Joe Biden looks to run political interference to the Supreme Court

[User]

15 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Hey dum-dum, stick to the subject. 

Joe Biden didn’t interfere with the prosecution of his son, who was just convicted of a felony by a Federal prosecutor who had been appointed by Trump. 

You Trumpers have more criticisms and problems with Trump appointees than with Biden appointees. 

Yes, his administration certainly did as did the DOJ in general. 

They drug their feet on the tax charges and hit the statute of limitations and then they tried to plead him out on a sweetheart deal that if a Judge had not reviewed and questioned the absurdity of it, there would never have been a prosecution at all. 

 

[sharkman]

On 7/27/2024 at 4:38 PM, Chrissy1979 said:

Was Teddy Roosevelt sick upstairs? He wanted to expand it to 13.

Given the overwhelming evidence at least two justices are bought and paid for by billionaires (and tried to hide it), why are you opposed to them having ethical restrictions that are enforceable?

Ah yes.  Whenever i want to know what kind of propaganda they are feeding the mindless, I look for posts like this.

Does anyone believe that Biden thought this up?  The dementia addled guy that had to step down is dreaming up stuff like this?  Come one, man.

[Rebound]

1 minute ago, User said:

Yes, his administration certainly did as did the DOJ in general. 

They drug their feet on the tax charges and hit the statute of limitations and then they tried to plead him out on a sweetheart deal that if a Judge had not reviewed and questioned the absurdity of it, there would never have been a prosecution at all. 

 

AGAIN, Junior: That Prosecutor was appointed by Donald Trump.  
So if you think he’s a lousy prosecutor, then don’t vote for Trump.  Simple!

[West]

19 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Hey dum-dum, stick to the subject. 

Joe Biden didn’t interfere with the prosecution of his son, who was just convicted of a felony by a Federal prosecutor who had been appointed by Trump. 

You Trumpers have more criticisms and problems with Trump appointees than with Biden appointees. 

Yes he tried it just didn't work out. 

He's also tried to illegally appoint a special prosecutor to go sniffing in Baron Trump's underwear drawer. 

What he's doing is very text boom communist. Very very sick person and so are you for supporting 

[Rebound]

Just now, sharkman said:

Ah yes.  Whenever i want to know what kind of propaganda they are feeding the mindless, I look for posts like this.

Does anyone believe that Biden thought this up?  The dementia addled guy that had to step down is dreaming up stuff like this?  Come one, man.

It does not matter.  The actions and the policies matter.  

[Chrissy1979]

8 minutes ago, sharkman said:

 

Does anyone believe that Biden thought this up?  The dementia addled guy that had to step down is dreaming up stuff like this?  Come one, man.

Who claimed Biden doesn't have advisors? 

When you're not caught up in a cult of personality, such things don't matter 

Now try explaining to yourself how Trump could have gotten Nancy Pelosi and Nikki Haley mixed up.

 

Edited July 29, 2024 by Chrissy1979

[Chrissy1979]

19 minutes ago, User said:

You were the one making up the obviously absurdly false on its face claim that:

"two justices are bought and paid for by billionaires (and tried to hide it)"

And that they admitted to this...

They never admitted to being "bought and paid for" nor is there evidence of that. Yes, Clarence Thomas went on vacations with his rich friend... but there is zero evidence that "bought" him. 

 

Then why did Clarence not report it?

[sharkman]

8 minutes ago, Rebound said:

It does not matter.  The actions and the policies matter.  

Then the exact same new policy should apply to all politicians.  Let's dig through 50 years of Biden's "actions and policies" and vacations, extravagant gifts, strange accuracy with investments and so on.  Let's go there and see what's under THAT rock, you hypocrites.

[Matthew]

On 7/27/2024 at 1:25 PM, West said:

by attacking long standing tradition on the Supreme Court

The sacred tradition of taking bribes from billionaires?

I'm ok with ethics rules for everyone in government.

And I'm ok with term limits for everyone in government.

Why would anyone be opposed to these two things?

[West]

6 minutes ago, Matthew said:

The sacred tradition of taking bribes from billionaires?

I'm ok with ethics rules for everyone in government.

And I'm ok with term limits for everyone in government.

Why would anyone be opposed to these two things?

Joe's just trying to create some smoke screen for himself. When his fraud cases hit the Supreme Court to rule whether or not these are official president acts, then he can cry he's being persecuted. 

I'm okay with ethics rules but that isn't what this is about. It's about undermining the court system because they ruled unfavorably on his pathetic lawfare campaign looking to take out his rivals

Edited July 29, 2024 by West

[Deluge]

On 7/27/2024 at 5:38 PM, Chrissy1979 said:

1. Was Teddy Roosevelt sick upstairs? He wanted to expand it to 13.

2. Given the overwhelming evidence at least two justices are bought and paid for by billionaires (and tried to hide it), why are you opposed to them having ethical restrictions that are enforceable?

1. Nobody should pack the courts, so yes, TR was f*cked in the head for wanting that. 

2. Well? Don't just stand there with your cyber thumb up your cyber ass; where is the overwhelming evidence? 

[User]

56 minutes ago, Rebound said:

AGAIN, Junior: That Prosecutor was appointed by Donald Trump.  
So if you think he’s a lousy prosecutor, then don’t vote for Trump.  Simple!

Talk about a half-truth. 

He was nominated to be a prosecutor by Trump in general, then held over by Biden and appointed to the special prosecution by Merrick Garland. 

What is your point?

This doesn't change the facts for how Hunter Biden was allowed to escape tax charges and was almost given a sweetheart plea deal. All under Biden and Biden's DOJ and Biden's AG. 

 

[User]

50 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Then why did Clarence not report it?

This is a question, not evidence to back up your absurd claim. 

Are you not familiar with the public reporting on what Clarence Thomas has said here regarding this? 

[CouchPotato]

The standard of lawfare being used against Trump could just as easily be applied to Democrats and the Rino establishment. The same people saying Trump is not above the law would be crying "political prosecution" if it happened to people on their side. The fact that Trump ended up with 34 felonies over a hush money payment is a talking point for them. But it's also proof of political prosecution for reasonable people.

[Matthew]

57 minutes ago, West said:

Joe's just trying to create some smoke screen for himself.

A more realistic interpretation is that it's a lame duck president thinking about his legacy. The presidency has no constitutional power to change how the courts work. But he does have the power to try to lead a legislative initiative.

If there was any political gamesmanship involved it would be in forcing House Republicans to reflexively side with the pro-corruption status quo as you are currently doing.

[User]

11 minutes ago, Matthew said:

If there was any political gamesmanship involved it would be in forcing House Republicans to reflexively side with the pro-corruption status quo as you are currently doing.

There is no corruption as the status quo. 

 

[West]

31 minutes ago, Matthew said:

A more realistic interpretation is that it's a lame duck president thinking about his legacy. The presidency has no constitutional power to change how the courts work. But he does have the power to try to lead a legislative initiative.

If there was any political gamesmanship involved it would be in forcing House Republicans to reflexively side with the pro-corruption status quo as you are currently doing.

Hes a man who's cognition aren't right so I doubt he's the one calling the shots. At this point just a figurehead for the corruption going on in behind the scenes

[Chrissy1979]

1 hour ago, sharkman said:

Then the exact same new policy should apply to all politicians.  Let's dig through 50 years of Biden's "actions and policies" and vacations, extravagant gifts, strange accuracy with investments and so on.  Let's go there and see what's under THAT rock, you hypocrites.

Go ahead. I'll bet you wind up looking as gullible and weak as you did when you said Hillary should be locked up 

[ironstone]

On 7/28/2024 at 10:30 AM, Chrissy1979 said:

Other than their admissions after getting caught 

Can you please post the links to the 'overwhelming evidence' that you speak of?

[ironstone]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Then why did Clarence not report it?

https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/20/democrats-concerned-with-scotus-ethics-rules-should-look-into-leftist-justices-first/

[Chrissy1979]

10 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Can you please post the links to the 'overwhelming evidence' that you speak of?

https://www.npr.org/2023/08/10/1193162713/clarence-thomas-supreme-court-gifts-disclosure

 

https://www.courthousenews.com/alito-kicks-up-ethics-questions-with-new-undisclosed-gifts-from-billionaire-donors/#:~:text=Justice Samuel Alito is the,him by billionaire conservative donors.

[Chrissy1979]

7 minutes ago, ironstone said:

https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/20/democrats-concerned-with-scotus-ethics-rules-should-look-into-leftist-justices-first/

They should investigate dead people? Good one 

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

It does not matter.  The actions and the policies matter.  

Hmmm...

Actions:

Trips and falls down a lot. 

Can't speak coherently. 

Claimed he had never met Hunter's business associates.

Does not appear to like African-Americans.

Policies:

Open border.

Surrender.

New Wars.

Insane spending.

War on fossil fuels.

Ok...seen enough. Time for an about face to closed borders, ending senseless wars and drill baby drill.

[User]

21 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

They should investigate dead people? Good one 

No, just pointing out that this is all pure partisan politics at its worst. 

[Nationalist]

24 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

https://www.npr.org/2023/08/10/1193162713/clarence-thomas-supreme-court-gifts-disclosure

 

https://www.courthousenews.com/alito-kicks-up-ethics-questions-with-new-undisclosed-gifts-from-billionaire-donors/#:~:text=Justice Samuel Alito is the,him by billionaire conservative donors.

You're jealous...I can tell.

But...Chrissy Baby...people with rich friends tend to get expensive gifts from them. I am terribly...terribly sorry...

That any friends you might have...

Are poor.