yr-old boy contributing nothing but LOLs and LOSERs and fart jokes.

Isn't it naptime yet?

The adults would like to discuss things.

[eyeball]

Again I say, one of the best reasons for deep transparency and accountability is to help undermine the truly ridiculous claims about corruption that all to often becomes associated and implicated with the sort of conspiracies one expects to find in the National Enquirer and on Goddesse's hard drive.

There's probably no bigger hurdle to making things better than crying wolf at every turn when it's just really an occasional coyote causing problems.

At risk of sounding like an authoritarian dare I say we might be a lot more governable and easier for politicians to relate to if we weren't forever looking at them with such deep suspicion.

When we give them shit to work with that's probably what we can expect in return.

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

YOU were the one who insisted 100 times over that legislation was perfectly fine and the constitution didn't need to be changed

LMAO! Yer a fricken loon dude.

[eyeball]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But the constitution requires all the provinces to buy in AS WELL as the gov't and it's always a disaster when they try.

Yeah, I have little doubt politicians would cawk this up.

That's why it'll have to be a Citizens Assembly.

[eyeball]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I know you feel we should just do away with democracy. 

No, a Citizen's Assembly should be eminently democratic.  Coupled with a professional technocracy and referenda we'd be the most advanced human society in the known universe.

You gotta think bigger man. Life's to short.

14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Which is how i know you don't actually have a problem with corruption.  

You only know that because you're a loon.