Media Trump's Up New Trump Attack

[CdnFox]

12 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

 

I already explained that. I don’t treat people according to the their appearance and neither should you. 

So that's called being 'Colourblind'  And apparently it makes you a very racist bigot. I'm totally telling your mother on you. 

 

What Does Racism Look Like? Colorblindness - Anti-racism Resources - Research Help at Fitchburg State University (libguides.com)

Why Color Blindness Is a Counterproductive Ideology - The Atlantic

Why saying “I don’t see race at all” just makes racism worse | (ted.com)

Colorblind Ideology Is a Form of Racism | Psychology Today Canada

 

Do you see the mixed messaging? If someone ignores another person's color and just treats them as they would anyone else they are horrible racist bigots. If somebody acknowledges another person's color and treats them appropriately based on that color it makes them a horrible racist bigot.

So basically everybody who treats anybody of any color other than white in any fashion is a horrible racist bigot.

You can treat white people however you like by the way of course, let's face it in the eyes of the left we don't really count as people anyway. Especially the males.

 

Joking aside, I am so done with it. I am now 100% okay with somebody being treated as the color they appear to be and if they attempt to use their race in any way shape or form I am 100% okay with them being called on it

If you on the left want us to do something differently than you better get your story straight.

[Hodad]

5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

J.D. Vance is a b.a.d. a.s.s.

 

We already knew he lacked a sense of empathy, but apparently he also lacks a sense of irony 

The idea that "Trump is America's Hitler" Vance is calling anyone else on Earth a "chameleon" is too rich.

[robosmith]

On 7/31/2024 at 2:59 PM, gatomontes99 said:

You and reality really are unaquainted, aren't you?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianbushard/2024/07/31/trump-claims-kamala-harris-only-recently-identified-as-black---heres-why-thats-not-true/

Is that better. She claimed to be the first AA female AG of Cali.

You STILL quoted NOTHING from your NAKED link. I'm not going to chase your wild gooses anymore.

Quote it or not, I don't care.

On 7/31/2024 at 3:09 PM, Reg Volk said:

Really her skin colour (and gender) isn't and shouldn't be an issue, though it's played a large role in getting her all the way to the point of presidential candidate for the Democrats without having to win one single primary.

The bigger issue is exactly that - why she could never win a primary if forced to follow the US "democratic" system - she's unlikeable, her policies are trash, and she's been a terrible VP.  

Yes she did play a major role in that debacle.  Which is why the withdrawal sucked so bad.

She won the same primaries as Joe since she was on the tickets as his VP WITH HIM.

[Nationalist]

On 7/31/2024 at 6:05 PM, Rebound said:

Kamala Harris attended and graduated from historically black Howard University. So she’s “identified” as being black since at least age 18.

She can be black and Indian, and female.  Being one does not mean she is not the other.  Kamala was the first black AG of California, and the first Indian AG of California. Jerry Brown’s sister was the first female AG of California. 

You and Trump are racists.  

You Libbies have entire decks of race cards stashed away in a box labeled, "use when no argument exists"...right?

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, Hodad said:

We already knew he lacked a sense of empathy, but apparently he also lacks a sense of irony 

The idea that "Trump is America's Hitler" Vance is calling anyone else on Earth a "chameleon" is too rich.

Well...at least you try hard...

[gatomontes99]

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

We already knew he lacked a sense of empathy, but apparently he also lacks a sense of irony 

The idea that "Trump is America's Hitler" Vance is calling anyone else on Earth a "chameleon" is too rich.

You know nothing about JD, do you?

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

You STILL quoted NOTHING from your NAKED link. I'm not going to chase your wild gooses anymore.

Quote it or not, I don't care.

 

Are you afraid to look at reality?

[Michael Hardner]

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

The idea that "Trump is America's Hitler" Vance is calling anyone else on Earth a "chameleon" is too rich.

You're missing something though. He doesn't have the right language for a MAGA guy, which he's trying to be.

Chameleon is not a MAGA word...

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

You're missing something though. He doesn't have the right language for a MAGA guy, which he's trying to be.

Chameleon is not a MAGA word...

You mean like Kamachamelion. Harris.

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

You're missing something though. He doesn't have the right language for a MAGA guy, which he's trying to be.

Chameleon is not a MAGA word...

His fake MAGA accent is slipping.

[reason10]

NOTHING ^HERE says Kamala claims to be black. Duh

That's why you're supposed to QUOTE your EVIDENCE instead of NAKED LINKS. Your credibility is further DESTROYED.

 

Edited August 2, 2024 by reason10

[Boges]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Joking aside, I am so done with it. I am now 100% okay with somebody being treated as the color they appear to be and if they attempt to use their race in any way shape or form I am 100% okay with them being called on it

If you on the left want us to do something differently than you better get your story straight.

If people in the GOP were colour-blind they wouldn't be calling the Harris appointment a DEI hire and saying she can only be Indo-American, when she's clearly bi-racial. 

[Boges]

There's also a cultural element to this. 

As someone whom also has Jamaican heritage, I know this. A person with a different heritage can certainly embrace other cultures, especially if they were raised in such cultures. They shouldn't be treated as if they're a fake. 

Kamala is on record as saying her parents were very active in the civil rights movement. 

[User]

27 minutes ago, Boges said:

If people in the GOP were colour-blind they wouldn't be calling the Harris appointment a DEI hire and saying she can only be Indo-American, when she's clearly bi-racial. 

Pointing out what others are doing based on race doesn't mean you are above such things and "color blind"

 

[Boges]

1 minute ago, User said:

Pointing out what others are doing based on race doesn't mean you are above such things and "color blind"

When pressed on if he thought Harris was a DEI hire, Trump repeatedly asked for a definition (If he didn't know he's incompetent). 

Then he went on his screed about her suddenly deciding that she was black. As if a bi-racial person can't be two things at the same time. It's a really offensive line of thinking. 

[User]

5 minutes ago, Boges said:

When pressed on if he thought Harris was a DEI hire, Trump repeatedly asked for a definition (If he didn't know he's incompetent). 

Then he went on his screed about her suddenly deciding that she was black. As if a bi-racial person can't be two things at the same time. It's a really offensive line of thinking. 

Do you really think Trump doesn't know people can be bi-racial? Maybe... just maybe the point he was making is that Harris plays up whatever she wants to be to whatever audience she is seeing... she is a phony. Trump is a circus clown though and not articulate at all...

But either way, this is not what I was responding to, I was responding to your comment:

"If people in the GOP were colour-blind they wouldn't be calling the Harris appointment a DEI hire "

[Deluge]

On 7/31/2024 at 3:52 PM, robosmith said:

NOTHING ^HERE says Kamala claims to be black. Duh

That's why you're supposed to QUOTE your EVIDENCE instead of NAKED LINKS. Your credibility is further DESTROYED.

Oh, you'll want to read this before you start shooting off your stupid mouth again:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/2601879/kamala-harris-embraces-exclusive-blackness-at-the-expense-of-her-indian-heritage/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Pmax_USA_Magazine_21-June-Intent-Audience-Signals&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwh7K1BhCZARIsAKOrVqFepm1C9olSTBj7gDclsMBbDLC1I0XgYuGzIPp5kHAbYc-83d_q_TAaAjPnEALw_wcB#google_vignette

[ironstone]

On 7/31/2024 at 6:05 PM, Rebound said:

Kamala Harris attended and graduated from historically black Howard University. So she’s “identified” as being black since at least age 18.

So are white people that attended black colleges considered to be black too?

https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/white-enrollment-is-increasing-at-hbcus/

Personally I think Kamala's ethnic identity isn't that important overall. It is funny to see how her identity keeps evolving because of the left's obsession with identity politics.

It's pathetic how the mainstream media is trying to protect her from her own past. Since her coronation, she has yet to face a single tough question from the media. She will likely get the Biden treatment as in getting softball questions or even getting them in advance. All they care about is getting her into the White House. Trying to whitewash her time as border czar is only the start.

She doesn't have a record to boast about.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Boges said:

If people in the GOP were colour-blind they wouldn't be calling the Harris appointment a DEI hire and saying she can only be Indo-American, when she's clearly bi-racial. 

People in the GOP WERE colour blind and many said so - till you on the left started demanding that's racist (see the numerous articles i posted or the 100,000  ones online). 

So get your story straight and get back to us, you racist. 

[Boges]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

People in the GOP WERE colour blind and many said so - till you on the left started demanding that's racist (see the numerous articles i posted or the 100,000  ones online). 

So get your story straight and get back to us, you racist. 

It's a neat trick you play there where you no claim that race doesn't matter where it mattered for so long. And whitey benefited greatly. 

See redlining in Real Estate throughout the 20th Century.

I know it tough to know that a POC in her 50's is a lot harder to beat than and old man in his 80's. Especially with minority groups Trump hopes to court. 

[BeaverFever]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So that's called being 'Colourblind'

No I didn’t advocate being colourblind 

 

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Do you see the mixed messaging? If someone ignores another person's color and just treats them as they would anyone else they are horrible racist bigots. If somebody acknowledges another person's color and treats them appropriately based on that color it makes them a horrible racist bigot.

Only a conservative could be so absolutely clueless   “Acknowledge another person’s colour and treat them appropriately”. LMAO I would love to hear an example of how you do that in your own life  

 

I didn’t say IGNORE their race.  What Im trying to tell you is don’t make ignorant uninformed assumptions about a person’s race based on their appearance and then dont use those ignorant assumptions to make even more ignorant uniformed assumptions about the person.  Only a clueless conservative could think those are your only 2 options   Do you not understand?

[CdnFox]

43 minutes ago, Boges said:

It's a neat trick you play there where you no claim that race doesn't matter where it mattered for so long. And whitey benefited greatly. 

That's not my trick .  It's your trick.  Like i pointed out if you say race matters you're a racist, if you say it shouldnt' matter you're a racist.  So why are you being so racist, racist?

And i love that "whitey" benefitted  Way to prove you're not racist  

Also everybody alive benefitted.  White people Black people, chinese people, indian and every other people currently enjoy the same benefits and same rights and same fruits of their labours today.  If you go back 8 years half the time the president of the united states was black and there's a very real chance that for the next 8 years it may be a black person again. 

And while 'whitey' benefitted from the slave trade, so did 'blackies".  IN fact kamala's ancestors made good money off of it. 

 

Sorry kiddo.  You failed that one. 

[CdnFox]

12 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

No I didn’t advocate being colourblind 

You absolutely 100 percent entirely did. You literally gave the definition of it. 

Quote

Only a conservative could be so absolutely clueless   “Acknowledge another person’s colour and treat them appropriately”. LMAO I would love to hear an example of how you do that in your own life  

Ummm - according to the sources i posted and teh millions i didn't that would make you a racist for even saying that.  So it sounds like you're saying only conservatives are not racists  

Personally i kind of prefer the colourblind thing that you suggested and don't really agree with the radical left's !diotic ideas but then hey, I also don't think math is racist so obviously i'm out of the loop. 

But if you're going to treat people appropriately based on their colour of appearance that might include being sensitive to 'micro agressions' and language, or being sensitive to some topics.  For example when i was younger i was a the bar with some buddies who happened to be first nations and we were going to leave and go somewhere else and one of them had a nearly full beer - i said "hey, chug that back and lets get out of here".  One of my friends said "to be honest we really don't like that term".  I mentally filed it away as "don't use that around first nations people" and that was the end of it. No big deal but there you go. 

 

Quote

I didn’t say IGNORE their race.

Yeah you did 

Quote

What Im trying to tell you is don’t make ignorant uninformed assumptions about a person’s race based on their appearance and then dont use those ignorant assumptions to make even more ignorant uniformed assumptions about the person.  Only a clueless conservative could think those are your only 2 options   Do you not understand?

What i understand is that you've realized you were wrong, and that there's a problem with the left right now where they insist that race be both ignored and recognized at the same time, and doing either makes you a racists.  "Schrodinger's Homies" if you will , they must be both coloured and non coloured at the same time  

So spare me your bullshit.  If Kamala 'blackfaces' her self to black people then that's entirely cringe and worthy of rebuke, and saying a black person is a black person or an indian person is an indian person etc etc is perfectly acceptable.  

Now go have  a meeting with the other lefties and see if you guys can get your story straight on how you'd like 'people of colour' to be treated ffs. 

[BeaverFever]

On 8/2/2024 at 1:59 PM, CdnFox said:

You absolutely 100 percent entirely did. You literally gave the definition of it. 

No I didn’t. Buy you’re known for grossly misrepresenting what others say

 

On 8/2/2024 at 1:59 PM, CdnFox said:

What i understand is that you've realized you were wrong, and that there's a problem with the left right now where they insist that race be both ignored and recognized at the same time, and doing either makes you a racists.  "Schrodinger's Homies" if you will , they must be both coloured and non coloured at the same time  

So spare me your bullshit.  If Kamala 'blackfaces' her self to black people then that's entirely cringe and worthy of rebuke, and saying a black person is a black person or an indian person is an indian person etc etc is perfectly acceptable.  

Now go have  a meeting with the other lefties and see if you guys can get your story straight on how you'd like 'people of colour' to be treated ffs. 

NOBODY has ever said a person’s race should be ignored. What clueless bigots like you are totally incapable of comprehending is that

1) YOU don’t get to tell other people what their race:ethnicity is whether they like it or notA person who appears to your culturally ignorant eyes as Black Indian “Chinese” etc may not actually be that or they may be mixed, or they may have llived her for multiple generations and don’t  identify with a foreign culture..  Or may they do. The point is THEY tell you mot the other way around  

2)Only bigots like you would believe that people should be treated according to their race….and that you alone get to decide what that treatment is

 

You are nothing but a pathetic LIAR when you say Kamala is “blackfacing” herself. She has been open that she is half black her entire life and participated in Black sororities, attended a black college etc. What’s cringeworthy is Trump presuming to dictate to Black people who is and isn’t black based on his own ignorance, blatant lies and prejudices.
 

Go ahead and delete that inconvenient information so you can  go back to living in your clueless fake news Trump cult bubble. 

[CdnFox]

15 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

No I didn’t. Buy you’re known for grossly misrepresenting what others say

Kid.  There's nothing terribly wrong with being a leftist.  I mean it's certainly nothing to be proud of   But if that's how you see things then great. 

There IS something wrong with going through life as a completely dishonest liar who is so ashamed of his own comments that he has to pretend he didn't say it. 

You said people shouldn't recognize colour when they interact with someone.  You said they should just treat them like anyone else.  This was after you freaked out about me asking what colour you think Kamala should have been treated like when someone treated her like she was black. 

That is, 100 percent, without a doubt, without the need for spin or 'interpretation', precisely what being colourblind is. It's treating everyone the same regardless of colour when you interact with them. 

 

There is no misrepresentations here,  there's no wordplay or twisting of meaning, 

Now you're so ashamed that a) you're trying to claim you didn't say what you said. and b) it's my fault. 

Every now and then you show some promise as a thinker who actually can make an argument.  And then you pull this kind of childish crap that woudn't impress anyone over the age of 7. 

Get it together kid.  And go reread what i said without your tribal filters on, there's some important stuff in there.  And no more being a tard pls. 

[User]

On 8/2/2024 at 1:21 AM, robosmith said:

You STILL quoted NOTHING from your NAKED link. I'm not going to chase your wild gooses anymore.

Quote it or not, I don't care.

This is really rich coming from you. You ran and hid from me because I was calling you out repeatedly for never actually providing any quotes for the things you claimed were being said.