Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

The last two jobs on Trump's resume are game show host and president.

The last 34 crimes on his rap sheet are convicted felonies.

Edited by Rebound
  • Like 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted

Willie Brown would surely vouch for Kamala's abilities.😉

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
7 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Walz had to leave early to address congress, but he forgot to take out the trash and stick it at the curb. His wife was forced to.

 

This man shout be lynched!!!!

He abandoned his duty to go to Congress just before his trash was due to be deployed to the curb. Shameful!

And he expects us to call him a domestic garbage man? He's no garbage man.

I took out the garbage for a few years, but I'm not a garbage man. I've known real garbage men. Guys who would deploy and deploy and deploy trash cans day after day. Nothing to protect their hands but a thin pair of gloves. Now those are real garbage men. I'm not a garbage man, and neither is Tim Walz!

  • Haha 1
Posted

While he was out there, he was bragging to his neighbors about how he retired as a Command Sergeant Major, and when the neighbors think he served in Afghanistan in a combat zone, he doesn't correct them... 

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

IMG_2107.thumb.jpeg.7b0bd1d0bddcb33b948c71d2ac7f0eae.jpeg

I don't think anything. Biden literally said he picked her because of her sex and race. 

 

 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, User said:

While he was out there, he was bragging to his neighbors about how he retired as a Command Sergeant Major, and when the neighbors think he served in Afghanistan in a combat zone, he doesn't correct them... 

I don't think anything. Biden literally said he picked her because of her sex and race. 

 

If so, just like Trump picking Vance and Pence.

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

like it did in 19 74.

That's where the cult seems to be stuck in. Possibly much earlier.

  • Thanks 1

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
9 minutes ago, Aristides said:

If so, just like Trump picking Vance and Pence.

I don’t recall Trump ever saying he picked either of them because he was looking for a White Male. 
 

You got that quote? 

 

 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, User said:

I don’t recall Trump ever saying he picked either of them because he was looking for a White Male. 
 

You got that quote? 

Do you have proof that JD Vance is a White Male? 
She changed her name so many times that maybe she started off XY or female or black.  One minute JD Vance was Indian, now suddenly she’s white… it’s all very sketchy.  

Edited by Rebound
  • Haha 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Rebound said:

She changed her name so many times that maybe she started off XY or female or black.  One minute JD Vance was Indian, now suddenly she’s white… it’s all very sketchy.  

Pretty lame comparison.

His wife had to take out the trash because he was too busy claiming to be a veteran.

tim.thumb.jpg.bc796c14d83b1f4bee153f424ebf1084.jpg

Edited by CouchPotato
Posted
18 minutes ago, User said:

I don’t recall Trump ever saying he picked either of them because he was looking for a White Male. 
 

You got that quote? 

He didn't have to. It's who his party represents.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Aristides said:

He didn't have to. It's who his party represents.

So, no. You are just making stuff up. 

28 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Do you have proof that JD Vance is a White Male? 
She changed her name so many times that maybe she started off XY or female or black.  One minute JD Vance was Indian, now suddenly she’s white… it’s all very sketchy.  

To be fair, you are part of the party that thinks boys can be girls... 

 

  • Thanks 1

 

 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Walz had to leave early to address congress, but he forgot to take out the trash and stick it at the curb. His wife was forced to.

 

This man shout be lynched!!!!

It may have been over 100 years since we did that, but this would be the best reason to bring it back!

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

The last two jobs on Trump's resume are game show host and president.

Don't forget that he was a lwnj agitator. That he did probono. See, you got a free government service. You should be happy.

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Implying that a woman in a position of power is a wh0re doesn't resonate in 2024 like it did in 19 74.

Donald Trump's sexual history is fair game. So why is it so unfair to look at his opponent's history?

https://www.megynkelly.com/2024/07/23/kamala-harris-willie-brown-relationship/

As Megyn explained, Harris was 30 years old and a prosecutor in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office when she became linked to the then-60-year-old Brown. “He is like the godfather of San Francisco politics and very well known,” she noted. “And sure enough, that relationship paid dividends for Harris in more ways than one.”

Spiering, whose book offers a deep dive into Harris’ rocky tenure as vice president, agreed that the relationship between Harris and Brown is “completely fair game” to talk about because “it is how Kamala Harris went from a relatively unknown Alameda County prosecutor to the forefront of San Francisco social life and politics.” 

As he explained, Brown was “the most powerful politician in California” when the two started dating. He was married at the time but reports indicate that he and his wife were separated. “He also gave [Harris] a number of positions… that paid her lucratively,” he said. “He gave her the keys to a BMW, and he went around the most powerful and most wealthy circles of San Francisco and California politics with her on his arm, opening up the doors to her professional and political future.”

In a 2019 op-ed for the San Francisco Chronicle titled “Willie Brown: Sure, I Dated Kamala Harris. So What?“, Brown acknowledged that he “may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker.” And Megyn pointed out that he is also on the record saying he helped her get elected to her position as district attorney of San Francisco.

 

 

You lefties really take the cake. When it comes to attacking Trump, it's no holds-barred, anything goes. But when his opponent's history comes under scrutiny, you guys are crying that it's unfair because she's a woman.

 

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Implying that a woman in a position of power is a wh0re doesn't resonate in 2024 like it did in 19 74.

Yeah, I think it is a stupid line of attack. I would steer away from that if I were Trump. He seems to do best when people are making these attacks against him. Instead of focusing on how she got power unfairly, it's better to argue why she is incompetent.

Politicians and sexcapades have been around longer than we have. No one cares who Trump, Clinton or Kennedy slept with. Also if calling a woman a skAnk has any possibility of working it has to come from another woman, and even then it likely won't be very effective.

Posted (edited)

.

1 hour ago, ironstone said:

Donald Trump's sexual history is fair game. So why is it so unfair to look at his opponent's history?

To be fair, though, MichaelHardner has not said that it is not fair game. He said it doesn't resonate. I think he is likely right. In the end no one is going to care about this stuff. No one cares who Trump, Clinton or Kennedy slept with either. I know that's not exactly comparable, because the point being made is that she is incompetent and got where she is unfairly. But it's smarter to just argue that she is incompetent than to bring up Willie Brown or the DEI hire thing.

Perhaps, it's not entirely true that people don't care about this stuff. But I think these kind of attacks from either side of the alley resonate mostly with their base.

Edited by CouchPotato
Posted
4 hours ago, User said:

I don't think anything. Biden literally said he picked her because of her sex and race. 

Well you should be glad she picked an old white man running mate because of his sex and race then. I mean if sex and race are your 'qualifications' maybe you should put down the Confederate flag long enough to vote for her.

Posted
23 minutes ago, herbie said:

Well you should be glad she picked an old white man running mate because of his sex and race then. I mean if sex and race are your 'qualifications' maybe you should put down the Confederate flag long enough to vote for her.

Is that why she picked him? I don't think she said that like Biden did about her. 

From what I have seen from reports, she likely picked him because he has no other political aspirations and was basically bending the knee to her and pledging his fealty. 

No, race and sex are not my qualifications. They were Bidens in picking her. 

Not sure what stupidity you are playing at here, I have no Confederate flag. 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, herbie said:

Well you should be glad she picked an old white man running mate because of his sex and race then. I mean if sex and race are your 'qualifications' maybe you should put down the Confederate flag long enough to vote for her.

Ha! Your argument that User wants people to hire by sex and race is him condemning someone for hiring by sex and race?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 hours ago, Rebound said:

IMG_2107.thumb.jpeg.7b0bd1d0bddcb33b948c71d2ac7f0eae.jpeg

No, he got there by winning primaries.  You know...democracy...

As Democrat and Liberal governments fall, Republicans and Conservatives come to the rescue.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...