What is maga

ExFlyer · May 4

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm sure you.....

Will come to realize how much of a loser you are and how deep that loser bucket is...

I can hear your whining echo form the depths of the loser bucket while you are treading in the loss

CdnFox · May 5

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Will come to realize how much of a loser you are and how deep that loser bucket is...

Ahhh you've reached the "Spending time having wierd fantasies about me" stage of your meltdown are you ? Well it's to be expected.. At least you haven't hit the ass porn phase.

myata · May 5

This is what comes obvious: maga and its sore converts are dumb, hopelessly and desperately. That one quality defines it, and them fully and completely. The only concept they can grasp (one and only) is "we rule" and "we do it by forcing everyone else obey and then worship us". Swearing, obscenities, personal attacks all has immediate and obvious explanation: having failed to explain and sell one, the only premise they understand they resort to uncontrolled, destructive rage. Like an ape, etc you name it.

Maga has no place in democracy. It's an antithesis and adversary of it. Grown up democracies must see it for what it is and develop effective defenses against it.

eyeball · May 5

1 hour ago, myata said:

Maga has no place in democracy. It's an antithesis and adversary of it. Grown up democracies must see it for what it is and develop effective defenses against it.

MAGA traces its roots to the disaffected Democrat voters that followed George Wallace and his American Independent Party which went nowhere but did split the vote and ensured Republicans won.

Wallace's supporters went on to follow a couple other dingbats like Ross Perot, eventually morphed into the Tea Party and finally started washing up on Republican shores like a migrant of some sort that finally took over the joint.

myata · May 5

42 minutes ago, eyeball said:

MAGA traces its roots to the disaffected Democrat

Whatever the origin, you're making a good point on the limitations of this grossly outdated and inadequate in this age binary political system. When some people are bored to death with the default, only and forever choices they are driven to experiment with increasingly crazy ones, and all the way to maga.

In a sane political system, they would just create their own political stream. If it reflected the views and priorities of a layer, fraction of the society they would gain representation and attempt to implement their plans and projects in the full view of the society. If not, it would wither out. Instead, it breeds in the shadows then attacks and takes over one of the default players with catastrophic consequences for the society (Brexit, U.S.)

ExFlyer · May 5

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Ahhh you've reached the ".

Pinnacle of the winner podium and you, well ,there is not spot on the podium for losers...like you LOL

ExFlyer · May 5

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Ahhh you've reached the "Spending time having wierd fantasies about me"

I do not need to have any fantasies...you prove how weird and how much a sore loser you are every time you post.

image.jpeg.102043931c64e4a75bfbec70ed9ef83f.jpeg

betsy · May 5

On 5/3/2025 at 2:47 PM, myata said:

To put it simply and succinctly, maga is a political technology of principle-less antidemocratic populism that combines fascist-style massive propaganda with modern channels of spreading the message into the population. It works as this:

- Appoint an unconditional diabolical and hellish adversary, then the enemy. There's nothing good about them and no understanding and/or compromises are possible

- Fan out hatred and raise the temperature by drumming half-lies, groundless allegations and far-reaching allusions

- Avoid and denounce any notion of responsibility, or relation to the reality

- Use massive financing of private capital to amplify and spread the message

- Promise instant solutions and miracles without any regard for the reality

This is maga and it always works the same, trying to undermine and destroy an imperfect but functioning democracy without offering any positive and feasible ideas and ways to improve it. Maga is about destruction and power, power and destruction only and it has no other intent and doesn't understand any other purposes of democratic politics.

Maga can try to blend into democratic political process but it's not a part of democracy and in fact, anti-democracy.

Maga is a real, present and factual threat to democracies. They need to develop means and instruments to defend themselves against maga. Not in the least in these domains:

- Veracity and objectivity of political news. Tight control of foreign ownership. Responsibility for spreading biased false messages.

- Strong and immediate prevention of anti-democratic authoritarian tactics and practices, such as threats, intimidation, vandalism, public messages of hate with responsibility up to the level of the party if its leadership fails to denounce and restrict such practices.

- Illegal practices, conspiracies to undermine democracy should carry heavy sanctions including fines, prohibition to take public office, etc.

This is a socialist propaganda.

Desperately trying to demonize maga.

Nothing disimilar with how the socialist element in our society had tried to demonize the FREEDOM CONVOY!

Convoy money didn't come from 'foreign actors,' CSIS told officials during protest

CSIS director's account of extremists was at odds with government's rationale for triggering Emergencies Act

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/convoy-protest-money-csis-1.6621944

Edited May 5 by betsy

Chrissy1979 · May 5

MAGA is the anti-Christ. Those who follow worship Satan (ie Trump).

User · May 5

LOL, great. The same folks who refuse to define what a woman is in any meaningful way, so that they can protect dudes who think they are women... are now going to try to define what MAGA is?

Moonbox · May 5

11 minutes ago, User said:

The same folks who refuse to define what a woman is in any meaningful way

Who's talking about defining women here? LOL!

You're proving our point. 🫠

myata · May 5

57 minutes ago, betsy said:

This is a socialist propaganda.

Desperately trying to demonize maga.

There's nothing to comment here: 0.00% thought and meaning. Either whatever we do is right and perfect or someone is trying to demonize us. Can't be proven wrong ever and in principle.

QED: maga.

User · May 5

7 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Who's talking about defining women here? LOL!

You're proving our point. 🫠

I was making a point about the stupidity of folks like you trying to define MAGA when you refuse to define woman in any meaningful way.

What exactly is the point you are trying to prove here?

User · May 5

On 5/3/2025 at 5:53 PM, Moonbox said:

Just some combination of dumb/misinformed/uninformed/deluded.

Was this your big point here?

Just more of the same old childish name-calling.

Moonbox · May 5

2 minutes ago, User said:

I was making a point about the stupidity of folks like you trying to define MAGA when you refuse to define woman in any meaningful way.

That's what you think you're doing, but it would probably break your brain to consider that a lot of so-con/RINO style conservatives or softer democrats etc would agree that a biological woman is a woman, and that Trans-women aren't the same nor should they be considered the same.

As out-of-touch and contemptible as runaway social justice had become, it pales in comparison to the hysterical overreactions of the MAGA culture-war circus. Where a trans person poops is not the existential crisis of our time that you would have us believe.

betsy · May 5

39 minutes ago, myata said:

There's nothing to comment here: 0.00% thought and meaning. Either whatever we do is right and perfect or someone is trying to demonize us. Can't be proven wrong ever and in principle.

QED: maga.

So....you agree. It's a demonization.

myata · May 5

What one is supposed to say in these cases? I'm lost. OK. If in some distorted version of this world "presenting factual and logical arguments" means "demonization" I hope I was able to offer a strong and convincing demonization without major factual and/or logical flaws.

User · May 5

22 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

That's what you think you're doing, but it would probably break your brain to consider that a lot of so-con/RINO style conservatives or softer democrats etc would agree that a biological woman is a woman, and that Trans-women aren't the same nor should they be considered the same.

As out-of-touch and contemptible as runaway social justice had become, it pales in comparison to the hysterical overreactions of the MAGA culture-war circus. Where a trans person poops is not the existential crisis of our time that you would have us believe.

No, that is precisely what I was doing.

"would agree that a biological woman is a woman"

What next... is a cat a cat and a dog a dog? You just used the term to say it was the term.

Where a trans person poops is only an issue because folks like you pushed it on us to make it one. This is the classic dishonest argument folks like you make. You don't care about pushing this crap, but when we oppose it then that is the issue.

User · May 5

14 minutes ago, myata said:

What one is supposed to say in these cases? I'm lost. OK. If in some distorted version of this world "presenting factual and logical arguments" means "demonization" I hope I was able to offer a strong and convincing demonization without major factual and/or logical flaws.

All you did here was assert a long list of your unhinged, baseless opinions.

Nationalist · May 5

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

Who's talking about defining women here? LOL!

You're proving our point. 🫠

Quite frankly...none of you really have a point.

You have a lot of accusations and made-up chickenshit designed to shock and scare the mindless. But a real and honest point? No.

But hey...if your happy acting like that mush-brain @myata...then I'm happy for you.

WestCanMan · May 5

2 hours ago, myata said:

There's nothing to comment here: 0.00% thought and meaning. Either whatever we do is right and perfect or someone is trying to demonize us. Can't be proven wrong ever and in principle.

QED: maga.

So you'll quote Betsy, and go back at her, but no one else lol.

You're such a gutless little low-IQ weasel.

myata · May 5

Maga operates by assigning hate tags. Hate word + name. That's all, the only information it carries and passes. Hate them worship him. And this is why it's impossible to have any meaningful discussion with it. Take it out far and safe away from your home. Don't hesitate don't delay it or you will regret. Some do right now.

Moonbox · May 5

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

You have a lot of accusations and made-up chickenshit designed to shock and scare the mindless. But a real and honest point? No.

A real and honest point is that Donald Trump lost in 2021, and you never even managed to admit that. 🤡

User · May 5

2 minutes ago, myata said:

Maga operates by assigning hate tags. Hate word + name. That's all, the only information it carries and passes. Hate them worship him. And this is why it's impossible to have any meaningful discussion with it. Take it out far and safe away from your home. Don't hesitate don't delay it or you will regret. Some do right now.

This entire thread was an effort on your part to assign hateful things to MAGA and anyone associated with the use of that political / campaign slogan.

Moonbox · May 5

12 minutes ago, User said:

This entire thread was an effort on your part to assign hateful things to MAGA and anyone associated with the use of that political / campaign slogan.

Well you voted for a guy who campaigned against the fictional kidnapping and barbequing of family pets, so at a certain point you have to "call it like it is".

Stupid.