Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Trump needs money to pay off the debts caused by unnecessary wasteful wars, so he should stop extorting other countries and sell off assets like Alaska to the Russians or California to the Jews.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Gaétan said:

Trump needs money to pay off the debts caused by unnecessary wasteful wars, so he should stop extorting other countries and sell off assets like Alaska to the Russians or California to the Jews.

LOL...interesting thought...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
23 hours ago, Nationalist said:

He has harsh words for Alberta. Oh the shame...

Beave...Albertans could give a rat's a55 what Libbies like you think. They're obviously tired of being mugged by

Ontario and Quebec.

Perhaps it's time Alberta...and Saskatchewan...we're treated equally and with some respect?

Seems Flames fans don't agree with your assessment.

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/canadian-hockey-fans-boo-us-national-anthem-calgary-ottawa

Posted (edited)

2023 USD in the table below.

TradeWars.thumb.jpg.1d8adf17ea0e86acc2b441148926358b.jpg

I did a quick spreadsheet to illustrate the power the US economy has. The 25% tariff the US is placing on Canada and Mexico effects 21% and 25% of their economies respectively. The 25% tariff that each has placed on the US only effects 2% or less of the US economy.

So, while up to 2% of the US economy will slow, Canada and Mexico will see significant slow downs in their economy. It is only a matter of time before they must relent. And it isn't hard. Do better at stopping fentanyl and terrorists and this is all over. All they have to do is enforce their own laws. That's it. It shouldn't be a big deal.

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

So, while up to 2% of the US economy will slow, Canada and Mexico will see significant slow downs in their economy. It is only a matter of time before they must relent. And it isn't hard. Do better at stopping fentanyl and terrorists and this is all over. All they have to do is enforce their own laws. That's it. It shouldn't be a big deal.

Shut the f*ck up, no one is buying your nonsense propaganda.

 

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Shut the f*ck up, no one is buying your nonsense propaganda.

 

Ah, rule #2. Got it.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

The U S. incapable of policing its own border? Hardly. It's a fake excuse that only fools the very stupidest Trumpers (see above). For everyone else, Trump has been clear it's about destroying our economy so he can annex us for our resources. Any Canadian who tries to argue otherwise is a fool or a traitor or both 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

No one knows what you're blabbering about with this new dumb bit dipshit.

You don't understand Rule #2? Hayzeus man you need to watch more CNN and not Fox. Fox is way to far left.

Posted
On 2/2/2025 at 12:00 AM, BeaverFever said:

I wonder if it would have been more strategic if Canada had announced all the tariffs for take effect in 3 weeks instead of the small amount starting this coming week . 

The Orange Baboon has a simple mind and responds to simple things.  There's no reason whatsoever to slow-roll anything with him.  Phasing the tariffs in gives him an off-ramp (and I'm sure Canadian leaders would be willing to massage his ego if he asked) but also sends the signal that we're not playing games. 

Canada has way more leverage than this clown pretends.  There's no doubt that the Canada depends on the US less than the other way around for trade, or that they can make Canada "lose" a trade war, but there's no winning for them either, and we can make it very painful.  We're still their biggest export market.  We can still deny them ~$100B a year on patent royalty payments we're not required to honor sans trade deal. We can impose export taxes on the things the US can't replace cheaply like oil, aluminum etc, and send them to competing markets instead.   

The MAGA donkeys laugh at our threats and the disparity in economic power, but it belies a comical misunderstanding how economics work.  It's cutting off the nose to spite the face.   

 

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
44 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Shut the f*ck up, no one is buying your nonsense propaganda.

 

Is it propaganda if it is true?

Quote

Mexico reaches deal with Trump to suspend US tariffs for a month

Sheinbaum posted on X that she and Trump had had a “good conversation.” The two leaders agreed Mexico would immediately reinforce its northern border with 10,000 members of the country’s National Guard to prevent the flow of illegal drugs, Sheinbaum said, while the US would work to prevent the movement of high-powered weapons to Mexico.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/mexico-reaches-deal-trump-suspend-160749120.html

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Democrats right now:

 

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Reading that Donnie and his allies are accusing USAID of being a money laundering operation. 

While I agree they need drastic reform, stop funding the homosexual parades in Toronto and need to stop using it as a front of a soft coup, THIS IS NOT CANADA'S FAULT. 

Honestly we in Canada are getting destroyed by fentynal coming from the US. Secure your damn border, Donnie. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, West said:

Reading that Donnie and his allies are accusing USAID of being a money laundering operation. 

While I agree they need drastic reform, stop funding the homosexual parades in Toronto and need to stop using it as a front of a soft coup, THIS IS NOT CANADA'S FAULT. 

Honestly we in Canada are getting destroyed by fentynal coming from the US. Secure your damn border, Donnie. 

Why would fentanyl be smuggled over the border when it is decriminalized in Canada?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Why would fentanyl be smuggled over the border when it is decriminalized in Canada?

Decriminalized is different than "legal". You'll still get arrested for dealing fentynal, just not if you are using. 

There are issues that I've alluded to earlier with the Canadian approach including emotional blackmail and hateful rhetoric from politicians (NIMBY, racist, etc) when you raise concerns about what it's doing to our communities (it's really bad). But I don't think "Canada" is solely to blame for the issue and the US needs to look themselves in the mirror on allowing the issue to harm surrounding countries 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

What does that have to do with Canada, dumbf*ck?

Rule #2

It has to do with Mexico, which was listed in my post.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Then why has Trump's main justification for the tariffs been to stop the flow of illegal fentanyl? And it is to this "national emergency" he says he is reacting.

 

That should be obvious even to you. He did campaign on secure borders stopping illegals and stopping drug flow. He did not campaign on a trade war with their closest neighbor and ally. Trump supporters are all worked up about stopping the porous border to the south and will support actions to secure the border to the north. But nobody was claiming or riled up about Canada somehow taking advantage of the united states.

Also he's trying to suggest this is some sort of emergency rather than something that would have to go through congress. An automotive trade that has been in place for the better part of 60 years is not an emergency. Tensional killing people might be considered one.

Don't ask questions you should already know the answer to

 

 

Quote

I find your excusing and justifying his lies so he can bully Canada reprehensible.

That's because you're a retarded inbred leftist  without the ability to think for yourself. A normal person whose parents weren't related would have noticed that I didn't excuse or justify anything. I simply stated facts I understand that for you on the left facts are like a combination of kryptonite and bug repellent. But unfortunately facts don't care about your feelings.

I have been clear that I think that not only is his trade war with us a mistake but that his approach to tariffs in general is a huge mistake. I have said this is not going to end the way he thinks it's going to. And I have pointed out how this will very possibly lead to him being impeached and thrown out of power.

But you think I've excusing him. I've met labradoodles that are smarter than you.

Reading through the rest of your post you really don't understand what you're even talking about or what the reality is here. The only thing you said that was correct is it's going to be very bad for his people as well as us which is something I've already said a dozen times over.

Go back to playing with your Lego kiddo, the adults are talking

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Silence yankee scum.

Oooh...a combo of #2 and #6. Very sophisticated.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
4 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

I could give a rats ass what RWNJs like Smith thinks.  They are treated with respect their politicians are just radical , they’ve replaced Quebec as the new problem child of Confederation 

Except they actually have a reason for their gripes.

Again, and I noticed you've never addressed this, you can't treat someone that crappy for that long and expect them to turn around and sacrifice more to help you.

If they are a problem child they're one that Trudeau created by beating and molesting them regularly. And now that they're fighting back people like you are shocked that they don't want to be abused anymore.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Oooh...a combo of #2 and #6. Very sophisticated.

Sorry I'm not familiar with whatever retarded memes you apes are communicating with each other through these days.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Sorry I'm not familiar with whatever retarded memes you apes are communicating with each other through these days.

it was right in his post. 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If all else fails, just be angry.

So that retarded language you mentioned that you can't understand and aren't familiar with would be english. And yeah, we know. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
20 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Sorry I'm not familiar with whatever retarded memes you apes are communicating with each other through these days.

You can't call me an ape. That's racist. Still using rules for liberal tactics #2. Just read the sig line. I put it there for easy reference. If you want, I can meme it for you. Would that make it easier?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

You can't call me an ape. That's racist.

You're white.

Quote

Still using rules for liberal tactics #2. Just read the sig line. I put it there for easy reference. If you want, I can meme it for you. Would that make it easier?

Nah, I don't care about your dumb list, scumbag.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...