Jump to content

Transgender commits hate crime by shooting up a Christian school


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Red flag laws are a gateway to increased control over our right to bear arms. 

No, we stick with DL's and state ID's with occasional background checks as a security measure. 

So you believe there should be no restrictions on gun ownership and are prepared to put up 37,000 dead Americans annually and mass shootings as a result. Just be honest about it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Aristides said:

So you believe there should be no restrictions on gun ownership and are prepared to put up 37,000 dead Americans annually and mass shootings as a result. Just be honest about it.

Do you believe that leftists are being honest about these "gun" problems when they keep citing "SEMI-AUTOMATIC ASSAULT RIFLES AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!" as public enemy number one?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/195325/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-weapon-used/

ScreenShot2023-03-29at7_17_53PM.thumb.png.84d44ad052d3edb786e6c540117365a1.png

More people are killed by hand (foot, etc) than by "rifles" each year.

Twice as many people are killed by knives as rifles. Are leftists advocating for a knife ban? 

Granted, of the 4,700 "firearm, type not stated" murders there are likely some more rifles, but it's also likely that they're going to be in the same proportion to other firearms that we see among the specified guns on the chart. I.e, 1/15th the number of handgun murders.

Did you ever notice that when leftists shriek about gun violence it's never the handguns that their street thugs use to kill thousands and thousands of people, it's always the rifles which kill less than 500? Why is that, honestly? It's like trying to solve the Aspirin death problem before tackling fentanyl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aristides said:

So you believe there should be no restrictions on gun ownership and are prepared to put up 37,000 dead Americans annually and mass shootings as a result. Just be honest about it.

Vehicle collisions make up a larger death toll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh Christmas came early for republicans finally they have an ACTUAL trans spree shooter unlike the lies they’ve told about past killers 

Never mind that 99.9% of mass shooters are straight white males -that’s not a pattern - the ONE trans mass shooter who identifies as a white male “proves”  that trans people are the real safety problem! ?

The fact that her parents were “very religious” and refused to accept her and that she lives in a time where republicans are escalating every more anti-trans mass hysteria was probably more of a contributing factor than her actually just being trans.

 Not to mention that in America’s shitty society where guns are easier to obtain than healthcare, she appears to be yet another example of someone with a diagnosed yet untreated mental health condition who legally owns multiple firearms including at least one assault rifle. 

Edited by BeaverFever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

Oh Christmas came early for republicans finally they have an ACTUAL trans spree shooter unlike the lies they’ve told about past killers 

tranny-shooters.jpg

 

Tra-NNy-Mass-Murder.jpg

Hey, I'm going to help you with that first one Beave because you seem to have a lot of trouble supporting your argument.

Sorry, but the best I could find were the leftists at Snopes.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/03/29/viral-transgender-shooter-claims-context/

They might help you with your fringies of Progdom who like yourself have bought into the whole, "ignore the obvious" thing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2023 at 2:26 AM, Americana Antifa said:

While I'm sure you want to murder leftists, that's not really an option.

How about red flag laws and closing loopholes?

I’m all for gun control. Let’s start by disarming all Democrat politicians and Hollywood celebrities and their bodyguards.

Then we could disarm all the Communists and trans-activists. Those people are also dangerous.

Edited by Mako
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Infidel Dog said:

tranny-shooters.jpg

 

Tra-NNy-Mass-Murder.jpg

Hey, I'm going to help you with that first one Beave because you seem to have a lot of trouble supporting your argument.

Sorry, but the best I could find were the leftists at Snopes.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/03/29/viral-transgender-shooter-claims-context/

They might help you with your fringies of Progdom who like yourself have bought into the whole, "ignore the obvious" thing.

What are you trying to argue here?

So the right wing media has claimed the shooter is trans.  You don’t have to go very far at all to find that.   They are doing the happy dance because the right has been looking for a trans boogeyman (boogeyperson?) for years now ever since their Muslim terrorist hysteria kinda wore off. 
 

Some of the MSM are also claiming the shooter is trans or is unconfirmed trans

 

…although it seems to he a right wing made up lie that they had taken testosterone or that testosterone ha y do with it (doesn’t the right admire testosterone anyway?)

I haven’t seen anything that says she raised by the state. However It is a fact though that her parents were ultra conservative Christians with whom she was living at the time of the attack and who knew of her mental illness and also knew that she owned at least one gun at some point. Amd it’s also a fact that she attended that Christian school that she shot up. The repressive conservative Christian upbringing conveniently left out of the tweet you copied.

 

My point still stands 

Edited by BeaverFever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Oh Christmas came early for republicans finally they have an ACTUAL trans spree shooter unlike the lies they’ve told about past killers 

Never mind that 99.9% of mass shooters are straight white males -that’s not a pattern - the ONE trans mass shooter who identifies as a white male “proves”  that trans people are the real safety problem! ?

The fact that her parents were “very religious” and refused to accept her and that she lives in a time where republicans are escalating every more anti-trans mass hysteria was probably more of a contributing factor than her actually just being trans.

 Not to mention that in America’s shitty society where guns are easier to obtain than healthcare, she appears to be yet another example of someone with a diagnosed yet untreated mental health condition who legally owns multiple firearms including at least one assault rifle. 

99.9% of mass shooters are straight white males? Where’s your evidence?

And then you blame the victims of trans-violence on people who criticize the trans-movement. Great victim blaming. Classy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Aristides said:

So you believe there should be no restrictions on gun ownership and are prepared to put up 37,000 dead Americans annually and mass shootings as a result. Just be honest about it.

No restrictions until you f*ckup like that tranny did in Tennessee. 

See, gun ownership is a constitutional right - it's necessary in the event that a piece of sh*t democrat goes tyrannical on our citizenship. We're not going to cave in to the bleeding hearts just because they hate guns and the constitution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, West said:

Leftist lunatics still trying to change the subject to gun control when the whacko killed kids because they were Christians. Sad

What Bullshit.

 

So all the kids killed in non religious school shootings were killed because they weren’t Christians. It’s only logical. 

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Deluge said:

psst! Hey dumba$$! Do you see the words "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed."? 

That makes "well regulated" mean "combat ready". ;)

Dufus buys a gun so automatically Dufus is “combat ready”. Enough Dufus’s buy guns and you automatically have a Dufus army. Too funny. 
 

A country full of wannabe Rambo’s. What could possibly go wrong.

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Deluge said:

No restrictions until you f*ckup like that tranny did in Tennessee. 

See, gun ownership is a constitutional right - it's necessary in the event that a piece of sh*t democrat goes tyrannical on our citizenship. We're not going to cave in to the bleeding hearts just because they hate guns and the constitution. 

Like I said, dead kids are just the cost of you getting to play soldier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Deluge said:

Red flag laws are a gateway to increased control over our right to bear arms. 

No, we stick with DL's and state ID's with occasional background checks as a security measure. 

Yes and no.

Done properly, red flag laws would make people safer, which would lessen the attack on your right to bear arms.

But... could you trust the Dems/FBI not to "red flag" you if you just posted something on FB that they don't like? Of course not. They're lying about what people did on Jan 6th and there's 40,000 hours worth of video evidence of that. If they're willing to lie in the face of all that evidence, will they lie about things that aren't on camera? Of course.

The FBI's lies and crimes of the Russian collusion witch hunt are well documented. Their constant stream of lies and crimes of Jan 6th are still going on 2 years later. The constant invective about white male conservative terrorism is complete nonsense but they don't let the fact that they don't have any evidence of it get in the way of their story.

In all honesty, it's ironic/alarming that the Dems are going after gun rights, because the 2nd amendment is in place specifically as a check on gov't power. Your guns are literally supposed to be a threat to them and/or the Republicans if they become tyrannical, and it doesn't seem as though that's out of the question after seeing Adolf Biden's speech:

 

 

 Joe %22Adolf%22 Biden.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Authoritarianism is authoritarianism, no matter the specific version.

indeed

but logically extrapolated, the consequences of Molotov von Ribbentrop world is the Ostfront

two mass mobilized totalitarian Utopian forces on trajectory to a catastrophic total war of annihilation

I don't think anarchism is a realistic objective in the near to mid term

none the less, faced with Ostfront 2.0, I would choose anarchism over socialism

I simply don't have faith in collectivism not to be captured by the Tankies in the end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,741
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    timwilson
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • User earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • User earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Videospirit went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...