What The Liberals Did To Canada

[I am Groot]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You have an active imagination... as I suppose all Poilievre supporters need to have.  Of course you're for it regardless of wishes from the people who would actually live in and around it....you don't live there so no sweat of your balls.  Maybe you'll get lucky and they'll propose a mining site down the road from your home to spend some good family time watching them excavate.  

No one is putting in a mine or a pipeline on their land. Their view is they have a say in anything that goes remotely near their land. And I say bullshit. If they don't want any development nearby, then forego all the money we're paying to keep them in their isolated little villages. Go into the cities and find jobs. Or starve. And I don't care which.

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

The fear has warped your ability to employ logic. One could put it down to your use of the LSB instead of MSB.

Why would I or anyone else fear someone whose approval rating is non-existent and will never get near the PM desk.  You've lost so often you actually think you're winning with each crying episode.

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

I know that's the way it's SUPPOSED to be.

We need a government that works for Canadians and not the rest of the world.

lol... another cry hard conservative says something on Facebook and that's your trusted source of information.... nice!

CPP manages their/our investments without government direction, and does a very good job of it.  That's fact.

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

No one is putting in a mine or a pipeline on their land. Their view is they have a say in anything that goes remotely near their land. And I say bullshit. If they don't want any development nearby, then forego all the money we're paying to keep them in their isolated little villages. Go into the cities and find jobs. Or starve. And I don't care which.

No, but they want to eliminate the tanker ban on the northern coast which is there for a reason.  Again, the balls in Smith's court right now anyway so pump your hope in her direction before complaining about a proposed project that may never get off the ground if she can't do her part.  You follow Pierre's thinking of 'who cares what they think'.... small wonder he's an epic failure that's going nowhere fast.

Edited March 4 by LinkSoul60

[Legato]

3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You follow little Pierre's thinking of 'who cares what they think'.... small wonder he's an epic failure that's going nowhere fast.

I rest my case.

[LinkSoul60]

3 minutes ago, Legato said:

I rest my case.

That would be great.... if you had one

[eyeball]

19 hours ago, Goddess said:

But you also want FREE everything for everybody.  For instance, You said Lesbians fleeing the "persecution" of the US should get free everything.

Where do you think that money is going to come from?

Private donors for the most part, 70% private - 30% public, whatever it was the last time you lost your shit screeching over it.  And it was in Canada not the US.

[ironstone]

A blast from the past.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-york-times-says-canada-s-middle-class-richer-than-u-s-1.2618487

Ian Lee, assistant professor at Carleton's Sprott School of Business, argued the new study “completely deconstructs the narrative” of Canada’s middle-class demise — something Opposition Leaders Tom Mulcair and Justin Trudeau have frequently spoken about.

But Trish Hennessey, director of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, argued Canada measuring its success against the U.S. is “like comparing ourselves to a sinking stone.”

So back in 2014, the leftists were saying it was the US that was the 'sinking stone'.

 

[Goddess]

2 hours ago, ironstone said:

Since Carney is gung-ho about deepening ties with India, in effect opening everything up for them, it's reasonable to assume there will be more Punjabi type violence on Canadian soil.

https://khalistanextremismmonitor.org/reports/punjabi-gangster-terrorist-linked-killings-in-canada

Some of you may be interested in this interview Poilievre did on the Triggernometry podcast.

 

It was a very good interview.  Triggernometry has almost 2 million subscribers.

Nothing new in there for me, as to what direction he thinks is best for this country, but he does comment on his election loss and whether it can be attributed to Trump and the reasons why the US is moving away from China.  He sees what is really going on.

The interview does show the polar opposite views of Poilievre and Carney.  Either power and money gets concentrated in a few elites and government takes on the backs of the people, or government works for the people and the people have the power.

This was the choice to be made in the last election and it will still be the choice in the next one.

I hope we choose better next time.

 

 

 

[Goddess]

He's doing a good job in Europe.

 

 

[I am Groot]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

No, but they want to eliminate the tanker ban on the northern coast which is there for a reason.  Again, the balls in Smith's court right now anyway so pump your hope in her direction before complaining about a proposed project that may never get off the ground if she can't do her part.  You follow Pierre's thinking of 'who cares what they think'.... small wonder he's an epic failure that's going nowhere fast.

If I'm paying for your food, water, shelter, clothing, healthcare, transportation, and other expenses, I think it behooves you to cooperate or pay for those things yourself. We have to put garbage dumps somewhere. We have to put power plants somewhere. We have to put industry somewhere. We have to put ports and pipelines somewhere. For the good fo the nation. 

[Legato]

3 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

That would be great.... if you had one

Is that a tremble I hear in your voice.

The Baba Yaga's coming, better hide he might PP all over you.

[I am Groot]

[LinkSoul60]

3 hours ago, I am Groot said:

If I'm paying for your food, water, shelter, clothing, healthcare, transportation, and other expenses, I think it behooves you to cooperate or pay for those things yourself. We have to put garbage dumps somewhere. We have to put power plants somewhere. We have to put industry somewhere. We have to put ports and pipelines somewhere. For the good fo the nation. 

That's one way to look at it... you owe us so flock you.  The original route is off the table now anyway because of the challenges so looking at a Prince Rupert route.  I doubt jamming it down anyones throat is going to work but if they can make everybody happy and find a proponent good on them. I'm not convinced we need a bitumen pipeline to the north coast but do agree we need more and/or expanded infrastructure for what we have to offer.  

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Is that a tremble I hear in your voice.

The Baba Yaga's coming, better hide he might PP all over you.

I guess he'll find me because I have no idea who Baba Yada is...

[ironstone]

From the Toronto Star:

Rising grocery costs forcing Canadians to cut meals and rely on credit, survey says

 

More Canadians are relying on credit to put food on the table — and sacrificing nutrition in the process — according to a new survey that shows how the strain of Canada’s affordability crisis is increasingly surfacing in grocery aisles.

A new survey from insolvency and debt relief firm Spergel finds that a majority of the 269 Canadians questioned said they had skipped meals or reduced portion sizes in the past six months due to financial pressure. Fifty three per cent of the respondents, who were between the ages of 30 and 60, reported using credit, buy-now-pay-later services, lines of credit or payday loans to purchase groceries in the last six months.

Two in five respondents, 46 per cent of which were from Ontario, said they had delayed paying another bill so they could afford food.

https://archive.ph/Gp4F8#selection-4309.26-4309.109

From the National Post:

Liberals reach 49% voter support and the party's biggest lead in 10 years: Leger poll

https://nationalpost.com/news/liberals-reach-49-voter-support-and-the-partys-biggest-lead-in-10-years-leger-poll

Clearly a lot of Canadians are totally incapable of connecting the dots.

[Goddess]

 

 

[Goddess]

 

 

[Goddess]

CNRL defers oilsands mine expansion, citing regulatory uncertainty | Globalnews.ca

 

Again.  "Regulatory uncertainty."

At a time when the world is demanding oil & natural gas from reliable countries.  Canadian companies don't feel confident moving ahead because of harmful policies from Ottawa.

[eyeball]

28 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Again.  "Regulatory uncertainty."

At a time when the world is demanding oil & natural gas from reliable countries.  Canadian companies don't feel confident moving ahead because of harmful policies from Ottawa.

That's because Canadians don't feel confident with Ottawa's policies - not when so many have proven so harmful.

Like I say, if nothing moves nothing gets hurt.

[LinkSoul60]

42 minutes ago, Goddess said:

CNRL defers oilsands mine expansion, citing regulatory uncertainty | Globalnews.ca

 

Again.  "Regulatory uncertainty."

At a time when the world is demanding oil & natural gas from reliable countries.  Canadian companies don't feel confident moving ahead because of harmful policies from Ottawa.

Pay attention when you read....  the regulatory uncertainty has to do with the MOU and industrial carbon pricing and pathways project your conservative premier signed and was happy about.  The ball is in Edmonton's court now, not Ottawa's.

[ironstone]

13 hours ago, eyeball said:

That's because Canadians don't feel confident with Ottawa's policies - not when so many have proven so harmful.

Like I say, if nothing moves nothing gets hurt.

Another country will fill that void and they'll likely be less environmentally friendly than if it was done in Canada.

Canadians will lose out.

[ExFlyer]

On 3/3/2026 at 3:55 PM, Goddess said:

The Liberals sell virtue.

The NDP sells outrage.

Neither sells growth.

And the conservatives have nothing to sell as they are always losers LOL

[I am Groot]

[ironstone]

Police investigating two more Toronto synagogues damaged by gunfire

These incidents follows another shooting of a Toronto synagogue on Monday

https://archive.ph/bs0ER

B’nai Brith recorded over 5,791 incidents of antisemitism in Canada in 2023, an unprecedented figure. These incidents included vandalism, shootings, and threats across several locations but details on arrests and names were not specified in the reports.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, ironstone said:

Police investigating two more Toronto synagogues damaged by gunfire

These incidents follows another shooting of a Toronto synagogue on Monday

https://archive.ph/bs0ER

B’nai Brith recorded over 5,791 incidents of antisemitism in Canada in 2023, an unprecedented figure. These incidents included vandalism, shootings, and threats across several locations but details on arrests and names were not specified in the reports.

But the Muslims are the real victim here