What The Liberals Did To Canada

[ExFlyer]

4 minutes ago, Legato said:

None, and has eff all to do with what Poilievre said. You know that. So why the knee jerk response.

 

Polievere said what he did in the video posted and my response was to debunk it...and it did. LOL

Can't send anymore from our ports if the posts are maxed out and can't send oil or LNG if there is no pipelines to the east coast ports 

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

No, he's only aware that Justin Trudeau was PM for 10 years and Carney is PM now.  Otherwise, he's not aware of much at all...

HA HA HA

PP just cannot get over that Trudeau is out dating Katy Perry and not playing political footsie with him any more LOL

[CdnFox]

11 hours ago, eyeball said:

Sure you're not. LMAO!

 

LOL yeah, just like i wasn't sure he wouldn't run again and wasn't sure he would lose if he did    I'm funny that way   

Quote

I had more important things to do than stare at the bleedingly obvious.

Sure.  I mean it takes a lot of effort, pulling your head out of the sand like that,,,,   

[CdnFox]

55 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Is PP aware of the reality of port facilities???7121516

 

Yes. Apperently you're not 

Quote

Is he aware there are no pipelines to the East Coast ports?

I'm going to say yes because he said in the video "there aer no pipelines to the east coast".  Nice to see your attention span is as good as always  

Quote

Are all complainatives really so uninformed of what is true and untrue??

 

So far the only one that's showing up that's stupid is you.

 

He said the reason they're buying other people's natural gas and oil is because we don't have pipelines to the east coast. And he's right. You actually took the time to post proof that he is correct. Which makes you the special kind of stupid

 

He's pointing out that as a country we need to get out of our own way. The liberals spent 10 years saying there was no business case for natural gas. Carney has deliberately left policy in place that prevents pipelines from being built. If we HAD built pipelines or if we were in the process of doing so now, WE could be the ones serving other countries energy needs.  Which would be good 

 

That's not complex.  

[Goddess]

There are two visions for Canada and they are both very different:

Poilievre:

• Approve energy projects in 6 months
• Export energy globally
• Remove energy taxes

 

Carney:

• More taxes,
• More sacrifice
• More immigration
• More Net Zero restrictions

 

 

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

There are two visions for Canada and they are both very different:

Poilievre:

• Approve energy projects in 6 months
• Export energy globally
• Remove energy taxes

 

Carney:

• More taxes,
• More sacrifice
• More immigration
• More Net Zero restrictions

 

 

Not to mention left in place anti pipeline law and anti tanker law

[Goddess]

Well, our Liberal gov't and their bought-and-paid-for MSM has brainwashed Canadians with so much hate for the Us that this has happened:

Shots fired at US consulate in Canada days after embassy attack

 

Liberals hate whoever the CBC tells them to hate.

You really need to watch Travis Dhanraj's testimony at committee today.

CBC is Canada's Pravda.

Edited March 10 by Goddess

[Goddess]

36 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You really need to watch Travis Dhanraj's testimony at committee today.

 

 

 

 

[Goddess]

Questions for the die-hard Liberal supporters here:

1.  Is there anything the Liberal party could do that would make you withdraw support for them?

2.  If there is, what would you do about it?

Here is the situation in Canada now, the Liberals have been rewarded by voters for everything they've done.  They know what they can get away with.

They know they can crap all over the Charter and Canadians will do nothing, in fact a large amount will cheer it on.

So our Charter means nothing.  Even if the courts decide it was a violation, nothing happens.

Maybe you're thinking you can vote your way out?  You can't.  Floor-crossing has now been weaponized against the citizens.  Anyone you vote in can cross to the Libs for a fancy title, a big raise, world travel and an unlimited expense account with no accountability.

Maybe you're thinking we can all protest?  Nope.  Nothing happened the last time they shut a large protest down, they know they can shut it down again, whether it violates the Charter or not.

They know they have all the legal and political power now to do anything they want.  There's nothing holding them back now.

So:

1.  Is there anything the Liberal party could do that would make you withdraw support for them?

2.  If there is, what would you do about it?

 

 

[Reg Volk]

 

[Goddess]

Carney will be going on vacation, again, after leaving Norway.

Reminder that as governor at the Bank of England he was investigated for abusing tax dollars for travel:

Bank of England scandal: expenses déjà vu? | The Independent | The Independent

 

And this:

Carney’s dire record at the Bank of England is a warning to Canada - Yahoo News UK

When he was installed as Governor by the then Conservative Chancellor George Osborne in 2013, Carney was described as a rockstar central banker, the most brilliant financial mind of his generation, and someone who could bring some intellectual fireworks to economic policy.

And yet for all the hype, and the huge salary and expenses he was awarded, the reality turned out to be dire.

There were four big problems with the way Carney ran the Bank. To start with, he printed way too much money, first in response to the financial crisis, and then to our departure from the EU. The result? The UK suffered from a spike in inflation that was way above the rest of our competitors.

Next, he lost control of regulation, allowing pension funds to invest far too much money into high-risk assets, paving the way for the LDI blow-up that helped end the premiership of the unfortunate Liz Truss.

Thirdly, he presided over a steep decline in the City, with the number of companies listing their shares in London in freefall, and while it would be unfair to blame that entirely on the Governor, it was certainly his job to figure out how to maintain London’s status as one of the great financial centres of the world.

Finally, and perhaps most seriously, he politicised the Bank. He was a hardcore Remainer when it would have been better for the Bank to remain neutral, and then, even more disgracefully, after leaving office he very publicly endorsed the Labour Party at the last general election, even though a former Governor should remain above the fray.

And he committed the Bank to combatting climate change, when it was hard to see that it was ever part of its mandate – the Bank is meant to control inflation and maintain the stability of the financial system.

Meanwhile, growth stagnated and real wages stopped rising. On any measure you care to look at, Carney was the worst Governor of recent times. In the years since he left, Carney’s successors at the Bank of England have been struggling to clear up the mess he left behind. His successors as Canadian PM will have to do the same – because Carney will prove just as deeply disappointing in that job as well.

[herbie]

OMG look what the Liberals Did To Canada!

 

[Reg Volk]

The Liberals just plain suck.

 

[Goddess]

23 hours ago, Goddess said:

Questions for the die-hard Liberal supporters here:

1.  Is there anything the Liberal party could do that would make you withdraw support for them?

2.  If there is, what would you do about it?

I notice none of the Liberal cheerleaders want to answer these questions.

The reason they won't is because they would rather see Canada burn to the ground than admit their own stupidity in continually voting in the most corrupt gov't in Canadian history.

There is nothing the Liberal party can do to destroy Canada that will change their vote.

[ExFlyer]

25 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I notice none of the Liberal cheerleaders want to answer these questions.

The reason they won't is because they would rather see Canada burn to the ground than admit their own stupidity in continually voting in the most corrupt gov't in Canadian history.

There is nothing the Liberal party can do to destroy Canada that will change their vote.

Why perpetuate a useless debate??

The Liberals are the government and will remain so until the conservatives find a leader.

In the meantime, it is fun watching cons on this forum whine and cry at everything the liberals do and get done and the cons get nothing. The conservative MP's would rather abstain and hide behind curtains than vote so the liberals win.

So...keep on keeping on and getting nothing in return LOL

[Goddess]

6 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Why perpetuate a useless debate??

The Liberals are the government and will remain so until the conservatives find a leader.

In the meantime, it is fun watching cons on this forum whine and cry at everything the liberals do and get done and the cons get nothing. The conservative MP's would rather abstain and hide behind curtains than vote so the liberals win.

So...keep on keeping on and getting nothing in return LOL

Thank you for proving my point.

I knew it would be you that wouldn't disappoint. 😎

[Legato]

11 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Why perpetuate a useless debate??

The Liberals are the government and will remain so until the conservatives find a leader.

In the meantime, it is fun watching cons on this forum whine and cry at everything the liberals do and get done and the cons get nothing. The conservative MP's would rather abstain and hide behind curtains than vote so the liberals win.

So...keep on keeping on and getting nothing in return LOL

So can't answer the question, quick, move into deflection mode.

Still frightened of Poilievre I see.

[LinkSoul60]

37 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I notice none of the Liberal cheerleaders want to answer these questions.

The reason they won't is because they would rather see Canada burn to the ground than admit their own stupidity in continually voting in the most corrupt gov't in Canadian history.

There is nothing the Liberal party can do to destroy Canada that will change their vote.

Easy enough questions to answer....

1. Yes, fail on building a stronger domestic economy.

2. I'd be inclined to vote for an alternative, if in fact there was one.

Not complicated is it...?

[ironstone]

Vehicle exports fell sharply in January as trade deficit grew: StatCan

 

Canada’s trade deficit with the world increased in January as the number of vehicles exported to international markets dropped more than 20 per cent, according to the latest data.

Statistics Canada says total exports in January fell 4.7 per cent from December 2025, which was the largest monthly decline since April 2025. At the same time, Canada’s imports fell 1.1 per cent, which ballooned the trade deficit to $3.6 billion compared to $1.3 billion a month earlier.

Motor vehicle exports dropped by 21.2 per cent, which was one of the biggest declines among product categories. Six out of 11 sectors saw exports fall in January.

https://globalnews.ca/news/11727310/canada-trade-deficit-january-2026/

How much more of this can our auto sector take?

[LinkSoul60]

11 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Vehicle exports fell sharply in January as trade deficit grew: StatCan

 

Canada’s trade deficit with the world increased in January as the number of vehicles exported to international markets dropped more than 20 per cent, according to the latest data.

Statistics Canada says total exports in January fell 4.7 per cent from December 2025, which was the largest monthly decline since April 2025. At the same time, Canada’s imports fell 1.1 per cent, which ballooned the trade deficit to $3.6 billion compared to $1.3 billion a month earlier.

Motor vehicle exports dropped by 21.2 per cent, which was one of the biggest declines among product categories. Six out of 11 sectors saw exports fall in January.

https://globalnews.ca/news/11727310/canada-trade-deficit-january-2026/

How much more of this can our auto sector take?

Probably not too much more in the status quo.  Is this Trudeau's fault or do you think maybe Trump's tariffs in the auto sector had something to do with it?

Edited March 12 by LinkSoul60

[ironstone]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Probably not too much more in the status quo.  Is this Trudeau's fault or do you think maybe Trump's tariffs in the auto sector had something to do with it?

The tariffs certainly had something to do with it. But our auto sector was struggling well before Trump's tariffs and the move to ban ICE vehicles was probably too much, too soon. The Liberal plan to go all in on EV's instead of letting the market decide wasn't helpful.

I guess the trend in Canada will continue to be massive subsidies with no guarantees that companies will stay in Canada. And Industry Ministers that can't be bothered to read contracts doesn't help either.

Peak employment in the Canadian auto sector was around 180,000 in the early 2000's and now the number is about 115,000.

Production during the same period went from 2.1 million down to 1.3 million vehicles in 2024.

So auto production has been trending down well before Trump came along.

https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/canada/motor-vehicle-production

[ironstone]

Mohamed Fahmy: Iranian sleeper cells are activating, and Canada is a target

This country has been a haven for IRGC members

https://archive.ph/YGfH7#selection-2149.0-2153.42

Wow, what a complete shock this is.

Can anyone on the left defend the Liberal record on immigration?

[Goddess]

Citing the slowdown in the EV market in Canada and uncertainty in trade, Honda has "postponed" plans to establish EV production in Canada.

Down the drain:

Honda - $15.7 billion

Stellantis - $26 billion

Ford - $19.5 billion

GM - $6 billion

Collectively:  $67 billion dollars torched in Liberal "investments"

 

Liberals:  "Yes, we know Poilievre was right on everything, but he was 'distasteful' so we voted for complete economic and societal collapse instead."

3 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Can anyone on the left defend the Liberal record on immigration?

They don't care.

It doesn't matter the massive record of failure in every government portfolio, it means nothing to them.  They're on the "winning" team.  That's all that matters.

[LinkSoul60]

16 minutes ago, ironstone said:

The tariffs certainly had something to do with it. But our auto sector was struggling well before Trump's tariffs and the move to ban ICE vehicles was probably too much, too soon. The Liberal plan to go all in on EV's instead of letting the market decide wasn't helpful.

I guess the trend in Canada will continue to be massive subsidies with no guarantees that companies will stay in Canada. And Industry Ministers that can't be bothered to read contracts doesn't help either.

Peak employment in the Canadian auto sector was around 180,000 in the early 2000's and now the number is about 115,000.

Production during the same period went from 2.1 million down to 1.3 million vehicles in 2024.

So auto production has been trending down well before Trump came along.

https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/canada/motor-vehicle-production

You appear to be a big supporter of US policy so I'm sure you'll recall that the liberal plan to go all in on EV's was very much driven by the Biden administration direction for the auto sector, with we are and will continue to be integrated with.

No, nothing is guaranteed which is why incentives have to put forth to attract and retain investment for the long term.  

You're correct that employment and throughput in Canadian auto sector has declined over the past couple decades, and your solution to this is....what?  

[Goddess]

33 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Production during the same period went from 2.1 million down to 1.3 million vehicles in 2024.

So auto production has been trending down well before Trump came along.

This information will be quickly ignored.

Libbies are hard-wired now.  Everything wrong with Canada is Trump's fault.

11 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You're correct that employment and throughput in Canadian auto sector has declined over the past couple decades, and your solution to this is....what?  

The Conservatives have a solution to that.

HINT:  The solution isn't blaming Trump.

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Easy enough questions to answer....

1. Yes, fail on building a stronger domestic economy.

2. I'd be inclined to vote for an alternative, if in fact there was one.

 

Dang.

If only you had this conviction a decade ago.  We wouldn't be in this mess.