Jump to content

Transgender commits hate crime by shooting up a Christian school


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Contrarian said:

Oh yah, The Michael Savage Doctrine, anyone talking about "guns" aside from the NRA points, MUST want shreding of the CONSTITUTION, says MAGA logic.

Actually, EVERY left wing goose stepper (in other words, every LIBERAL) basically wipes their @sses on the Constitution.

Oh, and since you want to bring up NRA points, first prove to us that there is such a thing as NRA  points. This would mean you have to find a NRA website and find the actual "Points." Or you can open maybe 1/4 of your brain and admit you just made that "Points" shit up.

Oh, and while we're at it,  you need to do an essay on "MAGA Logic." First you have to find a MAGA source, and then look through it and find the heading "MAGA Logic" or you can admit that you are also making THAT shit up.

A or B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for confirming you're just a PARTISAN HACK.

NOpe. He's just smart. Lefties are stupid and violent. And they mostly make up the criminal class. Denying them the right o (a) own a gun and (b) hire armed bodyguards) would  probably result in a major REDUCTION in violent crime in a given area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

Conservative Justices are doing that for you. "Well regulated militia" used to mean possession was NOT a PERSONAL RIGHT.

You DEFINITELY must come from inferior, social promoting Canadian schools, to say something so STUPID.

Here is the second most important amendment to the United States Constitution.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

WHERE in this historic sentence is the phrase "NOT A PERSONAL RIGHT" ?

And you wonder why so many people call you stupid.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

No need to do an essay on MAGA, MAGA is not capable to recognise a legal election in their own country.

First election, and then talk about gun laws.

Look: 

In Pennsylvania, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate millions of mail-in ballots, alleging that the state's election was marred by widespread fraud. The case was dismissed by a federal judge who cited a lack of evidence to support the campaign's claims.

In Michigan, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the certification of the state's election results. The case was dismissed by a judge who ruled that the campaign had failed to provide evidence of fraud or irregularities.

In Arizona, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to have some ballots disqualified due to alleged errors in the way they were filled out. The case was dismissed by a judge who ruled that the campaign had not provided evidence of widespread irregularities.

? 

None of the LIES you just vomited are relevant to the homework. You were to either find "MAGA logic" or admit you were making it up. A Florida educator gives you an F for that pathetic response.

Most of Florida doesn't give out participation trophies, so you have FAILED this test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Good Guy with a Gun argument is becoming more irksome the more I hear it. 

This shooter rolled up with 3 weapons and hundreds of rounds of ammunition. Does every school need an armed guard? Even a Christian Middle School? 

In Uvalde there were officers that were supposed to protect the school. They waited outside and let kids get murdered because they were outgunned. 

A pistol won't do shit when someone decides, for whatever reason, they want to murder people on their way out. 

So is America really going down the path where security needs weapons of war, because weapons of war are so easy to get?

Seems more like a 3rd world country than the richest country to ever exist. 

Edited by Boges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2023 at 8:25 AM, West said:

did no such thing. I simply stated THE FACTS

lying sack of shit.

Typical distraction pointing to wokeism and gender identity as the cause of the event, which is the only response of the openly fascist lunatics that pretend to represent conservatives these days.

Every single subsequent response you posted was further statements of hate towards identifiable groups.

Sorry to inform you my Dad got f***ing medals for shooting people with shit beliefs like yours and I certainly don't have to sit still and listen to it. You like "free speech" well you just heard some.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Americana Antifa said:

Why can't we have red flag laws along with all of that?

Because we don't need them. How many gun owners are actual mass murderers? Not very many, so there's no reason to slap restrictions on law abiding citizens just because an occasional a$$hole goes on a killing spree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

That is irrelevant. Will bring Donald in here too.

Some people like Trump still think they won elections. 

So in a way, who cares about reality? Just say you are a winner, and that makes you winner?!

?

Are you saying you cheated to get those consolation trophies? Cuz that's what the hair sniffer in chief did. ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

no evidence, all federal courts found no issues with the election. 

It is the only referee that matters. The rest is just like sports talk.

Some evidence. It's minor, but evidence has turned up, and that helps validate my suspicions.

And we're just talking about what's been found. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2023 at 2:26 AM, Americana Antifa said:

 that's not really an option.

this cycle of retaliatory violence scenario does not seem to be in your interests

surely this simply plays into the hands of the Fascists

the bourgeois left is not going to fight a domestic terror war

only the Marxist-Leninists, or the "Tankies" as you call them, would stand a chance in such a conflict

so this would be coming at you from both sides, Fascists from the right, Tankies from the left

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2023 at 4:45 AM, Perspektiv said:

Personally, nobody should have access to semi automatic assault rifles.

if the Democrats were going to enact another Assault Weapons Ban, they would have done it already

but they're not going to, because it would massively backfire just like it did the last time

furthermore, the Supreme Court as currently configured would overthrow such a ban as unconstitutional

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2023 at 8:55 AM, West said:

Assault rifle is just a lefty term. Isn't actually a class of gun

no, there is such a thing as an Assault Rifle

from the German StG44 Sturmgewehr

but looking at the footage of this shooter on camera

what they appear to be using as their primary weapon is a 9x19mm extended barrel pistol

so that is not a rifle at all

this weapon would be more accurately classified as a "machine pistol"

here is a photo of the weapon used by the shooter

7D6B3979-BA5E-4101-956F-0D79188AC6FF.jpe

for comparison,

here you see the high velocity 5.56x45mm Assault Rifle round on the left

with the 9x19mm low velocity Machine Pistol round on the right

223-Remington-5564562-grain-Federal-Prem

and here is the footage of the shooter employing that machine pistol as their primary

apparently the shooter knew that a rifle was not needed at such short ranges

and that by switching to 9x19mm pistol rounds, they could carry much more ammo

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Because we don't need them. How many gun owners are actual mass murderers? Not very many, so there's no reason to slap restrictions on law abiding citizens just because an occasional a$$hole goes on a killing spree. 

Red flag laws don't just prevent mass murders, they prevent homicides too.

Crime in general is rare. Any preventative laws we have are going to prevent pretty few cases. It's illegal to call on people to commit violence, even though most people probably won't go through with what you're asking for.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

this cycle of retaliatory violence scenario does not seem to be in your interests

surely this simply plays into the hands of the Fascists

the bourgeois left is not going to fight a domestic terror war

only the Marxist-Leninists, or the "Tankies" as you call them, would stand a chance in such a conflict

so this would be coming at you from both sides, Fascists from the right, Tankies from the left

First of all, tankies usually side with fascists. Look at how many tankies are siding with Putin. Even the tankies who don't like Trump will still side with Trump over Biden. And this isn't new, the Soviet Union sided with the Axis until they were kicked out because Stalin was greedy.

If tankies in America are going to stand against the fascist Republicans, of course I'll take it. It's like Ukraine accepting the help of nazis to beat back Russia. Sometimes that's just part of fighting for survival.

But I'm not counting on tankies. I'm counting on anti-fascist Americans to arm themselves against the scum for self-defense. That includes leftists, liberals, and people who are mostly apolitical.

Edited by Americana Antifa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

Red flag laws don't just prevent mass murders, they prevent homicides too.

Crime in general is rare. Any preventative laws we have are going to prevent pretty few cases. It's illegal to call on people to commit violence, even though most people probably won't go through with what you're asking for.

 

Red flag laws are a gateway to increased control over our right to bear arms. 

No, we stick with DL's and state ID's with occasional background checks as a security measure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

You see the words "well regulated" don't cha dipshit? Yet some states don't even require background checks to buy guns. That means, you f__king braindead Id iot that the Constitution is not being followed.

psst! Hey dumba$$! Do you see the words "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed."? 

That makes "well regulated" mean "combat ready". ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

First of all, tankies usually side with fascists. Look at how many tankies are siding with Putin. Even the tankies who don't like Trump will still side with Trump over Biden. And this isn't new, the Soviet Union sided with the Axis until they were kicked out because Stalin was greedy.

yes, Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, that does seem to be the zeitgeist these days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone needs to take a chill pill.

- Yeah, this absolutely was a leftist hate crime, and CNN and the Dems are doing everything they can to slap a GUNS label on it instead, and strip the trans label from the whole affair, but we knew that would be the case going in. 

- Yeah, this was absolutely also another gun crime. A person with serious mental health issues was able to get their hands on some semi-automatic rifles and go wild on some helpless children. 

- Yeah, the hate-mongering from the Dems and the MSM points to this exact kind of thing happening. They should take at least some ownership instead of shifting the blame to guns.

- Yeah, it's inevitable that if there are 300,000,000 guns lying around then it's only a matter of time between events where someone has a "falling down" moment.

 

Fact is this was just another brutal tragedy in a long line of tragedies that won't end any time soon. 

What's unique about this tragedy is that a massive amount of very hateful government/MSM rhetoric was partly to blame for this mass murder. Period.

Whether or not that person was able to get guns, they had enough hate to go on a killing spree, and they could have killed more people with a minivan at a Christmas parade than they killed with those guns. Van attacks have also been far more deadly. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,717
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Watson Winnefred
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...