Will Carney and the Liberals now reverse course of Canada?

[blackbird]

The question now is will Carney and the Liberals reverse their grotesque Marxist policies brought in by Trudeau and Guilbeault such as the anti Alberta, anti oil and gas sector laws, no more pipeline legislation (C69)?  Will they reverse their soft-on-crime, catch and release legislation and stop the mayhem in the streets caused by dangerous offenders?   Will they reverse their Marxist no more gas vehicles by 2035 legislation?  The economy and cost of living are still major issues.  If Liberals don't reverse course there could be a serious threat to the continued existence of Canada as one nation.   It's all in Carney's hands now.  He should realize many Canadians supported the "stop the carbon tax" movement and oppose the Marxist agenda of the Liberals and the only reason Carney was elected was because of the threats from Trump.  Conservatives were 10 to 20% ahead in the polls until Trump began his threats and Carney replaced Trudeau.  Is that the only thing supporting Carney now?  He better start thinking about the failed Liberal laws and policies.  The love of hockey and fear of Trump may not be enough to ensure Canada's future.

Edited Tuesday at 10:59 AM by blackbird

[betsy]

2 minutes ago, blackbird said:

The question now is will Carney and the Liberals reverse their grotesque Marxist policies brought in by Trudeau and Guilbeault such as the anti Alberta, anti oil and gas sector laws, no more pipeline legislation (C69)?  Will they reverse their soft-on-crime, catch and release legislation and stop the mayhem in the streets caused by dangerous offenders?   Will they reverse their Marxist no more gas vehicles by 2035 legislation?  The economy and cost of living are still major issues.  If Liberals don't reverse course there could be a serious threat to the continued existence of Canada as one nation.   It's all in Carney's hands now.  He should realize many Canadians supported the "stop the carbon tax" movement and oppose the Marxist agenda of the Liberals and the only reason Carney was elected was because of the threats from Trump.  Conservatives were 10 to 20% ahead in the polls until Trump began his threats and Carney replaced Trudeau.  Is that the only thing supporting Carney now?  He better start thinking about the failed Liberal laws and policies.

 

It's a minority government.   All parties saw what happened to the NDP for having propped up Trudeau.   Other parties will hold a tight rein on Carney, should he try to go down that path again.

 

[Michael Hardner]

2 hours ago, blackbird said:

   Will they reverse their Marxist no more gas vehicles by 2035 legislation?  

If you can point to which part of Dad Kapital Marx wrote about converting to electric vehicles? 

I'm really hoping that all the parties change, to become more collaborative. I don't see the Liberals going back to the moralism that help bring Trudeau down and I hope Conservatives can return to the pragmatic functionalism that has marked every great conservative PM that we have had. 

 

I don't know if Carney is going to be able to weather the political economic storm that's coming, but even if he's out in one year he can do a lot for the country by bringing up the level of dialogue between the factions.

[ExFlyer]

Oh Blackturd, suck it up..you lost LOL

Calling names will get you nowhere.

One thing for sure, the majortity of Canadians realize Carney and the Libs are better suited to fight Trump and make Canada independent of our southern neighbours..

His obsession with Trudeau made Canadians realize he is a one trick pony

PP even lost hos own seat...that he held for 20 years. . His own constituents realized he is incapable of leading LOL

You have 4 to 5 years to be bitter...it is going to be fun watching you squirm LOL

[Politics1990]

he will do better then trudeau did but he will probs only be there for 4 years i would say

[Moonlight Graham]

16 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

If you can point to which part of Dad Kapital Marx wrote about converting to electric vehicles? 

It's in the back somewhere.

[blackbird]

We will see whether Carney and the Liberals reverse the previous ten years of Liberals blocking resource development and preventing Canada from achieving its full potential.  It often takes 15 years for a resource project to be approved.  The energy industry is crucial to the prosperity of Canada.  We need pipelines to do that.   

Forcing Canadians to buy EVs instead of gas vehicles is wrong for many reasons, one being it is a form of authoritarianism or Marxism.  The idea that government knows best instead of the people and private industry is Orwellian.  We don't need that.  It could be a harbinger of coming authoritarian control of what people say on social media or speak in society as well.

Edited Tuesday at 02:40 PM by blackbird

[TreeBeard]

2 minutes ago, blackbird said:

blocking resource development

Canada digs more oil under the Liberals than at any point in Canadian history.  

[Boges]

If the CPC can't get behind policies that help diversify Canadian investment then they're in opposition with the desire of Canadians. 

The goal here is to weather and protect ourselves against an erratic POTUS that seems more inclined to watch the world descend into chaos than unite anyone. 

In his short time as PM, Carney seems to be handling this issue with confidence and poise. That's why his party got my vote. 

[CdnFox]

19 minutes ago, Boges said:

If the CPC can't get behind policies that help diversify Canadian investment then they're in opposition with the desire of Canadians. 

The goal here is to weather and protect ourselves against an erratic POTUS that seems more inclined to watch the world descend into chaos than unite anyone. 

In his short time as PM, Carney seems to be handling this issue with confidence and poise. That's why his party got my vote. 

I'm not sure the liberals are going to put forward a lot of those policies

They're already talking about NetZero, how every business is going to have to have a carbon  plan built into their investments and be accountable, I doubt we are going to see a single pipeline get started and they're not going to be able to deliver their green Energy Corridor and it won't be the conservatives that hold them back from all of that

 

[blackbird]

1 hour ago, Boges said:

If the CPC can't get behind policies that help diversify Canadian investment then they're in opposition with the desire of Canadians. 

The goal here is to weather and protect ourselves against an erratic POTUS that seems more inclined to watch the world descend into chaos than unite anyone. 

In his short time as PM, Carney seems to be handling this issue with confidence and poise. That's why his party got my vote. 

You have things backwards.  It is the Liberals who blocked pipeline projects, blocked the export of natural gas to Europe and other places, delayed resource development, and put taxes and excessive regulations on industry and business.  If you want the economy to really grow, you voted for the wrong party.

[blackbird]

1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

Canada digs more oil under the Liberals than at any point in Canadian history.  

If that is true, tell us why the Liberals killed the Energy East pipeline and the Northern Gateway Pipelines projects and brought in the no more pipeline law, C69? Also banned tankers on the BC north coast and put net zero caps on the energy industry as well as carbon taxes.

[WestCanMan]

The Liberal MP's would have to be pretty spineless, useless flunkies if just changing one a-hole is going to change all of their minds. 

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, blackbird said:

The question now is will Carney and the Liberals reverse their grotesque Marxist policies brought in by Trudeau and Guilbeault such as the anti Alberta, anti oil and gas sector laws, no more pipeline legislation (C69)?  

The Bloc have a stranglehold on Carney's ability to do anything. 

Get ready for a new Quebec Appeasement Era.

[TreeBeard]

42 minutes ago, blackbird said:

If that is true, tell us why the Liberals killed the Energy East pipeline and the Northern Gateway Pipelines projects and brought in the no more pipeline law, C69? Also banned tankers on the BC north coast and put net zero caps on the energy industry as well as carbon taxes.

It is true.  We are digging more oil than ever.  I have shown you this before.   Those projects were either not economically viable or were not politically viable.  

The Liberal government has been great for oil production though. 

 

 

[eyeball]

28 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The Bloc have a stranglehold on Carney's ability to do anything. 

Get ready for a new Quebec Appeasement Era.

Why?   Lib/NDP = 175   Con/Bloc = 167

It'll be the NDP sharing the driver's seat not the Bloc. The Bloc would produce a more unstable coalition by far.

[TreeBeard]

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Why?   Lib/NDP = 175   Con/Bloc = 167

It'll be the NDP sharing the driver's seat not the Bloc. The Bloc would produce a more unstable coalition by far.

That poster has some issues with math. 

[eyeball]

1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

That poster has some issues with math. 

He must think the Bloc get first dibs at sharing power because they won more seats than the NDP.

No doubt Blanchette feels the same way.

[Boges]

1 hour ago, blackbird said:

You have things backwards.  It is the Liberals who blocked pipeline projects, blocked the export of natural gas to Europe and other places, delayed resource development, and put taxes and excessive regulations on industry and business.  If you want the economy to really grow, you voted for the wrong party.

Carney is a different leader than JT. He's a strong economic mind. I trust his insights over PP's the now private citizen whom leads the CPC. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

The Bloc have a stranglehold on Carney's ability to do anything. 

Get ready for a new Quebec Appeasement Era.

It looks like the NDP actually is going to hold the balance of power.

37 minutes ago, Boges said:

Carney is a different leader than JT. He's a strong economic mind. I trust his insights over PP's the now private citizen whom leads the CPC. 

None of that is true kiddo. Carney is absolutely identical to Justin Trudeau the two of them have been working very closely for the last 5 years. Why you might get a little bit of a different spin here and there is going to be the same thing with the same results.

[blackbird]

1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

The Liberal government has been great for oil production though. 

Except you forgot almost all of the oil goes to the U.S. and they blocked new pipelines so we could not increase shipping oil overseas with the exception of a limited amount through the Trans Mountain Pipeline.  Eastern Canada imports oil from other countries.

Edited Tuesday at 06:16 PM by blackbird

[blackbird]

50 minutes ago, Boges said:

Carney is a different leader than JT. He's a strong economic mind. I trust his insights over PP's the now private citizen whom leads the CPC. 

Dumb comment.  PP lost his seat but that has nothing to do with it.  He still did a fantastic job.

[Boges]

1 minute ago, blackbird said:

Dumb comment.  PP lost his seat but that has nothing to do with it.  He still did a fantastic job.

Bro blew a massive lead. It could be considered one of the biggest political collapses in Canadian history. 

At least he has his pension to fall back on. 

[TreeBeard]

46 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Except you forgot almost all of the oil goes to the U.S. and they blocked new pipelines so we could not increase shipping oil overseas with the exception of a limited amount through the Trans Mountain Pipeline.  Eastern Canada imports oil from other countries.

Largest profits in the history of the oil sands is happening under the Liberals. 

[WestCanMan]

54 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It looks like the NDP actually is going to hold the balance of power.

🤣

OMG, it's not very often that you get a redo like that, based on such slim chances. 

What do they have? 7 seats? And they've got that much power? It's almost unheard of. 

But TBH, in this instance the Bloc and NDP can both play the role of sycophant, so both parties have their influence lessened somewhat.