Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

When they do ultrasounds on fetuses to determine sex, they don't do genetic tests

That's because the presence of a penis is proof of the genetics.  They verify it when they have the baby in hand :) The presence of the physical attribute he mentioned is very very very very strong evidence of the biology he mentioned.

Now - if the picture was deliberately altered with photoshop so that it DIDN'T have a penis anymore - people might be fooled into thinking it wasn't a male but the fact is it would STILL be a male. 

The ability to trick people into thinking you're something you are not does not make you that something. 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

When they do ultrasounds on fetuses to determine sex, they don't do genetic tests

LOL, that is because 99%+ of the time when an unborn child on an ultrasound has a penis it is a boy and a vagina it is a girl. 

It is amazing the lengths of obfuscation and lies you folks will go to for your gender identity madness. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That's because the presence of a penis is proof of the genetics.  They verify it when they have the baby in hand :)The presence of the physical attribute he mentioned is very very very very strong evidence of the biology he mentioned.

And physical attributes can be changed, dummy. 

Quote

The ability to trick people into thinking you're something you are not does not make you that something. 

Who cares? Seriously, if someone looks like a woman, dresses like a woman, talks like a woman and has all the physical attributes of a woman, their genetic make up is completely irrelevant in 99 per cent of human interactions.

Edited by Black Dog

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
25 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Are you stopping to pull out a genetic testing kit before taking them home? Be serious.

LOL, this is my question, only not honest. 

The issue is not if you would stop before taking "her" home, it is if you are going to go ahead and have anal sex with him when you find out its a dude. 

I guess we know you will. Right?

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted (edited)
Just now, User said:

LOL, this is my question, only not honest. 

The issue is not if you would stop before taking "her" home, it is if you are going to go ahead and have anal sex with him when you find out its a dude. 

I guess we know you will. Right?

Transwomen can have vaginas dummy.

Edited by Black Dog

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
Just now, Black Dog said:

Transwomen can have vaginas dummy.

ROFL, yeah, good luck with that. You speaking from experience?

Women can wear strap-ons too... 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
Just now, User said:

ROFL, yeah, good luck with that. You speaking from experience?

Women can wear strap-ons too... 

See it's pretty funny how quickly the faux concern for women's spaces or the integrity of women's sports falls away and the rank bigotry comes out with you losers. Die in a fire.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

See it's pretty funny how quickly the faux concern for women's spaces or the integrity of women's sports falls away and the rank bigotry comes out with you losers. Die in a fire.

Rank bigotry? Are you not proud of sleeping with a dude with a fake vagina?

 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, User said:

Rank bigotry? Are you not proud of sleeping with a dude with a fake vagina?

Post your wife, I wanna check something.

Edited by Black Dog

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Post your wife, I wanna check something.

Go practice figuring this stuff out on your own. I can't help you. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

Go practice figuring this stuff out on your own. I can't help you. 

Does that mean no wife/gf or are you just ashamed?

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Does that mean no wife/gf or are you just ashamed?

I am not interested in your sexual fetish with dudes. Move on. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

And physical attributes can be changed, dummy. 

 

Not really.  You can mutilate people but that's not the same as 'changing' them.  At the end of the day they still have the xy chromosomes they always did. 

Quote

Who cares? Seriously, if someone looks like a woman, dresses like a woman, talks like a woman and has all the physical attributes of a woman, their genetic make up is completely irrelevant in 99 per cent of human interactions.

Sure. Agreed. And generally speaking if i am interacting with a "Man" who prefers to present and consider themselves a 'woman"  i'm refering to them as a women when speaking to them or about them.  Why not? 

But.  That's not good enough apperently.  What their lobbyists want is to take the rights of others.  They want men to be able to beat up women and pretend that they werne't men to begin with. They want small female children to have their penises in their face in public showers. They want the public to pay their tax money to give them 'tampons' so they can feel like they're real women.  god knows where they stick them. And they want children to be forced not just to accept them but to 'celebrate' them and swear that it's a great thing even if their beliefs say otherwise. 

Then want to push it till it infringes on the rights of others and thats where there's a problem. 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

I am not interested in your sexual fetish with dudes. Move on. 

This isn't about me, I want to see what sort of swamp creature you're content to stick your c*ck in since you seem so interested in what other people do with theirs.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
21 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

And physical attributes can be changed, dummy. 

Black Dog is contemplating getting a sex change and he's using this board to justify his decision. 

I say just do it, man, you've been wanting it for years. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Black Dog said:

This isn't about me

Oh look, you've yet again brought up your sex fetishes with yet another poster and yet again are trying to claim that despite the fact that every thread you post in where people disagree with you you manage to steer the conversation to having sex with males. 

Kid, you'll feel better if you just stop with the denials. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

This isn't about me, I want to see what sort of swamp creature you're content to stick your c*ck in since you seem so interested in what other people do with theirs.

Of course it is about you, as you seem to have a problem discerning sex and no issues with dudes pretending to be women as you are here making that case that you can't tell. 

 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Not really.  You can mutilate people but that's not the same as 'changing' them.  At the end of the day they still have the xy chromosomes they always did. 

So what no one is doing that level of genetic testing.

Quote

Sure. Agreed. And generally speaking if i am interacting with a "Man" who prefers to present and consider themselves a 'woman"  i'm refering to them as a women when speaking to them or about them.  Why not? 

Well, you seem to consider them liars, so why accord them that level of respect

Quote

But.  That's not good enough apperently.  What their lobbyists want is to take the rights of others.  They want men to be able to beat up women and pretend that they werne't men to begin with. They want small female children to have their penises in their face in public showers. They want the public to pay their tax money to give them 'tampons' so they can feel like they're real women.  god knows where they stick them. And they want children to be forced not just to accept them but to 'celebrate' them and swear that it's a great thing even if their beliefs say otherwise. 

Then want to push it till it infringes on the rights of others and thats where there's a problem. 

LOl holy shit all this botching about the tampon thing and you don't actually understand why they would be there, incredible. Anyway, how does putting tampons in a boys bathroom infringe anyone's rights? Like I said, women's sports and spaces are issues where moderates can see your side, but the tampon thing makes you look like utter lunatics.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
2 minutes ago, User said:

Of course it is about you, as you seem to have a problem discerning sex and no issues with dudes pretending to be women as you are here making that case that you can't tell. 

Oh I see you were so preoccupied with the genitalia of transwomen that you failed to understand the argument.  Not my problem, dummy.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Oh look, you've yet again brought up your sex fetishes with yet another poster and yet again are trying to claim that despite the fact that every thread you post in where people disagree with you you manage to steer the conversation to having sex with males. 

Kid, you'll feel better if you just stop with the denials. 

This is the dude who brought it up actually:

29 minutes ago, User said:

LOL, this is my question, only not honest. 

The issue is not if you would stop before taking "her" home, it is if you are going to go ahead and have anal sex with him when you find out its a dude. 

I guess we know you will. Right?

Like you and JD Vance's balls, this is where his head went straightaway. I'd hate to see what you freaks get up to in your DMs, woof.

Edited by Black Dog

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Oh I see you were so preoccupied with the genitalia of transwomen that you failed to understand the argument.  Not my problem, dummy.

How cute. Look at you refering to the dudes as transwomen. I bet they love you for that. 

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Like you and JD Vance's balls, this is where his head went straightaway. I'd hate to see what you freaks get up to in your DMs, woof.

I can see why this is upsetting for you. If only he had a fake vagina, then you would be into him. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, User said:

How cute. Look at you refering to the dudes as transwomen. I bet they love you for that. 

Look at you ignoring the argument because you're so wrapped up in the personal disgust that is the basis of your beliefs on this issue. So funny to see your pose as a rational man of integrity completely crumble here because you got the icks. F*ckin' loser.

Quote

I can see why this is upsetting for you. If only he had a fake vagina, then you would be into him. 

That wife of your must be a real bog monster for you to get this mad about it lol.

 

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

So what no one is doing that level of genetic testing.

Why would they?  The evidence is there without it and unless there's some indiciation that it might be unclear there's no need for verification. 

We also don't genetically test to confirm they're human beings and not a lizard person.   Pretty much for the same reasons :) 

 

Quote

Well, you seem to consider them liars, so why accord them that level of respect

Lots of people are liars. As long as the lie isn't harmful to others or their rights i chalk it up to the same sort of 'white lie' as "no, that dress doesn't make you look fat".  But - when it goes farther than that then there's an issue.  

There are those who feel as you suggest that no lie is tolerable and i respect their decision as well. 

Quote

LOl holy shit all this botching about the tampon thing and you don't actually understand why they would be there, incredible. Anyway, how does putting tampons in a boys bathroom infringe anyone's rights? Like I said, women's sports and spaces are issues where moderates can see your side, but the tampon thing makes you look like utter lunatics.

Oh look - you know i was right so rather than address the points you try to obfuscate and distract. 

Well - i guess that's your way of saying i was right without saying it. 

The trans activist want to move beyond the simple courtesy of playing along with the "lie" as you put it and that's where they go from legitimate issues to scumbags and there's pushback. 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Why would they?  The evidence is there without it and unless there's some indiciation that it might be unclear there's no need for verification. 

We also don't genetically test to confirm they're human beings and not a lizard person.   Pretty much for the same reasons :) 

You're almost there.

Quote

Oh look - you know i was right so rather than address the points you try to obfuscate and distract. 

You didn't answer the question. B!tch. How does putting tampons in a boys bathroom infringe anyone's rights? 

Edited by Black Dog

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,833
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    maria orsic
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • VanidaCKP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • maria orsic earned a badge
      First Post
    • Majikman earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • oops earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...