Charlie Kirk shot!

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

Uh, cuz it would be blatantly unconstitutional?

Democrats through the constitution out the window when they burned down cities, killed CEOs, violently attempted to kick Jews out of universities, attacked ICE, tried to kill a SCOTUS judge, tried to kill Republicans playing baseball, tried to assasinate Trump, tried to make up crimes to prosecute Trump, allowed China to send fake IDs to use in voter fraud, allowed illegal aliens to vote, killed Charlie and the thousands upon thousands of violent acts that go unpublished every year. And it is one sided. Some try to bring up Gifford and the MN reps, but both those shooters were nut jobs, one even thought he was helping Tampon Tim run for senate. 

The violence is one sided. Left wing speakers and comics stand in front of their groups every day with minimal security if any at all. But conservatives have to have significant security and even then, they risk being killed. 

Look at all the pics of Charlie. He and his wife never put pics of their children facing the camera. Why? Because the left is nucking futs. 

But, I would not do extra constitutional acts to get it under control. I would, and most people that think like me would support, prosecuting threats and acts aggressively. That means finding every rioters at every "protest" and putting them on trial and putting everyone, that is guilty, in jail for the maximum allowed by law. 

 

[User]

25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NO ONE is as DISHONEST as the PATHOLOGICAL LIAR Trump, NOR the $800M LIBELER FOS LIES.

Well, you are certainly competing for the biggest liar on this forum. 

[SpankyMcFarland]

I can’t see how Americans are going to escape from political violence. They can protect their politicians better but that comes with its own costs. Unfortunately, we may have to consider how we keep this plague south of the border. 

Edited September 11, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[Chrissy1979]

38 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Why would they care if they want to send a message?

Because if you wanted to create a false flag, the easiest thing to do would be to plant pro-trans rhetoric at the crime scene. You guys are being played so you stop talking about Epstein, which is making certain people very nervous.

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Because if you wanted to create a false flag, the easiest thing to do would be to plant pro-trans rhetoric at the crime scene. You guys are being played so you stop talking about Epstein, which is making certain people very nervous.

Want to play a fun game? Why don't you list all the right wing, false flag events in the last decade?

I'll start. Jessie Smolet. Oops, he was left wing. 

[User]

3 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Because if you wanted to create a false flag, the easiest thing to do would be to plant pro-trans rhetoric at the crime scene. You guys are being played so you stop talking about Epstein, which is making certain people very nervous.

You might as well say it was Bigfoot riding a Unicorn for as much veracity as your claim has. 

You people have no shame. 

[Chrissy1979]

3 minutes ago, User said:

You might as well say it was Bigfoot riding a Unicorn for as much veracity as your claim has. 

You people have no shame. 

But it was fine when you did the same thing for the Minnesota shooting?

[User]

Just now, Chrissy1979 said:

But it was fine when you did the same thing for the Minnesota shooting?

I didn't do the same thing. 

 

 

[CdnFox]

20 minutes ago, User said:

Well, you are certainly competing for the biggest liar on this forum. 

We don't know that. For all we know he could be the size of Urkle. 

Oh wait, i see what you mean now.  Yes. 

[TreeBeard]

23 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

why do you only ban lefty-wing posters?

@boges was “left”?   They seemed really conservative to me.  Seemed to support Ford and the more “progressive” conservative policies.

[BeaverFever]

8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Let me say, I think the guy that asked the question was just there at the wrong time. I don't suggest you watch the video. I did and the guy that was asking the question looked shocked and horrified. So much so, I am relatively confident he had nothing to do with it. 

 

Where can you even find the video?

[Deluge]

3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

It was obviously a pro-gun nut. Just look at his T shirt.

It was a left-wing a$$hole posing as a gun nut. That piece of shit was going all the way. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Because if you wanted to create a false flag, the easiest thing to do would be to plant pro-trans rhetoric at the crime scene. You guys are being played so you stop talking about Epstein, which is making certain people very nervous.

But if they wanted to create a REAL flag it would be even easier to cover their gear in pro trans rhetoric. 

Just like the last shooter did. 

We're not being played at all. We see you for what you are. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Like ATOMIC BOMBS, there are tools more effective and less effective at KILLING. Duh

Guns are the TOOL of CHOICE for the vast majority of mass and long range KILLING HERE.

AR-style rifles kill less people in the US than hammers and bats.

It's positively weird that they're the poster-child for US homicides.

When you think about it:

1. AR's kill less people than almost any other gun and most other murder weapons. Handguns kill 5x as many people as AR's
2. AR's are the main weapon that Americans have which actually offers them 2nd amendment protection from a tyrannical gov't...
3. The AR is the only weapon that the Dems truly hate. If you try to take handguns away from inner-city criminals, the Dems lose their minds. 

Hmmmm....

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, blackbird said:

That is blatantly false.

The U.S. has 120.5 firearms per 100 people.

Canada has 34.7 firearms per 100 people, or about 1/4 the number of firearms compared with the U.S.  

quote below from Estimated number of civilian guns per capita by country - Wikipedia

United States	120.5	Americas	North America	326,474,000	393,347,000	1	1,073,743	392,273,257 Est.	[note 2]
Falkland Islands	62.1	Americas	South America	3,000	2,000	2	1,705	295
Yemen	52.8	Asia	Western Asia	28,120,000	14,859,000	2	N/A	N/A
New Caledonia	42.5	Oceania	Melanesia	270,000	115,000	2	55,000	60,000
Serbia	39.1	Europe	Southern Europe	6,946,000	2,719,000	2	1,186,086	1,532,914
Montenegro	39.1	Europe	Southern Europe	626,000	245,000	3	103,536	141,464
Canada	34.7	Americas	North America	36,626,000	12,708,000	2	2,081,442	10,626,558
Uruguay	34.7	Americas	South America	3,457,000	1,198,000	2	605,313	592,687

And we're going to need a lot more per capita, thanks to the democrats. 

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

It was a left-wing a$$hole posing as a gun nut. That piece of shit was going all the way. 

I doubt he was posing as anything, i suspect he was just wearing a shirt.  He doesn't seem to have intended to be caught. 

But you have to love that they find pro trans crap all over the gun and ammo and left wing ideology as well.... but that means nothing to the left. His shirt looks SLIGHTLY right wing to them and suddenly he's MAGA   

[WestCanMan]

8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Let me say, I think the guy that asked the question was just there at the wrong time. I don't suggest you watch the video. I did and the guy that was asking the question looked shocked and horrified. So much so, I am relatively confident he had nothing to do with it. 

 

Maybe he was shocked and horrified because he knew what was about to happen, and the part he was playing in it. 

If you're talking about after the shooting, anyone would be shocked looking at that. 

I don't know though, I only saw the video of Charlie, not one of the person asking the question. 

Edited September 11, 2025 by WestCanMan

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

AR-style rifles kill less people in the US than hammers and bats.

Guns are the TOOL of CHOICE for the vast majority of mass and long range KILLING HERE.

You're not going to kill many people with a hammer or bat. Esp NOT long range. Duh

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

It's positively weird that they're the poster-child for US homicides.

Did you see how scared LEO was to face the school shooter with an AR in Uvalde, TX

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

When you think about it:

1. AR's kill less people than almost any other gun and most other murder weapons. Handguns kill 5x as many people as AR's
2. AR's are the main weapon that Americans have which actually offers them 2nd amendment protection from a tyrannical gov't...
3. The AR is the only weapon that the Dems truly hate. If you try to take handguns away from inner-city criminals, the Dems lose their minds. 

Hmmmm....

The thing we know that you DO NOT is the much greater lethality of being hit by AR high velocity ammo. 

There was a 60 Minutes segment showing HOW and WHY.

Edited September 11, 2025 by robosmith

[CouchPotato]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Maybe he was shocked and horrified because he knew what was about to happen, and the part he was playing in it. 

If you're talking about after the shooting, anyone would be shocked looking at that. 

I don't know though, I only saw the video of Charlie, not one of the person asking the question. 

The guy who asks the question is totally freaked out by the shot.

[CDN1]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Nope. Hatred of the dismantling of the Constitution BY VIOLENCE at Trump's DIRECTION on Jan 6th.

His PARDONS of HIS GOONS, PROVES they did EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTED.

Anti-White, anti-West, cult of terrorists. 

Edited September 11, 2025 by CDN1

[CouchPotato]

18 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Where can you even find the video?

People keep posting tons of them on X, in spite of people asking them not to out of respect. One video shows a guy cheering while everyone else ducks.

I saw the video of Charlie Kirk getting shot by accident just scrolling on there yesterday. Not a pleasant sight. 

Edited September 11, 2025 by CouchPotato

[User]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Did you see how scared LEO was to face the school shooter with an AR in Uvalde, TX

I am so tired of the complete ignorance and dishonesty people like you spread around like manure. 

Uvdale was far more stupid and complex than this, when the reason Officers was not responding had far more to do with the fact that they were told not to. 

There were officers there that wanted to respond and were forced not to by those in charge. 

Reducing the complete idiocy that happened that day to they were scared of an AR is just ignorant and dishonest. 

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The thing we know that you DO NOT is the much greater lethality of being hit by AR high velocity ammo. 

There was a 60 Minutes segment showing HOW and WHY.

You people are so dumb. 

As if the lethality of being hit with a 12-gauge at close range is somehow better?

 

[BeaverFever]

7 hours ago, CDN1 said:

Gabby Giffords was shot by a schizophrenic. It wasn't political.

Funny, when the shooter potentially has even remotely left-leaning beliefs or is Muslim, their mental illness is irrelevant. Pretty convenient. 
 

Spoiler alert: EVERYONE who decides to assassinate someone over politics is mentally unwell. 
 

7 hours ago, CDN1 said:

Please, no one knew who the hell those two Minnesotan politicians were.

They guy who targeted them sure did, he was a local right wing nutjob. It doesn’t matter that YOU didn’t knew who they were I don’t even understand the point you’re trying to make. 
 

7 hours ago, CDN1 said:

Look at all celebrations online. This killer is a hero to them, just like Luigi.

I haven’t seen any celebrations, certainly not by Democrats or their media personalities. Of course random anonymous people online are going to be awful, conservatives are no different. Again, look at how conservatives responded to the Paul Pelosi attack or Heather Heyer’s death or even when the toddler Alan Kurdi drowned in the Mediterranean. Trolls will be trolls.  The right wing troll army is a lot bigger than the left wing troll army  

7 hours ago, CDN1 said:

Charlie Kirk very well could've become President one day. 

That sounds like quite the exaggeration but whatever  I get that he’s was a prominent apostle 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited September 11, 2025 by BeaverFever

[Deluge]

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I doubt he was posing as anything, i suspect he was just wearing a shirt.  He doesn't seem to have intended to be caught. 

But you have to love that they find pro trans crap all over the gun and ammo and left wing ideology as well.... but that means nothing to the left. His shirt looks SLIGHTLY right wing to them and suddenly he's MAGA   

I don't know. That shirt looks pretty clear - a US flag and an uzi.

Looks to me like an a$$hole leftist who wanted to kill Kirk, AND make MAGA look bad both at the same time. 

[Venandi]

11 minutes ago, User said:

You people are so dumb. 

BUT capitalizing RANDOM words MAKES em look SMARTER.