Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Are we just going to ignore the fact that the Alpha isn't going to vote for someone to lead Him?

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
59 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Do normal Americans want to crash the economy and create a fascist police state where undesirables are rounded up by a engorged state security apparatus as Trump is promising to do?

Normal Americans understand that men can't be woman just because they say they are. 

That aside, we already had a Trump presidency, none of that happened and that is not what he is promising. 

Not that I would expect someone who can't even be honest about what makes a man a man to be honest enough about any of this. 

 

 

Posted
40 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Missed?

Have you seen the predictions?

I've seen ^your IGNORANT belief that "predictions" are infallible. Except when it comes to climate change. LMAO

The thing is, physics is much more predictable than HUMAN decisions, yet your IGNORANCE causes you to believe the OPPOSITE. 

Meanwhile Harris/Walz is leading substantially in favorability. 

image.thumb.png.87120bd66889dcc1a6c577640640d2d0.png

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Oh, I'm sure it's been great for the democrats, as you inflation sluts are wired for abuse. But normal Americans want the hair sniffer and his useless VP to just go away. 

To you the MAGA CULT is "normal Americans," when you guys are the biggest whack jobs around. LMAO 

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

1. No, that's what democrats want. It's why they're cool with a massive work skills deficit and ongoing inflation. 

You're so ignorant you STILL don't know that inflation is well under 3% because FOS LIES won't tell you the truth.

Posted
9 minutes ago, User said:

Not that I would expect someone who can't even be honest about what makes a man a man to be honest enough about any of this. 

I find a lot of gender ideas new and old to be ill conceived, but seldom dishonest.

But I agree with your logic that the more dishonest a politician is, the less I trust them with government policy making. I'm still a registered republican and I wonder if Republicans will ever return to a situation where they can frame their policy ideas from a place of facts and honesty rather than deliberate disinformation tactics and dishonest sloganeering.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I've seen ^your IGNORANT belief that "predictions" are infallible. Except when it comes to climate change. LMAO

The thing is, physics is much more predictable than HUMAN decisions, yet your IGNORANCE causes you to believe the OPPOSITE. 

Meanwhile Harris/Walz is leading substantially in favorability. 

image.thumb.png.87120bd66889dcc1a6c577640640d2d0.png

"As of 3 p.m. Eastern on Oct. 18, our model gives Trump a 52-in-100 chance of winning the majority of Electoral College votes. The model gives Harris a 48-in-100 chance"

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/?origin=serp_auto

Enjoy the election.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

1. To you the MAGA CULT is "normal Americans," when you guys are the biggest whack jobs around. LMAO 

2. You're so ignorant you STILL don't know that inflation is well under 3% because FOS LIES won't tell you the truth.

1. There's only one cult in this country and it's the democrat party. 

2. And you're such a pain slut that you actually buy into that 3% bullshit. Go find a rabid wokejob forum and get your gimp on over there. ;) 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"As of 3 p.m. Eastern on Oct. 18, our model gives Trump a 52-in-100 chance of winning the majority of Electoral College votes. The model gives Harris a 48-in-100 chance"

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/?origin=serp_auto

Enjoy the election.

Coin flip.

6 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. There's only one cult in this country and it's the democrat party. 

Yeah, cult leaders don't ever get switched. Duh

6 minutes ago, Deluge said:

2. And you're such a pain slut that you actually buy into that 3% bullshit. Go find a rabid wokejob forum and get your gimp on over there. ;) 

You're in denial, like all of the MAGA CULT.

Posted (edited)

Jesus said "But whoso shall cause one of these little ones who believe in Me to fall, it were better for him that a millstone were hung about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

Certainly wouldn't be in favor of Kamala's pro abortion position of children with Down Syndrome that's for sure. 

It's also a heresy to believe in abortion because you would be denying Jesus' humanity while in the womb and the immaculate conception is a core Christian belief

Edited by West
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're so ignorant you STILL don't know that inflation is well under 3% because FOS LIES won't tell you the truth.

You do know that doesn't mean prices have come down right? They just aren't going up as fast as they were.

Edited by Fluffypants
Posted
29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Coin flip.

With a 2-headed coin.

She's crashing and it's visible.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

I've seen ^your IGNORANT belief that "predictions" are infallible. Except when it comes to climate change. LMAO

The thing is, physics is much more predictable than HUMAN decisions, yet your IGNORANCE causes you to believe the OPPOSITE. 

Meanwhile Harris/Walz is leading substantially in favorability. 

image.thumb.png.87120bd66889dcc1a6c577640640d2d0.png

Bullshit:

Screenshot_20241022_164953_Firefox.thumb.jpg.369bc42af7e43f51bb53f6d7ad2c588e.jpg

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/kamala-harris/

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
4 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Many of us have read the New Testament, and I think it is fair to say that Jesus Christ would never vote for Trump.  Jesus cared about the sick, the poor, and the vulnerable. Jesus also preached forgiveness, and loving thy neighbour.

All of which are foreign to trump. Harris is certainly not perfect, but if Jesus was resurrected, he would guide his followers to vote Democratic..

Someone's off the sauce today 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You realize that's not a favorability comparison, right? 

Eh, scratch that, of course you don't. 

You can use the same link, but look at the right data.

image.thumb.png.2ebbeacc59fbfa42f92e05cd40f7ab3e.png

 

image.thumb.png.d6e83c6585bca6550c29a7d80758e6cf.png

 

 

And she is listed as unfavorable. You made my point.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
9 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You realize that's not a favorability comparison, right? 

Eh, scratch that, of course you don't. 

You can use the same link, but look at the right data.

image.thumb.png.2ebbeacc59fbfa42f92e05cd40f7ab3e.png

 

image.thumb.png.d6e83c6585bca6550c29a7d80758e6cf.png

 

 

Those graphs look like the sound waves coming out of Kamala's head when she bumps into a door.

The ringing would put shame to Big Ben.

Posted
25 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

And she is listed as unfavorable. You made my point.

No, you are lying. And you know it. 

Robosmith claimed:  "Meanwhile Harris/Walz is leading substantially in favorability," alongside a graphic supporting that claim.

You claimed "Bullshit" and proceeded to post a graphic that did not support your claim, and posted a link to a site that directly contradicts your claim. 

She is viewed much more favorably than Trump. She is leading in favorability. You were wrong about something basic. You're just not honest enough to have a mea culpa.  

Posted
58 minutes ago, Hodad said:

No, you are lying. And you know it. 

Robosmith claimed:  "Meanwhile Harris/Walz is leading substantially in favorability," alongside a graphic supporting that claim.

You claimed "Bullshit" and proceeded to post a graphic that did not support your claim, and posted a link to a site that directly contradicts your claim. 

She is viewed much more favorably than Trump. She is leading in favorability. You were wrong about something basic. You're just not honest enough to have a mea culpa.  

His lie was that she's above water. She's not.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
27 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

His lie was that she's above water. She's not.

It's not, and you know it. And everyone else knows it. Jeebus, dude, it's just a few posts up. We can all see it.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hodad said:

It's not, and you know it. And everyone else knows it. Jeebus, dude, it's just a few posts up. We can all see it.

You literally posted that she isn't.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

You literally posted that she isn't.

False. She is viewed much more favorably than Trump. Even ACTUALLY favorable at times. But clearly you can see that she is leading in favorability ratings. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Hodad said:

False. She is viewed much more favorably than Trump. Even ACTUALLY favorable at times. But clearly you can see that she is leading in favorability ratings. 

That's not what underwater means. Underwater is a term used to describe polls that rank unfavorable higher than favorable for an individual politician, political party, organization or movement.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Many of us have read the New Testament, and I think it is fair to say that Jesus Christ would never vote for Trump.  Jesus cared about the sick, the poor, and the vulnerable. Jesus also preached forgiveness, and loving thy neighbour.

All of which are foreign to trump. Harris is certainly not perfect, but if Jesus was resurrected, he would guide his followers to vote Democratic..

that is comfortably the most desperate argument we've seen so far from the left :) 

Honestly I thought you were going to go with space aliens but claiming the endorsement of a major deity is definitely in the same class  :) 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
6 hours ago, Rebound said:

The Biden Administration has delivered a remarkable economic recovery

The Biden administration ended the covid lockdowns.

Then they destroyed the economy with record-level inflation. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...