Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Nah I can't recall which thread it is, but it was something along the lines of "the social roles, behaviours and expectations associated with adult females" and you were like "noooo not good enough!!!!"

Oh, that is your definition? 

Yeah, of course I am going to point out that you just defined what a woman is by how a woman behaves. That is a meaningless circular definition. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, herbie said:

Of course they don't. Doubling down is all they know even when it makes you look even more foolish.
As is their truly deviant minds that can only think in sexual terms so Grampa kissing the grandkids, politicians kissing babies is perversion. Bathrooms are sexual. Tampons are sexual. They'd like toilet paper to come only in pink or blue. Even goddam M&Ms have sexual connotations to them.

Congratulations!

This post has earned you The Groovy Guy of the Day award.

What stupidity. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
6 minutes ago, User said:

Oh, that is your definition? 

Yeah, of course I am going to point out that you just defined what a woman is by how a woman behaves. That is a meaningless circular definition. 

It's not anymore than saying a lawyer is someone who practice law would be.

The simple fact you were blathering about women who dress and look like men shows that somewhere in the recesses of your lizard brain that you understand how gender is socially constructed and how one conforms to that social construct determines the extent to which they are considered a woman by others, but it just hasn't bubbled to the surface yet. too complicated I guess.

Posted
1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

Normal people think Vance is creepy. People who are in the cult think a respected teacher and military veteran is creepy.

Which tend to support the notion that only oddballs and broken people are for Trump.

Nah. That's not a reason. That's lie/unsubstantiated opinion number 789 in a row from you. YAYyyy...

You're such a cultist that you think "CNN said" means "fact". FYI anyone who's old enough to read should know better.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, West said:

Stolen valor. Offers up a tampon to little boys as a teacher. Creepy old man vibe.  Celebrates racial violence. The guy gives me the willies. 

He scares you cause he’s beating the snot out of JD Vance, and you’re starting to realize that Trump’s gonna lose. 
 

But Coach Tim? Sergeant Tim? The Governor who Trump praised for deploying the National Guard Tim? The father of a social worker who helps the homeless Tim? Lunchroom Monitor Tim?  If that creeps you out, it must be cause you can’t handle normal when you see it.   
IMG_2140.thumb.jpeg.3494c31b7247d50e2830f33d9f337dc8.jpeg

Edited by Rebound
  • Like 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's not anymore than saying a lawyer is someone who practice law would be.

 

Sure it is. We have a definition of law. That's not circular at all. We can say this is law and this is a person who practices law

But if you don't have a definition of woman and you're only definition of woman is someone who behaves like a woman then it is in fact a circular argument

I'm a little surprised that needed to be explained

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sure it is. We have a definition of law. That's not circular at all. We can say this is law and this is a person who practices law

But if you don't have a definition of woman and you're only definition of woman is someone who behaves like a woman then it is in fact a circular argument

I'm a little surprised that needed to be explained

Why are you so obsessed with other people’s genitals? 

  • Haha 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Rebound said:

Why are you so obsessed with other people’s genitals? 

Nobody mentioned people's genitals. That was pretty random, Have you been hanging around with black dog too much? :) 

  • Haha 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, robosmith said:

What's really creepy is how easily you're CONNED by your "news" sources. LMAO

Nothing like indulging in InfoWars, OANN, and numerous YouTube channels, with "Independent" journalists, that make REBEL News look like Pulitzer Award winners. . 

Edited by DUI_Offender
Posted
9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's not anymore than saying a lawyer is someone who practice law would be.

The simple fact you were blathering about women who dress and look like men shows that somewhere in the recesses of your lizard brain that you understand how gender is socially constructed and how one conforms to that social construct determines the extent to which they are considered a woman by others, but it just hasn't bubbled to the surface yet. too complicated I guess.

Yet again... that doesn't make someone a woman. You keep conflating behaviors with what someone is. 

My brain is rooted in objective facts, yours has been drowned in left-wing nonsense. 

So, seriously, you keep wanting to say gender is different than sex... so what is sex and what is gender for labeling a woman/female?

Please, try to actually make some logical sense of what you are selling here. 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, User said:

Yet again... that doesn't make someone a woman. You keep conflating behaviors with what someone is. 

My brain is rooted in objective facts, yours has been drowned in left-wing nonsense. 

So, seriously, you keep wanting to say gender is different than sex... so what is sex and what is gender for labeling a woman/female?

Please, try to actually make some logical sense of what you are selling here. 

Why are you so obsessed with other people’s genitals?  
When it’s JD Vance wearing a dress, you don’t care, but when it’s somebody else, it’s a big deal!  If a man in a dress can’t read stories to children, he certainly shouldn’t be Vice President of the United States, right? 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Nah. That's not a reason. That's lie/unsubstantiated opinion number 789 in a row from you. YAYyyy...

You're such a cultist that you think "CNN said" means "fact". FYI anyone who's old enough to read should know better.

I have noticed that any opinion you disagree on, supposedly comes from CNN. Why is that, just curious...

 

Out of these news agencies, can you rank them from most accurate to least accurate:

-CBC

-BBC

Al-Jazeera

-CNN

-FOX News

-OANN

-REBEL News

-New York Times

-Washington Post

-InfoWars

-YouTube Joournalists

-Twitter

-MSNBC

 

 

Have at er...

 

1 minute ago, Rebound said:

Why are you so obsessed with other people’s genitals?  
When it’s JD Vance wearing a dress, you don’t care, but when it’s somebody else, it’s a big deal!  If a man in a dress can’t read stories to children, he certainly shouldn’t be Vice President of the United States, right? 

He is certainly not impartial, that is for sure.  Luckily, rabid MAGA supporters account for only `/4 of Americans, and less than 10% of Canadians.

Edited by DUI_Offender
Posted
1 minute ago, Rebound said:

Why are you so obsessed with other people’s genitals?  
When it’s JD Vance wearing a dress, you don’t care, but when it’s somebody else, it’s a big deal!  If a man in a dress can’t read stories to children, he certainly shouldn’t be Vice President of the United States, right? 

You're the one who keeps bringing up genitals, and it's starting to get a little creepy. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

I guess it makes perfect sense that the people who couldn't find fault with Joe would also think that Walz is normal.

If a dude:

  1. sniffs children
  2. kisses little children on the mouth
  3. showers with his teen daughter

... that's "normal"  for leftists. They would elect a guy like that as their leader, no less. (they did, twice)

I think we can all just agree that Tim Walz is just fits that level of 'normal' perfectly then. The reason leftists love him is that he's so similar to kid-sniffin' Joe. 

  • Downvote 2

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
16 minutes ago, User said:

Yet again... that doesn't make someone a woman. You keep conflating behaviors with what someone is. 

Because how someone behaves in large part determines how they are perceived and therefore defined. Literally everything around us is defined by how we perceive it and choose to define it based on that perception.

Quote

My brain is rooted in objective facts, yours has been drowned in left-wing nonsense. 

How are objective facts determined, exactly? 

Quote

So, seriously, you keep wanting to say gender is different than sex... so what is sex and what is gender for labeling a woman/female?

Sex is biology, gender is (largely) social.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Rebound said:

He scares you cause he’s beating the snot out of JD Vance, and you’re starting to realize that Trump’s gonna lose. 

Timmy Tampon doesn't scare anyone, and if he could beat JD Vance then he wouldn't have ran and hid on the tarmac.

Chickens2.thumb.png.98ba25142dc967a3f68b09ce47cd2c25.png

Quote

But Coach Tim? Sergeant Tim? The Governor who Trump praised for deploying the National Guard Tim?

You might have praised him for allowing riots to destroy so much of the city and assault/kill so many people, but decent people don't, and even Tampon Timmy admitted that his defence of Minnesotans was an abject failure.

The problem with that is that he didn't even try. He was just too stupid to do the right thing.

Can the US afford to have someone really stupid defending the country?

Timmy Tampon: "Whoops, can we get a second chance, like Custer did?"

Quote

 Lunchroom Monitor Tim?  

Exactly, Reb!!!! That's the perfect job for him. If he lets a big kid slam a little kid's head off the table 4 days in a row, and then stops him on day 5, it doesn't affect the whole country. In fact, if the little kid gets enough brain damage, he's certain to vote Demi. 

IMG_2140.thumb.jpeg.3494c31b7247d50e2830f33d9f337dc8.jpeg

Timmy pretended to be a warrior, then cut and ran. He collected the cheques and received all the training for two decades, then when his unit went to war he just waved.

The he pretended that he went to war, but he didn't.

Then he let Kamala's campaign issue a semi-apology in the form of a snotty insult against Trump and Vance.

Honestly, the Dems were even above using their weak apology for Timmy's valour thieving as an opportunity to politick. They are amoral (not to be confused with immoral).

  • Downvote 2

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
35 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Because how someone behaves in large part determines how they are perceived and therefore defined. Literally everything around us is defined by how we perceive it and choose to define it based on that perception.

That's just not even a little bit accurate at all.  I don't know where you got that nonsense idea.  Hell some of our greatest science breakthroughs came from defining something long before we saw it. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

He scares you cause he’s beating the snot out of JD Vance, and you’re starting to realize that Trump’s gonna lose. 
 

But Coach Tim? Sergeant Tim? The Governor who Trump praised for deploying the National Guard Tim? The father of a social worker who helps the homeless Tim? Lunchroom Monitor Tim?  If that creeps you out, it must be cause you can’t handle normal when you see it.   
IMG_2140.thumb.jpeg.3494c31b7247d50e2830f33d9f337dc8.jpeg

He creeps the hell  out of me.. big difference..  because he's creepy as f

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Why are you so obsessed with other people’s genitals?  
When it’s JD Vance wearing a dress, you don’t care, but when it’s somebody else, it’s a big deal!  If a man in a dress can’t read stories to children, he certainly shouldn’t be Vice President of the United States, right? 

What makes you think I am obsessed with other peoples genitals?

Where did I say it was a big deal that someone else was wearing a dress?

Please come back and be prepared to actually discuss with me things I have said. 

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

It's not anymore than saying a lawyer is someone who practice law would be.

The simple fact you were blathering about women who dress and look like men shows that somewhere in the recesses of your lizard brain that you understand how gender is socially constructed and how one conforms to that social construct determines the extent to which they are considered a woman by others, but it just hasn't bubbled to the surface yet. too complicated I guess.

Gender: Male

Says so right on my birth certificate. 

Know why? Because I have XY chromosomes and the physical attributes. "Jane" the sexy tranny looks edible enough, but when "Jane" gets close, you realize "Jane" is a "Jim". Know why? Because "Jim" has the XY chromosomes and the physical attributes. "Jim" wants you to believe he's a she.

Can you? Could you entertain, flirt with and take home "Jim"? Not unless you're gay I bet. Know why?

Because "Jim" is a man. A male. No matter how you dress him up...no matter how much you butcher him up...no matter what you do..."Jim" will always be "Jim".

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 hours ago, User said:

do not care about the facts here

The only fact i was interested in was whether the law stated that boys bathrooms must dispense these items. It does not, as I've said all along.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Matthew said:

The only fact i was interested in was whether the law stated that boys bathrooms must dispense these items. It does not, as I've said all along.

Yes, it does. 

 

5 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Sex is biology, gender is (largely) social.

What are the labels for sex? and for gender?

 

 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Gender: Male

Says so right on my birth certificate. 

Once again I'll remind you that the Olympic boxer you were throwing a fit over has "female" on her birth certificate.

When they do ultrasounds on fetuses to determine sex, they don't do genetic tests

Quote

Know why? Because I have XY chromosomes and the physical attributes. "Jane" the sexy tranny looks edible enough, but when "Jane" gets close, you realize "Jane" is a "Jim". Know why? Because "Jim" has the XY chromosomes and the physical attributes. "Jim" wants you to believe he's a she.

Physical attributes can be altered you know. 

Quote

Can you? Could you entertain, flirt with and take home "Jim"? Not unless you're gay I bet. Know why?

Because "Jim" is a man. A male. No matter how you dress him up...no matter how much you butcher him up...no matter what you do..."Jim" will always be "Jim".

Genetically perhaps, but who cares?

Imagine you (well, a much younger you) went out and  this person started hitting on you:

MN4YMVoe_400x400.jpg

Are you stopping to pull out a genetic testing kit before taking them home? Be serious.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...